We are going to eliminate the players in order from the youngest to the oldest. I'm pretty sure this is the winning strategy.
More votes on Le Chat, please!
Where the hell did I say that? Of course I read those 3 pages of spam. That's why I complained about it. If you will take my suggestion, restrict yourself to 4 posts a day, and make an effort to post relevant opinions and responses in each post. That will reduce the amount of noise in the thread and make it easier for everybody to participate.woah, wait what?
to clarify, are you saying you can't be bothered to read 3 pages of posting?
If you didn't find Artem scummy, you could have just said that, and I would ask you why you were voting and pushing him them. If you do find Artem scummy, I want you to summarize your opinion on him. This will help me feel how honest you are being about it.What if there weren't exactly 2 posts that I feel could sum up the case? What if I don't find Artem scummy? I think those 3 pages do the best job of displaying what I wanted to display.
Why can't I be concerned with both? Of course I'm interested in knowing who wants to lynch who - the largest part of my scumhunting in later days comes from comparing people's positions on wagons and card flips.magnus_orion wrote: As if you aren't concerned with the scumminess of the lynch so much as concerned with whether people will be willing to lynch.