Mini 1462: Serra's Fun House (Game over)

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #784 (isolation #0) » Sun Jun 30, 2013 7:04 pm

Hey guys. I'll catch up later, unless I can't sleep or something. :p
Hey everyone I know

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #786 (isolation #1) » Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:47 pm

I'm up to page 8 or so. Sunburn is killing me, so I'm going back to sleep.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #802 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 01, 2013 3:29 am

Mmk, one thing I can say is that these walls aren't helping anything.
All they do is distract town and misdirect them.
DP is looking slightly scummy.
I'll keep reading and see if I can spot any key scum tells.
I can't operate properly with this goddamn sunburn.
Like tiny little needles stabbing me repeatedly.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #805 (isolation #3) » Mon Jul 01, 2013 7:51 am

I might be able to get behind that.

I'll go ahead and state

Intent to hammer

Broom, you should claim now.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #809 (isolation #4) » Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:32 am

Oh, I missed that too. Lol.
well, I still want to hear from him.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #811 (isolation #5) » Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:36 am

I claimed intent to get information out of him. I still want that information. Voting now leaves it open for derphammering without info. IF he is town, I want to hear his reads.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #825 (isolation #6) » Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:20 pm

In post 816, DoctorPepper wrote:You had no read on broom before, and all of a sudden an intent to hammer. Thats opportunistic as hell fuzzy.

I don't remember saying that I didn't have a read on him.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #833 (isolation #7) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:16 am

In post 831, Nachopappa wrote:I like you because Yates doesn't like you. I'd be willing to vote Mr Ree since he seems to be conspiring with Yates, and Yates is like entrusting him which sucks. It's like Ree is his partner-in-crime. They must have some past experience to explain their chemistry. Eww.

If Yates/Ree is a scumteam, we're essentially screwed.

Basically this. I've seen Yates scum.
*shudder*
Terrifying in it's most literal meaning.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #836 (isolation #8) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:26 am

That's a tale I'd rather not relive.
Maybe post-game.
Maybe.

Still waiting on Broom

Yes ETL. The happy kind.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #855 (isolation #9) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:18 am

Hmm. Yates, would you say that it's possible two townies are paired together, and that one flipping town does not damn the other as scum?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #866 (isolation #10) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:33 am

Welp, I want to hear from her first, before I make any decision like that.
I think you're onto something, though, Yates.

ETL, yates makes sense. He's saying that with 4 neighbors, it's likely that there is scum in at least one of them.

PEdit: SERRA. <3 WE MISSED YOU.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #879 (isolation #11) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:03 am

Hmm.
I'll sheep Yates on this one.
VOTE: MetalSonic

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #882 (isolation #12) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:14 am

*shrug* I could've just voted him. Reasoning is simple. I knew we were nearing deadline and I felt Broom's lynch would make a lot of things clear.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #884 (isolation #13) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 11:08 am

Probably, yeah, but if he was scum it would've been worth it.

Everyone seems to have an idea of who's scum if x flips town, etc. etc.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #910 (isolation #14) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 4:48 pm

I'm keeping my vote where it is. I think Yates is right about MS.
I don't want to see a no lynch either.
ETL-Of course my posts are full of nothing. There are only 15.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #913 (isolation #15) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:25 pm

In post 911, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
In post 910, fuzzybutternut wrote:I'm keeping my vote where it is. I think Yates is right about MS.
I don't want to see a no lynch either.
ETL-Of course my posts are full of nothing. There are only 15.
You're telling me 15 posts and 20+ pages you couldn't come up with anything substantial? Really?

Do you really think I've had time to read every page of this game?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #915 (isolation #16) » Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:30 pm

Totes makes me scum.
Totes.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #932 (isolation #17) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:50 am

Well, if we don't decide something soon, No Lynch is inevitable. :/

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #967 (isolation #18) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:17 am

We're getting nowhere. >.>

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #975 (isolation #19) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:46 am

In post 968, DoctorPepper wrote:^ you arent helping

Well, let's see, we've got Person A screaming at Person B while Person C joins in, Person D is yelling for no reason, Person E is complaining about being lynched because he's scum, and I'm just sitting in the corner wishing everyone could get along.

If MS wasn't scum, he wouldn't be fighting his lynch so hard. It's day.fucking.one.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #977 (isolation #20) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:58 am

Yes. I have.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #978 (isolation #21) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:58 am

More than once IIRC.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #980 (isolation #22) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:01 am

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=26454

This is one of them. Everyone had a lover. No one knew if that lover was scum. I self-hammered that game because I thought my lover was scum. Different game, same concept.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #982 (isolation #23) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:17 am

Is there a point to these questions or...?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1001 (isolation #24) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:37 am

Okay, I understand ETL's skepticism..sort of, but that's not enough to lynch them. IF, later, we see RM as scum, we lynch her then, when we have more evidence. Not now, when all we have to go on is a claim.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1004 (isolation #25) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:43 am

Anyone care to explain to me why MS hasn't been lynched?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1011 (isolation #26) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:59 am

Did you not notice how he freaked out when votes were put on him? It's day 1.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1016 (isolation #27) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:04 am

As much as I hate to admit it, Yates isn't scum. Not from what I can tell. I've seen Yates scum game, and this isn't it.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1019 (isolation #28) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:12 am

In post 1017, Nachopappa wrote:YOU SAID HE WAS SCARY AND MADE YOU SHUDDER AS SLENDERMAN

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, he is. He plays a good scum game. This isn't his scum game.

fuzzybutternut · Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:24 pm

Alright, this tunneling is getting annoying.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1045 (isolation #30) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:11 pm

Tell me again why we aren't lynching MS?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1047 (isolation #31) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:29 pm

Ah. Mmk. Who's on your mind, Rach?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1051 (isolation #32) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:11 pm

I just don't want a no lynch. We get no information out of that.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1054 (isolation #33) » Wed Jul 03, 2013 4:20 pm

Uhh, Pepper, I never claimed either, and looking through TSO's ISO, he didn't claim for me.
So...your point there is null because missing information.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1081 (isolation #34) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:17 am

Alright. What are we gonna do here guys?
I feel if MS flips town, Nacho is definitely scum.
And vice-versa.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1083 (isolation #35) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:54 am

Mod said no. So it's no. Get over it.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1106 (isolation #36) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:45 am

I don't even know what to think. :/

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1108 (isolation #37) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:43 am

What makes you think that?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1111 (isolation #38) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:50 am

Mac, do you know something we don't?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1114 (isolation #39) » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:57 am

*shrug* okay. If you say so. I'm following my gut, though.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1190 (isolation #40) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:12 am

Sorry guys. I was terribly sick yesterday.
High fever and shit.
i'll be catching up soon.

I don't like the quick wagon on Broom, though.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1191 (isolation #41) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:15 am

Well, that took a lot less time than I thought.

VOTE: Nacho

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1254 (isolation #42) » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:54 pm

In post 1223, Infinity 324 wrote:My first yates game yay!

Reads

Mr_Ree - town (why not)
Yates - conf town
Nachopappa - conf scum (The other 3 neighbors are town)
RachMarie - town (she is much scummier as scum + the mason claim)
shos - town (based on RM)
broomhead - scum (yay scum claims [super fake and backpedaling])
Nul - null (Most of his play has been town, and I don't like when we're lynching people for logic fails [when people use that sort of logic it usually means the person in question is town in my experience], but does this look like a scumslip to anyone?)
DoctorPepper - null
fuzzybutternut - null-leaning-scum
Mac - town (why not)

PEdit: Did I miss something? What cop claim? I'm town neighbor obv.

There are a few things I don't like about this post.

Conf. Town on Yates. How. That's not even possible.
the "Why Not" post on Mr. Ree. Town doesn't just "Why not" someone. They dig deeper for evidence on WHY someone is town.
then the Why Not on Mac. Again. Town doesn't do that.
of course, you're obviously scum, soooo.
also, that was definitely NOT a scum slip from Nul. Like, what?
come on. You go on this whole lecture about how town and then BAM. Scum slip. Seriously?
Pappa I can agree on though.
Do I see a scum bus? It's coming in pretty fast if you ask me.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1272 (isolation #43) » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:50 am

.....

Infinity. NO ONE is confirmed town unless SOMEONE ELSE confirms them.
The only way they can be confirmed town to you is if you're SCUM.

VOTE: Infinity

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1322 (isolation #44) » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:41 am

I swear I thought I posted here. >.>

*shrug* I read, I know that.

Anywho, infinity is town.
Nacho is still scum.
etc. etc.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1326 (isolation #45) » Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:48 am

Infinity is town because he's doing town things.
Nacho is scum because MS was town.
I redirect you to the post I made specifically about those two.

fuzzybutternut · Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:00 am

That was your first post?

Is my vote still on you? *shrug*

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Nacho

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1410 (isolation #47) » Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:36 am

*sigh* Nacho is scum guys. 99.99999999999% sure of it. When Mac flips town, we lynch Nacho. Kay? Kay.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1411 (isolation #48) » Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:36 am

Mac should also probably claim, being at L-1 and whatnot.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1416 (isolation #49) » Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:30 am

In post 1412, Infinity 324 wrote:Nul is obvtown, mac is town, nacho is town. I don't really want to lynch off the wagon until me and Yates talk about the Ree tell.

How about we lynch DP.

I'm starting to reconsider Yates's alignment, but I want a claim from him in the neighbor qt first.

Also FBN, you still need to explain your switch on me.

I did. Did you miss that?

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:13 am

In post 1272, fuzzybutternut wrote:.....

Infinity. NO ONE is confirmed town unless SOMEONE ELSE confirms them.
The only way they can be confirmed town to you is if you're SCUM.

VOTE: Infinity

This.
and in my next post I labeled you as town.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:14 am

In post 1421, Infinity 324 wrote:Eh

If there is a last scum it's probably broom by PoE and being my weakest townread (I don't think ree would try to connect two of his buddies)

But we'll cross that bridge when we come to it I guess

Why isn't DP being lynched yet

Because Nacho is scummier.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:24 am

ISO him and tell me what ISN'T scummy about him.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:17 pm

In post 1426, Infinity 324 wrote:Oh ya, and I have a townread on fuzzy. I did some meta research and iso'ing of TSO earlier. I wanted to wait until fuzzy had answered the question, but it seems I made it obvious already.

PEdit: Fine.

Remember all those towntells I pointed to earlier? I don't think they're faked. Nacho posted stream-of-conciousness-style posts instead of well-thought-out ones like scum are more likely to do; I think that they all came at once has more likely to do with his mood than anything else.

The emotion in all his posts at the end of D1 are really genuine.

The suspicion on yates looks like paranoid town.

Ask rach for meta.

Yates is town. There's no doubt about it. This simply isn't his scum play.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:22 pm

I meant to erase everything outside "Yates" but I forgot/got lazy.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:29 pm

I know. I was stating my opinion on Yates using your post...

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:32 pm

That post before my vote looked scummy. My scum read on you was retracted by the following posts, and by how you reacted to my vote.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1465 (isolation #57) » Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:53 pm

VOTE: Mac

I feel like Infinity just isn't going to let go of this whole "Mac" thing.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1467 (isolation #58) » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:35 pm

In post 1465, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: Mac

I feel like Infinity just isn't going to let go of this whole "Mac" thing
.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Jul 14, 2013 10:36 am

In post 1474, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't really like this "lynch Mac" idea. But if that's the only way I'm gonna get you guys to lynch DP and Ree, then I'm ok with it.

Do you have anything scummy that Mac has done?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1492 (isolation #60) » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:01 pm

Uhm. Town shouldn't be okay with lynching someone they don't think is scum.

VOTE: Infinity

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1494 (isolation #61) » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:07 pm

Uh, can we lynch this, please?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1547 (isolation #62) » Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:55 pm

First, you haven't really submitted anything worthwhile. second your two top scum are my two top town reads (infinity and Nacho) and third, because this post just seems to be all about yates (yes, the world DOES revolve around you yates...), fuzzy's iso contains soooooo many posts about how yates is town, I would have guessed that fuzzy is the doc and he is just putting in the good word for when he dies. But I don;t think thats true. so there.

1.) Yes I have.
2.) You're telling me I'm scum because my reads don't agree with yours? LOL
3.) Yates is town. I have SEEN Yates scum. I can point you to a game where YATES IS SCUM. This is not scum yates.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1549 (isolation #63) » Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:12 pm

I'm sorry, I just don't see what's so scummy about DP.
If you can show me exactly what's scummy about him, I might vote him, but I think Nacho is much scummier.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1558 (isolation #64) » Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:25 pm

fuzzybutternut · Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:23 am

I hadn't noticed that Yates. Sorry.
I've looked into Mr. Ree a bit. Not much, tbqh. Haven't had the gumption to do much ISOing, myself.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1580 (isolation #66) » Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:36 pm

Why are you worried if people are talking about you?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1588 (isolation #67) » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:01 pm

These are good points. I think you've convinced me.
VOTE: Dr. Pepper

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1594 (isolation #68) » Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:31 pm

o/ Telo!

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1605 (isolation #69) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:20 pm

so many replacements. ;_;

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:02 am

V/LA for like, the rest of today and probably some tomorrow. My aunt's coming into town. So yeah, I'll post when I can.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:09 am

Infinity is town.
Ree is town.
Pepper is scum.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:15 am

SO..that means you're confirmed scum too?

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:23 am

....did Infinity just claim scum?

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:16 pm

I..I just can't believe that claim..
I just really can't..but, I still don't think you're scum.

Infinity literally said "Yates confirmed Ree and me as scum, I think Ree is scum but I don't

think

I am. How can you not be sure if you're scum or not? Scum slip.
VOTE: Infinity

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1661 (isolation #75) » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:53 am

So, it's an anti-town role, but not necessarily a scum role?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1665 (isolation #76) » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:38 am

How do you know there are no town killing roles? ._.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1667 (isolation #77) » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:40 am

I don't know what's going on. Everyone seems like they're lying. WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING THIS TO ME.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1669 (isolation #78) » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:57 am

^and you know each other is town.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:00 am

Ree has a point. Lynching a PR is definitely not something we need to do. I'm willing to believe him on this whole "This role is town" thing.
VOTE: Yates

fuzzybutternut · Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:10 am

If Yates has QT's, wouldn't that make him a PR?

fuzzybutternut · Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:14 am

Umm, I didn't know Yates had QT's?
I don't know what the fuck is going on in this game. >.>

fuzzybutternut · Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:19 am

>.> Someone is lying and I don't know who it is. I'm more inclined to believe Ree though.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:22 am

Oh. okay. :/ Still.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1710 (isolation #84) » Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:50 am

I agree that Yates should be interrogated.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1712 (isolation #85) » Sun Jul 21, 2013 8:54 am

With as many fucking claims as we've had in the past few days, I don't know what the hell I prefer.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1715 (isolation #86) » Sun Jul 21, 2013 9:06 am

If I'm correct, Ree is practically a jk, right?
So that could possibly prevent an NK? Fuck if I know man.

fuzzybutternut · Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:38 pm

I'm disappointed by macs flip too.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1788 (isolation #88) » Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:47 am

Yeah, I'm keeping my vote where it was yesterday.

VOTE: Yates

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1804 (isolation #89) » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:06 am

So..confused..STILL.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1808 (isolation #90) » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:26 am

I'm about at Telo's level, tbh. :s

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1831 (isolation #91) » Fri Jul 26, 2013 8:23 pm

I say we lynch Yates today. (b".")b

fuzzybutternut · Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:41 pm

Who would you prefer lynched, Shos. Me or Yates?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1838 (isolation #93) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 4:42 am

In post 1837, shos wrote:Masons almost never get lynched. If they get to endgame, without proper fskeclaims they will simply not be lynched ever. So im pretty sure yhey targetted rach; nokillibg is useless as scum in this position. For an ezample, a fuzzy kill would would be better yhan nokill.

So ree is conftown on my end. Yates' attempt to now lynch a mason is horrible thinking and unlike him.

Id like to have both dead, yates first. If course one st a time; fuzzy might just be uberlazy.

KA looks town. Im missing a slot...

I'm always UberLazy.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1856 (isolation #94) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:43 pm

Can we just end this day already? :/

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1860 (isolation #95) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:58 pm

In post 1857, RachMarie wrote:Why you in such a hurry fuzzy?

This day feels like it's dragging on and on. I hate that.

Ree- If Yates doesn't flip scum, which I'm pretty sure he will, i'd look at Nacho next.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1864 (isolation #96) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:05 pm

In post 1861, DoctorPepper wrote:Its been 2 real life days fuzzy...

Doesn't feel like it. :/

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1868 (isolation #97) » Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:48 pm

In post 1865, Mr_Ree wrote:
In post 1862, RachMarie wrote:That is why I am holding the hammer Ree...

I can hold it for a good long time til things are accomplished.

In my first Newbie game I held it for 2 days waiting for the IC to make his case and defense... then I hammered him.....

Unfortunately or fortunately to some people lol, most of that game is lost in the major crash over a year ago...
You totally just reminded me of our last game together ...

Lol

I thought that was pretty obvious though, and probably a good idea.

Why so anxious fuzzy? If you are so sure about Yates scum, then just treat him as confirmed and proceed from there. If you could call his scumbuddies right now, who would they be?

Nacho. If there's a third, probably DP or Broom, though that's unlikely.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1884 (isolation #98) » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:03 am

I seriously feel like this day has gone on forever, but that's probably because I've been asleep for the majority of the past two days. :/
meh. W/e.

Shos, if I weren't so sure you were town, i'd lynch you so hard.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #1891 (isolation #99) » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:34 am

In post 1887, shos wrote:
In post 1884, fuzzybutternut wrote: Shos, if I weren't so sure you were town, i'd lynch you so hard.
Please explain.

Pretty sure that's self explanatory.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:51 am

Shos is doing scummy things, but I still think Shos is town. >.>

fuzzybutternut · Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:49 pm

In post 1896, shos wrote:Lol at phonepost ^^^

Abiut fyzzy:
I played with him once. In there he was hyperactive town; and ill say more: in that game i suspected him and had gone through his meta to see if he is scumplaying. The results were NO; as town, he was consistently hyper iirc.

You're trying to push my low post count as a scum tell? Seriously? I haven't had a high post count sense my 9th or 10th game. That was because I was new and had no idea what I was doing. I'm not new anymore. I know what i'm doing.

In description of my previous post: If you were scum, you'd be dead. You're doing scummy shit. IE, the above, but it hasn't swayed my town read on you. I used to do the same shit as town, which is why your read hasn't faltered.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:41 pm

In post 1925, shos wrote:Waiting for yates.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:16 am

Hmm. I did a lot of thinking last night. That hammer from shos seemed pretty town, tbh. I'm leaning more as a nacho/broom team, though I'm not sure if KA is the third scum or if it's DP.

I think i'll
VOTE: Broom
to see what happens.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 02, 2013 10:19 am

In post 1941, DoctorPepper wrote:Fuzzy, how can you have both KA and nacho as scum reads? They are of different neighborhoods, aren't they?

Btw, arent we in mylo?

Yes, this is Mylo.

And do you expect me to have two neighbors as scum? That's absurd.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 02, 2013 1:32 pm

Fairly certain it's broom. The more I think about it, the more it just seems likely.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:09 am

UNVOTE:

You guys know how to talk a lot when people are asleep. >.> reading now.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:15 am

If it's evidence you're looking for, look at broom. His posts suck worse than mine.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:44 am

I say we either go for broom, who is my highest suspect OR go for Telo, who's done shitall.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 1:50 am

and if said lurker is scum?

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 3:56 am

I'm not claiming. I refuse. Broom can claim.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:07 am

Because I have no reason to claim.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 9:22 am

uhh, no. I told you, I'm not claiming. Take it how you wish.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:47 am

*sigh* I hate claiming like this.

I'm a cop.

Night 1 I investigated KA
Night 2 I investigated Shos
Last night I investigated Ree

That's why i've been pushing a broom lynch today.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:52 am

I got all innocents.
and I was trying not to make myself obvious. >.>

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:57 am

Well, I investigated shos because I found the slot to be scummy.
I investigated Ree because I wanted to be completely sure that I could trust him.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:43 pm

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:44 pm

I'm stocking beanie babies right now. I'll be on later.
And because I found shos scummy and I wanted to make sure Ree wasn't lying?

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 12:58 pm

Because I'd fake-claim cop and get myself lynched. Done that before, didn't work out too well.

I didn't investigate broom because I had higher suspicions.
Anyway, back to cataloging.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 3:35 pm

In post 2003, Mr_Ree wrote:Yeah, that looks pretty damning...

The only thing giving me pause before we speed wagon fuzzy is his reluctance to claim. Can't wrap my head around why... perhaps he just needed time to work out his cop claim. Rolecop? That would explain targetting PRs wouldn't it?

...yeah....maybe...

I hate claiming as cop. I like to try to stay hidden as long as possible, so that if we do end up in Lylo, town can pull off the easy win.
Had I completely ignored KA, I have a feeling I would have either A.) Been figured out as cop or B.) Been forced to claim earlier.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 03, 2013 3:44 pm

Anywho- I'm going to sleep, so i'll be on tomorrow. I still say Broom should be looked at more closely. But meh.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:53 am

In post 2007, broomhead wrote:
In post 2003, Mr_Ree wrote:Yeah, that looks pretty damning...

The only thing giving me pause before we speed wagon fuzzy is his reluctance to claim. Can't wrap my head around why... perhaps he just needed time to work out his cop claim. Rolecop? That would explain targetting PRs wouldn't it?

...yeah....maybe...
He just wanted to create mystery or suspense behind his claim, to make it seem like we dragged the claim of cop out of him (which he still gave pretty easy) and the fact, that we only gain from more claims.

In post 2005, fuzzybutternut wrote: Had I completely ignored KA, I have a feeling I would have either A.) Been figured out as cop or B.) Been forced to claim earlier.
oh yeah not voting for one person in particular is SOoooo obviously a cop tell. PUH-lease

You have no idea how I play cop.

and yeah, it is Broom. Because if you completely ignore someone, there is ALWAYS a reason.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:39 am

Sure thing. One moment.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:48 am

(This might take a while, I have over 40 games to go through)

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:54 am

Here are two. One cop one Tracker (which I find to be the same thing)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=25288 -My first

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29653 -Tracker game

I have more, somewhere, I just have to find them. Don't wanna keep y'all waiting, though.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:01 am

I are confused.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:01 am

Oh, that's why. ETL, you put Broom in there twice. Derp.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:05 am

In post 2016, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
UN-OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT 4.02
Not Voting (8) -
broomhead
, KingdomAces, DoctorPepper, fuzzybutternut, shos, Nachopappa, broomhead, Mr_Ree, Telo

With
8
alive, it's 5 to lynch.

The deadline for Day 3 is in (expired on 2013-08-16 23:59:59).

Telo is V/LA until Monday.

(Because I didn't see one from Serra yesterday, even though he said he found internet, just in case, here you go. )

Fixing this for ETL. <3

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:54 am

In post 2021, shos wrote:lol ETL what you doin here

fuzzy, I'm going thorugh that Tracker game of yours. there too you were reluctant to claim; you breadcrumbed 'seguido', and said that crumbing 'traqueur' is too obvious.
did you breadcrumb here? if not why not?
I honestly don't understand how they figured out you're a tracker.
on N2, your first post was 'DP is confirmed town'. why did you not say anything of that kind here, when you have THREE townresults, and are in mylo, and even worse - you actually voted your conftowns.??

in your cop game you got only one result- a guilty - and claimed immediately taht you're the cop. why were you so afraid to claim now? more specifically, in mylo?

I breadcrumbed here, yes.
It was a post that said "'Course Other People..." not capitalized. The cop game was my first cop game. I was anxious because he was a very good player and I didn't really understand the idea of "subtlety," if you will. On N2, I didn't speak, but I know what you're referring to, and it was because, iirc, DP had a lot of attention the previous day. Like I said, I voted my conf. town because I was trying to hide my PR. No, i've never done that. I'm trying to figure out a way to stay alive as long as possible. I guess you could call it trying different tactics, idk. It wasn't a matter of being afraid, it was a matter of A.) Not thinking and B.) Hoping to stay alive through the night.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:58 am

Wait, retract that. That wasn't my breadcrumb this game. That was another game.
My breadcrumb this game was my ISO #14, where i said "of COurse other People..."
What game was I thinking of? smh

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:15 pm

lolwut? I've pretty much said we need to lynch Broom today, several times.
We lynch Broom today, if Ree still doesn't believe my claim, he can interrogate me tonight or w/e and find out.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 04, 2013 12:48 pm

In post 2031, Mr_Ree wrote:The thing is, Shos and I walked into the day thinking it was Fuzzy AND broom.

The days events don't LOOK like they support that theory. Fuzzy claiming cop and voting broom. We have to get it right. Scum would want to lynch town and win today instead of drawing it out.

I know Aces isn't stupid, I've played with him before. He has the potential to have coached fuzzy.

@Fuzzy, please explain the reasoning behind who you picked as investigation targets. I've said multiple times that this game can be broken by simply clearing the non pairs. Why didn't you go there? Why broom? Why not Telo or Doc?

if you don't mind my doing this later, then I have no problem explaining, again.

But family is over and stuff, so I have to go for now.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:10 am

In post 2036, shos wrote:/sarcasm

I investigated Ree because I really didn't feel like his claim was real. It was a win/win situation because A.) If he was lying, he'd be scum and B.) If he wasn't lying, he'd be someone we could definitely trust.

I investigated shos because i thought shos was scum. That's usually the basis behind any of my investigations unless I have a deeper reason to.

KA- If that's the case, then why did you believe Ree so easily?

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 5:34 am

Ree claimed BP Interrogator. You're trying to tell me that having a cop in this game makes it unbalanced? Is BP Interrogator not unbalanced enough or something?

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:18 am

Because he was a claimed PR? I wanted to find out if he was lying. Vote me if you want, I don't care. But when I flip cop, lynch Broom.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:03 am

*sigh* I'm not going to sit here and argue with you about why I made the choices I made. I have my own way of playing PR's. Get over it.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:08 pm

In post 2052, Mr_Ree wrote:Yeah but we need to know. If we make a mistake here, it's game over. That's as good a reason as any to go into as much detail as possible.

I understand that.
Going into detail is fine. Go as in depth as you want, but I'm not going to sit here and argue over my alignment, because if scum is on my wagon, it's not going to matter.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:09 pm

In post 2054, Nachopappa wrote:EBWOP: Fuzzy REFUSED to claim coming into today. What incentive is there for him to refuse to claim. What is there to withhold at this point of the game? I cannot wrap my head around that

The only thing that made me hesitate is just how astonishing what his investigations were...Shos and then Ree...my gut is I cannot believe he would make those investigations

I don't see why this is so hard to believe. I really, really don't.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:20 pm

Unkillable=/=untargetable. Js.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:06 pm

In post 2062, shos wrote:1. Fuzzy has repeatedly argued about how someone was scum because he was 'fighting his lynch ON DAY ONE OMG'.
2. Now, in Mylo, fuzzy is nearing a lynch and is not fighting his lynch.
-->by fuzzy's logic, fuzzy's scum.

it is hard to believe because your logic is equal to the worst logic ever in this while.
and it is YOU who needs to go into detail, not us; we have already asked you the questions. if it wasn't obvious, you should probably answer the questions I posed in my casepost.

'I am not going to argue over my alignment'. why are you playing mafia, man? :/

also note for everyone: Ree is unkillable, and can jailkeep a townie, so even if we mislynch, there's a not-so-bad chance that he can actually save a kill.

uhh. What? Those two things =/=. Like, seriously. This logic is mind blowing.
Scum fight their lynch because they have a reason to. Town doesn't, because they don't have a reason to.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:11 pm

In post 2065, Nachopappa wrote:Ree told us to unvote the first time. I was waiting for Shos to finish his long post of analysis, which is pretty damning, just like the rest of evidence that this is a fakeclaim. Shos' second vote is a green light to lynch scum.

This is the worst fakeclaim I have ever seen.

I don't even know what to say

Ree said to hold off on the wagon because the only thing holding him back was why Fuzzy was hesitating to claim. Also, Fuzzy already gave us his cop games.

I've had plenty of time to mull over this. Why? Because it's just terrible that a scum would fakeclaim all innocents in MyLo, instead of a guilty on anyone and end the game like that

You pretty much just admitted that you think I'm town, because you can't fathom why scum would do this.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:17 pm

In post 2069, shos wrote:lucky I'm still here!

town don't have a reason to?
how bout playing to your win condition?
do you have a reason to play this game at all?

From my point of view, fighting your lynch as town IS against your wincon.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:31 pm

What? No.
I didn't say anything about MYLO. I said he was fighting his lynch on day one. Day one=/=MYLO.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:10 pm

No you're not. If you're untargetable then I wouldn't have gotten a result from you.
You also would've claimed untargetable when you claimed unkillable.

What?

Do I have to pull a quote from another game to make you people realize how I play this PR? I do not, nor will I EVER play cop like I'd play VT or any other town role. I play as scummy as possible so I can SURVIVE.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:12 pm

Where did I fakeclaim as town?

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:15 pm

If he was really untargetable he would have voted me instantly. He's not untargetable. I got an innocent report on him.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:55 pm

In post 2081, broomhead wrote:this is so boring listening to fuzzy, I know you all are scared to mislynch, but fuzzy is our first captured scum. Lets prove it.

Sounds like scum is scared to me.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 3:55 pm

In post 2081, broomhead wrote:this is so boring listening to fuzzy, I know you all are scared to mislynch, but fuzzy is our first captured scum. Lets prove it.

Sounds like scum is scared to me.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:37 pm

The more I thought about it, the more I figured it was the best thing to do. From what I understand about Ree's role, he could protect me tonight. That's really the only reason I hesitate to claim. Fear of being NKed.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:43 pm

Look. Here's the lynch pool. Broom, DP, Nacho. They're the three that I haven't confirmed as town.

P-Edit: To each his own, I guess.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:45 pm

Oh wow. I did, didn't I?
Okay, lynch pool is Broom, Dp, Nacho, Telo.
Sorry. Sleep deprivation.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:57 pm

lol no. that's called Fuzzy needs to go to sleep 'cause he's had a long day cleaning up shit. but okay.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:11 am

I'm fine with a no lynch, tbh.
VOTE: No Lynch

p-edit: So no lynch it is.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:27 am

In post 2115, shos wrote:Serra, FFS, edit your sig, you don't need no replacement.

Fuzzy.
your target tonight.
if it dies, I will autovote you forever.

I'll hold you that.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:39 am

In post 2116, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 2115, shos wrote:Serra, FFS, edit your sig, you don't need no replacement.

Fuzzy.
your target tonight.
if it dies, I will autovote you forever.
I'll hold you that.

This should say "I'll hold you to that."

I think you understood.

Yes, someone hammer the NL

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:18 am

By my count, a no lynch was reached.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 09, 2013 4:29 pm

I had Meet and Greet for school today. I'm incredibly tired.

FOS: Broom

.
Take that how you wish.
Good night.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:01 am

Yeah, I fell asleep last night.
Anywho, I investigated Broom last night.
Hence the FOS on Broom. In case you didn't get that much.

I'll be V/LA through tonight, though, because I'm moving and probably won't have Internet access.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:37 am

In post 2139, shos wrote:uhh we massclaimed.? must've missed that somehow lol :/ or am I just confusing that telo slot again. what did telo and DrP claim?

If we nolynch today again, then there's no need for me to reveal my thoughts, it'll just guide scum in case they attempted to kill me/ree tonight as a gambit. ree should keep targetting me I think. remember we need just two scums dead.

fuzzy. the man just FOSed someone who he supposedly got a guilty on. what claimed cop doesn't vote his scum result? I mean obviously when Broom comes he will vote fuzzy. so why not vote broom.

either way a nightkill only helps us. a nokill helps us even more. so what do you guys think we need to do? fuzzy won't die tonight anyway; scum will kill KA obviously and fuzzy will have another result.

VOTE: Nolynch
*sigh*
nights should start being shorter lol

@mod: what happens if we have a long series of time with no deaths?

There's a reason I stated I was going to sleep.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 10, 2013 5:25 pm

Here's what we do today.
We look for Broom's partners and lynch Broom.
I'll either die tonight, or scum will continue to do whatever they did last night.
If I don't die, I'll have another report. If I do die, you all have 3 clears.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:15 am

In post 2149, broomhead wrote:So the path for me is obviously clear, because I have proven a scum. Sorry folks, but the proof is only verifiable by me.
VOTE: Fuzzybitternut
Its plain, he is lying about being a cop, because I am town. Simple. Lets just take a look, fuzzy, claimed a cop, gave night results that only someone trying to negotiate a sticky situation would investigate. (if they were my choices, I would have chosen 3 completely different people...). Oh and his cop claim was pretending to be all 'oh i don't want to claim' but in two posts turned into 'ok, here it is'.
Its foolish, and he is lying. Lynch him!

Lynch or no lynch, fuzzy is still scum, so we might as well lynch him now, and perhaps scum will kill tonight (but if they no-killed or targeted ree/shos last night then they'll do it again tonight) so instead of going in a no kill circle, lets get one of the two scum we need to kill now! There is no point in waiting.

PS, there is the option that I am lying and fuzzy is for real. laaaaaaame. I hope you can tell for yourselves that this is not true. and come on, the scum wouldn't kill the cop last night? I can tell that fuzzy wasn't chosen by ree because he got a "result", so that means he was in the open, and a real cop in the open and investigating is dangerous, well worth the kill. Everything about fuzzy's claim is weak. I implore you to see reason so we can win. (tried to find a dumbeldore gif for that...)

In post 2139, shos wrote:uhh we massclaimed.? must've missed that somehow lol :/ or am I just confusing that telo slot again. what did telo and DrP claim?
I don't know their claims, and I'd be in favor to know what they are, but I could wait till tomorrow and after we kill fuzzy.

Sooooo, I'm scum because my Night choices aren't the same as what yours would have been? Also, that little subsection down at the bottom about the "PS" only makes you look guiltier. Here's what it looks like. "Yeah guys, I mean, he COULD be the real cop, but that would mean that i'm scum and that's soooooo laaaaame." Yeah. Pathetic. You say scum would have killed me last night. Bad scum would have. Any kind of experienced scum would keep a claimed cop alive after a No-Lynch. There's this thing called WIFOM that scum creates. You should know all about that, scum.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 11, 2013 9:21 am

In post 2153, KingdomAces wrote:The only way I'd even consider lynching today is if there was actually a confirmed scum, which there isn't. The only reason I didn't vote no lynch before now is because I didn't want to rush the day before we actually got a straight answer from Fuzzy, (which technically we still haven't which is really making me think that he's more likely to be scum.) and before Broom got a chance to post.

VOTE: No Lynch

As bad as Fuzzy's cop play has been, it's not enough to say that he is definitely scum. If I were a town cop in this situation, I would be suspicious of the massive amount of town power that had been claimed even without the cop role, so I would pretty much just assume that one of Ree/Shos was lying.

I also don't find his reluctance to claim, or how quickly he recanted that reluctance, alignment indicative. Play that doesn't make sense from a town perspective does not necessarily mean it makes sense from a scum perspective.

I actually don't remember whether Telo or DP claimed or not, but if they had anything worth claiming then they would have done so already, so I may have just assumed I remembered them claiming VT.

In post 2137, fuzzybutternut wrote:Yeah, I fell asleep last night.
Anywho, I investigated Broom last night.
Hence the FOS on Broom. In case you didn't get that much.

I'll be V/LA through tonight, though, because I'm moving and probably won't have Internet access.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:08 am

*sigh*
so no lynch it is. At least I can maybe gain info on someone else tonight.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 11, 2013 11:14 am

So are we no lynching or what? This is irritating.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 11, 2013 12:03 pm

mmk. VOTE: No Lynch

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:07 pm

Broom, you're so scum it's not even funny.
Second result: Telo-Guilty.

Also, I just got home.
I'm going to do this in order of investigation.
VOTE: Broom

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:11 pm

In post 2178, broomhead wrote:It seems that Ree was never invincible after all. Good ruse. and he pretended to do the lie detecter at the beginning too. Kept him alive a while too

This is a scum post. Kids, take notes.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 13, 2013 4:36 pm

In post 2180, broomhead wrote:why because the liar says so? I am just having trouble deciding whether telo is a scum buddy or town.

No, it's a fake analysis of the night kill which means absolutely nothing.
That post was literally pointless.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:37 pm

In post 2183, DoctorPepper wrote:You know, with all the speculation about having scum between the neighbors, Im concerned. Why did fuzzy not check Nacho but he checked KA/Infinity/ETL...

Maybe he's trying to protect one of them without incriminating the other. This bothers me a lot.

BTW, its lylo guys. Dont vote now, its too fucking early

I checked Telo over Nacho because Telo hasn't done anything lately. I know she's been having RL issues and what not, but that meant one of two things to me.
1.) I get an innocent. We don't have to worry about her and she can continue with RL
2.) I get a guilty. Another scum bites the dust.

It's a win-win situation.

I say Broom over Telo today because, with Telo being V/LA with RL stuff, we get less out of her than we will out of Broom.

fuzzybutternut · Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:43 pm

In post 2203, shos wrote:still worth it, killing town's power in the price of just one scum. that's 3 kills, one of which a PR, for one scum dead, which you had the night to plan a bus on him..

no, DP is not scum.

Now, that we all haven't hammered, we know it's either fuzzy scum, or broom/telo/nacho.

can anyone go over their ISO and see if such a team fits? we need just one person who isn't fitting to hammer fuzzy.

fuzzy's actions as a cop were extremely scummy. not voting for his guilty result, investigate a mason, investigate town PR, and when all town are supposedly known, investigate scumreads. this can't get any worse than that, I think, except for investigating both masons or claiming scum on a town result XD

if fuzzy is scum then a broom/KA scumteam fits the best imo.

Telo, Nacho, broom, it's time to start hunting for a team.

Uh..when did I not vote a guilty? And when did I say that I didn't investigate my scum reads first?

fuzzybutternut · Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:40 am

In post 2207, shos wrote:@Fuzzy: you got a guilty on broom, said some vague statement about the result which was not clear at all, and FOSed. who FOSes a guilty result?

@Broom: I tried to say everything I could think of so far. now I have like a week free so I'll make some ISOs and decide which one we should lynch imo.
and rephrase 2206, I didn't understand what you mean

Yes, I Fos'd him. What do we get out of lynching straight away? Abso-fucking-lutely nothing. There was nothing vague about the result. I specifically said "I got a guilty on Broom last night." How is that vague?

fuzzybutternut · Thu Aug 15, 2013 4:41 am

In post 2205, broomhead wrote:I will UNVOTE: fuzzy because I would also like to talk more in this day before we kill fuzzy. And make no mistake, fuzzy, you will be lynched at the end of today.

There is more to be gained from talking about our situation. I mean, lets not forget that this is (imo) shos last day on earth. I'll post later, busy now.

Awe.

Why'd you unvote. Lynching to PR not going like you want it to? It's okay, I understand. Scum is as scum does.

fuzzybutternut · Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:11 am

In post 2210, shos wrote:@2209: it doesn't matter that you are a PR, it's lylo. if he's scum he won't care
@2208:
In post 2132, fuzzybutternut wrote:I had Meet and Greet for school today. I'm incredibly tired.
FOS: Broom
.
Take that how you wish.
Good night.
that, is vague.

2209 was pure sarcasm.

yes, I know that was vague, but what other reason would I have to FoS him (which was essentially my vote without a vote) if I hadn't gotten a guilty on him? I honestly thought you guys would understand that.

fuzzybutternut · Thu Aug 15, 2013 12:47 pm

In post 2213, shos wrote:cop has no incentive to do practically anything he has done.

Explain.
I'll admit I haven't been the luckiest with my investigations this game, but I don't exactly see where you can say I'd have no incentive to do anything i've done this game.

fuzzybutternut · Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:05 pm

In post 2216, Telo wrote:
In post 2211, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 2210, shos wrote:@2209: it doesn't matter that you are a PR, it's lylo. if he's scum he won't care
@2208:
In post 2132, fuzzybutternut wrote:I had Meet and Greet for school today. I'm incredibly tired.
FOS: Broom
.
Take that how you wish.
Good night.
that, is vague.
2209 was pure sarcasm.

yes, I know that was vague, but what other reason would I have to FoS him (which was essentially my vote without a vote) if I hadn't gotten a guilty on him? I honestly thought you guys would understand that.
You've comeback with two disputed guilty verdicts. One I know for certain is false. I think you're voting broom over me because he really is guilty and when he flips red you buy my death with his.

If broom doesn't put his vote back on you I'll switch my vote to him. You're guilty for certain but I'll vote broom if he's protecting you.

This is what caught scum says!

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:17 am

Broom or Telo, either one. Broom>Telo, though.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:27 am

In post 2232, Telo wrote:
In post 2228, fuzzybutternut wrote:Broom or Telo, either one. Broom>Telo, though.
If you got two guilty returns why would it matter Broom before me?

Because i'm OCD and would rather lynch in the order of the guilties I got? I've said this before, I'm sure.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 10:50 am

In post 2177, fuzzybutternut wrote:Broom, you're so scum it's not even funny.
Second result: Telo-Guilty.

Also, I just got home.

I'm going to do this in order of investigation.

Broom

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:51 am

In post 2236, Telo wrote:and then you made up some bs after that.
It's ok. I don't think anyone needs more proof on you. You're today's lynch.

Please, tell me what "BS" I "made up," because you're really looking like caught scum, now.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 5:08 pm

Telo, why are you scum raging? You're not getting lynched until tomorrow.

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 16, 2013 8:05 pm

In post 2249, broomhead wrote:well, sorry I did not contribute more today ladies and gents, I'm a busy boy as of late.

Here is my vote as I might not be back on, VOTE: Fuzzy Putting him at L-1 and since most of the game knows he is guilty, lets get him. Easy fruit.

Also:
In post 2225, shos wrote:The only hesitation that I have is with KA: ETL's replaceout was something that totally made me think that slot is town...
me too.

Which is why my scum list stands at Fuzzy/Nacho/Telo.
Fuzzy for the obvious. Nacho in contrast to KA (although I've thought nacho was town since day one...). and Telo as I think Dr. P is innocent.

Question too, did Dr P and Telo ever claim yet???

Do you not listen, Broom? Like, at all? You're scum, Telo is scum, we lynch you today, I die tonight, auto-town win.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:06 am

Yes, let's lynch the cop. That makes sooooo much sense.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:20 pm

Was that a lynch?

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:25 pm

>.> Game's not over yet. He could have hammered for town cred.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:51 pm

Woohoo. <3

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:52 pm

Serra, this game was great. <3 I loved every bit of it. Modding was flawless.
You guys are great.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:54 pm

In post 2276, DoctorPepper wrote:Great modding serra

Wish you locked the thread for suspense hahaha

Great game guys
I was so fucking lucky Infinity replaced out. And people read me as town, for reasons I myself dont understand.

Great game Fuzzy and Nacho we screwed up a lot but at least we prevailed!

I totally thought I was today's lynch. Honestly. I wanted this to be a perfect win sooooo bad.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:00 pm

Part of me fell for it, and part of me was just..I mean I knew there was no way that a role could be that over-powered. A role like that would rely on town not believing it. I was tempted to call him scum for it soooo many times.

http://www.quicktopic.com/50/H/NrjksiuKseA
Scum QT.

fuzzybutternut · Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:48 pm

lolol. Why the fuck wasn't I lynched? I STILL don't understand Shos' plan.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 18, 2013 6:40 am

In post 2291, shos wrote:I truly did suck this last day, didn't I?

Definitely not. You played exceptionally well. All we needed was one vote from you, and it was game over.
Looking back at all the wagons, I think all three of us were on every lynch, tbh.

Also, when Ree tried to call me out a few pages back. I could have been gone right there.
Let's talk about Ree's semi-fake claim. THAT was amazing.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 18, 2013 9:42 am

In post 2298, Mr_Ree wrote:Lol. Good job guys!

I can't believe you didn't kill me right away haha. That claim was outta this world yet believable apparently. I knew I screwed up when I admitted I could still be targetted.

I had the team all wrong. The only one I did successfully call was fuzzy.

I'm always scum, even when I'm town.

I think you should have voted me when you said that Serra confirmed that you couldn't be targeted. I probably would've panicked.

<3 Rach.

fuzzybutternut · Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:36 am

<3 I should have been lynched. I really should have.

fuzzybutternut · Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:32 pm

See, I thought about it, and I was like "There's no way that role is even remotely correct. That's just too OP and would rely on the town's disbelief of the role. If town believed it, and it was true, then there is literally no killing it." I just...couldn't make myself believe that you were lying. lol

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:38 am

Nacho and Doc were the allstars of the scum team, tbf. Couldn't have done it without them.

fuzzybutternut · Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:39 am

As soon as DP voted, I literally sat there and refreshed the screen, hoping nacho would come in and hammer.
and then I started thinking "Oh god, what if there's a vig" lololol

fuzzybutternut · Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:30 pm

In post 2348, DoctorPepper wrote:Wait, they dont have a best role claim category anymore :/

Damn, most memorable is for humorous stuff.

Tbh, this was pretty hilarious.

<3 Ree for President, 2016!

fuzzybutternut · Fri Aug 23, 2013 4:33 pm

In post 2361, Mr_Ree wrote:Except hiders. Never lynch a hider...

Especially the annonymous jailkeeping truth cop one-shot vig neighbourizing hiders

Never ever lynch them. Ever...

I mean..who would lynch that?
Unheard of..absolutely unheard of.