Mini 1668 - Mafia in Bremen - Game Over!
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 73, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Rune
Are you serious? Page 3 and you're already wondering about multiball?
I'm not buying that from town. That sounds like scum with a team comp which suggests multiball, ie bulletproof / goon.
This is a jump given Rune's sign-up date and Rune's own explanation. Are you always this quick to judge?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 92, Jake from State Farm wrote:Daughter has 2 soccer games, wife and I are walking a 5k on Saturday, Sunday I'm running my first half marathon, and tomorrow im chaperone on a school field trip.
I'll try to pop in every day though. Duces
Why feel the need to give your weekend itinerary?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 200, Rune wrote:@184 - there are several better votes than you right now. I really don't like your average post length but I'm willing to admit the possibility that I am (obviously) just biased against it.
Do you think that larger average post length means the person is more likely town?
I was reading RC as scum for her vote on Rune and then the weird whiplash onto Dan for using the word "credible". I'm not entirely sure anymore given how Dan and RC interacted.
Jake, in a vacuum, you agree that preemptively giving excuses for future behavior is scummy?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 234, TheReverend wrote:It could even be argued that rune knew it was an L-1 vote because he's keeping a closer eye on the score than the average townie is.
Not so sure about dann. He looked really bad in exchange with cowbells, but that's possibly the result of cowbells looking so good.
rune though, I'm keeping my vote there.
I went back and forth on RC so much in my head.
At first I thought the immediate vote onto Dan was rash and baseless given how many people hate meta. I assumed Dan was just one of those people. Then RC started to really dig into Dan about his specific use of "credible". I can't really fault Dan for using that word. I think it was the appropriate English word to use. I did find RC zeroing-in on that word was town thinking.
I then thought both of them came away looking town given that exchange. Reading 209 and 210 makes me think that RC is a rash player and quick to be offended, so the reaction to "credible" seems to be a less "in the moment" and more a general play style of RC.
I think RC should realize that the players of MS fall into two categories when it comes to meta. One group supports its use and thinks that meta can lead to useful reads. The other group dislikes its use and thinks that meta is not an accurate way to read individuals.
That said, RC's more recent posts look fairly town.
Rune looks pretty town too.
In post 371, NotAnAxehole wrote:What I mean by that first statement is, if I have a scum read on him, I should also have one on you, because the quality of the posts aren't a determinant factor.
I'm very confused by this statement.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 376, HaVoC wrote:It seems like people like Rune and Elyse want me to "provide more content" and it would be easier if RC or anyone who has a scumread on me asks me a question about my play so far. I feel there hasn't been much that I have said so far that is scum-worthy, but if someone else for instance Axe thinks so, I am more than happy to correct them or clarify as to why I am town.
This is weird.
In post 379, Jake from State Farm wrote:ok going to dedicate about an hour to start catching up. damn you all for talking so much lol
In post 381, Jake from State Farm wrote:Spoiler:
Taking a break at the end of page 9. More tomorow. Night folks
These posts are weird too.
Having a hard time parsing the motivation for all of them.
I had a strong town read on NotAnAxeHole at the beginning of the game, but he is steadily slipping lower and lower on my Town -> Scum ladder.
In post 419, NotAnAxehole wrote:I would be okay with a policy lynch on palkia, I probably won't read anything he posts anyway... Absolutely worthless.
I read Palkia as fairly likely town. His posts may be annoying to read, but it looks like town posting rather than scum posturing.
420 is a good post! Makes me feel less suspicious of Jake.
In post 422, Jake from State Farm wrote:If you are going to post something I despise so much, you got to at least back it up with some reasons. So let's hear some.
This is bad.
There is a lot of aggression in this game that I feel is completely unwarranted (BBT to Rev, RC to Dann, Jake to Havoc, Palkia to... everyone). Am I going to have to be a bouncer between all of you? To keep you guys in line?
In post 430, NotAnAxehole wrote:In post 429, Oversoul wrote:Why was Reverend getting so much heat for his early game? I thought he was exuding towniness out of every orifice.
What?
I agree he looks town, that's not what I'm questioning.
Why did you feel that I was addressing this to you?
Pedit:
Oh! How crass you are, NotAnAxeHole.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 443, Jake from State Farm wrote:Jake to havoc? There's been no aggression from me, if I get aggressive you'll know it.
Post 422, where I quoted. I felt that was aggressive to Havoc when Havoc has know way of knowing that would upset you.
The specific line that I quoted in the post reads as false to me. A lot of your posts do not read as genuine to me. You seem a lot less curt and in your face from what I remember of your play.
Fair, NotAnAxeHole. I am just confused that you want to scum read them both, on principle in that post I quoted?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Hmm... sitting down and doing my reads list, I actually don't have as many strong town reads as I thought... Anyway, Hostile Intent and Prolapsed Brain could do with more substantial posts in my opinion.
Town:
TheReverend
Rune
RC
Town-lean:
NotAnAxeHole
Palkia
Null:
Hostile Intent
TheDudeAbides
Scum-lean:
BlueBloodedToffee
Jake From State Farm
HaVoC
Scum:
Elyse
Prolapsed Brain
VOTE: Prolapse Brain
PB is not scumhunting. His most recent votes on Rune and Havoc have been horrible. He votes Rune for a scumslip, never points out the scumslip, does not try to get people to vote Rune, and then switches back to Havoc who he was initially voting to "ignite discussion", but now seems to be voting for... what exactly? It is still unclear why PB is voting Havoc, yet he puts him at L-1.
His comment towards Arceus also reads as fake (about Arceus feigning ignorance) as well as post 65 where he posts the eye roll emote. That does not look like a town person trying to help another player understand why the other player is wrong.
Elyse is on there because I do not think her reads/walls are genuine. She focuses a lot of her posts on Prolapsed Brain, yet does not ever vote Prolapsed Brain despite holding a scum read on Prolapsed since her first catch-up post where she says both PB and Rune are fencesitting. She is doing everything she can to note vote Prolapsed Brain. This associative relation, combined with my scum read on PB is why I think Elyse is scum, possibly a buddy with PB.
Pedit:
Ah, that is what I thought, given your signature Jake.
It is giving me scummy vibes because I actually think you're forcing a new posting style in an effort to be nicer and it is coming off as fake to me.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
BBT scum lean read/Rev town mainly stems from your interaction with Rev about his self vote. I thought Rev came away looking town there, but I think I am in the minority in that.
I don't think Rev would actually say those things if he was scummy. It is partly "too scummy to be scum" and also the way he handled all of that pressure on him. He didn't get defensive in a way that he would lash out at others or forgot to scumhunt like most scum do.
BBT on the other hand looked too dogmatic about the self vote discussion. You harped on that point for a long time considering how Rev answered it. The whole exchange felt like you needed something to comment on, saw an opportunity to talk, and took it.
I didn't actually think the self vote talk was meaningfully contributing to your scumhunting at that moment.
Plus, our play styles don't jive. I think I may need to calibrate my Scumdar for you or else I'm just going to naturally find you scummy but that's on me and not you. :/-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
I thought Axe was town for his comment about Rune. It appears that he, Rune, and Nikanor all play face to face together or something. I think the random compliment to Rune is more likely to come from town than scum, as Rune was facing growing pressure in that moment. Axe easily could have let his comment slide. He didn't need to make it.
I also liked his early reads list and the logic about separating reads + reasoning. Felt genuine and town motivated, like he wanted legitimate discussion on his reads/various players.
The read weakened towards the later pages because I don't like his reasoning for the scum reads. They feel canned.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 484, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:You wouldn't be the first. I'm naturally scum read until people understand it's a play-style thing.
What do you think about Rev mixing up his reads, trying to defend it, then backtracking completely?
What do you mean? I didn't think he back tracked from it? The mistake looked honest but I must have overlooked how he responded.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 584, Rune wrote:IMO Havoc, Oversoul, and Palkia should be lynched in that order (preference for D2, not a suggestion for the upcoming days). My initial vote D2 is for Oversoul because I think his play from this point on will make it less likely for people to vote his direction, whereas Havoc is going to be part of the scum discussion for a while, and won't be forgotten.
In other news, BBT continues to look scummy.
VOTE: Havoc
Elyse & others: Let's get the pressure on here.
You voted me because not many other people suspected me?-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 556, Rune wrote:Read everything I said about Arceus and Dan / Arceus and Palkia. Your support of Palkia in spite of the atrocious hammer doesn't help.-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 542, Jake from State Farm wrote:Hammer without a claim = bad
P.edit - you can say it 3 more times, I'm obviously not scum
Not necessarily. With Prolapsed, I think the hammer is questionable. Prolapsed did not have a dire urgency to live which would telegraph a potential power role claim.
In post 543, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 541, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
His late D1 play is pretty town.
His entrance was also pretty town.
Can you explain your problems with the hammer?
I don't agree, I thought his predecessor was much better but his posts IMO weren't that spectacular
Define "much better".
In post 545, TheReverend wrote:He replaced into a slot that was very scummy. Maybe he's decided that he's got no chance of survival and is just going to troll the shit out of the game. I have no idea. Basically it's a policy lynch, and I wouldn't be remotely surprised if he flipped scum. If he's town, he still needs to go. I was really hoping he'd be vig'd.
That hammer was not only scummy as shit, it was unacceptable imo.
Policy lynches are bad.
By accepting a policy lynch, you're ok with scum coasting by for another day.
In post 556, Rune wrote:Read everything I said about Arceus and Dan / Arceus and Palkia. Your support of Palkia in spite of the atrocious hammer doesn't help.
I tend to be a bleeding heart. I find Policy Lynches to be very anti-town. In most cases, more anti-town than the person being lynched.
In post 558, Rune wrote:So we had 3 votes in less than 4 hours when the town was obviously pretty close to a lynch anyways. The wagon on the lynch was essentially 4 parked RVS votes and 3 quick votes with no decent explanations (except Oversoul).
I don't understand how you can call my vote a quick vote. My vote did not immediately follow another vote onto the wagon, which is the definition of a quick vote.
Post 573 - I guess Elyse can be town.
Wow my reads were so off from yesterday. *sigh*
In post 594, NotAnAxehole wrote:Is everyone discounting the possibility of Elyse / Rune scum team? They're playing off of each other so hard...
Day 1
Elyse at first suspects Rune, then joins him for no apparent reason.
Day 2
Elyse and Rune disagree on who to go after first HaVoC/Me, they are the only two who are looking to lynch me on Day 2 and the disagreement once again seems fabricated.
I think you're getting a little bit paranoid.
In post 599, Rune wrote:If axe and havoc are a team, how did the counterwagon form so efficiently and quickly? It would require hostile and Palkia to both be really bad town, which seems moderately unlikely.
I think the answer is that Hostile is scum and Palkia will hammer anything.
You should vote Hostile.
In post 600, Rune wrote:4 RVs and 3 quickvotes including no intent or chance to claim on L1 and hammer.It's either suicide town or dumb scum.
I think you have these backward? Wouldn't it be suicide scum, dumb town? Ask yourself, honestly, which of the bolded is more likely? Suicide scum or dumb town?
In post 606, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 604, Jake from State Farm wrote:
No you failed cause you are calling him town and I believe even said his late posts were town yet admit his actions are not.
This doesn't compute
Ah, I see.
Correct, his late Day posts were town. So were is entrance posts.
Looking at his overall play, it's clear Palkia is town.
You're trying to focus on one action to paint him as scum. Show me posts that make you think Palkia is scum.
I agree.
If Palkia was a public alt we could know what type of player would hammer like that. If it was Varsoon, or Ika, or Marquis, I think the hammer itself would be null. People tend to view votes as more important in determining alignment than general play.
Hostile Intent continues to be useless as ever.
Everyone should vote her!-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
No. Just highly unlikely. But it is a safe assumption that scum will not do things that warrant a policy lynch, unless they would do those things as town.
Shocking I know.
I don't know Anti to do those things as either alignment. But I'm not 100% convinced that this is Anti :\
Rune, where did I misquote you?
And those actions were not for "no good reason". I think those people are town and scum respectively.
I'm sorry I don't play like you Rune. I think you're assuming too much of me.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 639, TheReverend wrote:In post 637, Rune wrote:@Rev why oversoul over havoc?
oversould suggested a policy lynch will be a town lynch. He knows something I don't.
I am reading Palkia as town.
You want to policy lynch Palkia.
Ergo, I think your policy lynch is a town lynch.
Noted that you admit Palkia's lynch is a policy lynch. So, I guess I was half right with the Palkia wagon.
---
INDEPENDENT FROM ABOVE
From a theory/general perspective, I think policy lynches are generally a bad thing. They are not designed to help town win the game. They are designed to teach a lesson to a player, to cull the site meta. For that reason, I think that policy lynches tend to be a lynch on town. Scum already have a lot to lose by doing something that will attract attention. Why would they do something that is grounds for a policy lynch?
In post 640, Rune wrote:In post 638, Oversoul wrote:Rune, why do you think Hostile is town?
Because I think other people are more likely to be scum. Which is why I've asked for a case/opinion against HI, which no one seems to be able or willing to provide. Odd. That being said, I'm not discounting the possibility of HI scum. But there is no reason to lynch anyone today who we are not sure is scum, and HI does not fit that criteria. Havoc fits it much better. In my opinion, you do as well.
@TDA post...........
@Havoc post.........
1. You never answered my question - where did I misquote you? You keep giving me general statements that I am not interpreting your posts correctly. I would like it if you want post by post to explain yourself, since we clearly have mixed signals?
2. Fair. My HI vote mainly stems from her quick vote on the Prolapsed Wagon. Up to that point, she had done very little scumhunting. She put her only two votes of that day on the two largest wagons. She keeps making prod dodge posts in the guise of random comments about the day.
I will admit, I found 626 to be particularly town. However, I do think we should apply pressure to HI so that she starts contributing. I do not like it when people like HI phone into the game and barely contribute any scumhunting.
Then again, maybe I should be contributing to a major wagon so the game moves forward.
In post 648, Rune wrote:If Oversoul is town, I think it is highly unlikely that Palkia is scum.
Why?
I appreciate the defense from AxeHole, but I'm not sure how I feel about him. He is all over the place with his posts. He did understand my opinion about the Palkia votes, which makes me think he is trying to think like I am. I don't see scum going through that trouble, especially since I have, admittedly, an odd way of thinking.
In post 666, Rune wrote:Re-read D2 at least. I sense some night-chat plan where scum will 'slowly' pressure HI while maintaining strong townreads on Palkia. I think Oversoul has done nothing but push a very specific agenda today, and I still think Arceus was very scummy. Both Axe and BBT are complicit in this and at least one of them is town being strung along.
Havoc is probably a safer lynch, but I think town will gain the most from lynching Oversoul.
Are you this paranoid in real life, Rune? This is moon beams logic, tinfoil territory, etc. This assumes so many things rather than settling for the most simple, logical explanation.
That being said this post is very town given those feelings though. Damn. I haven't seen this type of meta gamestate analysis in a long time.
In post 669, TheReverend wrote:In post 653, Oversoul wrote:Havoc was just replaced in another game. I don't know if he will continue to play in this game.
Excellent contribution.
Can anyone explain what the point of this post is?
There's nothing else of his either side of it for at least an hour. So he pops into the thread to tell us havoc is still site active. Then disappears again. Thanks oversoul. Really helpful.
There's a wagon on you building, have you got nothing to say about that?
I was informing everyone that the pressure on Havoc would likely be falling on deaf ears since Havoc is most likely going to be replaced. Did you mean should I address Rune and Axe's votes on me at this time? I'm confused.
In post 679, Rune wrote:I could be convinced either way, but I really think an Oversoul lynch tells us more about the game. I would also lynch Havoc in a heartbeat.
Rev, you, and Jake are my strongest townreads right now, and I think we should collectively decide where to vote.
What does my death tell you about the game state when I flip town?
Also, why do you have a town read on Jake?
In post 688, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:529 - Oversoul, why HI?
Also, you never addressed my reasoning for why I thought Rev was scum. Can you do so now?
I answered this above in an answer to Rune.
I think she is scum coasting. I think her vote on the PB wagon was the most opportunistic.
Although, I do have to admit, if Palkia IS Antihero then my read of Palkia is very muddled as I think I remember Antihero being against players who do that sort of thing.
I'm going to hold off on answering your second question for the time being, I'll answer it before this Day is over though. Remind me if I haven't already addressed it by that point.
In post 708, Rune wrote:Because I think it is pretty obvious that Oversoul was either sending a message to scumbuddies to hammer or hoping to add to the PB bandwagon to detract from the Havoc wagon.
Again with the paranoia. This assumes so much.
How do you realign your reads when I flip town?
In post 713, Jake from State Farm wrote:I'll vote havoc and maybe Axe
So, not really scumreading anyone then?
In post 722, Rune wrote:VOTE: Havoc
I probably won't be changing this until Oversoulsheeplordwhatever posts again and manages to convince me of his scumminess, largely because BBT's play bothers me and I think Havoc is pretty likely to flip scum.
I like the new moniker I have.
Although I have one question to ask...
Is it lonely in that dark tunnel?
In post 727, NotAnAxehole wrote:but in all seriousness,
Elyse is town,
Rune is town,
BBT is town,
Rev is town,
Jake is town,
Oversoul is town,
Palkia is town.
HaVoC is scum,
TDA is scum,
HI is scum.
You should probably move your joke vote to account for your seriousness. Right now it is being wasted.
Rune, I would vote Havoc but I'm not going to wait for a replacement for a claim/reads, so it would likely be to outright lynch him.
I said it was exciting because people are saying interesting and controversial things and I am a contender for lynch.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 741, Rune wrote:Additionally, if you flip town, I would then look at HI more seriously and also be extremely suspicious of Axe.
This is mainly what I wanted to know about the fallout from my lynch. I wanted to know who you would reconsider, other than Palkia.
What is your current opinion on Rev? I don't understand his posting today. Steep drop in good content from yesterday.
re: Paranoia - understandable. I just find it interesting that you are already going to such great lengths to begin building a scum team with me at the center. It assumes that I am a good scum player (I'm not) and the team would defer to my judgment (probably wouldn't), and it just flat out assumes that I am scum (I'm not). Back when I played a lot of games I would construct teams based on a single person, watching their interactions with those people, etc. Unfortunately, more often than not I was wrong about the central person that I used to anchor my reads, so I would be dejected with the game and my ability and just play shitty once that person flipped town or something.
In a way, I did that with PB and Elyse. I was really sure that PB was scum and thought that Elyse had cold feet and couldn't find it in herself to bus him. That is partly why I completely dropped the Elyse scum read today. I felt it was better to go after something different that caught my eye (HI) to help me readjust.
That said, Elyse's posts today are still leaving me with something to be desired.
pedit:
That is exactly my point by saying Havoc is probably going to be replaced-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
I strongly think that Palkia is town, which is why I said that Rev.
Rev, what is your read on Jake?
I think you're discounting the other very town things that Rune has done. Sure, his reasoning for a lot of town reads seems to be PoE mixed with "other people are super scummy" but he has done some very town things.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 777, Jake from State Farm wrote:Why does palkia get a free ride? I'm suspicious of havoc also and have no problem switching my vote but I'm not comfortable with how he's being let off the hook for his scummy play. Until he posts or his replacement posts something to convince me my read is wrong. I see no reason to compromise this early. We still have plenty of time.
You're not exactly pressuring Palkia with your vote. Even if you were applying pressure correctly, it wouldn't matter since Palkia is now MIA like Havoc.-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
Ok, I lied to get Nikanor to post
What are the chances that Nikanor didn't prod Palkia because Nikanor knew Palkia was active because Palkia was scum?
This theory depends on several assumptions.
That Palkia was active during the night (submitted a night action, could possibly not be scum in that case)
That TDA and Havoc are VTs
That Nikanor did *not* make a mistake
Hmmmm
I will be curious to see how this all plays out at the end of the game-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 713, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 691, Rune wrote:In post 683, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 679, Rune wrote:Rev, you, and Jake are my strongest townreads right now, and I think we should collectively decide where to vote.
You know my opinion
I think Palkia is a bad lynch for today for reasons I've already explained. I strongly suggest you reconsider, or at least provide your other scumreads as well as a justification for why we should lynch Palkia over the other obvious candidates.
I'll vote havoc and maybe Axe
Jake is really doing whatever he can to make sure he is not on a main wagon today.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
In post 813, TheReverend wrote:So how often do you see scum say "I'm voting for a or b" and then vote c?
Actually quite often. Especially if they are bussing. It's the epitome of opportunism.-
-
Oversoul Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 14514
- Joined: June 5, 2011
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
-
Oversoul Survivor
-
- Oversoul
-
-
-
-
-