Mini 1698: MDCXCVIII [C'est fini!]

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #21 (isolation #0) » Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:42 pm

I claim jester survivor

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #23 (isolation #1) » Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:54 pm

VOTE: implosion

Because you never know when something will implode!

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #60 (isolation #2) » Thu Jul 16, 2015 6:58 am

In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 49, implosion wrote:
Unvote

VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.

Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.

VOTE: implosion

I don't paticularly like this vote from Dragonspawn. It seems rather oppurtunistic with a wagon on Implosion starting.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #64 (isolation #3) » Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:06 am

Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #69 (isolation #4) » Thu Jul 16, 2015 7:43 am

In post 67, Shazam wrote:
In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.

Scummiest thing yet. Not only are you wrong about how many votes were on implosion, but what townie would suggest that we need to find two scum before putting pressure on one? Definitely seeing a Mario/Implosion team as a possibility.

If spawn was the 3rd vote, then I retract what I said

3 is not actually bad and we can keep this on Implosion.
And I was thinking that we already had 4 votes on Implosion. What's more, it is good to have pressure on more than one player, as otherwise if we're wrong we have nothing to fall on. And I don't like how you said that being wrong is scummy.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #71 (isolation #5) » Thu Jul 16, 2015 8:33 am

Is that RVS?
If not, then since when have we only had one suspect on D1?
We do not have to lynch every suspect.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #79 (isolation #6) » Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:45 am

In post 73, Necessary Evil wrote:
WoodyWoodpecker wrote:
In post 70, Necessary Evil wrote:This idea that we need multiple suspects is awfully strange.

Hi, have you played mafia before?

Yes. Something the timing seems strange, especially since he is still voting for Implosion.

You seem to be unable to realise someone can have more than one scumread. In this setup, there is likely three mafia. I don't see why I can't suspect more than one person.

In post 60, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 49, implosion wrote:
Unvote

VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.

Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.

VOTE: implosion

I don't paticularly like this vote from Dragonspawn. It seems rather oppurtunistic with a wagon on Implosion starting.

What makes you think dragonspawn's vote was opportunistic? He gave a fine reason for it, I think. Further, why are you voting Implosion when the first suspicion you have is towards dragonspawn?

In post 71, MarioManiac4 wrote:Is that RVS?
If not, then since when have we only had one suspect on D1?
We do not have to lynch every suspect.

I think we're better off focusing on one at a time. It creates more pressure and keeps the town from becoming splintered. However, I am not necessarily opposed to having multiple suspects at a time. What you specifically suggested seemed suspicious to me so I am investigating you.[/quote]

If everyone agrees on one person, that's a bad sign, as that means mafia are content with the lynch.
We are better off with everyone grilling their scumread, like you are doing with me right now.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #152 (isolation #7) » Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:58 am

In post 81, Shazam wrote:
In post 79, MarioManiac4 wrote:

If everyone agrees on one person, that's a bad sign, as that means mafia are content with the lynch.
We are better off with everyone grilling their scumread, like you are doing with me right now.

So you're admitting that town gains information if we all agree on one person. But you also don't want us to do it.

No, because in pure statements, mafia can bus.
I meant if the player was actually being lynched and everyone online was jumping aboard, because that would indicate scum were content with the lynch.
It is always best to have more than one suspect and it's the way it's always done.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #154 (isolation #8) » Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:16 am

In post 153, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 152, MarioManiac4 wrote:It is always best to have more than one suspect and it's the way it's always done.

Purposefully?

Because it seems like you're missing the point that people are suspicious because you are purposefully trying to direct how everyone should be acting.

Really?
Because in Post 67 Shazam tried to paint me as scummy for not sharing his opinion on the matter.
I am defending my opinion.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #168 (isolation #9) » Fri Jul 17, 2015 10:40 am

What question? Sorry, I think I missed this.