In post 17, Accountant wrote:VOTE: All Alone
for naked voting.
If he hadn't done that I would have voted Davsto for first to confirm + sp00ky avatar.
This feels awkward. Accountant is trying to back up her RVS with a 2nd RVS FoS.
In post 17, Accountant wrote:VOTE: All Alone
for naked voting.
If he hadn't done that I would have voted Davsto for first to confirm + sp00ky avatar.
In post 26, Accountant wrote:In post 24, Slandaar wrote:I don't feel like voting any of you at the moment, instead, I shall just let you all know that I am town. I obviously wouldn't lie to you good people so this effectively makes me confirmed town! If only every townie was as clever as me and had thought of this great way to confirm themselves the game would be so easy!
VOTE: Slandaar
In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
In post 35, All Alone wrote:In post 23, Davsto wrote:Ay. I like that pun. UNVOTE: Accountant.
VOTE: absta101 for having numbers in his name, the worst thing. This RVS vote is staying here I think.
piiiiiiiiiing
VOTE: Davsto
In post 36, Performer wrote:In post 27, Slandaar wrote:I think you missed the part where I confirmed myself as town using logics.
VOTE: Slandaar
In post 50, Accountant wrote:Was it really a gambit though?
It wasn't, just pre-game joking on my part. Can't speak for Slandaar, but my gut tells me he's doing the same.
What is one fm game that stands out in your memory?
I have not completed a single full game of forum mafia on this site.
Would you say you play as a better mafia scum or townie?
I think that I play better as scum, and enjoy it more. The "naughtiness" of sneaking around behind town member's backs amuses me, and I'm a big believer in the whole "knowledge is power" thing. Plus the level of coordination enjoyed by scum through night chat is just astounding.
What is the strangest fm game you ever played?
FM 7C on the Town of Salem forums. It was a forced Hydra game where you shared a slot with another player. I was the town roleblocker and ended up blocking a vanilla townie every night, stating the witch(an evil role) was confirmed town then lynching the doctor and elite bodyguard consecutively. I also ordered the vigilante to shoot a townie, and somehow managed to townread every single evil role in the game. Needless to say, a lot of shit was slung my way after the game
Have you ever dated anyone from fm?
No, I'm a physical asexual - I've only dated imaginary people(who are the only people that I'm attracted to).
What is a fun fact about yourself?
I'm not actually an accountant, but I do know some accountancy and I like long lists of numbers.
Whstde your issue with naked voting?
Public nudity laws aside, I don't like unreadable people in general and not backing up your vote makes you harder to read in my opinion.
In post 53, Accountant wrote:Expedience with that serial killer soft though
In post 130, Wanderer-nl wrote:UNVOTE:
I think Mario is trying to see more in that post than there really is, like he was looking for a reason to just jump this wagon. Also too soon for L-1 imo, plenty players haven't posted yet since RVS.
In post 132, Accountant wrote:26 is a joke vote, yes. Hence the follow up about me being mafia trying to mislynch him. I really don't like 127.
1. How does this stem from a scum motive? It's not a lie, either.
2. Well, I haven't played proper FM anywhere but here and there; I have no conpleted games here, and 7C was definitely my most memorable game there, the others being a role madness where I died without accomplishing much and a couple of replacements into late games.
Are you just looking for excuses to hop onto the wagon, mario?
In post 141, Accountant wrote:1. Trying to appear more new then you are. You twisted the question. He asked about forum mafia in general, and you twisted that to this site.
The full, complete answer would be:
1) I have no completed games here.
2) I have two completed games on the Salem forums. One was as a third party solo role in a role madness (SFM7, I was the Harpy), the other I talk about in the next question plus two replacements about 100 pages in, in which I lasted three RL days and five RL days, respectively. Note also that the culture, game mechanics and playing style in those forums are vastly different from MafiaScum.
Now, tell me: how did my answer push a scum agenda?
In post 63, absta101 wrote:Performer's RQS is pretty much null; i've seen town do it many times.
In post 62, Wanderer-nl wrote:I have voted. I unvoted later because I no longer think Performer's vote looks suspicious.
In post 66, Akarin wrote:As I don't have any other games on site, none of them stand out in my memory.
The strangest game I played had a Jester whose existence was announced at the beginning of the game, the game ended in a loss for everyone else if they were lynched. That really messed up how the game worked.
I probably play better as town, and it's more fun!
Ihavedated someone I played a forum mafia game with, it was okay!
Fun fact: I milked a cow today (at a county fair.)
In post 67, Akarin wrote:Back on topic,
I think Wolfie and Expedience (Expy?) are being silly in thinking of this as some daring gambit. It's a simple joke that plenty of people as either alignment do all the time. "Practically confirmed town" is ridiculous.
It's weird that the gambit language has been repeated so much. And Wolfie looks like she has a lot more experience, it's weird that she'd buy into this kind of logic if she were actually trying to figure out if Slandaar were town or scum.
VOTE: SilverWolf
In post 69, Davsto wrote:In post 67, Akarin wrote:Back on topic,
I think Wolfie and Expedience (Expy?) are being silly in thinking of this as some daring gambit. It's a simple joke that plenty of people as either alignment do all the time. "Practically confirmed town" is ridiculous.
It's weird that the gambit language has been repeated so much. And Wolfie looks like she has a lot more experience, it's weird that she'd buy into this kind of logic if she were actually trying to figure out if Slandaar were town or scum.
VOTE: SilverWolf
Definitely agreeing here.
Slandaar's comment and the other person's follow up was blatantly a joke, and why people are actually voting on the two based on that is beyond me. It's like super-reaching, trying to find evidence when there's nothing.
VOTE: SilverWolf
In post 74, Davsto wrote:Uh, sorry, I appear to have misplaced my vote, it wasn't silverwolf who voted someone (seemingly seriously) based on the stuff.
UNVOTE:
It was Performer.
VOTE: performer
However, SilverWolf, townreading them by that exchange is also silly. I just find reaching to vote on a single person more scummy than oddly townreading two people from it.
Excuse me while I facepalm for being silly enough to mix that up.
In post 79, Davsto wrote:Yeh, sorry, I saw Akarin's comment and vote on you and assumed you were one of the ones voting Slandaar, without checking.
In post 89, Accountant wrote:I don't think that what Slandaar did was alignment indicative at all, and I'm treating it as a null tell on him. I think that SilverWolf's townreading me and Slandaar seems far-fetched, and an experienced player like him should know better. I'm not sure what to think about this, but it's possible buddying.
I think Akarin's analysis pretty much hit the nail on the head as well. I'm currently looking at the votecount and it's three votes for me three for Performer, so I think it makes sense to go ahead and
VOTE: Performer
Performer, if you could justify your vote that would be great.
In post 157, Davsto wrote:No.
I mixed it up because I agreed with the points, but didn't realise that Akarin had placed her vote on someone that hadn't actually done that.
In post 101, Expedience wrote:In post 100, Accountant wrote:That was a mistype. It should be "where town claimed town", which means that since scum would know you played in games where town claimed town, they would be incentivized to claim town to seem town themselves.
I'd say this is averyweak argument, since SilverWolf didn't say that she believed this to be a Town tell before Slandaar made his comment. It would require scum to both read the games that she mentioned, and also require SilverWolf noticing and mentioning it. If SilverWolf and Slandaar were both scum, I really don't think they'd be this blatant.
Nevertheless, I don't think Town are any more likely to claim Town during RVS / RQS than scum.
In post 161, absta101 wrote:@MarioWhere does she say she isn't a good player?In post 148, MarioManiac4 wrote:If she pushes some mislynches she can point to that and say "look, I'm not a good player. I'm not scum for pushing these mislynches."
I really don't want to have to go find them. I just remember seeing town players do RQS, especially newer players.Can you link these?
Also, I want to make it clear that the meta point I mentioned isn't the main reason for my null-read of his RQS. It's mainly because I don't see any compelling scum or town motivations for what he did.
In post 157, Davsto wrote:No.
I mixed it up because I agreed with the points, but didn't realise that Akarin had placed her vote on someone that hadn't actually done that.
In post 164, Davsto wrote:Let's take a look at the three votes on Slandaar, shall we?
In post 26, Accountant wrote:In post 24, Slandaar wrote:I don't feel like voting any of you at the moment, instead, I shall just let you all know that I am town. I obviously wouldn't lie to you good people so this effectively makes me confirmed town! If only every townie was as clever as me and had thought of this great way to confirm themselves the game would be so easy!
VOTE: Slandaar
Clearly a joke vote.In post 28, Accountant wrote:I know you're town. I'm actually mafia trying to push a quickhammer on a townie before people realize how confirmed he is.
A bit meh on this one, but doesn't seem to be making the vote based on the joke vote.In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
In post 36, Performer wrote:In post 27, Slandaar wrote:I think you missed the part where I confirmed myself as town using logics.
VOTE: Slandaar
On the other hand, Performer seemed to take the obvious joke seriously and actually voted based on it, by the looks of it.In post 51, Performer wrote:As for someone claiming to be mafia or town...I played games on another site, where a few people did that early in day 1 and wow, it turned out quite bad for us townies, because they turned out to be something other than the claim.
That is why I voted Performer over the others.
In post 168, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 165, MarioManiac4 wrote:If I'm not missing something about Ara claiming Performer thought slandaar was town then most of the wagon is built on sand.
The fact that Accountant and Performer were counterwagons also give me a townread on that slot.
Can you please make this a little more clear because I have no idea what wagon you mean and whom you're townreading.
In post 171, absta101 wrote:@MarioThat's not what i'm getting at. You said in point 2 that she is trying to make excuses for wrong reads with her ToS (town or scum, i'm guessing). You then explained in post 148 that she could push a mislynch and then later state that she isn't a good player like she already 'told us'.In post 166, MarioManiac4 wrote:I never said she DID, I said she COULD.
What i'm asking is, where does she say that she isn't a good player in her original response to Performers RQS? All I see is her saying that she is a better scum player, this does not mean she is a bad town player.
In post 180, Accountant wrote:In post 176, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 171, absta101 wrote:@MarioThat's not what i'm getting at. You said in point 2 that she is trying to make excuses for wrong reads with her ToS (town or scum, i'm guessing). You then explained in post 148 that she could push a mislynch and then later state that she isn't a good player like she already 'told us'.In post 166, MarioManiac4 wrote:I never said she DID, I said she COULD.
What i'm asking is, where does she say that she isn't a good player in her original response to Performers RQS? All I see is her saying that she is a better scum player, this does not mean she is a bad town player.
What I'm saying is the TOS game implies she's not great without actually stating it. She could easily point to this after pushing a mislynch.
All of this would actually be irrelevant if Accountant said that she's not a bad town player and wouldn't point to it after pushing a town lynch.
I'm not a bad town player, and if I push any mislynches or give out bad reads I'll take full responsibility for it, just like any other player in this game. There, now you no longer have any excuse to vote me.
Personally, I still like my vote on him, he feels like he's scum going "I need to appear like a scumhunter so I'll pull something that won't actually expose real mafia but that gives me justification to push a scumwagon". I think Davsto's comments about SilverWolf over-reaching can be applied times two to mario.
In post 183, Wanderer-nl wrote:Mario you missed this:
In post 170, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 169, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 168, Wanderer-nl wrote:In post 165, MarioManiac4 wrote:If I'm not missing something about Ara claiming Performer thought slandaar was town then most of the wagon is built on sand.
The fact that Accountant and Performer were counterwagons also give me a townread on that slot.
Can you please make this a little more clear because I have no idea what wagon you mean and whom you're townreading.
So I thought Performer was being voted for townreading Slandaar for a moment, when that didn't happen.
I was townreading Performer.
Ara is Akarin?
Most of what wagon was built on sand?
So what did happen?
Are you still townreading Performer?
Does any of this this change anthing of your read on Accountant?
In post 195, Accountant wrote:Mario has said nothing to convince me that my vote on him is unjustified. Istilldon't understand what his case against me is. Like, can someone explain why he thinks I'm scummy because I don't understand anything he's saying right now. He's just throwing out sarcastic questions and acting like I'm proven scum or some shit.
Slandaar: 26 was a joke vote. I meant it to give off a "raging townie votes cocky player" vibe, and followed it up with 28 after you posted 27. Also, it was in RVS.
In post 209, SilverWolf wrote:In post 121, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
No. 2 gives me a sense of trying to work things out. A townread.
Also Slandaar attracting attention with his first posts gives me a townread on him.
Mario, please explain this better. Why are you townreading Akarin off of this post? Especially considering you are scumreading Akarin off of this 151 and this 156. How are you reading Akarin now?
Also, you said you townread Performer here 169 and then later said you don't yet have a read on Perfomer 197. Can you explain this inconsistency?
In post 210, SilverWolf wrote:I don't really think Mario's voting Accountant for playing the newb card to be a very valid scumread. Accountant has not, from what I've seen, been playing like she doesn't know what she's doing. Clearly, her response to the RQS was simply to give an example of a game she was in and talk about what happened.
143 is a good observation. Starting to lean town on absta. This is the second time Accountant has better explained herself later while not giving that reasoning in the first place. This pings as scummy to me. Also, 132 basically just sheeps Wanderer's wording here which I don't really like. Mario points that out here which is good 139. FoS is getting stronger on Accountant.
142 looks town from Mario. Although I didn't like his original reasoning for voting Accountant, this kind of play reminds me more of town Mario than scum Mario from the experience I have with him so far. Scum Mario is lurky and plays it safe, where town Mario is very aggressive in his pushes and does tunnel, hyper posts, and doesn't mind drawing attention to himself.
In post 212, Slandaar wrote:Alright I will try and explain this as best I can.
Wanderer says this:
In post 65, Wanderer-nl wrote:I said his tone was the same as his tone in another game where he was town.
Now, I find this just wrong, it is the wrong way to defend my opening post. The tone is the same as my town tone so it's null doesn't really tackle the content of the post and the reasons people were voting me. I have a hard time imagining town thinking in this way.
Also; I find it hard to believe town can take my tone, from my first post, and think it is the same as a game where I was completely serious.
VOTE: Wanderer
I am not that confident but this seems the best to me.
In post 216, SilverWolf wrote:In post 214, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 209, SilverWolf wrote:In post 121, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 34, Akarin wrote:VOTE: Slandaar
1. OMGUS
2. Only player to confirm via PMor Private Topic???
3. Tied leading wagons, fight!
No. 2 gives me a sense of trying to work things out. A townread.
Also Slandaar attracting attention with his first posts gives me a townread on him.
Mario, please explain this better. Why are you townreading Akarin off of this post? Especially considering you are scumreading Akarin off of this 151 and this 156. How are you reading Akarin now?
Also, you said you townread Performer here 169 and then later said you don't yet have a read on Perfomer 197. Can you explain this inconsistency?
1. It was an early stage of my reading. I wanted to note a townlean on Akarin at the time. I am now scumleaning on Akarin.
2. I actually completely forgot about Performer I was mostly thinking about Accountant at that time, and wasn't thinking about much else. Not really remembering him, I said I didn't have a read. That is actually a trait in my TvT tunnels. Once I've overlooked the game a bit further, I might unvote
So are you saying that your tunnel on Accountant is a TvT now?
In post 234, Akarin wrote:In post 191, MarioManiac4 wrote:
@Expi; I'm not here to discuss my playstyle. If you think it's so terrible try WOT1-ing me.
Mario, this doesn't actually address Expy's point:
In post 181, Expedience wrote:
I feel that Mario's aggression is excessive, unwarranted, and anti-Town. He looks very hard to find scummy things, and to some degree he's probably seeing things that aren't there. The repeated stabbing of his quote + quip seems like he's trying to appear very pro-Town by filling up pages and raising his post count, while perhaps saving some of his point for later posts and, uh, not nonuple-posting would actually help more. Perhaps I'm reading too much into this in some ways and it's just an aspect of his playstyle when he replaces in, but it nevertheless makes him lean scum for me. I support the wagon against him.
He said maybe it was just your playstyle, but it's not an unreasonable read. He does point out a possible scum motivation, but you just dismiss this very offhandedly. Do you think your play this game matches your other games, or is it different somehow?
And I agree, the giant quote wall spam makes the game much harder to read, and your aggression is over the top. Please try to tone it down for the sake of keeping everyone engaged and the game pleasant to read.
In post 238, Akarin wrote:Mario, do you want to actually answer my question?
In post 322, Davsto wrote:Yay.
I claim 1-Shot Vigilante. I shot Grayfoxxxx last night. This gives three notable possibilities.
1) He is Bulletproof - this was the most likely, he would know why I was asking if he were Bulletproof, yet he has claimed VT, so that is out of the window.
2) He was protected by a Town Doctor - I find this improbable, to say the least, due to him hardly being a worthy person to protect.
And 3, which I now believe happened:
3) He was protected by a Mafia Doctor, predicting a Vigilante kill. Thus, he is most likely Mafia.
In post 337, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 334, ChannelDelibird wrote:In post 333, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 332, ChannelDelibird wrote:But, at any rate, GrayFox: let's talk about why you were so incredibly absent Yesterday that someone tried to vig you.
I can't speak for others. Someone said he was a rolecop? How could he shoot me?
He explicitly claimed last page. Keep up, man.
326
In post 384, GrayFoxxxx wrote:In post 383, MarioManiac4 wrote:
So why didn't you do this before?
If you can defend yourself why the fuck can't you give reads?
"Delaying my hand".
Jokes aside, I'm not in a position to quote, edit, and format anything right now.
That's why the fuck
In post 387, GrayFoxxxx wrote:I like to provide reasoning while dropping a big list.
You know, go ahead and skip the "BUT WHY?", part of the process.
In post 465, Davsto wrote:Wanderer did something that seemed notably more scummy than Grayfoxxxx's bumbling, I don't see how this is suspicious.In post 463, MarioManiac4 wrote:See how quickly that wagon on Grayfoxxx disappeared?
Don't any of you find it suspicious?
I have never really found wagons randomly appearing or disappearing particularly indicative of anyone's alignments involved, or at least not in a consistent, readable way.
In post 474, ChannelDelibird wrote:Mario, did you read #400? What do you think of it? I know that GrayFox's iso is 'bad', quote unquote, but I'm not convinced that it comes from a scum mindset. I don't know either way, but it's certainly nagging at me.
In post 525, ChannelDelibird wrote:Hi, Mario. If you want GrayFox lynched so badly, how's about you slow down a bit and wait for him to either redeem or destroy himself by following up on those reads he promised us? We're not under serious time pressure and multiple people have made it clear that they want to hear more from him. There's no need to fume about us not doing something which is still very much on the table. If you're town who wants to see GrayFox die, why let him slide by hurrying up someone else's lynch?
In post 528, ChannelDelibird wrote:Yeah, but it's not like you're the only one who thinks that he's scummy. Wouldn't your cause be further advanced by, instead of putting Wanderer at L-1, reminding everyone of how late GrayFox is in producing that content he promised?
In post 685, Octopus wrote:I apologise if I have offended anyone.
IF your claim is accepted then you are little more than a VT, why would an NK be used on a VT, when there is a known, and presumably still active, power role in the game?
Have you learnt to read yet?
Allow me to help..
In post 667, Fraggernaut wrote:The Sun has rose!
Our guests come downstairs,after a attempt on one of their lives was made during the night.
No one has died!
And congratulations on loosing the town a power role for no reason CDB, Perhaps you all should learn what a Jailkeeper can do?
In post 689, Davsto wrote:Seriously, this is flailing on its highest level. I say someone hammers and we just put Octo out of their misery.