My response to Archmage's case on me from
838.
1. Wanderer was noncommital and non-involved with the Day 1 lynch on Davsto.
True. I wasn't able to get a decent read on Davsto, and I could have done more by engaging with Davsto and stuff to improve it but I decided to pursue my own leads instead.
2. Wanderer never mentions Scorpius at all on Day 1.
That's possible, I tend to look at 2-3 people at a time because I can't handle too much information at once. What do you think of my posts about (and to) Scorpious Day 2 and today?
3. She displays similar wishy-washy behavior towards Scorpius on Day 2.
Oh right, here's my answer. So what exactly is wishy-washy and why does that make me scum? And similar to what?
Wanting Scorpious active: Ofcourse I want him active, if he's town he needs to help us find scum and if he's scum we want to catch him in a lie/contradiction and for that he needs to post.
About wanting Mario lynched over Scorpious: I was scumreading Mario and going back and forth (or being wishy-washy as you call it) on Scorpious. Mario is usually more involved, this time I missed his questioning and sharing thoughts, he was just there.
4. Hammers Mario for being "robotic and fake," with plenty of time left on the day.
I explained the 'robotic and fake' already.
As for the time of my hammer:
In post 721, ICEninja wrote:This game is kind of stagnating. As of right now, I'm pretty OK with either wagon. I'm pretty sure there is exactly 1 scum between them, and if we miss today we'll get scum tomorrow.
I'm not really sure where to go after that, though. I'll need to look at interactions depending on which one flips scum.
In post 725, Alchemist21 wrote:I don't think we're going to get much more discussion out of this Day. Someone should probably hammer at this point. I'm still thinking Mario/AA are the scumteam.
In post 729, Syndesis wrote:I'm done vomiting words for now. Hammer if you want so I can stop WIFOMing myself on Scorpious. Will probably attempt another reread overnight.
I also asked:
In post 724, Wanderer-nl wrote:I'm not liking Archmage too much again, and only makes me want to hammer Mario more.. I'll wait for Syndesis to post his thoughts.
Ice, do you have anything else you want to share before hammer?
Anyone else?
And everyone posted between that and my hammer, nobody told me to hold it. If it was too soon then I'm sorry, but I really thought everyone had made up their minds and done with the Day.
5. Turns on Scorpius as soon as its clear that he is the prime target.
(Could you please use actual post numbers instead of the numbers that are in iso? I have no idea where to place 30 and 31 rn. Also, for quick access, if someone is too lazy to make the postnumber into a link I'll open the reply-box, make the post-link myself and click it in preview, so the actual postnumbers would be great. Anyway, found them in my iso)
In my
801 (31 in iso) I was in a really bad mood and starting to get annoyed with Scorpious. I have no better explanation for 801, and after some more thought about Scorpious' claim I decided to drop it because it's outguessing the mod. It's null. The wiki-page says most commuters are even/odd-night or x-shot, but a full commuter is still considered normal, so it is possible though unlikely.
6. *Ignores the reasoning behind unvoting Scorpius to less than L-1 and votes Scorpius back up to L-1*
Yes, that happened. I made a mistake and I unvoted again.
My one reservation:
Wanderer's insistence on getting Scorp to answer questions about his reads on Day 2 could just be a scum trying to mentor their scum-mate along, but it is still a generally pro-town thing to try and get people to answer questions. Her insistence on getting Scorpius to try and answer questions seems like something that scum would not be obligated to do. I can see upsides and downsides to it as scum, but it just doesn't seem like something scum should be encouraged to do, if we act on the assumption that Wanderer and Scorp are scum-buddies.
What happens to this thought if Scorpious flips town?
For the record, I'm townreading Archmage now. I think he put a lot of effort in his case on me and I didn't get the feeling he was trying to make me look bad, he just misinterpreted some things which also have to do with how I post when I'm in a bad mood. I'm sorry, it's a female-thing..