Just because you can doesn't mean you should
VOTE: ircher
In post 26, camn wrote:What did I ever do to you?
In post 48, iraonavp wrote:In post 47, Thurhame wrote:Is there a Town benefit to claiming Miller early?
Yes, so cops don't waste time checking me. In general, if someone claims a guilty on someone later and they suddenly claim miller, you know they're probably lying because they didn't claim d1.
In post 103, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:UNVOTE: camn
VOTE: duppin
duppin needs to talk more, so vote. This is the most I've seen of them:
In post 59, duppin wrote:I'm not sure I believe the miller claim. I think it's a pretty silly play as scum but on the other hand if you do intend to claim miller you have to do it early on so yeah.
In post 37, Thurhame wrote:Why shouldn't he be?
We're passed the RVS stage. What's your opinion on things such as the Kitty wagon, camn's stance on lurkers, Almost50's wagon-for-wagon's-sake, my opinion of Aristo, or iraonavp's complete abscense?
Weird response to obvious fluff. Honestly most of your posts sound like scum fishing for town credit.
VOTE: Thurthame
I'd like to do this for now.
I don't like the first couple sentences, especially. It says nothing while attempting to appear to have an opinion on something. "I don't believe it but it would be silly as scum but it makes sense if he's telling the truth" makes my head spin. Attempting to have an opinion on something while not actually committing one way or another is a scumtell in my book.
In post 102, SnarkySnowman wrote:
Something I did at the beginning of the game... and then voted Camn
In post 411, Aristophanes wrote:But why?In post 399, GuyFawkes wrote:In post 398, camn wrote:Then you need rope.
not as much as snarky does
(I should iso to see if there's a case from you..)
In post 493, Aristophanes wrote:Not what I'm saying.In post 492, camn wrote:In post 482, Aristophanes wrote:I'm better at late game, so I apologize for being weak so far.
Let me slide until endgame guys! That's a good strategy!
Holy cow, I'm easily manipulated wording-wise. I should work on that.
What I'm saying is that I realize I have been weak, and though there is no excuse for it, I also know that I can sort data a lot better after more is present.
Yes, this can be said for most people, but it is something I need work on. That's all.
I'm far too meta this game and that's getting me scumread.
But I'm not asking for a free pass.
In post 539, The Archmage Ludicrous wrote:Not lynching Katsuki here is a mistake.
"Seriously" claiming as an SK is too much bullshit to deal with.
In post 713, Thurhame wrote:He's dead, he can't talk
In post 0, RadiantCowbells wrote:
Rules in the studio:
-------
3) Lynches will occur when one player has received the majority of votes. You may post during the twilight period between the hammer and the closing of the thread.
In post 818, Aristophanes wrote:That would have blown everyone's plans!
I had a guilty on you, and Innos on Thur and Iroan!
I only targeted you because of the quickhammer!
Would have had Guy with his fakeclaim too!
We literally had this game if not for this quickhammer
I played a PR well for once, evading NKs, not being outed D1 or 2, and having it solved in Lylo. For once I played well!
And I got quicklynched
Had a fun game tho!