In post 1151, Nosferatu wrote:this is stagnant.
You're stagnant.
Anybody wanna humor me with the short version of this game?
In post 1151, Nosferatu wrote:this is stagnant.
In post 1163, Maxous wrote:In post 1162, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Gotcha. So if Huntress comes in and says the same?
well that would depend on wheter or not Huntress DOES say the same, for her defence.
Lowell wrote:Lot of new people. Oof, it's like starting over. I'll get to this hopefully later today.
In post 1272, Froot Loop wrote:I posted a bit about what I thought about Max yesterday.
Lowell - some people asked you questions yesterday but you haven't answered.
In post 1286, Maxous wrote:I would still say huntress is scummy, she seemed pretty content to let the mislynch go through without getting her hands dirty so to speak.
In post 1286, Maxous wrote:I've mentioned 3-4 times that the scum-read on huntress is not a lurker lynch
it's because of her struggle and unwillingness to give and explain reads.
In post 1309, Froot Loop wrote:I get this but it's a bit hypothetical to influence anything.
In post 1321, a plain farmer wrote:@Johnny: When you complained about Froot, Titus, Fack, and Max in 1292, was any of what you pointed out alignment indicative, or were you just annoyed by them?
In post 1328, Froot Loop wrote:@Johnny - what do you mean by 'lost'? I understand that Max is saying scum can have difficulty with reads because they're basically all made up. You don't agree with this?
In post 1345, Froot Loop wrote:@JF - I get that and I also get why that post was annoying, it's a bit nothing. But why did you mention one specific post when I'd posted two afterwards and you didn't mention them?
In post 1344, Roshar wrote:I actually think this is a pretty decent explanation to why he voted Lowell.
In post 1344, Roshar wrote:In post 1293, Maxous wrote:In post 1292, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I saw you respond once to the idea when I posited it here, but that was hardly a defense from the accusation.
Don't worry about it.
I was tired and being a bit snippy.
Maybe I wasn't clear before but I think it's scummy because she has struggled to come up with content to give. I don't think it's case where she's just lurking, I think suspect shecan'tcome up with much which would indicate a scum struggling with the game.
i'll vote lowell though because i'm really not inclined to just ignore the nos night-kill.
People will argue WIFOM but nos was not an obvious kill nor a universal strong town-read so i'm inclined to think there was a particular reason for it.
Not like Lowell has been a shining beacon of town play regardless
vote: lowell
I actually think this is a pretty decent explanation to why he voted Lowell.There was no reason for Nos to be NK'd tbh(unless I missed a crumb) and while Max and I clearly disagree on if this implicates Lowell or not, I can see how someone can reach that conclusion.
Titus, you then posted this:
In post 1318, Titus wrote:@Maxous, I don't see how.
Why are you voting Lowell out if wifom and not Huntress who you have a scumread on based on play?
For someone who was avidly trying to sort Max, how did you miss this:
In post 1286, Maxous wrote:I would say the nosferatu kill would implicate Lowell the most to be honest.
He was the only person nos was really against.
^
This was a pretty poor vote anyway.
sheeping titus and "taking blame" for a mislynch he didn't actually hard-push sounds off.
In post 1380, Titus wrote:In post 1379, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Mixed alignment neighbors always catches me by surprise, but lemme think. Scum neighbor claims, nothing happens. Town neighbor claims, dies. Good???
And why would a town neighbor necessarily die given the natural suspicion that would fall on a slot that claimed neighbor given Nos's flip?
In post 1383, Froot Loop wrote:But what did you think about the other posts? It just seems strange - my initial post annoyed you for lack of content, then I posted more content so I would guess that you would be a bit appeased, therefore there'd be no need to say anything at all.
In post 1390, Roshar wrote:and omg, not buddying &63&*@Q#^( before lowell jumps on that
In post 1392, Froot Loop wrote:Sorry for double posting.
In post 1412, Lowell wrote:In post 1395, FA_Q2 wrote:Not very keen on Lowells push on Rosh for asking him about his stance on clumsy. It feels like he is misrepresenting rosh and it is a rather weak reason. It does not help that he makes the proclamation rosh is scum and then does not continue to engage with rosh after he responds. Rather, he posts that he would have killed Nos if he were scum. Why go there and ignore Rosh's push back?
In post 1354, Lowell wrote:No but seriously if I were scum I definitely would have killed Nos. So yeah she's right about that.
But anyway, I'm not, and didn't, and actually the fact that she thought about this in this way says more about her scumminess than mine.
Why?
Why you 'definitely would have killed Nos?' This statement really does not make sense.
VOTE: lowell
Eh, what can I say. I was feeling truthful at the moment.
Still, try to see through the awkwardness of it and to my obvtowniness. I know this is asking a lot. Be strong here.
In post 1543, Titus wrote:In post 1542, JohnnyFarrar wrote:I don't actually have a vote in mind, otherwise I'd be pushing it. The people who I probably won't vote are Titus, Froot, Gar, and Lowell. Anyone else is porbably worth voting at some point, but I dontnhave any really clear reads atm
*squints at reads list, looks at D1* Why on everyone?
Roshar wrote:@Johnny, why do you think Garmr is town?
Lotta not explaining shit in this post, but the try hard point just made your case look like a name-calling wet fast.In post 1555, Lowell wrote:Had to ISO myself to remember what's going on.
VOTE: rosh I don't remember if there's a reason this never gained steam. But look, she's a try-hard, trying hard to look like she's participating.
Slight scumlean on titus as well. Townreads on johnny and huntress. And also I'm sure there's other players.
Oh. Gar was covered, I trust you to do better as scum to end the day when the main wagon is on town, and Froot is presenting neat and new ideas without ignoring people. I can't imagine her working with anyone else rnIn post 1557, Titus wrote:I was asking why on all of those while Roshar asked just on Garmr.