Mini 158 - Amnesia Mafia - Game Over

Foolster41 · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Fri Feb 11, 2005 9:35 am

Hi all. Great to se eths game is finnaly going. I'm going to randomly

vote: Uraj45

Foolster41 · Post Post #23 (isolation #1) » Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:42 am

Yes, in most cases no lynch is a bad idea. But it is also true that lynching no one would be better than lynching a townie, which we have about 75-83.33% odds of doing (Asuming 2 maf and possibly 1 SK which is about standard for 12 player game) Of course now is definitly not the time to descide that. A no lynch is a definite last resort at the last posible moment of the deadline when we still have no clues at all.

Right now the only thing I see as suspicious is DMI's 3 vote. So I suggest lacking any other cluers we see what me might tell us about his whereabouts last night.

Unvote vote: DMI

Foolster41 · Post Post #35 (isolation #2) » Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:47 am

Dmi wrote:Fine. I didn't vote for him randomly. I got a guilty result on him. Happy?

Hmm. I'll accept that as a role claim for now I guess.

unvote: dmi

though

FOS: DMI, Subtletactics

mr_gnome_it_all wrote:No. Since there was already two votes for him you should have just waited rather than suspiciously adding a third vote, especially in a game like this where the doc doesn't know who he is and protecting someone would mean tying up most (if not all) of the night choices of players who still know nothing about themselves.

I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean, what does this have to do with docs? could you clearify please.[/b]

Foolster41 · Post Post #54 (isolation #3) » Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:10 am

It looks like though not the worst possible result (one or two usefull townies dying) not very good either.

Jaguar and Leonidas: Why specificly did you vote for Electra/Subtle? It's always helpfull when you give a reason, rather than placing a vote that no one else eactly understands.

I'm not sure about the guilt of subtle tactix, what he says about day one I think make sense sense as he said. he didn't jump on the quailman wagon.

Right now the most suspicous to me is Leodidas who put the 2nd last vote on Quailman.

Also I hope that Dragon Phenoix's actions yesterday shows that lynch jumping is NOT appreciated or tollerated by the towm. and will only earn a night death or a good chance of being lynched the next.

Foolster41 · Post Post #55 (isolation #4) » Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:11 am

Oh yeah, and

vote: Leonidas

for being the 2nd to last vote on quailman.

Foolster41 · Post Post #59 (isolation #5) » Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:40 am

FOS: Foolster 41
I did not like your attitude yesterday, and I don't like it now.
What did I do? I'm sorry if I did something that offended you.

I have my reasons and they are better than DMI's. I am thinking that there are several naive, paranoid, etc cops out there, but I know what I am not!

I'm sorry, I didn't mean it to sound like you were out of your mind ot vote for electra or anything like that, I was simply wondering if there was any information you would like to share with the town. I asumed you had a reason, and if you do, you've either notied something in the posts or have some abillity.

With 2 paanoid/nieve type charecters gone, there probibly arn't any left, though Like I always say about outguessing the mod...

Foolster41 · Post Post #60 (isolation #6) » Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:41 am

FOS: Foolster 41
I did not like your attitude yesterday, and I don't like it now.
What did I do? I'm sorry if I did something that offended you.

I have my reasons and they are better than DMI's. I am thinking that there are several naive, paranoid, etc cops out there, but I know what I am not!

I'm sorry, I didn't mean it to sound like you were out of your mind ot vote for electra or anything like that, I was simply wondering if there was any information you would like to share with the town. I asumed you had a reason, and if you do, you've either notied something in the posts or have some abillity.

With 2 paanoid/nieve type charecters gone, there probibly arn't any left, though Like I always say about outguessing the mod...

Foolster41 · Post Post #61 (isolation #7) » Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:43 am

Bah. Sorry.
Also

fos: Uraji45

for being the 3rd last on quailman, which is also to a lesser extent supicous.

Foolster41 · Post Post #62 (isolation #8) » Wed Feb 23, 2005 10:58 am

I forgot to also add that I would be very interested in what Subtle has to say.

Foolster41 · Post Post #68 (isolation #9) » Thu Feb 24, 2005 2:52 pm

You cite my "additude" again draco, but you havn't yet told me what I said wrong.
again, I didn't mean to sound pushy or anything but I was curious if jag had any information he was willing to share.

You also realize that any information gathered last night is useless since they may have been targeed by one of the falsifyers, thus always getting a bad result, right?

I'm hesitent do follow leo on a lynch since he was in a supicious posistion in the last lynching of a townie (2nd last).

Leo: I asume you italisized self proclaimed non-paranoid cop to imphisisze that jag's non paranoid. I would like to know exactly how jag can be so sure she's not paranoid or didn't get a falsified result last night.

because of his jumpyness and following on lynches with only hearsay Lepnidis looks the most like scum to me.

FOS: Leonidis

Foolster41 · Post Post #71 (isolation #10) » Fri Feb 25, 2005 10:34 am

Draco: Only 3 posts in a row really. the 2nd was a accidental double post. I admit I'm forgetfull, It just a happens that thoughts pop back in to my head just after I hit the "post" button. I'm afraid I don't how this could have anything to do with a bad attitude though.

Leo: Just before you seem to be strongly following jaguar and now with a little suggestion that she might be insane or mislead from another role you start questioning her?

I''m not getting a really strong guilty vibe from electra, I think the best move at this point might be preasureing Subtle for his information.

unvote vote: Subtletactix

Foolster41 · Post Post #85 (isolation #11) » Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:07 pm

*Mod prods Foolster41* Ouch! I guess I'm supposed to say something.

It looks like we have just one mafia left amongst the five of us.
Jaguar is obvously cleared I think since she was right about Electra.

Out of the remaining three (Uraji, Gnome and dranko) only Uraji seems slightly more supiscous because of the 3rd last vote on quailman back on day 1. of course, Gnome hasn't said much this game (Post #75) so, I'm not sure about him.

So what do we do at this point? Push someone for a claim of some sort?

Foolster41 · Post Post #90 (isolation #12) » Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:52 am

So, pushing dranko for info sounds good to me personaly. I geuss I can wait though to hear what gnome has to say before I cast my vote since it's only 3 to lynch.

Dranko - As it's been said before I beleive numerous times, any information on who you've been targeting for night actions and any results you received if any would be a role claim.

Foolster41 · Post Post #94 (isolation #13) » Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:31 pm

I targeted:
1-Fuldu, cop, killed night 1
2-Dmi, mudslinger, killed night 2
3-Electra, mafia, killed night 3
and since all three died the same way, i was pretty sure I'm a vig.

Well, obvously neither 1 of us are cops.
possiblities:
1-Dranko's a role blocker, i'm a vig. (did any of the 3 you target get na action?)
2-I'm a role blocker, drano's a vig and someone else killed fuldu (someone else target fuldu N1?)
3-Drankop's lying. Not sure about the likelyness of this one. He could have chosen two names from the dead and a 3rd who didn't die for "realism" though that sounds far fetched to me.

Jaguar:

What did you mean "Mafia wouldn't target their own?" You know mafia targeted dranko? Sorry if I'm missing somehting obvous, too lazy to go through last 3 pages again.

Mod: Could you please prod gnome? i'm stull very curious about any insights he might have.

Foolster41 · Post Post #99 (isolation #14) » Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:59 pm

Jaguar - so, I'm less belevible as a vig because I killed all of my targets?

[qupote="jaguar"]Additionally, give me reasons why, once you realized your targets died, you still submitted a name for nights 2 and 3. I can understand the night 3 target, but explain to me why you each targeted Dmi and DP on night 2. [/quote]

Perhaps you forgot but DMI on night 2

quickkilled a townie before we could get info

. This was to me scummy enough an action to target him. Also with one kill, ther was no way I could be 100% sure it wasn't a co-incidence and as I said,
DMI Looked very much like scum.

Having two vigs is very unlikely. So i'll

vote: dranko20

now. From past actions, as I explained before you shouid see that Dranko has been leading

Foolster41 · Post Post #101 (isolation #15) » Mon Mar 14, 2005 1:21 pm

Sorry about that. hit the post button while I was stuill composing. I started to say something about dranko, but realized that i was thinking about someone else.

still, I find it hard to beleive dranko's also a vig, and that "attitude" comment before without explaining what he ment and after I apologized for what he might have misunderstood as attidude left a bad impression on me, felt liek he was just parroting leodonis for no real reason.

Here are the claimed kills for both of us:
Dranko20 Foolster41
N1: Qualman - Miss Fuldu - Stabbed & Shot (?)
N2: DP - Shot DMI - stabbed
N3: Electra - Stabbed Electra - stabbed

I beleive following this pattern, it looks like all of my targets were all stabbed (plus any addiontal attacks). But electra seems out of place in dranko's colomn. I beleive that Dranko is lying, he's taking credit for the electra kill to look like a vig. but I think the pattern shows that he targeted leodonis, the cop instead.

fos: dranko20

Foolster41 · Post Post #102 (isolation #16) » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:10 pm

helloooooo? Anyone there? It ahs been 2 days wihtout posting! Please post soon! I want to know what you think of the evidence against dranko.

Mod could you prod everybody else perhasp they all are suffering from amnesia.

Foolster41 · Post Post #109 (isolation #17) » Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:14 pm

Jag: Wasn't planning on targeting anyone tonight anyways.

We're doing better here on post frequencey but is there anything left to do since dranko's already claimed what looks like a bogus claim? It seems Dranko's alreayd dead at this point and any hesitation is only holding back the game. Of course if you have anything important to say, you should say it now before night falls.

Foolster41 · Post Post #116 (isolation #18) » Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:25 pm

Hi, I'm waiting on what Uraj has to say.

Foolster41 · Post Post #123 (isolation #19) » Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:33 pm

Why does this mean I'm maf? A SK still living with 2 townies would still cause the game to not end. I know for a fact that I am a vig, but even so I find it VERY hard to beleive that there are 3 Maf+SK in a game. You said your self, you are a SK and so you should die either way.

I simply don't see how there's anything more to say. To me the only risk is SOMEHOW gnome is scum and in that case no matter if we lynch either at this point the town looses.

vote: uraji

Foolster41 · Post Post #132 (isolation #20) » Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:22 pm

Wow, this was an interesting game.
I was going to vote for going to night with no kills, as a way of proving my innocence since maf would have to be insane at that point to do that.

The mudslinger and gossiper surprisedme, though the town was pretty lucky to get rd of them as early as we did.

Good game all,
Good game, yggd...