Mini 1150 - There Goes the Neighborhood - Game Over
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Nachomamma8 (20) - I have a few questions about your claim. 1.) Why do you think you have a better chance winning with town than with scum? 2.) How do you have more of an interest in killing the scum than town? 3.) If we did keep you alive, why do you say at least until the day before LyLo? I'll give my opinion on the claim once these questions have been answered.
Did you have an issue with his self vote?AurorusVox (21) wrote:Seacore, do you often self-vote in RVS?
@Twistedspoon & Packbat - Why no comment on Nacho's claim?
What sort of behavior prior to LyLo do you think would indicate that he was planning to switch sides? Personally, I can't really think of anything.Doombunny9 (42) wrote:I see what you mean now.I was thinking that if it looked like we were reaching a endgame situation but before we were there, we could get him vigged if it looked as if he might "switch sides"(This is all assuming we have a living vig at that point) but as Sea stated, this all doesn't matter too much until we get to that point so there's no use trying to plan out so far in advance.
Why did you add the bolded portion to this post? The bolded basically lessens the amount of pressure put on Kryptinen and gives you room to backpedal if necessary.Seacore (45) wrote:At this point I'm going to throw my vote at Krypt, as he's officially done the scummiest thing I've seen so far in this game.Is it obv scum? No, but it's page 2 and I'd like to start voting based on suspicion.
Why the unvote? Also, why not vote Kryptinen here? Your previous vote had been what looks like a bandwagon vote: the third vote on the Seacore bandwagon and if you had switched your vote to Kryptinen, it would've been, at the time, the third vote on a bandwagon which actually had serious reasoning behind it.Doombunny9 wrote:
I have to admit I just realized that and loled.Sea wrote:I think it's definitely the person who started the wagon, ie, the second vote. We should definitely lynch that guy.
Unvote
I'd like to see Krypt answer Sea's questions.
AurorusVox, you questioned kryptinen and later voted her for unvoting but not revoting somewhere else. Doombunny9 did the same thing. Any particular reason why you didn't acknowledgehisunvote?
kryptinen (52) - Have you ever done this before? If so, can you link me to a game where you did this as town. Have you ever done this as scum?
Personally, I'm not at all convinced by the points against kryptinen. I'm guilty of similar behavior in some of my very first games: asking stupid questions with obvious answers or no answers in attempt to create discussion. I think kryptinen seems townish: there's not much scum motivation for asking those questions, but lots of town motivation.
Jedo the Jedi (60) - I don't really find this post scummy, because I don't think scum are likely to do something which they believe will appear suspicious. But I do have two questions for Jedo the Jedi. 1.) Did you suspect anybody at the time of this post? 2.) Why didyouthink people would vote you for this?
I realize I haven't given a lot of suspects, but I intend to post a scumlist once I'm finished catching up. However, I'll also want to see answers to these questions."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
@Doombunny9 (70) - Did you find Jedo's original vote for kryptinen in post 60 to be suspicious? If so, why no mention of it in this post?
If I interprated this correctly, you are saying you suspect Twistedspoon. Why? And is this because you think he's connected to kryptinen or do you think they are independently scummy?Jedo the Jedi (72) wrote:@ Spoon: This is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. It's a legitimate philosophy because people like you chime in and totally misconstrue the purpose. It's the reactions of course.I didn't say I would ride this to a lynch, but if I do and she turns out scummy, I can look straight at you for the next suspect.Those type of strong reactions really come in handy later.
Just to be clear, what do you think is kryptinen's motivation as scum to lie about knowing you were the second person to vote you?Seacore (73) wrote:Your original question to me did not look, at all, like you knew I was the 2nd vote. Was it a trap? Did you think I didn't know I was the 2nd person voting for me? You suggested that you thought I might 'panic'?
@Glass (75 & 77) - Why did you ignore Jedo the Jedi's response to your accusation? Did you still suspect him at the time? If not, why did you keep your vote on him?
I'm confused. If somebody had said that Seacore was the second vote on his bandwagon before Seacore answered your question, then how would they be defending Seacore?kryptinen (81) wrote:Yes, the question was a trap. If you had not answered it, someone had most likely jumped in and told me you were the second vote. It's nice to see who jumps in on whose defense. This is such a small thing anyone could have done it, and so even a scumbuddy would have been brave enough to do it.
@Jedo the Jedi (83) - When exactlly were you going to switch your vote? You seemed to have a suspect at this point. What was the discussion missing? Also, what was the point of this comment:
?Jedo the Jedi wrote:
He must not know you are town then, which means there's a possibility you are scum.kryptinen wrote:If he knew I was town he would not be pushing this wagon so hard, or otherwise he's be in trouble after the flip.
Jedo the Jedi said it was simply a bandwagon vote in post 60. Why not acknowledge that until now?Doombunny9 wrote:
Everyone have a good long look at this. How much more obvscum can you get rather than just admitting it? I don't see ANY pro-town reason for wagoning just for the sake of wagoning outside of the RVS, especially since you stated that you didn't think Krypt was scum.Jedo wrote:Oh yeah. I don't want to start the unraveling of a perfectly decent wagon.
Unvote, Vote: Jedo
AurorusVox, what is your opinion of Glass?
AurorusVox (98) - kryptinen asked him for his thoughts on Jedo the Jedi and Nobody Special. In this post, AurorusVox accuses kryptinen for asking this, but then proceeds to give his thoughts on both players and ends up suspecting both of them anyway. Looks like he's trying to have his cake and eat it too."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Quaroath (106) - If NS was your top suspect at the time of this post, then why did you have your vote on Jedo the Jedi instead?"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
@AurorusVox (114) - I'm curious what you think. Do you feel any pressure from a random vote? If not, how do you think random votes generate discussion?
What about AurorusVox? Do you not think that he tunneled?@Nachomamma (140) wrote:Kryptinen is town, andSeacore needs to take off his tunneling glasses.
Sorry this is taking me so long. Hopefully I'm finished catching up by tonight."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
1: What exactly is giving you the impression that Nobody Special knew his vote was L-1? I'm not seeing it.Setael wrote:[1: So not only did he evidently KNOW he was putting her at L-1,] he didn't think it was necessary to state that was the case. As if this weren't bad enough, his reason for voting DoomBunny is so bad, [2: it's like he's screaming "Don't look at me! Look at someone else! DoomBunny, look at DoomBunny!"]
2: If this was the motivation behind his Doombunny vote, then why did he choose to go after Doombunny and not somebody else that was already getting attention?
By the time of his post, TS had expressed suspicion of Jedo the Jedi and Nobody Special and mentioned that he didn't feel strongly about the kryptinen case. Who else did you want him to comment on? I find it odd that you get scum vibes from Twistedspoon for this reason despite AurorusVox having given less reads. What's even worse is that two paragraphs later,Setael wrote:Scum vibes from TS' post 104. He asks AV if he's happy with his Kryp vote and what he thinks of the other 2 wagons when I definitely can't tell you what TS thinks of anyone except maybe NS.youask AurorusVox for his thoughts on others here:
If you asked AurorusVox for giving more thoughts on the game, then why is Twistedspoon suspicious for doing the same? Looks likeSetael wrote:By post 118, it's clear that AV is hardcore tunneling on Krypt and saying nothing about everything else that's going on. AV, your thoughts on anything else?youare trying to both have your cake and eat it.
Which of these four players do you think are connected to each other?
@Jedo the Jedi (164) - I would suggest not talking about ongoing games. It is a rule:LynchMePls wrote:A4) You may not discuss other games still in progress in the game thread.
This stance on Jedo the Jedi doesn't seem as strong as before. Did he manage to change your mind at all?Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm still getting a fairly strong scumread from Jedi, but I can't in good consciousness let Powerlurker coast through this >.>"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
If these are your two top suspects, then why are you voting Nachomamma8?Powerrox93 wrote:@krypt:
Nobody Special
In ISO 3 and 4, he's doing a pretty huge overreaction deal about that he didn't announce that his vote in ISO 2 put Krypt a L-1
Twistedspoon
His behavior seems a bit to... how should I say it... random in order to be town behavior."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Okay, I've now gotten to the part where I replace in. Here are my responses to the responses of my questions...
Noted. At the time I asked the question, I hadn't seen this post.AurorusVox wrote:@Wicked
RE: Doom doing the same as Kryp, I've already covered ^^"AurorusVox wrote:Doom is also guilty of this, but his post at least indicated a reason along with it - that he's waiting for a response. Kryp has now had her response, but still no vote. Her continued questions indicate (to me at least) that she's not satisfied with the answers she's had so far, so I can't see what harm adding a vote to the pressure of her questions would do.
If Seacore was scum, how likely do you think it is for him to have done one of these things? And what do you mean by "wriggling out of the accusation" ?AurorusVox wrote:RE: Seacore's self vote - I'm undecided on the validity of self-voting (and other casual RVS behaviour) as a scumtell. My instinct bristles against it; but when I actually consider what a self vote is and what it does, it spirals into a WIFOM balancing act of purposefully bringing attention to oneself, negating a voting trail or early connections, and simply being cavalier. That's why I asked the question, to see what response he gave. I don't think his joking response was particularly scummy(like if he'd tried to wriggle out of the accusation/changed his vote immediately for exa)mple
Noted. What were you hoping to acheive with your kryptinen vote? ISeacore wrote:That I don't use that much guile[1] in my play. This is partly because of playstyle choice, and partly because most of my play time is at work, where I'm working on four or five other things and I read recent posts and then post quickly. Thus I state what I mean. I didn't feel that what I said took away much pressure. I stated that it was the scummiest thing I had seen so far and would be pursuing it. Was my post just as good, or better without the bit you bolded? Maybe? But I don't think long on most of my posts, particularly my early ones. I type and submit.dothink your post would have been better without the bolded portion. But my main reason for pointing out that post is because I think it is something scum would be more likely to say: I don't think saying that benefits town at all, but can give you room to backpedal.
I think most of the people in this game are unfamiliar with survivors. Why didn't you say this or at least acknowledge the claim?Packbat wrote:Survivor claims are a matter outside my experience - I'm probably going to treat it similarly to a miller claim and evaluate him on his play, but I have no useful analysis to contribute on the matter.
I understand this, but you still don't seem to answer my question. You said this:Doombunny9 wrote:Let me clarify. It's not a question of *if* he's going to switch sides but *when*. During a lylo situation, Nacho is going to want to quicklynch the first person he can (unless its him) which is why of we're nearing a lylo/mylo situation, we're going to have to vig him (Or if we don't have one, lynch him).
You say here that we could get him viggedDoombunny9 wrote:I see what you mean now. I was thinking that if it looked like we were reaching a endgame situation but before we were there,we could get him vigged(This is all assuming we have a living vig at that point) but as Sea stated, this all doesn't matter too much until we get to that point so there's no use trying to plan out so far in advance.if it looked as if he might "switch sides"ifit looked as if he might "switch sides". What could Nachomamma8 say or do to make it look as if he might "switch sides" ? Am I missing something?
Makes sense, but I have a follow-up question: do you think there was any good reason not to vote kryptinen at this stage?Doombunny9 wrote:I was on Sea for RVS. When it was clear that we were moving out of RVS, there was no reason to keep my vote on anymore and to switch it as quickly as possible. Krypt was beginning to look scummy at that point but I wanted to give her a chance to explain herself before I was sure."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
You didn't realize that Jedo the Jedi was bandwagoning just for the sake of bandwagoning even when he said he thought kryptinen was town:Doombunny9 wrote:I didn't find his vote to be suspicious at first. At first, it just looked like Jedo was bandwagoning to ensure that we keep discussion going and that we didn't stop which was ok at first. It was only when he confirmed that he was just bandwagoning for the sake of bandwagoning that I began to find him scummy.
?Jedo the Jedi wrote:Meh.I don't see the scumminess of kryptinen. I actually understand where she's coming from, and I applaud the effort to get town discussing. This day is starting off slowly!
Anyway, my day 1 philosophy is to get a bandwagon going until we really have some heated discussion (or the person has a scum tell), so I'll move my vote over to keep the steam going.unvote, vote: kryptinen
[rant]If you want to vote me for doing this, fine, but don't type some bullshit about it being a scum tell. Bandwagoning day 1 is a legitimate philosophy, and I won't have you calling me scummy just because you disagree.[/rant]
Okay. That makes sense.AurorusVox wrote:As for my having/eating cake, admittedly I did need to give reads on other players at that time, but the reason I called Kryptinen out on it was because she hadn't answered my questions of her to a satisfactory degree yet, and was trying to shoo me off elsewhere before in an attempt to get me off her back, which I didn't like, especially considering she called deflection a scumtell earlier. Since she'd asked, I wasn't going to outright ignore her, but I wasn't going to drop my line of questioning either.
In that case, why did you switch your vote to Powerrox93?Quaroath wrote:One scum is as good as another? Honestly I didn't think of moving it. I didn't want Jedo to go "pheew, the pressure is off me and i'm out of any spotlight for being scummy, and saying that I'm not scum because I said I'm doing something scummy.
1.) Theoretically if you did decide to win with scum: Why would you have to play like this to win with scum? Also, why do you think this strategy is better than other strategies?Nachomamma8 wrote:1) Well, if I were to try to win with scum, it would mean that I would have to lurk pretty heavily. If I were to do that much, there would be a good chance I'd be vigged/NK'ed for reading like a PR. This way, I can play normally and not get NK'ed for it, and the vig won't kill me as long as I'm helping the town.
2) I have a much bigger interest in killing scum than town because if we get to the day before LyLo, I die and lose.
3) Letting me die the day before LyLo makes sure that the town isn't screwed over by having a survivor in LyLo, but gives me enough time to lynch all of the scum.
2.) No, this is wrong. You haveat mostjust as much interest in killing scum as town does. I don't see how you could possibly try to argue otherwise. Town's win condition is to get rid of all scum. They don't have any alternative/additional objective like you do.
4.) Which side do you think wins most often? Town or scum?
I find your survivor claim suspicious now that you've acknowledged that you'll die the day before LyLo. It would require townat most2 lynches to reach the day before LyLo. In every single mini game I've played, with the exception of two games that each had very overpowered towns, the town has mislynched at leastthreetimes. You've been on the site long enough. Are you honestly expecting to win this way?"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Not even here:Jedo the Jedi wrote:If I ever felt like kryptinen was town, I would move my vote. That never happened, and it still hasn’t.
?Jedo the Jedi wrote:Meh. I don't see the scumminess of kryptinen. I actually understand where she's coming from, and I applaud the effort to get town discussing. This day is starting off slowly!
Anyway, my day 1 philosophy is to get a bandwagon going until we really have some heated discussion (or the person has a scum tell), so I'll move my vote over to keep the steam going.unvote, vote: kryptinen
[rant]If you want to vote me for doing this, fine, but don't type some bullshit about it being a scum tell. Bandwagoning day 1 is a legitimate philosophy, and I won't have you calling me scummy just because you disagree.[/rant]"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Forgot about this:
Well, I do have access to Nobody Special's quicktopics, but I'm not one of Nachomamma8's neighbors. Having said that, AurorusVox knew about Nachomamma8's role (if I interprated his messages correctly) so Twistedspoon must have told him.Packbat wrote:Wickedestjr, if you have access to the same neighbor thread Nobody Special had, can you tell us if Nachomamma8 claimed to you?"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
TL;DR
My scumlist (in order from scummiest to least scummy) is listed below:
Glass
Quaroath
Powerrox93
Packbat
Setael
Doombunny9
Nachomamma8
AurorusVox
Seacore
kryptinen
Twistedspoon
Jedo the Jedi
LynchMePls
Wickedestjr
Note: I had a hard time putting Nacho, Doombunny, and Setael in order. I suspect them each roughly the same amount."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
I still don't quite understand this. What gives you the impression that he thought his vote was a reasonable one? Also, ftr, the purpose of this questioning isn't to defend NS, but because I'm trying to get a better idea of your allignment.Setael wrote:Evidently he thought the reason he gave for voting doombunny was a reasonable one, and that it would be enough to avert attention that way.
I'm still not completely caught up yet, but noticed Powerrox's claim. I don't want to lynch him today, as we can learn more about him and, if he's town, others as well if he gets a chance to use his ability.
I don't want to lynch LlamaFluff today despite him replacing my top suspect. Instead, I'm going toVote: Quaroathwho's my next top suspect."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
I thought I had responded to these posts, but it looks like I hadn't.
Yes.Seacore wrote:@ Wicked I can't tell either way from your post, but are you aware that LMP is the mod?
1) Can you give examples of this, please?kryptinen wrote:@Wicked, I don't currently have the time that reading all their ISOs takes, but your reasoning doesn't have too big holes, just two things for now:
1) Doombunnys behavior can be seen as scum trying to redirect attention off of other scum, so I don't think it's a town tell.
2) You describe Twistedspoon's playing as classic acive lurking. Active lurkers don't want to fly under the radar, they want to make people think they are contributing when they are not. Why is this pro-town/why would town want to do that?
2) I don't think Twistedspoon is necessarily trying to appear like he is contributing. The reason for my town read is because his behavior reminds me of similar playstyles I've encountered in the past which came from townies. Also, the scumhunting he has done has felt townish to me.
@Nachomamma8 - If you are trying to hunt scum and are doing well enough, do you not think scum would kill you?"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Can people please move their votes to the Quaroath bandwagon? Just a reminder:- He made a big post in an attempt to appear helpful without actually contributing hardly anything new.
- He has coasted through the game just like Powerrox has.
- His vote for Powerrox...
- -Was piggybacking off of Nachomamma's vote.
-Was because he hadn't contributed much when he hadn't either (he even admitted this).
-Was inconsistent, because he had previously stated he didn't want to switch his vote off of Jedo the Jedi solely because he didn't want to remove the pressure on him. (So why was he able to switch it in this case?)
-Was opportunistic. In addition, he had expressed concern about the kryptinen bandwagon building up so quickly, but had no problem putting Powerrox at L-1 despite that bandwagon building up almost just as rapidly.
- -Was piggybacking off of Nachomamma's vote.
I thought about Powerrox's claim and have decided that I don't think it is the best idea for him to claim his results. I think he should wait until two days before LyLo to claim his results. This way we don't have to risk outing power roles when we don't need to. If he's town, then that's all revealing his results is going to do: out powerrroles. If he's scum hecouldbe a scum watcher (Seacore said he has had one in one of his games and I have also modded a game with a scum watcher), in which case, posting his results won't benefit us, and if he's not a scum watcher, but still scum, then he could easily pick somebody to "watch" that he isn't expecting to be visited and claim that they weren't. This is a scum strategy which could last him another few days and even if he posts an incorrect result, it would require a power role claim to out him as scum.
I don't want him to wait to reveal his results until LyLo, because then if he's town, a scum player could claim that they are a power role and that his results are wrong, get him lynched, and win. I don't want him to wait until the day before LyLo, because that would be the day we lynch Nachomamma8. So, I think he should wait until two days before LyLo and claim all of his results at once.
Thoughts on this?"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Hmm.. I completely forgot about the possibility of scum killing Powerrox. In that case, maybe itisbest for him to claim his results every day. I can't think of a better option.
@kryptinen (regarding Glass) - I'm not sure if you are using the fact that he has given only two opinions as a point against him or not. Regardless of if you are or not, I don't think either of those two opinions help us at all. Both comments involve him giving his opinion on theactionsof two players rather than his opinions on the players. He has never given his opinion on a single player which is very scummy. I don't see how I'm not getting much support with this point. What isyouroverall read of Glass? It wasn't very clear from your post."You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
-
-
Wickedestjr Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: December 27, 2008
- Location: UTC-5
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.