Seacore is clearly making light of it here. The only way I see for this to be interpreted is that either he thinks Krypt was trying to be funny and is posting that he gets the joke, or he doesn't think Krypt was trying to be funny, so he's poking fun at Krypt. There's nothing in this post that indicates Seacore thought either possibility was scummy.Seacore wrote:I think it's definitely the person who started the wagon, ie, the second vote. We should definitely lynch that guy.kryptinen wrote:Unvote. It's time for questions. Seacore, there seems to be wagon forming against you. Why do you think that is? Who do you find more suspicious: the person who started that wagon (the second vote) or the person who officially made it a wagon (the third vote)?
So then AV posts asking Krypt a bunch of questions and only after that does Seacore vote Krypt and post all the reasons he thinks Krypt's post was scummy. I don't like how it went down. If Seacore really thought Krypt's post was scummy, I don't think he'd have posted anything like post 43, and he definitely wouldn't have posted JUST that and not said anything about it being scummy until an hour later. I think he realized it would be more to his benefit to try to paint it into a scum tell and so he reversed his initial reaction which was to just joke about it.
I didn't get a scum vibe from Jedo's post 60 (where he votes Krypt) originally, since it seems unlikely as a scum move, but now that he's defended the post with "too scummy to be scum," I think it was premeditated.
Huge red flag. Jedo hasn't given a reason to be on the wagon and has only said he thinks Krypt ISN'T scummy. There's no way a townie wouldn't unvote here.Jedo wrote:That looks like L-1 from Nobody, so be careful with the hammer.
Jedo's excuse for not unvoting:
So evidently Jedo would have been fine with Krypt being lynched on page 2 (even though he supposedly thinks Krypt is town) as long as someone had good reasoning. This is insane.Jedo wrote:I don't want to start the unraveling of a perfectly decent wagon. Plus, since I stated she is at L-1, there is no excuse for an accidental hammer. Whoever hammers better have good reasoning.
Packbat votes NS for his Krypt vote. I hadn't realized Krypt was L-1 until Jedo pointed it out. I assumed that NS didn't realize it either, since otherwise it doesn't make sense for him to put her at L-1 for such a weak reason and he definitely wouldn't have neglected to mention that he was putting her at L-1. But then NS posts and makes it clear that my assumption was wrong.
So not only did he evidently KNOW he was putting her at L-1, he didn't think it was necessary to state that was the case. As if this weren't bad enough, his reason for voting DoomBunny is so bad, it's like he's screaming "Don't look at me! Look at someone else! DoomBunny, look at DoomBunny!"Nobody Special wrote:Okay, firstly, IT IS NOT MY JOB TO WARN EVERYONE when a vote is at L-1. Pay attention, do something for yourselves for once.
Secondly, thanks Doombunny for calling out Krypt on the "missing things" thing, except, wait -- youdidn't mention my question that she also avoided.Trying to single me out for something?
Thirdly, Krypt, stop avoiding questions.
Fourthly, Doom has now replaced Krypt as scummiest.
unvote
Vote: DoomBunny
Post 99 Seacore dismisses the Jedo case, and says that the only point against him is his Krypt vote. Blatant misrep of the case.
Scum vibes from TS' post 104. He asks AV if he's happy with his Kryp vote and what he thinks of the other 2 wagons when I definitely can't tell you what TS thinks of anyone except maybe NS.
NS follows Seacore's glowing example in post 110, misrepping his case as solely being about his not announcing the L-1 when this is clearly not true.
By post 118, it's clear that AV is hardcore tunneling on Krypt and saying nothing about everything else that's going on. AV, your thoughts on
This statement struck me as odd. He's clearly talking about his play in general, saying that once he random votes, he doesn't move it without good reason, but that excuse doesn't work in this game at all since his Krypt vote wasn't random.Jedo wrote:I put my vote down randomly, but I don't move it at the slightest whim or defense because I might have accidentally hit scum. krypt didn't give a good enough defense for me to move my vote.
Seriously? You're saying we can't be suspicious of you because you're too scummy to be scum?Jedo wrote:My one remark is that if I saw someone else playing like this, I would think it is so obvscum as to be townie.
Nacho's posts are spot on, except for this:
I don't follow the logic. If you think someone is scum that isn't handling the pressure well, how does it make any sense that you should avoid voting them in order to not put more pressure on them?Nacho wrote:NS: "Tell me why you don't like the RVS but participated anyways!" ~ Terrible question. Terrible L-1 vote. Also, the "slowly" bit is condescending and makes you sound like you're inferring krypt is flailing. So, why put more pressure on someone who's not handling the pressure they've got?
(Also, I'm not sure I understand neutral roles - when Nacho claimed he said he could win with the town. Is that even possible? By claiming he's aligning himself with us knowing he has to die before end game and then he'll just pretend he won? If he's really a neutral, isn't claiming that playing against his wincon?)
THIS.Packbat wrote:Seacore's defense of Jedo is scummier than the swimming pool of a foreclosed house in Florida; SC+JJ explains why SC attacked kryptinen's scrutiny of his wagon, being as that wagon was half scum.
Whoa, there. If you found some things scummy about him, why did you completely dismiss the case in your post 99 and why did you never mention these things you find scummy until now? (And still not say what exactly they are.)Seacore wrote:I have not defended Jedo, there are actually some things I find scummy about him, but the bandwagoning (the only thing I've brought up) is not among them.
This post is all kinds of scummy. Before voting Jedo, he reminds us that he was previously voting Jedo, and then hides behind Nacho's posts as a reason to vote him. The whole thing is just terrible.Twistedspoon wrote:hmm
My vote is on NS right now, but I did previously vote Jedo
Nacho has reminded me that Jedo is a safer bet than NS for scum. I don't really mind which is lynched, but there certainly seems a better case for Jedo now, what with all that wifom and paranoia
VOTE: Jedo
L-2 yes?
The problem with this, once again, is that this is not what you did in this game at all. If this is what you had done in this game, you'd have stayed on NS, as he was your random vote. Instead, you switched from NS to Seacore saying, "We need a wagon." THEN you switched to Krypt. So in this game you DID move from wagon to wagon. You DIDN'T pick a wagon day 1 and ride it. You didn't pick someone and do a "guilty until proven innocent". So the question is, if this is what you always do, why did you not do it to NS, your actual random vote? And why are you trying to convince us you DID do it to Krypt when that wasn't the case?Jedo wrote:I don't move from wagon to wagon. I pick a wagon on day 1 and ride it. It's kind of a "guilty until proven innocent" sort of gig. Not that I join because they are scummy--like I said, it's random--but since it was random, they have as much chance of being scum as any other random choice. Until they over-turn that with good reasoning, town tells, or a claim, I'm not going to let them go.
That's L-1
Packbat
Krypt
DoomBunny
Glass
Jedo
Seacore
NS
TS
Null reads on everyone else.