I too know over half the players and the mod, which means this game sets a new personal record for familiarity.
In fact, since that's the case, the prudent thing to do is to
In post 53, Darox wrote:
I can't tell from glancing who of Elmo or Implosion has a bigger wagon to sheep onto, so I'm just gonna twiddle my thumbs and wait for something interesting.
In post 70, vijay2vasandani wrote:In post 68, BBmolla wrote:In post 60, vijay2vasandani wrote:Elmo, why trust both implosion and BB? Personally I'm reading them as opposite alignments atm.
Explain.
I don't think you guys have different alignments. It's a feel thing.
In post 79, vijay2vasandani wrote:Because I know BB and always think he's town early game for some reason.
Also, the reason I haven't fakeclaimed a PR yet is because I'm trying to see what I can make of the trust tokens. Interesting concept, a bit like Resistance.
And where did I say it's odd if people don't agree with me regarding BB and implosion?
I don't think you guys have different alignments.
In post 103, The Mini-Librarian wrote:
2. You called implosion scum? *checks vijay's iso* Nope, you didn't do that.
vijay wrote:I'm leaning BB town atm. But at about 60-40.
In post 127, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Yes I read Vijay's iso. HE NEVER ACTUALLY CALLED IMPLOSION SCUM. He called them different alignments yes (and then switched his mind)
In post 158, Llamarble wrote:Okay, Hurricane Llama is here.
In post 236, Llamarble wrote:
I also thought [TML's] scumhunting from the next couple of posts looked earnest enough regardless whether it actually makes any sense.
There are several problems with this:Llamarble wrote:HC is fairly scummy. 234 and 275 are both kinda the way scum write stuff.
I did indeed use a Software Activity Detector last night, targeting Llamarble. Llamarble did not use any software Day or Night 1.I used a software activity detector on him today and found out that he used a software activity detector N1.