u expectin me to do dis shit all on my own
ffs
~Nacho
What?In post 7, CryoChemist wrote:Your OMGUS failed, Om.
Your analysis skills are overwhelming!Gorgon wrote:Looks like we have an innocent child then.
I mean I guess any reaction can be good except if it's fundamentally bad.Gorgon wrote:It might not be a groundbreaking revelation but at least it was something to comment on at a very early stage in the game; something that might provoke some sort of reaction, and it did.
This isn't like a "ha, found you scum thing"Gorgon wrote:Anyway, since you seem to have voted me for it I would like to hear how that post of mine is incompatible with town.
We could trade accounts if you want. I mean just consider it.In post 19, chamber2 wrote:I hate my role.
Considering that the only name that comes to mind with Cyro is crypto and Nudist rings up a bell for like two seconds for some faraway person I've played with, I'm doubting both of those claims. At least one of those are false.CyroNudist wrote:-We've played in many many games around here and we still had to look up "Innocent Child". We don't think it's even remotely "self-evident".
How is this scummy at all? This just means he's voting badly.CyroNudist wrote:-Pressure Votes carry 0 merit when you immediately say "I don't think he's Scum" and cave at the 1st sign of resistance calling it a page1 pressure Vote.
Not sure what I think about this but it hurts.Gorgon wrote:All this said, I'm not sure Bulb deserves my vote right now.
Are you fucking serious?Cyro wrote:If you could Quote where we said that you are Scum, we'd be grateful.
Because now he's a target.chamber2 wrote:Why would it be bad?
Are you seriously FoSing him for this? You literally have 0 support for your wagon. While I did agree with the target, the logic was definitely not hand-in-hand.Bulba wrote:Speaking of which... Joel, you join the largest wagon and then vote for a no lynch?! Seriously!?
fffffff--SK wrote:With that in light, FoS: joelsdaman1.
Yes I'm sure AdventureTime Mafia on Adverturetime.v1zerzion.net was a great site (Isn't that what all the crappy forums work on?) for mafia but this is mafiascum.Joelsdaman1 wrote: Plus, I'm not sure why people think I'm a noob...I've played this game for a while, but not on this site.
Could've sworn you were probing for town reads. Oh well.SK wrote:Because that was a pretty scummy response to some very light probing.
Yeah, who the fuck are you?
New fetish, apparently.In post 73, Bulbazak wrote:What is with the rush to end day phases so quickly?
Okay, here's where I actually explain the problem. See, you could easily wiki roles and finally find the Innocent Child with ease (http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... gory:Roles ; Sure you might have to look but wah the answer isn't as easy as you expected)goodmorning wrote: I only know it from offsite, never seen it here before.
What part of noob doesn't scream that FoS is an actual scum tactic to avoid voting, something they need to do anyway?Cryo wrote:Why do you think he went after SK instead of you?
Don't be straggling along now. I have a super duper scum read on you for your lurk tactics.In post 91, chamber2 wrote:This day sure is progressing nicely.
I'm sure a bazillion people pounced on this on the next page but this is just dumbdumb tactic. Surely by now people should realize that joel is a noobzorz.
AHarlequinn, on PlayDiplomacy wrote:(Let's see what sort of things Playdip comes up with!)
...you start double-checking your e-mails to make sure you don't sound like you're plotting against the recipient.
...you try to figure out which of your friends is least likely to have someone save them. Just in case.
...you get defensive and eye your teachers suspiciously if they mention "group roles" and "discussion outside of class."
...you try to convince madmen and serial killers to help you take on the mob.
...you start voting on the presidential candidate you most want to see dead.
Please stop ignoring it, please please.Doctor wrote:This seems scummy to me, joel. It seems like you're resigned to being lynched already. "Meh, just kill me and get it over with!" is how I interpret it.
I'm sure that scum is seriously this oblivious.Om wrote:You're flip-flopping in almost all of your posts. That's not scumhunt.
FFFFFFFFFF---Bulbazak wrote:That being said, I'm not ready to believe that Joel is a VI just yet, mainly because of how willing he is to shift suspicion onto almost anybody else.
So wait a minute.In post 119, joelsdaman1 wrote:I was going to join a newbie game, but I already played a few times and figured I could handle it.
But, yes, this site is fairly different than playdiplomacy.
Probably a misquote--my bad. It happens from time to time. It was about you though so I mean it sort of redeems it (not really...)chamber wrote:Why is it that I can't find this quote anywhere in my iso?
Chamber wrote:That's nice to know, and also incredibly underwhelming.
Literally the worst way you could take it considering I was defending you the entire time but w/e.joelsdaman1 wrote:But I'm not retarded just because I'm new.
Well it's true though.Joelsdaman1 wrote:It was more of a general statement, not an attack.
How do you get Yoda from this quote?PeregrineV wrote:It's not what people say, but how they say it.
As irrelevant as some parts were, there's still a wagon on Joel.PeregrineV wrote:Currently giving a + to Hiraki, because despite wall quotes his comments are relevant.
So here's my big problem with this.Om wrote:Link me your last town and scum flipped game.
Hiraki wrote:so 4 people after this if om and sk are not the scum team
Hiraki, in the same post wrote:chamber, gorgon, DansAdvent, joel, peregrine
Om wrote:Oh, wow! Little quick to jump there. No need to prompt mod to do you some favor. I don't like this.
Bulba wrote:Also I'm unclear on the rules about games. Is it that you can't discuss ongoing games that you're in, or you can't discuss any ongoing games, even if you're not in them? I ask, because Cryo is not in that game, so I'm not sure if it is against the rules or not.
No I wasn't?In post 388, Bulbazak wrote:Also, Hiraki, why did you defend Joel like you did? Everyone else had a clear stance one way or another, but you were wishy washy on the subject.
Hiraki wrote:So that leaves chamber (prob. scum), DansAdvent (hasn't posted enough), Gorgon (null atm),joel (null atm after reading some more. honestly not sure how to tell his alignment. that'd seriously be the only justification for a d1 lynch), peregrine (yeah null)
It's my 3rd party winconSK wrote:Also why are you so obsessed with Cyro's composition?
Just because he flipped scum doesn't make the action inherently bad.SK wrote:Hiraki: Remind me again why you're calling me scum. As far as I can recall, it was for my actions toward your poster townboy joel, who just so happens to have flipped scum.
So this assumes that you thought I was serious, even though I said I was never serious.Bulba wrote:because I thought Cryo was handling the matter well and that it would be out of his system d1.
You're fucking dead.Bulba wrote:and I would like a straight answer from him for once in this game.
Basically, Bulba had used a strawman here--it's obvious. He thinks that the only way Cryo can vote him is if they call him scum
Another example. Bulba gives a crappy answer later that he doesn't realize it's rhetorical but really?In post 60, Bulbazak wrote:In post 38, PeregrineV wrote:
Are you scum?
Do you seriously expect anyone to answer that?
In post 232, Bulbazak wrote:How is voting badly scummy? Scum will make bad votes or votes that they know are not true, but that doesn't mean ALL bad votes are scummy. I've seen many town players make what would be considered bad votes, simply because they believed in what they were saying at the time. I've also seen town players with a bad vote or reason to vote actually hit scum. Bad votes by themselves ARE NOT inherently scummy. This is an example of the HBA fallacy.
Oh--totally am.SK wrote: Again, I want to see what Bulb himself says about all this before I add my piece, but let's just say I think you're loco.
Seemed like a bit of bad offensive toward him. But that was early game and I'm letting that go. Not sure of my read on you now.SK wrote:What exactly did I do, again?
Yes please, I remember when a wagon on someone who said all FoS' are bad must be subjected to the same tells on mafiascum to the highest degree.Konowa wrote:120 is why Hiraki is scum. As I said earlier all of the "GUYZ GUYZ he's noobz" is such a soft defense without actually having to take a stance on his alignment, then repeated "joel wagon is bad" later on D1, again no stance on actual alignment is scum behavior.
no srz guys its ok to vote me if you eventually get offBulba wrote: I just want to get out of RVS so I can get some actual good reads, and if that involves a wagon on me, fine.
So is it really okay?Bulba wrote:Interesting. I walk away for a couple of hours and the wagon builds up to L-2. Chances of lynching scum d1 increasing...
It's a fucking RVS vote. Shit, how did I miss this stuff?Bulba wrote:Why?
Just to note, since I missed this in block of text skimming deluxeGorgon wrote:but I find no real reason to believe that joel is lying about it or misrepresenting what goes on there when he knows that this is in theory easy to check
this is kind of why i wanted/want om to die, we'll go to him next since after re-reading gorgon i am still ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhGorgon wrote:Last town flipped game is easy. In fact I already linked to it, but since you ask, here it is again.
MeanwhileOm wrote:As questionable as his posting is, I'm not really getting scum vibes from Hiraki.
Om wrote:I still haven't heard from you about it. Nor have I read an actual SK case from you.
Om wrote:Oh, wow! Little quick to jump there. No need to prompt mod to do you some favor. I don't like this.
(since when isOm wrote:Which was basically asking for mod-kill.
PeregrineV wrote:Konowa leaning scum because I don't like his Hiraki/GM reads, but I can follow his reasoning, so that's in flux.
>impliedBulb wrote:1.) Om implied several people were scummy without putting any pressure on them or taking a definitive stance on them, something he wrongly criticized Gorgon for earlier in d1. He implied that Gorgon was scummy for not putting Joel at L-1 early in d1. He implied that Morning was scummy for pressuring AA9. He thought that Hiraki was acting scummy, even though he stated that he did not think he was scum, and then followed that up by saying that he could be in a scum team with me, therefore implying I was scum as well. Finally, at the start of his conversation with SK, he implied that she was scummy as well.
This is a illogical statement, not a scummy one.Bulb wrote:2.) Om said that AA9 was town BECAUSE Joel was scum. There are 2 things wrong with this. First, his absolute certainty that Joel was scum. There was no if here. Second, his reason for AA9 being town didn't track, as Morning refuted it immediately. Most everyone else thought that AA9 was scum partners with Joel, including myself, who thought I saw evidence of chainsaw defending in AA9's posts. Konowa is wrong in his assertion that AA9's flip only benefited Morning's argument against Om/Jason, as the flip would have given credence to Om's post calling AA9 town and Joel scum, thus giving him town cred. This is further supported by Jason going out of his way to highlight the fact that AA9 did indeed flip town, again as a way to gain town cred.
Bulb wrote:3.) Om and Jason's votes have been opportunistic. Om was the fourth vote on the Joel wagon for sheeped reasons. Likewise, Jason was the fourth vote on my wagon for a bad reason as well (He voted me because I was asking Hiraki questions.). Jason's vote reads as opportunistic on a growing wagon, much like Om's reads as a bussing attempt on an idiot scum partner.
Yeah. Not really.Jason wrote:Repeat questioning either shows someone isn't reading, or they are trying to get an answer that suits them that they can jump on, at this point i can see bulb doing the latter
This is Om, who I'm seriously not interested in.Bulb wrote:4.) As I've mentioned before, I found Om's exchange with SK horribly scummy bad. Within a few short posts, he misrepped SK in an attempt to make her look scummy, he backpedaled when she pressured him about his reasoning, and finally he deflected the course of questioning by changing the subject when SK continued to apply pressure. It was at this point that my scum read on Om began.
Bulb wrote:5.) This point was not part of my original case, but I feel as I should make it now, since it is both recent and relevant. Jason recently refused to answer one of Konowa's questions. A desire to hamper discussion is a major scum tell for me, and discussion is furthered by questions. Jason's refusal to contribute to discussion just screams scum.
I'd refuse to answer this question as well, so nope.jpgKonowa wrote:Who else is scum?