[Mini 1447] Misaligned Malignant Multi-verse Mafia (abandon)

[The Central Scrutinizer]

As much as I like day 1 quicklynches, I like nacho, so f that noise.

VOTE: FourTrouble

1. Third vote
2. Potato
3. Can't say fuck

Also, Emp, isn't his name spelled "Grylls"?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Also, Emp, isn't his name spelled "Grylls"?

Ha, you fell my trick. TCS is Bear Grylls, Survivor!

I do like drinking my own piss.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Also, Emp, isn't his name spelled "Grylls"?

Ha, you fell my trick. TCS is Bear Grylls, Survivor!

I do like drinking my own piss.

I should point out that my role PM doesn't say Bear Grylls is a survivor. I deduced that myself with my genius.

I'm not a Survivor. Part of the bastardmoddery, I suppose.

I am Bear "Grilles," according to my role PM though. So it seems to me that the only way you could possibly have come to think of that gambit is that you're a Lyncher and I'm the lynchee.

Boring.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

EmpKing -- Yeah, you "caught" me. Good work. I'm claiming Bear "Grilles."

I honestly wouldn't have responded except for the misspelling in the name, which indicated to me that you have some special power. I don't know what you would be other than a lyncher. Maybe you only get a particular power after I'm dead? Is that true?

Your answer is pretty important. Alignment-determinative, I'd say.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

EmpKing -- Yeah, you "caught" me. Good work. I'm claiming Bear "Grilles."

I honestly wouldn't have responded except for the misspelling in the name, which indicated to me that you have some special power. I don't know what you would be other than a lyncher. Maybe you only get a particular power after I'm dead? Is that true?

Your answer is pretty important. Alignment-determinative, I'd say.

Edit to add: If you're a Lyncher; fine, just claim it. I'll probably end up getting lynched at some point anyway since Bear Grylls makes sense as a Survivor role. If you're not I think we ought to know.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Not a lyncher.

I'm satisfied you're town-aligned.

Next question.

UNVOTE: FourTrouble

VOTE: Arc

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Arc, what does the verb "to bus" someone refer to in the context of the game of mafia?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

UNVOTE: Arc

VOTE: FourTrouble

I changed my mind. This wagon is ok.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Aw damn, Empking found me out again. Time to bus Fuduzn I guess.

Nah, I'll stick with the dude who voted third and then hard defended a new player.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I don't know who that is >.<

It's Helen Keller.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Kind of a weird post restriction, considering that Helen Keller was blind and deaf, not mute. But hey, whatever.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Nah, I'll stick with the dude who voted third and then hard defended a new player.

this specifically should've gotten more attention.

I mean, I guess I can NOT give a reason for my votes if you'd prefer that.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

2 is a problem is Whiskers is town, not if he's scum. The first TCS clearly isn't willing to pursue, and flavor inconsistencies aren't really a reason to drop a post restriction that is going well otherwise.

I would have continued to believe the PR, honestly; I get the feeling flavor inconsistencies may be a theme of this game.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I thought misaligned refered to alignments changing?

So your alignment changes when I die?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Buh. This game needs an adrenaline injection or something. It's kinda hard to get any reads I feel great about when most everyone is standing around the water cooler filing their nails.

The empking/TCS thing is twitch inducing though I *feel* like empking might be town. Maybe it's the conviction that he's obvtown because he was invested early on. I don't agree with that, but meh whatever.

@ TCS

Why did you out that you were grills immediately? You know you're playing in a possibly bastard game, one that has personal win conditions in addition to the standard win condition, and the first mention of your role name causes you to out that it's you?

Honestly, because the nature of my role makes me not really care TOO too much about my flavor being outed, and second, because I thought it was odd that EmpKing would misspell the name Bear Grylls just like my Role PM did. I gained at least some information by responding to this.

Also, were you seriously satisfied with empking's answer that he wasn't a lyncher? Do you typically just believe whatever you're told in mafia? No doubts whatsoever?

Well, no, obviously not.

Nah, I'll stick with the dude who voted third and then hard defended a new player.

You're referring to four trouble right? He was actually the fourth vote on nacho, but whatever. How is voting for the first rvs wagon a scum tell? Also, is this really what you're calling "hard defending"? Because this is the only instance of four trouble talking about arc:

Arc obviously has different way of playing but he's trying to figure things out, seems like town.

He also called empking definitely town, who incidentally was the third vote on nacho, is he hard defending him too?

Well, calling lots of players "definitely town" is often a red flag, so it does reinforce my argument that FourTrouble is scum.

I think early mid-wagon votes are often good places for scum; and I think scum buddying new players is a good thing for scum to do.

Are these new concepts?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Gut mostly. TCS looks more like scum of the pair, but Empking feels more like scum. Honestly I could vote either way at the moment.

Translation: "plz someone build a wagon for one of these guys so I can vote without responsibility; I'm not choosy which."

[The Central Scrutinizer]

@TCS, what Avering just said is true, neither of you have the support needed to build a wagon against today. My post was just stating that I find you very nearly equally scummy, but if one of you is scum, the likelyhood that the other is scum goes down greatly in my eyes. In this situation, I'm likely to support either lynching.

Though, the post I'm responding to just makes you look more scummy to me. Instead of asking why you appeared more like scum, which I assumed nacho would anyway, and defending yourself, or trying to defend yourself with an attack of some sort, you try to warp what I said in response to nacho.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER

Thanks for convincing me.

Oh, my post was definitely an attack of some sort.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Buh. This game needs an adrenaline injection or something. It's kinda hard to get any reads I feel great about when most everyone is standing around the water cooler filing their nails.

The empking/TCS thing is twitch inducing though I *feel* like empking might be town. Maybe it's the conviction that he's obvtown because he was invested early on. I don't agree with that, but meh whatever.

@ TCS

Why did you out that you were grills immediately? You know you're playing in a possibly bastard game, one that has personal win conditions in addition to the standard win condition, and the first mention of your role name causes you to out that it's you?

Honestly, because the nature of my role makes me not really care TOO too much about my flavor being outed, and second, because I thought it was odd that EmpKing would misspell the name Bear Grylls just like my Role PM did. I gained at least some information by responding to this.

What information did you gain? The nature of my role would make me not care about my flavor being outed either in the strictest sense. My issue with it is that you know that there are personal win conditions in addition to the primary ones, that there's a very strong likelihood of there being multiple threats to town, and someone misspells your role name just like its misspelled in your role pm and without hesitation you play along. Doesn't make sense to me, not if you're town. It does make sense to me if your scum though, as you can plant that lyncher seed and make people wary of lynching you.

The information I gain pertains to my role... so I'm not really interested in discussing the subject further.

So you think scum wants to put themselves out there like that on day 1, page 1? And you call my reasoning shallow.

Also, were you seriously satisfied with empking's answer that he wasn't a lyncher? Do you typically just believe whatever you're told in mafia? No doubts whatsoever?

Well, no, obviously not.

So, what are you doing to try to figure out his alignment then?

winrar

Nah, I'll stick with the dude who voted third and then hard defended a new player.

You're referring to four trouble right? He was actually the fourth vote on nacho, but whatever. How is voting for the first rvs wagon a scum tell? Also, is this really what you're calling "hard defending"? Because this is the only instance of four trouble talking about arc:

Arc obviously has different way of playing but he's trying to figure things out, seems like town.

He also called empking definitely town, who incidentally was the third vote on nacho, is he hard defending him too?

Well, calling lots of players "definitely town" is often a red flag, so it does reinforce my argument that FourTrouble is scum.

I think early mid-wagon votes are often good places for scum; and I think scum buddying new players is a good thing for scum to do.

Are these new concepts?

Okay, we need to change your name to The Central Hyperbole. He called one player "definitely town" not lots. I also hardly call saying that someone is playing differently but seems like town "buddying". Your mid-wagon wiki tell is lame. It's a crap shoot that hits town as often as scum.

Welcome to day 1 mafia.

There's probably a reason it's on the wiki? Works better than 50% in my experience.

What scum tells do you want me to use this early? Feh.

Your reasoning is shallow.

Why were you afraid of putting nacho at l-2 on page one? Because i find that more suspect than someone putting fourth vote on an rvs wagon. It reads self conscious, coupled as it was with an over justification. And your first post is more what I read as buddying than four trouble saying a new player seems like town.

You caught me. Take me away. I'm a bulletproof miller vig, and Nacho is my mason partner.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Gut mostly. TCS looks more like scum of the pair, but Empking feels more like scum. Honestly I could vote either way at the moment.

Translation: "plz someone build a wagon for one of these guys so I can vote without responsibility; I'm not choosy which."

...you do realize that he was already voting empking at the time, right?

Have been all game, almost got lynched because I backed off a bit because my read wasn't as much scum at that point as it was just suspicious. That has slipped back closer to scum, but after TCS's post earlier, I feel he is more likely at the moment.

Also, @TCS, my problem isn't with the attack, its the method of the attack. Instead of bringing up evidence that I'm either full of shit or scum, you poorly paraphrased me to try to make me look as such. I find that tactic is usually used by scum, as it doesn't really give any information but still can get the job done if people take it as fact.

I pointed out what I perceived to be your actual motivations for making the post. I find that is a valid town way to play the game. I suppose I could do that in the form of a question, and then you people would think I was Thor or something.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Frankly, I

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tammy

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Frankly, I

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tammy

OMGUS does not become you.

Do you make a habit of voting the person who is trying to drive the game forward and Scumhunt on a regular basis? Or are you just MAD.

Curiosity, mainly.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

The information I gain pertains to my role... so I'm not really interested in discussing the subject further.

So you think scum wants to put themselves out there like that on day 1, page 1? And you call my reasoning shallow.

The information that someone knows who you are pertains to your role... If you didn't want to discuss it, you wouldn't have to talk about it so much
And yeah, sure. You think that it would be impossible for scum to put themselves out there...?

No, I guess not; in this game who knows what anyone's motivations could be. So fine. What does it tell you then?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Frankly, I

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tammy

OMGUS does not become you.

Do you make a habit of voting the person who is trying to drive the game forward and Scumhunt on a regular basis? Or are you just MAD.

I have this crazy theory that mafia is basically just a bunch of people playing pin the tail on the donkey, and that "scumhunting" per se doesn't really matter. The trick is just to find out who's full of shit, and I feel like your scumhunting is full of shit right now.

Maybe that will change later, but I can't really promise what you will do will make me do.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Frankly, I

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tammy

OMGUS does not become you.

Do you make a habit of voting the person who is trying to drive the game forward and Scumhunt on a regular basis? Or are you just MAD.

I have this crazy theory that mafia is basically just a bunch of people playing pin the tail on the donkey, and that "scumhunting" per se doesn't really matter. The trick is just to find out who's full of shit, and I feel like your scumhunting is full of shit right now.

Maybe that will change later, but I can't really promise what you will do will make me do.

So, you responded to this post right after I posted this and responded to something else later. Did it really take you nearly 24 hours to come up with this lame ass response? Because if you truly thought I was full of shit, this should have been your response yesterday.

And here's what you get to do now. Why am I full of shit? I've told you why you're full of shit, so now you get to say something that has meaning because mudslinging without anything behind it is shallower than your wiki tell.

My scumhunting isn't even close to being full of shit. It probably matters more to me than anyone else that my scum reads are right this game, and I'm using what little there is here to try to figure you people out. Maybe it's true as nacho said that everyone is being passive until they figure out what's going on with the alignment changes, but I think that's lame and it's lame to let people get away with that.

So, show me your suspicions are genuine and not just made up of you being pouty because I think you're scum.

Do you use that whole timing argument often, or is it just a scum tactic? Cause I'm not going to convince you to unvote me in any game ever if you actually think that's a scumtell.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Votecount 1.12

FuDuzn (4) - FourTrouble, Empking, Zdenek, Whiskers
The Central Scrutinizer (3) - Nachomamma8, Arc, Tammy
Tammy (2) - The Avering, The Central Scrutinizer
Zdenek (1) - Serrapaladin
Arc (1) - FuDuzn
Whiskers (1) - PimHel

Not Voting (0)

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

The Central Scrutinizer is V/LA until 5/15.

---

V/LA for two days. Sorry for not posting sooner, this was unexpected.

If you don't hear from me by Wednesday/Thursday, you may want to replace me.

Thanks,
TCS

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Back early. Thankfully problem was not as severe as I feared at first. Pretty awesome cause now I can mafia and watch TI3 west qualifier.

I think Fuduzn is probably town.

I remain suspicious of Tammy, but I don't think she's worth a D1 lynch.

UNVOTE: Tammy

I was torn between going back to FourTrouble, whose general approach to the game appears scummy, and Whiskers, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Whiskers is a Jester... I don't see any other motivation behind faking a post restriction, admitting it, and then claiming survivor day one.

VOTE: FourTrouble

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I remain suspicious of Tammy, but I don't think she's worth a D1 lynch.

Why are you suspicious of Tammy?

Gut; I think she's trying to hard to look town.

I was torn between going back to FourTrouble, whose general approach to the game appears scummy, and Whiskers, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Whiskers is a Jester... I don't see any other motivation behind faking a post restriction, admitting it, and then claiming survivor day one.

I don't understand any of this. You can't find Whiskers's motivation for the way that he's been playing so far so you attribute it to Jestering? Could be that Whiskers wanted to do a post restriction gambit, didn't like it mid day, and went with a survivor claim because he would get away with it. It could be that he was trying a post restriction so he would not really have to do anything all game, then took it back because he was getting too much heat and real-claimed.

Gambiting and then claiming a role that most people want to lynch day 1 in a Jebus game and you

don't

see a strong possibility that being lynched first or lynched at all is her primary or secondary win con?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

@TCS: You're making me jealous. They fixed the problem with the DotaTV TI3 matches not loading, right? I think that happened right after my laptop messed up.

...Erm, anyway.

After one read-through, I just have general thoughts, and they're basically agreements and echoing to be honest. Better reads tomorrow.

For some reason Tammy makes me suspicious. I can't quite put my finger on it, but I'm far from wanting to lynch her so far.

Fuduzn is definitely a sarcastic town bro who gives no bothers. Giving off a town vibe, but could be a mask.

Whiskers makes me want to bang my head against a wall in play style and in just general presence. (Not because you're a Brony. Let's clarify that now.)

ForT's play style is screaming "say as little as possible or necessary." It just seems like that's his style in general, though, a really overcautious way to save face no matter what role is taken. (Or you just play on your phone.) So you're under watch.

Skimming through Arc's ISO, he seems... well, I guess the most suspicious.

EmpKing is just rubbing me the wrong way...

Everyone else is not notable, but not unimportant. Just giving some general reads. (And TCS is

not

off the hook for following the most clearly superior MOBA out there.)

Yeah, they fixed DTV. Though I really enjoy just watching the GD stream, they've done a solid job putting it all together.

And I should definitely be off the hook because dota.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

If we don't lynch Tammy, we should really leash her. The chances of her being SK are way too significant to ignore.

I am willing to accept Fuduzn's meta-defense of her and not lynch her today. In that circumstance, I'm happy with my FourT vote, but I would compromise on an Arc lynch and I'm not particularly keen on an Emp lynch because I basically agree with everything he's said so far.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Leash as in, we should vote on who she nightkills and lynch her if she doesn't nightkill them.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

And sorry for the triple, but I would

second the request for an extension

since we now (in my opinion) have to establish a lynch and a night kill.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Tammy -- explain

how

that's a "scum claim."

Explain where I used hyperbole.

I don't understand where you're coming from.

No need to write a novella. Explain to me like I'm 5.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Well, calling lots of players "definitely town" is often a red flag, so it does reinforce my argument that FourTrouble is scum.

I think early mid-wagon votes are often good places for scum; and I think scum buddying new players is a good thing for scum to do.

Are these new concepts?

TCS here. I pointed this out before. Ft had only called empking definitely town, and here you say he's calling lots definitely town. Then you claim he's buddying arc when all he did was say he seems town.

That's exaggeration of the stances to make him look bad.

Empking is scum claiming by using "barrage of untruths" in an attempt to use empty rhetoric to make me look bad. I haven't told any untruths at all. That is not trying to assess my motivations which means he's not actually scumhunting but is pretending to. He's not actually trying to figure this game out because he's not town.

This is going to be an unfulfilling answer, but this is semantics. If a player strongly and for no reason determines that

a single

other player is town, then I treat that as a mild-to-medium scumtell. I said "lots" but my logic is the same whether that player is clearing "lots" of players or a single one. I might cop to thinking that clearing lots is a stronger scumtell.

Votecount 1.18

Empking (3) - Arc, Riningear, Tammy
FuDuzn (2) - FourTrouble, Empking
Riningear (2) - Serrapaladin, FuDuzn
The Central Scrutinizer (1) - Nachomamma8
Tammy (1) - The Avering
Whiskers (1) - PimHel
FourTrouble (1) - The Central Scrutinizer

Not Voting (1) - Whiskers

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

PimHel is V/LA until 5/20

---

If we don't lynch Tammy, we should really leash her. The chances of her being SK are way too significant to ignore.

Entirely this. My personal feelings about Tammy being town aside, her use of the "misaligned" part of this game to justify why she is Vig rather SK leaves enough doubt for me to prefer her leashed.

Lynching Rining and seeing FourT (or Emp, I guess) vigged would be optimal. Whiskers would be a compromise, but I disagree with Tammy that it'd be optimal for town. I do believe that Whiskers has some survivoresque wincon, and I don't have a problem keeping him alive to fulfill it. I definitely see FourT and Rining as more likely to flip scum than Whiskers. Not sure about Emp or Nacho. The former worries me with regards to the TCS business, and the latter hasn't really done enough for me to justify a good read either way

Any chance you could reconsider, Tammy?

I am misaligned though. Have you ever seen American psycho? Patrick Bateman is a serial killer. It's totally what I thought my role was until I got to the vigilante part then had to read it like three times to make sure I read that right. There is no way I'd claim VIG as serial killer day one or probably not at all. That's handing you an early ticket to the grave. I emphasized me being misaligned because I am and it's part of why I don't think my alignment will change.

I'll take input from the town, but I'm not going to be leashed. I'm fine with discussing it, but it's still my role and I'm taking the responsibility for what I do. I'll take far more into consideration those I have pretty decent town reads on though, and won't kill people I have town reads on.

I thought whiskers would be best because he's confirmed not town aligned or to have a non town win condition and could be dangerous for the town. I thought that better than one of the people I have leaning scum reads on but am not sure about. I'm worried about what nacho said about that one game where everyone thought they were town until day three. If that's the case here, I could really hurt town, so thought the confirmed unaligned would be better.

Honestly, as a day 1 vig claim, I think the only proper thing for town to do is get a double-dip out of your kills. We determine who we think are likely, potentially mutually exclusive scum, and lynch/vig them. If that's me and Emp, so be it (but I think that's a wrong choice, as I think Emp is probably town and so am I). Scum will be forced to kill you or we will be forced to lynch you. The doctor (assuming there is one), roleblocker, jailkeeper, etc. can more properly target their kills. Leashing a claimed vig/sk on day 1 is, in my opinion, proper town play, and if you refuse or balk I would lynch you regardless of your alignment because you are playing in an anti-town manner.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm going to have to bookmark this game so that I can mimic it when I (finally) get a Jester role. Grumble grumble.

Tammy: I'm sorry if my playstyle has become more "pithy" over time, but it is what it is. I am generally a terrible scumhunter if I over-analyze, and have come to detest walls of text, so I have been trying to simplify my style.

FourT still looks like scum... I am also finding a rini lynch acceptable at this point. He sayeth nothing.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Votecount 1.21

Riningear (4) - Serrapaladin, FuDuzn, Arc, Nachomamma8
FuDuzn (2) - FourTrouble, Empking
Empking (1) - Riningear
The Central Scrutinizer (1) - Tammy
Whiskers (1) - PimHel
FourTrouble (1) - The Central Scrutinizer

Not Voting (2) - Whiskers, The Avering

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

---

Jebus is 1/3 God.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So Rin is at -2.

I'd vote to lynch at deadline, probably.

My money is that at least one of these claims is completely bogus.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Rin: Any info on God?

None besides that he exists and that he just has to make it out alive for my wincon. That's all there is to it. I win or lose or get killed in the process due to the course of things.

So... are you just going to shut down completely now, or...?

So Rin is at -2.

I'd vote to lynch at deadline, probably.

My money is that at least one of these claims is completely bogus.

You still trying to lynch FT?
That's cool I guess.

No, we don't think you're scum...

THEN VOTE FOR ME AND LYNCH ME.

Fuck you.

Why aren't you voting for Rinin?

The case on FT is better than the case on Rinin.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I like lynching FT and Tammy shooting Whiskers (assuming Tammy is in accord with that).

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Gotta admit jester was my first thought when whiskers claimed to not be town.

Then I guess it's not such moonlogic after all.

Eh. I've been growing a bit suspicious. A lot of what he offers is sideline, and I see him around and posting elsewhere but not here. He sounds calm and reasonable which makes me wonder. I mean I like that he stood up for me with my claim but I also know that I tend to just like people who do that and can put them in my blind spot.

I'll watch him. I haven't seen a post from him in a while, that's for sure.

I like lynching FT and Tammy shooting Whiskers (assuming Tammy is in accord with that).

I would rather you be shot, considering Whiskers has been more useful than you lately and I don't buy your "I'm just trying to switch up my playstyle" excuse at all.

Not really an excuse.

Shooting me would be worse than pointless.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Lynching you is good then?

We could lynch you, but I don't see any point in that yet.

You have yet to really make a case for why I should be lynched, you just keep saying my name.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

How the FUCK did he guess that?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth
Jebus wth

[The Central Scrutinizer]

FourTroble's claim looks like a faolseclaim riffing off Arc to me. He's lent nothing to defend it, and it just seems weird that he hasn't loopholed his claimed post restriction.

Unvote
Vote: FourTrouble

Here is why we have to lynch FT today. If he's lying, then he's scum. If he's telling the truth, he could still be scum. And if he's telling the truth and he is scum, that highly calls in to question Arc's claim in my mind, as well as Nacho's clear.

So we have a lot to be gained by this I think, in addition to whatever other information we get from night actions.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I can say this much, though. I know for certain a God is town.

God is town=none of his scumpartners are God.

It really is that easy.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

FourTroble's claim looks like a faolseclaim riffing off Arc to me. He's lent nothing to defend it, and it just seems weird that he hasn't loopholed his claimed post restriction.

Unvote
Vote: FourTrouble

Here is why we have to lynch FT today. If he's lying, then he's scum. If he's telling the truth, he could still be scum. And if he's telling the truth and he is scum, that highly calls in to question Arc's claim in my mind, as well as Nacho's clear.

So we have a lot to be gained by this I think, in addition to whatever other information we get from night actions.

Should read: "if he ISNT scum, that highly calls into question arc's claim"

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'll play even though I think you're full of it.

R'hllor

Cthulu

Azathoth

Nyarlhotep

Yog-Shothoth

Yob-Niggurath

Lord Zarquon

Crom

Mitra

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Should be Shub-Niggurath.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Resetting the vote count does not sound like a town-positive power.

Why has no one mentioned this?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

VOTE: FourTrouble