This is a Pirates of the Caribbean reference, right? If it isn't, you will break my little heart into pieces.
Mini 1566: Lunar Silver Star Story Complete (Game Over)
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Why did this warrant an unvote?
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
You could probe a bit beneath the surface with some questioning, rather than just throwing a vote down and unvoting after what is a pretty underwhelming response?In post 41, PhDScar wrote:A few reasons, one I can't apply any more pressure than a vote and it didn't work so I backed off, I will be less likely to do this latter in the game but as of now it would probably have been a waste of time. I've played with people like him before and his lack of actual wording or explanation is not in the slightest a scum/town tell for those players. Also since the unvote I have actually started to lean a town feel for Aegor.
This deserves far more credit than it is getting. Well playedIn post 65, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 60, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:I wanna hear more from JakegSpoiler:
Is it still opportunistic if AD has never played with Jake before?PhDScar wrote:That's my point, it may look super tempting, but it really means nothing from Jake therefore making ActionDan's vote opportunistic.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Any thoughts on the game so far AJ?In post 50, Aj The Epic wrote:
If you've played with Jake before, wouldn't you know that's his opening post in just about every game? (In fact, I'm fairly certain he mentioned it was his opening post every time...) In which case, why is it tempting?In post 46, PhDScar wrote:No vote, no discussion of game, and no explanation of lateness. That is tempting.
On the other hand I've played with Jake before and I'm more than willing to wait for an actual post and let this slide.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
No, it doesn't.
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I just wondered the reasoning behind this question?
In post 97, sangres wrote:Why did it take you so long to come up with that response?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I see. I didn't particularly feel like it was an insightful question since anything could happen in the time between two posts. But I understand the motives.In post 121, sangres wrote:It's also an easy enough way to increase pressure. I didn't really get anything useful out of our interaction, as was expected.
Do you think Jake's lack of a reaction towards this pressure, other than "no", is telling?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Yep it does. Why would people starting piling votes on Jake though?In post 118, PhDScar wrote:
No it doesn't because the way it was presented. It was a naked vote, as scum it would of allowed him the opportunity for people to start piling votes without knowing it is normal play style, but since it lacks explanation he has the ability to play it off like he didn't vote for that reason (or it was a joke) if Jake called him out on it and provided evidence.In post 101, Mac wrote:
You could probe a bit beneath the surface with some questioning, rather than just throwing a vote down and unvoting after what is a pretty underwhelming response?In post 41, PhDScar wrote:A few reasons, one I can't apply any more pressure than a vote and it didn't work so I backed off, I will be less likely to do this latter in the game but as of now it would probably have been a waste of time. I've played with people like him before and his lack of actual wording or explanation is not in the slightest a scum/town tell for those players. Also since the unvote I have actually started to lean a town feel for Aegor.
Well if I'm reading his play correctly questioning more really wouldn't have goten me anywhere, I've played with simillier play styles before. So I'm fairly confidint I did the right thing.
This deserves far more credit than it is getting. Well playedIn post 65, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 60, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:I wanna hear more from JakegSpoiler:
Agrred
Is it still opportunistic if AD has never played with Jake before?PhDScar wrote:That's my point, it may look super tempting, but it really means nothing from Jake therefore making ActionDan's vote opportunistic.
Without him knowing Jake it's just a plain opportunistic joke but the extra safety from it being naked doesn't really apply
Does that make sense?
Also bolded parts are mine.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
In post 132, PhDScar wrote:I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.
I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.
Why are early wagons bad, doctor?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Policy lynches are terrible and you should feel fucking awful for bringing it up.
But Jake's replace out comments are sending shivers up my spine.
Anyway I have like three pages to read in more detail, and a couple of other games. I'll return soon enough because MY SATURDAY NIGHTS ARE SO DAMN AWESOME THAT FOR ONCE I'M NOT EVEN TOUCHING ALCOHOL!!!!-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Such a wide variety of responses I could use. I'm going with
lol wut?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Well, no it wasn't. Jake stepped in my line of questioning. :fferyimpression: It didn't matter whether Dan had played with Jake or not, the question still stood.In post 275, BROseidon wrote:Your line of reasoning there was illogical.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Are early wagons beneficial to scum? Wagon town > probably won't go through, alignment might become obvious. Wagon scum > ???In post 144, PhDScar wrote:
They aren't I didn't say they were. What I was saying was that that naked vote could of easily lead to a wagon and been very beneficial to scum. I would appreciate more votes on ActionDan right about now guys.In post 141, Mac wrote:In post 132, PhDScar wrote:I meant it was still opportunistic by the way. I think I got the language screwed up in the first sentence.
I think it could get people to pile votes because it was early, and people like to wagon early, also it could seem like a legitimate vote at first glance. Hence me say "tempting" which still seems to be lost on people.
Why are early wagons bad, doctor?
By attacking Dan's "opportunism," you are implying early wagons are bad. I don't understand why town would want to stifle a wagon, especially when it has just the one vote?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I hope by the time I reach 12 you have a post that contains more content that SMP is scum. Perhaps more reads, or an explanation why?In post 176, HighShroomish wrote:SMP is scum. And yes, I'm being completely serious.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
But I'm not brushing it off like it doesn't exist, I'm talking about it regardless. It didn't have to be Dan, it could been you, me or any player. Perhaps it's the wording.In post 286, BROseidon wrote:In post 101, Mac wrote:Is it still opportunistic if AD has never played with Jake before?Not sure if "opportunistic" is the right term, but AD voting for someone for doing something that they always do, and that AD should be aware of them always doing, is worth noting. The context of AD having played with Jake does change things, and you brushing it off like it doesn't is a bizarre line of reasoning.
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
1. It's still opportunistic though, am I right? It's an effort to look like they're doing something when they are really not.In post 342, PhDScar wrote:
1. The policy lynch was just a personal play style discussion and would of turned up nothing.In post 339, Mac wrote:DrScar, you called AD opportunistic voting Jake - why have you ignored the fact that Aegor and Jake were trying to policy lynch HKC, and in particular the fact that Jake is parking his vote there in an effort to be as anti-town as possible?
2. That is Jake being Jake, also I've had my vote parked up until two posts ago.
2. Yep, but your vote wasn't parked in an anti-town manner, like Jake's is.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
That's the only thing you have to say about this entire game, other than SMP/walls?HighShroomish wrote:@Mac if something has already been said, why say it again(i.e. Why the votes on PhD)
Every Jake post is making my eyes bleed, I'm not sure if it's scum or derptown though. I think I'm leaning the former, but I'm not overly familiar with his playstyle.
That's probably because there's just one head talking at the minute.In post 409, Jake from State Farm wrote:Yet I'm not attacking both hydras so obviously not letting my hydra hate influence me...
The other hydra is playing like they should. They aren't creating confusion in the game thread.
The thing that bugs me here is that whilst Bert is a good mafia player, he's pretty laidback and I can't imagine him doing much planning as town, possibly not even as scum, although I can't quite back that statement up. Similarly, Mara is very emotional as a player and whilst I think they're a good enough combo as a hydra, I can't see them staging this dissonance. Like at all.Dr Scar wrote:For example this did make me think of HKC as town. It just seemed so genuine at the time, but thinking about what Jake is saying I understand how any moderately good Hydra could plan and stage this.
Dramatic. What made you turn? Because I'm starting to fall that way too. But I still don't particularly like Shroomish.
You have absolutely nothing to add over the last 3 pages?
I disagree. I think laying out thought process from both heads is a solid town tactic and shows they're not afraid of hiding their opinions at all. Being so blatantly dissonant, whilst it might not be your cup of tea, shows very little "behind the scenes" planning and I feel this is coming from a town mindset, rather than scum manipulation.In post 435, Jake from State Farm wrote:Real hydra dissonance with a town hydra IMO would do their best to hash it out behind the scenes in their QT and would include explanations for why they disagree with each other's reads
It's a bit strange that you're trying to stifle HKC like so.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
In post 439, Jake from State Farm wrote:Oh 2 more things @ max
1. I'm sorry that answering others people's questions are making your eyes bleed. Should A. People stop asking me questions or B. Should I stop answering them?In post 440, HighShroomish wrote:I think it's the way you're answering questions.
Ha, you'd think, wouldn't you? And yet early on you were talking about a new playstyle, which I believe I played with once in that neighborhood game where I died night oneIn post 439, Jake from State Farm wrote:2. You have played with me at least 3 or 4 times and you aren't familiar with my playstyle?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Waiting on Aegor's reasoning for following Jake like a lost puppy
Also this felt weird as fuck.In post 466, Jake from State Farm wrote:Didn't even notice aegor changed his vote-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I don't really know what to make of it. I've played with Aegor a couple of times now and modded a game of his and I recall him being more logical rather than just throwing votes around. But he was scum in my modded game, so what I'm seeing is a stark contrast to both his usual selves.aj wrote:What would you make of it? Following a scum buddy seems to obvious, though Aegor doesn't seem like an experienced player. However, if it were my buddy, I'd probably just vote for him and drop him as a worthless partner.
Also Mac, can you explain how HC is town? To me, I don't mind Mara when she posts but the other hydra head is not helping their cause.
HKC is not a strong town read, but it's not a case of whether you mind them or not - but I assume you're talking about finding Mara town and not Bert? To put it bluntly - Bert is Bert. He's a bit of a troll but a solid asset if town. But as scum (I might be wrong here because I'm going off something I read a while back from someone) I'm almost sure he's more manipulative. If I'm wrong, anyone can feel free to correct me. But that manipulation is something I'm not seeing in this game, and the blatant dissonance is bound to attract some attention. I don't think it's coming from a scum hydra.
It's been coming. SMP is a concern but I'm not barking up that tree yet because there's very little point. I think AJ is starting to come into a very town read, but I recall having a similarish read in Xenogears and being wrong. My memory's a bit hazy, so I might double check that.In post 490, sangres wrote:In post 480, Mac wrote:fferycho is now a solid town read. And I'm starting to lean town on HS too.
unvote
I'm a little surprised you're solidly townreading us but yay. Agree on highshroomish.
I have independent reasons for thinking that both Jake and Aegor look scummy, but I'm having a little trouble picturing them as part of a team. :/
SMP is becoming a pretty distinct concern.
catboi's paraphrased fuckit-i'll-post-tomorrow gave me some town flickers, though!
I can't make head nor tail of this. Care to expand a little further?Jake wrote:Mac is being too cautious and he seems to be mirroring both sets of hydras when he does post, it's obvious he's easily swayed but doing it in a not so obvious manner
It is most certainly not. Town lurk too, believe it or not!In post 543, Jake from State Farm wrote:AND he's active lurking which is a scumtell.
In post 547, Jake from State Farm wrote:
Read that again and show me where I asked for or cared about the other site.In post 543, Jake from State Farm wrote:Well I can't go off some mysterious site. I can go off his play here and in 3 games as town he's played 1 way.
Now he's playing differently AND he's active lurking which is a scumtell.
These two statements contradict each other.In post 549, Jake from State Farm wrote:He didn't even give me a website or anything. No game links nothing. The burden of proof is on him. I've done my detective work.
My head tells me you're scum pushing the everliving fuck out of a goldmine you've found in SMP games, Jake, because it looks from the above you didn't want to delve any deeper than you had to and possibly ruin your argument. On the other hand, it's a legitmate enough argument that makes me consider SMP-scum.
I'd like to hear something from SMP at least, because I'm well aware that town lurk too, regardless of their activity in other games on and off site.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
holy fuck Jake, I can't be done with this fucking whining because we're not tripping over ourselves to lynch YOUR scumreads as opposed to our own. I mean I didn't say you were scum at all for contradicting yourself, just pointing out a fucking fact there, and you're putting words in my mouth for me.
I'll vote in my own time and for my own reasons rather than yours. Don't want to be swayed too easily, you know?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Hi anti!In post 714, Antihero wrote:hey mac.
so, is your vote out of frustration/anger? or is there something legit that you see that i don't?
in spite of whatever the fuck jake says, my vote isn't cause I'm hanging off the hydras (lol, he has a weird obsession there but apparently working with a townread is NOT allowed anymore) but it's his lack of fucking townreads that worries me. He's tunnelfucking SMP/HKC while taking awild sideswipe at anything that moves and by not having any townreads, other than someone that nobody really knows, he's showing a lack of commitment so he can probably go change his mind later on when one of his "scumreads" flips town.
no idea if this makes sense, it's late.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Is it really rich?In post 719, Jake from State Farm wrote:I'm showing a lack of commitment? Ha ha that's rich. And I almost always have trouble getting town reads
The latter doesn't surprise me because town generally work together and I can tell you don't do that very well.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
ha ha. Ffery, you can take this one.In post 721, Jake from State Farm wrote:Btw mafia isn't about finding town. It's about finding scum. I don't need town reads. I need scum reads and only need scum reads-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I don't understand this, other than the fact I find it particularly ridiculous?In post 850, BROseidon wrote:Given the playerlist, scum are probably 2/3 in the group with fewer posts than me.
That's it for now, I'll be back tonight or tomorrow to catch up-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
less than 24 hours to go so you try to start a new wagon on me who you have pretty much called town and shown no change in that read?
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
You can explain why if you want, meanwhile here's why my townread was decimated. Shroomish agreed with sangres townread of me a few pages back, preceded to never mention me again until the vote and, despite two people asking,In post 948, BROseidon wrote:
Mac, did you get scum this game? This post is bad :/In post 922, Mac wrote:Vote: Shroomish
I'm going back here. My lean-townread has been utterly obliterated over the course of this page.is still yet to explain his vote.This is a characteristic I'd associate with newish scum who forget how they faked their reads and I think it ties in here - since he hasn't given a direct read on me, he's forgotten that he agreed with sangres townread of me. The "shit, 24 hours" comment followed by starting a brand, shiny new wagon felt extremely fake and the lack of explanation & follow up to it has left me feeling rather uneasy with the whole thing.
Vote: Shroomish-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I'm a bit mystified as to why you haven't called out Shroomish for the lack of following up to your request for an explanation to be honest.In post 943, sangres wrote:
You explain why he shouldn't.In post 937, Aegor wrote:FU, sangres. SMP was at 5 votes way earlier in the game. Where were you on that bandwagon then?
We have one day left. Please explain to us why HS should be kept alive.
His vote on Mac was bad, but it doesn't look scummy to us.
We're generally not in favor of lynching townreads. I know, it's a radical idea, but it might just catch on.In post 938, Aegor wrote:And why you are not willing to vote for him now.
I'm also curious as to how you see the vote as not scummy, because I'm seeing the total opposite here.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
I am so fucking confused by this game right now.
SMP has no reason to lie, as either alignment, about Muffin's role unless he got super lucky about a guess, or of course they're both partners.
Anti has no reason, as either alignment, to counterclaim what SMP says unless he's scum wanting a really weak town PR lynched/towncred for killing a buddy. The former doesn't make any sense given the cop claim, and the latter doesn't really fit in with how Anti approached it either I don't think.
Neither option makes any sense, but I'm leaning towards SMP purely because I think he's the only viable lynch today. I think the whole "I wanted 2 shots off so I lurked" reasoning was bullshit too. Aaand furthermore, his accusation that Anti is lying and not being followed up by voting him doesn't make sense to me either. There's something else that made me think the claim was legit but a scum role, but I've forgotten.
Also, Aegor, you're wrong in your argument with Jake. The idea was clearly planted there by Anti.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Another naked vote?
*gasp*
I actually agree with this. I also agree that muffin/SMP don't make sense either and am willing to say Muffin is town.In post 1428, Antihero wrote:
jake's a tough nut to crack. he's playing to the scum win condition, but gut's still telling me he's not scum.In post 1427, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:
Scum is scum, regardless of their role. you think there is another scum-PR, though?In post 1411, Antihero wrote:mara, while jake is an honorary mafia goon, i think we could do better.
based on reactions to the claim yesterday, i think it's AJ and muffin.
VOTE: AJ
muffin/SMP doesn't make sense. I'm thinking it's probably Kdub/Jake
You're amazing.
This may come as a shock to you, but you can have more than one scumread you know? Like, there's probably one more scum on top of Jake (probably two since Jake's not scum!) This pretty much looks like you're using your scumread on Jake as a basis for not doing anything.In post 1472, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:we are exhausted from scumreading jake and having nothing happen from it, it saddens us
There's not one post in my ISO that defends SMP. Believe it or not (and I know you'll struggle with this) but I looked at an SMP lynch from both perspectives - I liked your case but you were tunnelling the ever living fuck out of him based on like 2 games and I wasn't sure if that was because you were scum pursuing an easy town lynch or not. I didn't try and "smear" your name, and then again during SMP/anti I looked at both sides of the argument and guess what? Neither made sense. I know you're super godly town, but do better.In post 1483, Jake from State Farm wrote:vote: mac
when smp was getting run up the first time, he had like 5 votes and mac was defensive of smp and trying to smear my name. He also was lightly defensive of SMP during the anti/smp claim thing but said smp is the only viable lynch. Given smp fliped a scum pr, this defense stands out to me.
The people most likely partners with SMP are in the group of mac/hkc/zmuffinman with mac/zmuffin the most likely pair.
Looking at the interactions between the 3, smp/mac/zmuffin REALLY make sense. Somebody check my work
Casually ignoring that I was V/LA. Thanks Jake!In post 1497, Jake from State Farm wrote:it's also noteworthy that the only people trying to do stuff are people who are most likely town meanwhile zmuffin and mac are waiting to see where they can hop on and not be suspicious. Townies would be trying harder to find scum, especially when townies have the edge.
so go ahead and berate me, insult me, slander my name, or do whatever it is you think you can to distract town away from you but I guarantee if the other townies actually do their own work they will probably come to a similar conclusion.
1) I didn't defend scumIn post 1520, Aegor wrote: If anyone strongly believes that Mac or AJ is town, please make your case. At this point, I fail to see any reason whatsoever to let two slots that have produced nothing of substance (or, in Mac's case, a defense of scum and nothing else except unexplained flip-flopping on the Day 1 HS) by Day 3 live.
2) I didn't flip-flop on HS without clearly showing my thought process
3) I can prove at least one of us is town!
Believe me, I can.In post 1529, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't think you can or do!
In post 1546, BROseidon wrote:Trying to read this game is the worst :/
HERE FUCKING HERE. I'd appreciate your thoughts Bro, since you're confirmed town and all.
The tiring thing about this game is the constant fucking whinging whenever someone gets called an idiot or petty. Grow a thicking skin and stop clogging up the gamethread with posts to the mod.
PEDIT
no jake! noooo!!!-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Feels. I really don't think he's scum with SMP, he said it best himself (self-meta ftw) that he's not afraid to bus the everliving fuck out of his buddies: for him to question both sides of SMP/Anti like such made him look town. I feel his thought process was almost similar to mine.
Obviously he's aware of his meta but still, point stands.
Really?In post 1583, Antihero wrote:
any insight from anything said in the QT, or are you just going to mill around and hide behind the "one of us has to be town" wifom smokescreen?In post 1566, Mac wrote:Well we're neighbours, so there's that.
VOTE: mac
i think you were right the first time, jake
I mean I could spend hours mulling over all of 6 posts but a) I had to go to work and b) this makes no sense from my scum perspective considering I played the original Tales of the Abyss game as a scum neighbour, with Nacho no less, and this has given me an insight into how I approach outing a neighbourhood as scum. So yeah, obviously I'm just hiding behind "one of us his town, please pick me!!!!!!" approach. Nice AtJ there too!
This is pretty much it, AJ was missing most of night one, and the bolded is a total misrep of what the fuck went down really. That's a bit worrying.In post 1589, Squirrel Girl wrote:Mod: This is your thread.
Mod: It is now open.
Mac: Hey, what are your thoughts?
AJ: HKC is bad spammy, almost scummy for it, Anti is bad at playing, Sangres is hard to read, Jake is a potential lynchbait, Aegor plays bad but I vibe town, Muffin is a rough replace because he will add to the anger of the thread, Null on SMP, townish Kdub. What about you Mac-y-poo?
*end of n1*
Mod: Thread is open again. (so, basically Mac didn't reply Night 1)
AJ: People are expecting a lot of posts from me and I am busy and don't give a hoot, my claim could save me anyway, so *nyah!*
Mac: Wanted a longer day, should have slowed SMP wagon. Town on Sangres. Town on BRO due to Sangres. HKC/Jake - noisy but townish but maybe one is scum, lean Jake in that case. Aegor is scummy, AJ is towny, Kdub is forgettable. Am I forgetting anything?
AJ: You forgot Anti. I lean that wasn't a bus though. Muffinz is also here, though I combine him with the other aggressive spam posters and find their demands on me unreasonable and playstyle based.
Mod: SG is supah sexy and awesome and cool - also she now has this link.
Pretty much that's it.
I think you're confusing a chainsaw defense on SMP with my scumread on HS. At the time, you didn't call neither a chainsaw defense and it appears like you're using a scumflip to your advantage 'cause you've found a link between me and SMP. I probed in his general direction because his game content was nothing more than SMP being scum (ironically right) but that doesn't make it a fucking chainsaw.In post 1593, Aegor wrote:
Presumably squirrel has an interest in her slot's survival, hence an interest in defending her predecessor's actions to the extent she is able.In post 1576, Jake from State Farm wrote:squirrel, why did you feel the need to defend your predecessor's actions?
VOTE: Mac
1) Chainsaw defense in posts 280 and 340. You mention SMP as a "concern" in post 582, but that unsurprisingly leads nowhere. You mention also that Jake's case is legit enough to make you think of SMP scum, but this also goes nowhere. Then you go back to voting HS, who had been tunneling SMP. You express your belief that SMP is more likely scum than Anti, but this goes nowhere. You do not post again for 5-6 days because, according to you, your V/LA.Mac wrote: 1) I didn't defend scum
2) I didn't flip-flop on HS without clearly showing my thought process
3) I can prove at least one of us is town!
2) I found the explanation you offered after revoting HS totally uncompelling, especially since the tunnel and naked vote accusations could be
leveled with equal validity against many other players.
As for 2, why didn't you bring it up earlier if that's what you thought?
I mean, it's pretty clear we haven't other than AJ's little whatever-the-hell-that-is. Between this and your previous question (both clearly answered) this makes me feel like you're posting in an effort to look like you're doing something.In post 1596, Kdub wrote:
Aj posted this (or something along these lines) unprompted? Obviously I don't have the exact words, but this gave me bad vibes.In post 1589, Squirrel Girl wrote:AJ: People are expecting a lot of posts from me and I am busy and don't give a hoot, my claim could save me anyway, so *nyah!*
Did you two claim to each other in the neighborhood?
The wording here is offIn post 1602, Jake from State Farm wrote:
I mean I know you are essentially confirmed town (assuming you aren'tIn post 1594, BROseidon wrote:Seems unlikely scum would bus at this point, or let pressure on a buddy build this far. Mac-town implies one of {Anti, Jake, Aegor} scum, and then probably 1-off for the other scum.the GF) but did you forget the game you modded?
Until recently, I wasn't. There hasn't been alot of participation between us in our neighbourhood but I made an early reachout and he answered pretty openly, as he did in his first post. But SG's blatant misrep and the "I'll claim to get out of a lynch" made me all ya know?In post 1604, Jake from State Farm wrote:the comment you made about "proving one of is town" for some reason sends shivers up my spine and I feel like your lack of participation is an effort to be as anti-town as possible. Also you not being more suspicious of your neighbor feels weird as fuck. This game is sucking the life out of me
do you have scum reads?
Yes I do. Everyone but you.
More seriously, Aegor/Kdub/SG/HKC is where the scum lie I think.-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
Obviously it got my attention, but I'm not really caring about his role, more his alignment. Maybe he was checking if I'd kill him? Who knows!Kdub wrote:Mac, is SG's paraphrase accurate? I'm curious why this wouldn't have gotten your attention at all.
Meanwhile, are you going to do anything substantial?-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK
-
-
Mac Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4410
- Joined: January 24, 2013
- Location: Aberdeen, UK