Mini 1621: Frog Mafia (KERO)
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Your right I was lying I'm really a Fbi Agent.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Hey waffle your awesome. See I'm buddying you so you have to like me. Wanna shift your vote onto 2 bird's stoned.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
On a more serious note
If that's what you found scummy about my post and not the fact I claimed miller then I think we have a problem here.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 29, 2birds1stone wrote:Garmr is scum, guys, he's pissed off that I caught him for the wrong reason.
I'm not pissed and you just admitted you're reasoning was wrong?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 71, 2birds1stone wrote:Only because you chainsawed your buddy.
Not sure how much of this is confirmation bias, but it honestly works so well as a scumteam.
Hmmm so why didn't you vote me for chainsawing but instead you voted me for saying lol and justifying your vote with lol by saying caught for the wrong reasons. Makes me wonder if you actually had anything at all.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 77, 2birds1stone wrote:I have an admittedly piss-weak case against you and you feel the need to cover your ass with that excuse anyway?
Caught.
Oh really
In post 22, Garmr wrote:
Hey waffle your awesome.See I'm buddying youso you have to like me. Wanna shift your vote onto 2 bird's stoned.
I been saying trigger words constantly on purpose.
So there's three possiblitiesyou're new to mafia,you're a village idiot or your scum.
You had enough games so strike 1
so that leaves one or two and I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you're are not a VI so that leaves scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 43, 2birds1stone wrote:Bad vote, ProHawk is taking it at least just as seriously. Also, taking RVS seriously is pro-town.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: VictorDeAngelo
Also you are sure I'm scum yet you are voting victor what is up with that?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 82, 2birds1stone wrote:First you say I'm OMGUSing you, then you complain I'm not voting you, which is it?
You're right, though,
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Garmr
The posts you quoted don't look like you're trying to attract attention, they just look like you're joking around (with the exception of post one, which I took to be a sincere miller claim until you retracted). You're trying to fit joke posts in with an alleged master plan, and it's just silly.
Because I didn't realize you took your vote off me till the vote count popped up? So how do you justify pushing me as your main scum read while you are on victor?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 84, 2birds1stone wrote:I didn't keep very good track of where my vote was, sorry.
It's one thing to lose track of someone else's vote but your own also I think that's a lie.
In post 53, 2birds1stone wrote:
Yes.Primate wrote:
Is treating RVS seriously an intentional play you are making in this game?In post 43, 2birds1stone wrote:Bad vote, ProHawk is taking it at least just as seriously. Also, taking RVS seriously is pro-town.
Because you didn't comment on it. Singling one out without commenting on the other points towards feigned scumhunting.In post 47, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Why does ProHawk taking things just as seriously make my vote bad?
Victor/Garmr scumteam, ProHawk possible third member.
In post 60, 2birds1stone wrote:ProHawk as possible Victor buddy.
You were pushing the fact that victor was your central focus for a while but as soon as I push you
In post 74, 2birds1stone wrote:It doesn't matter though, you're so hung up on being voted that I'm sure about you, even if my other reads are wrong.
Your focus returns to me and you act like I'm the one your most certain about the whole time.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
1.In short you if victor was your main focus for a bit and you were pinning people as scum due to association tells I don't think you would forget that you were voting him.
2.You admit I am your main scum read so why are you linking people to Victor and not me?
3.Saying you forgot your vote is like saying you don't care who you want lynched only if it's not you.
4.Also you agree with the situation easily You could of pointed out where I was wrong before but you just agreed. You could of said victor was my scum read for a while because of X and you became it after Y but you didn't you took the path of least resistance and the one you wouldn't have to explain yourself. This shows you know your reasoning is weak and you're more concerned about not making mistakes that would show you in a scummy light.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 88, 2birds1stone wrote:I linked you to ProHawk as well when I made the chainsaw comment.
I don't care who's lynched providing it's you or Victor.
My reasoning is weak because it's a page three case.
A chainsaw is attempting by definition "a playerwho defendsanother player by attacking the other player's attacker is very probably scum." Explain why would I chainsaw someone who has one vote on them for a rvs vote which doesn't need defending?
You don't care unless it's me or victor. But you know you're reasoning is weak so instead of pursing the hunt for scum. You are happy for today's lynches to come out people you have weak reasoning for?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 89, 2birds1stone wrote:I'm going to re-summarize my cases because I acknowledge that my posting is all-fucking-over-the-place right now.
Garmr:
Claimed with a "lol".
Got annoyed because he felt he'd dropped a different scumtell (this is massive alarm bells, btw).
Got annoyed again because "caught for wrong reason".
"LOLGAMBIT"
Victor:
Claimed a dubious scumtell against Boo when ProHawk was equally "guilty" of it; did not comment on ProHawk.
When I pointed this out, he didn't recognise the inconsistency; he voted me instead.
ProHawk:
Weak read, not scummy by himself.
Was chainsawed in RVS by Garmr.
Was ignored by Victor in favour of BooKitty, as previously mentioned
You're case on me is that you think I'm annoyed and me pointing out what I was doing to try and break rvs?
Victor
Basically your reasoning for him is because his a hypocrite which town are often guilty of as well?
Prowhawk:
Only scum reading him because of the actions of others and not his own with no actual flips?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 92, 2birds1stone wrote:
OMGUS generally requires a serious vote to be OMGUS too, didn't stop you from accusing me of it.In post 90, Garmr wrote:A chainsaw is attempting by definition "a player who defends another player by attacking the other player's attacker is very probably scum." Explain why would I chainsaw someone who has one vote on them for a rvs vote which doesn't need defending?
I don't know why you felt the need to change your random vote at all, but you clearly felt you did. Sure, defense, why the hell not.
If my case is so bad, why do you so desperately feel the need to respond to it? That's where the real clincher is, and your inability to let go is so hilariously damning.
The reason I won't let go is I think you're scum and you don't feel the need to justify anything unless pushed extremely and you dodge some points you can't answer or retort with a weak reason you think i'm scummy as if that would nullify my case. There's a reason your the number 1 wagon. Also the omgus vote is a emotional response that doesn't need a case on you. This show me you don't understand when and where tells can be used and you just throw them out.
It's fairly specifically what you were annoyed at, but yes.In post 91, Garmr wrote:You're case on me is that you think I'm annoyed
I'm not annoyed if i was was I would be pretty aggressive towards you and the reasons are to weak to even consider a tell.
Yes.In post 91, Garmr wrote:...and pointing out that I'm covering ass with nonsensical claims of gambiting
Has to edit my post will note that. But if I wasn't doing that why did I continue it so long and have evidence to prove it, also why would I be lying about my intention this early on when I could easily brush every case on me aside?
That's not what "hypocrite" means.In post 91, Garmr wrote:Victor
Basically your reasoning for him is because his a hypocrite which town are often guilty of as well?
Will you that one but still I been guilty of pushing a vote on some for one reason yet excluding another person for the same reason. Usually because I view one person as scum or the other as town.
[/quote] What do you think of prohawk with out the actions of others.
That's why I've said I specifically want you or Victor lynched.In post 91, Garmr wrote:Prowhawk:
Only scum reading him because of the actions of others and not his own with no actual flips?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Victor I like you're post 93 you can be town
his omgus
Me having a joke post
Finds a weak reason to vote me after voting him.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 102, Feysal wrote:Oh hey, we seem to be out of random vote stage. Good, I was never too comfortable with that, and coming back from a two year hiatus has not changed it.
So, Garmr. He was the first player who caught my attention, before the funny claims even, so I had a quick look at his past games to see who I was dealing with. One observation stood out - Garmr is good at staying alive. He has not only won but survived twice as scum, and has been endgamed several times. That gives me a town read on him. I can't think of a reason why he would have deliberately called attention to himself like this if he were scum. I could imagine a reason why scum could do that though - trying to look like carefree town. I have tried it myself in the past, not that it ever worked. I think Garmr is too experienced to try such a stunt, or to even need such trickery.
I don't know about 2birds, need to give him a closer look later. But, town on town fights are fairly typical for early game.
My vote stays on ProHawk. I did not like his initial vote, and in his ten posts he has said and done remarkably little.
When I want to look really town I usually get night one killed.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
The vote may not be on 2 stoned birds but I approve of that vote. Btw can you tell me why you're voting Flubber through I ask so you can appeal to my vanity.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 109, Bookitty wrote:Can I wait for a bit? I promise I will later.
Ohh I wanted you to say because he vote on you was bad and you did something right.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 138, ProHawk wrote:By a show of hands please,
Who thinks that this post was for realz?
Feysal's posts (Two by the way, and only one is serious) are garbage and a cop-out from scum hunting I would like to state for the record. Before I delve more into this topic, I would specifically like Garmr to comment on the following...
"Garmr is good at staying alive. He has not only won but survived twice as scum, and has been endgamed several times. That gives me a town read on him. I can't think of a reason why he would have deliberately called attention to himself like this if he were scum."
Although this is a teaser...
("I did not like his initial vote, and in his ten posts he has said and done remarkably little.")
Well to be honest I felt quite flattered a ego boost. Because I know that's what I'm good at but no one has ever mentioned it before. I don't know if his town or scum but he seemed to hit the nail on the head at least in that area.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 142, ProHawk wrote:Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I actually had a hard time finding games you actually made it to the end of. Maybe you could toss a couple links out for me.
Recent games town games I completed I have been killed night 1 (threat to scum yahhhh) But every game I finished as scum I survived to the end (not going to include the mod kill and forced replace outs.).
but here's the list not including newbies
-Mini 1501: We’re On A Boat!-
-Mini Normal 1505 N is for normal-(scum game)
-Mini 1500:Narnia- The Lion,the Witch,and the Wardrobe Mafia-
-mini1510 PAUL WALKER MEMORIAL flights of angels sing thee to-
-Micro 235 - NikPick IV ~Game Over~- I'm including this one because I made it to end game of game 1. The mod made a bad choice and reset the game after scum won and said scum have to win three times I was like fudge that.
Not that's if I don't get killed night one
Mini 1499 - State Farm Mafia 2 - Game Over
-white flag open 547-
the only time I ever got lynched as town was
mini 1523 viscon desert kingdom. The irony is I had nailed every single scum yet I still got lynched and no one listened to me. It was also the game that showed me elyse can't think past roles as town.
All the other games I got forced replaced out of because of my ban(none of those I was in a position to get lynched.) except one which i choose to replace out of after throwing a hissy fit which I embarrassed I did.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Just looking through 2birds games he seems to make it end game while his mafia a couple of time but he gets mislynched a lot as town. But considering all the scummy shit his done and how some people are avoiding the wagon and not really commenting on it or avoiding taking a stance on it(massive,waffleghost),
I feel the chances of him being scum.
Flubber is 2nd he just saw a wagon and not the reasoning from the people on it. (most were rvs.) and jumped on it and basically said he sheeped poor logic.
@2birds stoned
What do you think of flubber.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 153, massive wrote:In post 148, Gendaberry wrote:Also massive, what do you think of Garmr and 2birds? You seem to have mostly stayed out of it.
They're both goobers who know a lot of Mafia terminology.
How about a read then.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 151, 2birds1stone wrote:Garmr retroactively claims bullshit gambit,town completely ignores it.
I'm honestly not interested in voting anyone else today. At all.
he just admitted he and flubber are scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 183, Bookitty wrote:I did not think your miller claim nor yet your FBI agent claim was serious. I also didn't think they were gambits. To be gambits, more time would have been required prior to your retractions/changes. Piling trigger word on top of trigger word is not how gambits work, imo.
My comment to Flubbernugget was in response to his disbelieving the miller claim and was a longer way of saying, "Well, duh!"
Boo there's a point to me asking flubber why he took it seriously.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 185, Flubbernugget wrote:So basically I'm a fucking idiot that can't read.
UNVOTE:
Ill give the thread a better read through and try this again.
Yah now you admitted to it I can test my theory.
UNVOTE: 2birdonestone
VOTE: Flubber
I'm still happy with a 2bird wagon but flubber your a stronger scum read.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 173, Juls wrote:
In post 60, 2birds1stone wrote:ProHawk as possible Victor buddy.
I was with you initially (with hitting one not the other) but I read it as Victor was selectively reading. Why do you immediately jump to an association tell on page 3?
In post 71, 2birds1stone wrote:Only because you chainsawed your buddy.
Now Gamr is buddies with Victor? Do you always do associations on page 3?Like multiple ones?
In post 104, Bookitty wrote:I'm still thinking about 2birds1stone. The "I am trying to look awesomely townie" thing is the exact opposite of Garmr's "I'm trying to look horribly scummy" and both seem odd from a town perspective.
This is kinda a summary of how I am feeling but I am getting a pinging of a scum-on-scum fight. Like a good cop/bad cop routine (sorta...more like Republican/Democrat)
------------
Overall I think the fight between Garmr and 2birds comes out looking worse for2birds mainly for the association tells. Something is just setting me off thatthey may be buddies though.Maybe I can get Feysal to look up if either are hard-bussers (cause I am lazy ). Also, Waffle seems really odd. I'm not sure if I am scumreading him yet or not but I read his posts and I scrunch my nose a lot. I am townreading Victor and that's pretty much it. The reason being is the comment to 2birds about "no town thinks they have the game figured out by page 4" (or whatever). Everybody else is pretty NULL.
VOTE: 2Birds
Cough hypocrite cough cough-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 191, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 187, Garmr wrote:In post 185, Flubbernugget wrote:So basically I'm a fucking idiot that can't read.
UNVOTE:
Ill give the thread a better read through and try this again.
Yah now you admitted to it I can test my theory.
UNVOTE: 2birdonestone
VOTE: Flubber
I'm still happy with a 2bird wagon but flubber your a stronger scum read.
Talk to me about this theory because I reread the thread and think the fbi claim is bullshit.
If garmr is town because of how cc's work with named townies someone is going to have to spell it out for me.
The theory is if I have a way to read you every game or not because I noticed something you do as scum but I haven't seen you do as town. I did a meta on you because I noticed your town and scum game have a drastic difference.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 206, Flubbernugget wrote:Also I guess that means there's 4 scum too.
That's interesting and precise why do you think theirs 4 scum.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 217, Flubbernugget wrote:Garmr/waffle scum team
Nah it's garmr/flubber Lets bus each other.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 251, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 242, Garmr wrote:How long is it going to take before people realize flubbers trying to please the majority and vote him.
Sweetheart I did the exact opposite of pleasing the majority and was really obnoxious about it on top of that.
You realize I said tried/trying.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 253, Bookitty wrote:@Garmr: What's your take on ProHawk's recent posts?
Better than yours.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 255, Bookitty wrote:In what way? I crave specifics!
Your stances are usually uncertain.
One:you are hypocritical
you said you couldn't see my gambit as working yet you vote flubber and fucking 2 birds after that because of their votes on me and they way they handled it.
two:Long way to say nothing at all
With the 2birds stoned and me you took so long to explain why we were both null over multiple posts in the beginning.
three:the fact you keep implying I could be town while null reading me constantly.
four:Your reason to unvote on flubber
In post 205, Flubbernugget wrote:Hey grey we were talking about having garmr botch a fake claim so 2birds and I could bus the shit out of him. But it backfired and got 2birds massive scum points. But I still hopped on the garmr bus with him and the massive wifom of it all is gonna carry me to endgame 3 way lylo where I will use my secret double vote role pm to quickhammer us to victory.
Town already knows they're fucked, so it's only a matter of time before they all start replacing out just to have their replacements replace out. The whole shitstorm is going to be so fucking massive that by the end of it we're probably gonna end up down another list mod while bringing kuribo's campaign to replace a list mod to a screeching halt full of tears.
Because nothing says town like this post here.
five:the fact you criticize my play even through it busted us out of rvs got the game rolling and has made everyone pretty active and enjoyable. While your play itself hasn't actually been better than mine and actually a lot of your scum reads are based off my play. You haven't done much to push the game forward.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@bookitty
Prohawk reading my of my gambit and grey ice i'm scum isn't hypocritical if you actually can look beneath the surface of things.
My play was designed to get things rolling something for everyone to talk about grease then wheels. Grey ice play offers nothing he doesn't intend to be helpful to the town in anyway. It's not really hard to see the basic difference if you think about it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 258, Bookitty wrote:Wow, where to start with the misreps.
I voted Flubber for what I saw as the opportunistic timing of his vote on you. I unvoted him for the post you quoted, because I don't see scum responding to GreyICE in a way guaranteed to get negative attention like that one.
I voted 2birds1stone not for his vote on you, but for saying he was trying to look town.
I don't know if you're town or not. I don't have any experience playing with you. I thought your initial roleclaims were jokes. Your claim that they were gambits designed to attract votes doesn't hold up for me. That said, the same reason I unvoted Flubber applies to you. Here's the issue:
1. Scum wouldn't play in a way that attracts a lot of negative attention.
2. Scum know 1.
3. Therefore scum might play in a way that attracts a lot of negative attention on the thought that people will think 1.
Can you see why I might not be sure of my read on Flubber OR on you?
As for GreyICE, I took it as a joke because I've seen it a gazillion times before. (Inb4 lynch all liars: gazillion isn't actually a number.)
That said, I want you to respond to this and tell me if you understood it and what you disagree with in it. Also, any examples of hypocrisy on my part would be good, since you made the accusation.
What misreps lol.
Lets start with 2birds. Our interactions brought his behavior up so you can't say my gambit had nothing to do with it.
flubbers never really been a good scum player I don't think his actually won one game and I don't know if he actually likes scum. His better as town. Also look at chosen 376 for flubbers scum game. It basiccly oozes out scum.
In post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 66, T S O wrote:
Please elaborate, your cases are so usually top-class and your history of reading me so often correct that I'm particularly excited to hear you've formed a scumread on me.
It's also a bit disturbing that you called me scum, GG called me Town, and then you immediately accepted this without pushing your read. Why?
In post 67, ZZZX wrote:When the duck did I accept you as town? And no I can't make a case that good at page 1 .
TSO won't answer this so I will. Check the post numbers.
In post 38, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:TSO is town I guess. I cant see a scummy getting their panties all in a bunch over what he is getting his bunched up over.
But then TSO decides ZZZX is still scummy because nobody agrees with him on PAGE 3.
In post 68, T S O wrote:So, what you're saying is, you think I'm Scum, but you have no problems with other players completely disagreeing with that, you're not seeking to either change their opinion or have them change yours, and also you can't actually articulate why you think I'm scum.
And you wonder why I'm so often derisive to you.
In post 70, T S O wrote:I have a theory where if I constantly point it out he may actually correct it.
So until TSO canfinda read and notpusha read, he is scum, and ZZZX is chosen.
VOTE: TSO
In post 106, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: unvote
Yeah. I derped. Looking back, yeah that post was a defense post and nothing more.
He also slips up while his scum I haven't actually seen a town game where his done this.(doesn't this set of events remind you of something that happened this game.)
Also grey ice is exactly what prohawk said not interested in this game. He doesn't even intend to hunt at all. Through him calling it a gambit is weird I think it's just greyice not giving a fuck about this game. Can you tell how grey ice post can be considered townie.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 261, Bookitty wrote:You do know GreyICE had just replaced into the game when he posted that? As in, it was his first post of the game?
@GreyICE: Have you read the game thread yet?
You misrepresented the reasons for my votes. I still await the examples of hypocrisy.
I gave you one if you actually payed attentions o add that to the list but.
In post 256, Garmr wrote:In post 255, Bookitty wrote:In what way? I crave specifics!
Your stances are usually uncertain.
One:you are hypocritical
you said you couldn't see my gambit as working yet you vote flubber and fucking 2 birds after that because of their votes on me and they way they handled it.
Also Look at when prohawk voted grey ice posted more than one post. Seriously are you even reading the thread?
I'm this asking again has anything grey ice said actually warranted anyone to say his townie?
lol but admit it my actions have caused events to play out the way they have and your reasons to vote 2bird and flubber have came indirectly (birds case and me bringing him to the light and causing him to act that way from being put on the spot) or directly from my play (flubbers bad vote on me)-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
I shall refer to it as PLAY then-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 265, Bookitty wrote:Where have I said GreyICE was town? Seriously, quote me up. I don't have a read on him yet, so I KNOW I didn't say that.
Also, I'd like a readslist from you, garmr.
I didn't say you did I was asking you to say what so town about greyice because you seem to be touchy around him.
town-
Victor
null town-
Prohawk
Gendaberry
feyal
null scum-
grey ice
2bird
scum-
flubber
rest are null-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 267, Flubbernugget wrote:Garmr if you're going to bring up my first scum game you should bring up my first town game to see how much better that was.
It's not how good you were flubber it's you're behavior pattern. Compare the two first game was quirky town trying to figure out and understand the game. While the game I referenced was you unsure how to push a fake scumread on someone. Since you were not trying to figure out the game you could see were you weren't paying attention and was apologetic in parts.
Your compare my first game ever and my first (and only scum game which isn't multiscum.) don't really work in this context.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 270, Flubbernugget wrote:Okay so prove I'm making pushes as shitty as the one you cherrypicked for reasons I don't understand.
I cherry picked? dude you only have two scum games that are completed and the other ones multiscum and the tell doesn't really apply as much. What I'm saying the way you approach the game is different as scum. While you can clearly see you are hunting and looking in your town games.
In your scum games you tend to go with the flow unsure of where to start or go. This is evident in the way you are handling this game. The absences of you actually scum hunting is obvious in this game you are missing that mechanic.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 301, GreyICE wrote:In post 299, ProHawk wrote:In post 290, Feysal wrote:I'm kind of disappointed, I thought you were going somewhere with this. I wanted to read your case so I could see if the thought process behind it made sense for town, but now I'm just puzzled. I have never lied about meta, my own or anyone else's, as town or scum, though I have been accused of it over different interpretations. Why did you think that Garmr's replacements would have been relevant?
I'm sorry I disappointed you...
I thought you made up the whole Garmr thing, that's why it was relevant cause I couldn't find any games he actually made it to the end of. Turns out I was wrong.
Also, Waffle lying about not knowing what "lol" means makes no sense, unless he is newb-scum?
P-EDIT: THAT IS AN ACTUAL FREAKING SCUM READ AND I WILL TAKE IT TO MY GRAVE.
Waffle's scumbuddy, 100%
Lynch all liars
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 306, Bookitty wrote:Garmr, you think WaffleGhost is town? Or we're wrong for some other reason?
What i was referring to was prohawk being his scum buddy as prohawk is a town read of mine.
Waffle is null- with a slight scum lean after looking into it but what's interesting is the last 3 votes of him were based off the lol case while massives is a no case.
But The first 2 had real solid reasoning that rival the case on flubber.
In post 157, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 155, WaffleGhost wrote:@Gendaberry Check Newbie 1543. You honestly think as scum I'd say "OH I KNOW! I'LL DO THE EXACT SAME THING THAT GOT ME LYNCHED IN MY LAST GAME!!!" ?
I also didn't intend to be attacking anyone, I was stating my opinion on playstyle. I intended to share my stance on appearing town. I've had serious misconceptions about things in IRL mafia and was I mafia? No.
@Victor Whilst just reading through here's how people struck me based on my gut.
Null'
-Victor
-Salamence
-Gendaberry
-Massive
-Garmr
-ProHawk
-Jackel
-Primate
-Flubber
*I either didn't have the necessary amount of posts or didn't want to make a decision with what I had. In general I don't find reads before a certain number of pages to have any real weight.
**I know it's alot of null:/
Town
-Bookitty
-Every body's favourite wraith, your dear, WAFFLEGHOST! At you service.
Scum
-2birds definitely came off as scum but I can't say why at the moment.
I feel like I'm missing someone.
Hang on let me just trim this down so we're dealing with the actual content.
In post 155, WaffleGhost wrote:
@Victor
Town
-Bookitty
Scum
-2birds definitely came off as scum but I can't say why at the moment.
Insightful.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: WaffleGhost
In post 147, Gendaberry wrote:WaffleGhost really seems like scum who doesn't know what they're doing to me. Waffle hasn't really done anything at all so far. It's not putting pressure on anyone or voting anyone, and on top of that I don't like 56
In post 56, WaffleGhost wrote:I'm not accusing you of being scum, yet. Just stating my opinion as far as play. I'm just a dumb newbie though
Its the only post from Waffle with content, and even then he adds the "dumb newbie" comment in what looks to me like they're trying to preemptively defend themselves in case someone found the post scummy. I might be reading too far into it, but it looks like Waffle is trying to avoid suspicion by never accusing anyone, and by pulling the newbie card to try and make themselves look innocent.
VOTE: WaffleGhost
These two reasoning are way better than the current 4 votes on him. One which has none at all and the other is a lol case which is throw away. But it's the throw away lol case that gathered the most votes why didn't people him when he had these solid reasoning. Why let the wagon get to middle size then boom grow in a instant once a vote tipped it into the most voted category. I feel like the wagon started on town grounds and some point scum greased the wheels.
Maybe it's a bus or it could be a mislynch I'm not sure.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 309, Bookitty wrote:In post 307, Garmr wrote:But it's the throw away lol case that gathered the most votes why didn't people him when he had these solid reasoning.
I can't speak for others. The fact that WaffleGhost appeared to be a newb was certainly part of my reasoning in not voting him. The fact that he was faking being a newb and apparently trolling both me and the thread erased that reason.
Why do you think that deliberately lying to create an impression of newbieness is a throwaway lol case?
Well consider the fact he is a newbie with 2 complete games and i think no prior mafia experience before his first game because he didn't know what to do in rvs(first game) is a part of it. I don't think the lol case was him trying to create a impression of newbieness as I don't see how it's game relevant. When did the word Lol become a tell and mafia relevant. If it was faking not understanding rvs it would be a different story as someone explained that to him.
I think he was just fucking with you.
the other two cases through are more solid.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 311, massive wrote:In post 307, Garmr wrote:Waffle is null- with a slight scum lean after looking into it but what's interesting is the last 3 votes of him were based off the lol case while massives is a no case.
You can see my 131 for exactly where my vote came from, and which is way more succinct than the cases you think are "good" (especially since Gendaberry's is basically just expounding on this).
Primate: I think that must be an artifact of earlier times, because I'm the same way with my vote. I try and take care to place it where I think it goes and I HATE moving it. I'm not crazy about players who will vote seven people in the first three pages, it drives me nuts.
Cheers make that 2 I didn't see that post I only looked at time of votes.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 313, Bookitty wrote:In post 310, Garmr wrote:Well consider the fact he is a newbie with 2 complete games and i think no prior mafia experience before his first game because he didn't know what to do in rvs(first game) is a part of it. I don't think the lol case was him trying to create a impression of newbieness as I don't see how it's game relevant. When did the word Lol become a tell and mafia relevant. If it was faking not understanding rvs it would be a different story as someone explained that to him.
I think he was just fucking with you.
the other two cases through are more solid.
I also think he was just fucking with me (and calling his weird later questions a defense is also problematic for me). However, I think it's all of a piece in a way that I don't think you do. Playing up one's newbness and pretending not to understand things, including the meaning of terms like LOL (and he continued that past one post, so it wasn't a joke) can be a tactic to get out of scummy behaviour. Giving a whole list of reads that make very little sense can be either newb or scum (or both). If he's faking not knowing what LOL means, he was probably faking the rest of the newbie tells. When one part of the constructed newbie facade crumbles, the whole thing goes. WaffleGhost also called his questions a defence, which argues he meant it to be one.
Makes sense now?
I'm starting to understand the defense thing.
Also noticed feyal earlier comments (/case) can strike him off the list and i think it explains the situation. Look at that you and grey are the most suspicious ones on the wagon.
In post 214, Feysal wrote:
WaffleGhost
I find myself agreeing with much that Gendaberry has said about him. Downplaying his own post with that dumb newbie comment was strange, particularly since that post was only about mafia theory.His defense that he would not have done the same thing that got him lynched before is also rather disingenuous,since he in fact has done the same thing - the only question is, does it make him scum? I think not, but it sure does not make him town either. What Gendaberry said about his lack of content still stands, and tight schedules happen to scum too.
.
I think this was what it was a defense of and he did it on purpose to mock feyal about it. because he portayed himself as stupid earlier.
In post 56, WaffleGhost wrote:As town, appearing town benefits the town, unless of course, your just out for town cred. Appearing town is good but it should be something that happens naturally by actions and not by you hunting for opportunities to win over the town's trust, in my opinion. Only scum is concerned with being the towniest of the town for the most part.
Here are 2 mindsets
Must look town must look town. . . must. . . look. . . town. . . .
I'm gonna be a bad ass scum hunting machine, who cares if I get my complexion a bit dirty?
I'm not accusing you of being scum, yet. Just stating my opinion as far as play.I'm just a dumb newbie though :P
So he played himself off dumb on purpose as a sarcastic response to people scum reading for playing the noob defense in this pose.
That's the only reason why I think he would say as a defense otherwise it doesn't make logical sense.