In post 44, Keybladewielder wrote:Watashi wa makeru wake niwa ikanai!
weeb
VOTE: keybladewielder
In post 79, Keybladewielder wrote:In post 71, Seohyun wrote:In post 44, Keybladewielder wrote:Watashi wa makeru wake niwa ikanai!
weeb
VOTE: keybladewielder
I hate anime. So calling me a weeb is extremely offensive.
It's a quote from the only Pokemon who can talk, Mewtwo.
In post 114, Espeonage wrote:In post 113, Egg wrote:He'll be fine if there is a protective role. I have a feeling there is
This. There is enough protection wifom that I could get either protected or not shot at because I am out as a power role and thus am a protection target.
In post 127, Keybladewielder wrote:There's nothing more to say. No one is hitting me a scummy. We're still in RVS.
In post 143, Bert wrote:KBW has been null unless you think his "playing around rather than getting serious" is scummy (which i don't this early in the game)
In post 155, Bert wrote:in that case
it's time for you to vote someone who is scummiest to you and label those points out
In post 155, Bert wrote:
In post 154, Seohyun wrote:In post 143, Bert wrote:KBW has been null unless you think his "playing around rather than getting serious" is scummy (which i don't this early in the game)
which is why i said i wish i could say he was scum cus then it would be easier
^guy's bandwagon voting KBW since pg 1 with scummy looking logic
In post 158, Espeonage wrote:In post 157, TierShift wrote:Seohyun, next to being annoying, might also be scum.
In post 176, Bert wrote:In post 170, Seohyun wrote:yeah cus me rvs voting kbw citing him being a weeb was scum me trying to quick lynch
are you even trying? i only continued talking to him about it cus his reaction surprised me
i don't follow this train of thought about why you only continued talking to him because his reaction "surprised you." that makes me question if the reasons you posted for initially voting him (being "weeb") were just something you made up to fit with your vote
In post 170, Seohyun wrote:i voted kbw in what was clearly not serious?? but i guess either you all are rusing me or you can't understand a joke
and i really don't understand why a wagon so quickly built up behind me jfc
his reaction "surprised you," you kept your vote while talking to/about him, so why do you not understand why the wagon built up?
VOTE: Seohyun
In post 127, Keybladewielder wrote:There's nothing more to say. No one is hitting me a scummy. We're still in RVS.
In post 179, Egg wrote:In post 175, Bert wrote:In post 174, Egg wrote:Wisdom is probably the last person in this game I'd sheep
Why, eggzactly?
Apparently he has a bunch of styles, but I'm familiar with the overly literal spamming one and it annoys me. Probably would have /outted if I realized he was here. That's my own fault though for not checking.
Can someone define "weeb" for me? It's getting hard to ignore
In post 184, Bert wrote:kay
you and lastmanstandings are the people i am not familiar with, barring being an alt
In post 180, Seohyun wrote:imo ur reaching really hard for something that's scummy
and what does that lead you to think regarding your Bert read (or, alternatively, others who said they felt you might be scum)?
In post 187, Marquis wrote:In post 186, Seohyun wrote:and wisdom was pretty gud with his reads in the last game i was with him in
doesn't count if ur scum??
or are you not talking about team 9 in sdr2, because i'm like only half sure atm
In post 195, Flames682 wrote:Not really buying Seo's reasons on voting KBW.
In post 205, Flames682 wrote:In post 180, Seohyun wrote:i was deciding if 1. being called a weeb is a trigger for him 2. scum reaction cus i called him scum for it
decided, hey that'd be pretty stupid if he was scum for that and way too lazy of me (which is what i said)
I believe the doing it as a joke but not the reaction part.
In post 209, TierShift wrote:
Seohyun, could you use proper capitalisation and punctuation in your posts? I'm having a hard time reading thrm and might skip over them as soon as I determined your alignment.
In post 333, TierShift wrote:In post 186, Seohyun wrote:i don't understand what tiershift means by "focus" - well i have an idea but i would like him to tell me in his own words
Cool, what do you think I meant?
In post 346, TierShift wrote:It's just that you both don't seem to understand whiteknighting as a scumtell, which it is.
Seohyun, your focus was on kbw the whole time up to that point, just egging him on for no apparent reason. I dodn't understand why and it was, to say the least, not very constructive.
Now, you freak out over a wagon on him and unvote and just stop scumhunting.
In post 400, Egg wrote:In post 398, Seohyun wrote:The only experience I have with flames is him being pulled into a huge tunnelling battle that lasted precisely the entire game, so its like im expecting walls of text and I'm not getting any. Feels strangely empty lol
VOTE: espeonage
i like this vote
or micc or BBT
Can you explain any of those reads?
In post 406, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:293 - Seo, you're basically saying here that you unvoted because you were coming under pressure for your vote. That feels scummy, like you took pre-emptive action before you really picked up some heat.
In post 412, Egg wrote:Seo wrote: Espeonage, all he did was talk about flavor, then pokedex spamming, and then suddenly went "why is everyone town reading me!!"Micc, semantics battle, then dropped it for scumhunting elsewhere, didn't actually do anything after
Why are these scum actions?
In post 786, Egg wrote:In post 783, Flames682 wrote:Interesting how that also perfectly describes Marquis
Where did Marquis lie about the state of the game?
In post 835, Wisdom wrote:was it ever not dead?
In post 890, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Seo and KBW are also due prods.
In post 1008, Not_Mafia wrote:It's (one of) my move(s) aka abilities, there are multiple people in the game with it and if we use it on the same night we establish a neighbourhood with eachother, but we need to post in it for it to stay open, which we haven't been doing
In post 1025, Bert wrote:
@BBT: is there any reason why you haven't commented about not_mafia's opening up about you two's neighborhood? your side of the story?
In post 1085, Formerfish wrote:Well, we could have a Twilight Party. We all simultaneously watch the whole Twilight series, live chatting while we watch. We could take bets on what happens first: we have a flip, or one of us completely loses our fucking minds devolve into our base most urges kill our families and go on a nation wide game of hide and seek from the authorities.
Who's in?
In post 1146, Formerfish wrote:In post 1144, Seohyun wrote:lol are you actually using that as an indicator of alignment? reaching much?
I'm using it as an indication that you are lying.
pieguyn wrote:also my logic isn't that just being a Psychic makes you conftown; it's that there wouldn't be more than 1 Psychic on the scum team, since NM didn't understand how the role worked, and thus that any remaining Psychic would be conftown.
In post 1160, Formerfish wrote:You used your psychic ability on the first night? Why weren't you in the neighborhood then?
Flames682 wrote:Who did you target Seo?
In post 1164, Flames682 wrote:And along with FF I think Seo is lying. Or is saying the truth except he didn't really target BBT
VOTE: Seo
In post 1186, Formerfish wrote:In post 1183, Seohyun wrote:hahahhahahahahahahahhaahhha
moral of the story: If you want to check ur role again, don't just look at the pm chain, look at the original role
hahahahhahahahhahahaahhahha
So you saw the flip of NM in the chain, saw psychic, claimed to have done that move both nights (even though he died d2), saw red and never thought a thing about it? Its cause you are scum.