In post 157, BlankFace wrote: In post 153, House wrote:
I'd love for you to contribute something.
Quid pro quo.
This is how I contribute, questioning. I don't have the luxury of meta.
You don't need the luxury of meta to weigh in.
That said, at least you're starting to, so...
: Obvious
: Didn't jump on my mistake as an excuse to sell my wagon. Instead, he looked for the motive behind my push and analyzed my thought process.
: Hat buddy. Also, I've liked my interactions with him for the most part. His chainsaw/soft defense is keeping him out of my town pile, however.
: I've explained why I want her to be town in
51.
: Her scummy is well deserved, and I'd hate to have to lynch her.
d3x, Soren, farside22, PeregrineV, Katsuki: Haven't seen enough to base an opinion.
: I generally shy away from "too scummy to be scum" defenses, but that's more for players that have been around a while. I
think
she's an easy target for scum to get a mislynch on and won't be voting here today unless something drastic happens.
: Lots of questions, not much in the way of analysis. Related to IIoA.
: Hasn't done much that I'm happy with in his posts until after my reads list.