Mini 1676 Marvel Mafia- Game Over

Mac · Post Post #12 (isolation #0) » Wed May 20, 2015 8:38 pm

confirm

Mac · Post Post #27 (isolation #1) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:32 am

In post 24, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 22, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: Soren

naked vote. Creating an early wagon.

what is wrong with either of these?

Mac · Post Post #29 (isolation #2) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:37 am

he is voting him

Mac · Post Post #32 (isolation #3) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:51 am

In post 30, Vilewhirl wrote:ah yes but are you voting anyone?
thats the real question.

i am not, no.

Mac · Post Post #34 (isolation #4) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:57 am

In post 31, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 27, Mac wrote:
In post 24, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 22, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: Soren

naked vote. Creating an early wagon.

what is wrong with either of these?

Opportunistic. Shows potential scumminess. Something to keep an eye on.

shows potential scumminess doesn't cut it I'm afraid. neither does opportunistic really. we're in rvs; how is this opportunistic?

wagons are a good way of finding out someone's alignment, so why shouldn't we wagon soren?

Mac · Post Post #35 (isolation #5) » Thu May 21, 2015 4:57 am

In post 33, dragonspawn wrote:So why not?

because i'm not. next question?

Mac · Post Post #40 (isolation #6) » Thu May 21, 2015 5:35 am

In post 36, Soren wrote:
so what's stopping you from joining the wagon?

i'm questioning dragonspawn

Mac · Post Post #41 (isolation #7) » Thu May 21, 2015 5:39 am

In post 37, dragonspawn wrote:
What's wrong with noting scummy behavior and saying I am going to keep an eye on it? It's not like I'm saying he is 100% guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It's behavior I keep an eye on.

So why do you have a problem with me keeping an eye on toffee?

I find running up an rvs wagon for no reason as suspicious. I find in my experience that scum like to run up early wagons.

And if you want to run up sorens wagon, why not vote for him?

well it looks like you're setting yourself up to scumread bbt in the future. it's also not really that scummy?

can you point to these games where you have experienced scum building early rvs wagons? this seems like a very sweeping statement you are saying to fit your line of reasoning behind attacking bbt because town quite often do it too.

i'm not voting yet because I'm questioning you.

Mac · Post Post #42 (isolation #8) » Thu May 21, 2015 5:40 am

In post 38, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 35, Mac wrote:
In post 33, dragonspawn wrote:So why not?

because i'm not. next question?

Why? What's your relationship with toffee? Scumbuddies? Neighbors?

Your unwilling to vote. Not willing to elaborate why.

So what's wrong will keeping an eye on toffee?

rolefishing already?

also I'm not sure what toffee has to do with anything here, think vilewhirl was talking about me voting you

Mac · Post Post #50 (isolation #9) » Thu May 21, 2015 6:37 am

nope!

pedit; there is no reason. I just find your accusations a bit off base. this is not me saying bbt is town, that read will come, but I feel like your early stance on him was unjustified.

there is as much of a relationship between me and bbt as there is between you and soren. make what you will of that

Mac · Post Post #51 (isolation #10) » Thu May 21, 2015 6:38 am

that nope was towards shinobi who asked if I've ever caught scum rolefishing

Mac · Post Post #62 (isolation #11) » Thu May 21, 2015 8:45 am

In post 56, Shinobi wrote:
In post 51, Mac wrote:that nope was towards shinobi who asked if I've ever caught scum rolefishing

So why even bring it up if you know it doesn't work?

who said it doesn't work?

@farside it comes roughly around the time the wagon dismantles for a more serious one. generally, it's not the people on the rvs wagon but the person being wagoned themselves I look at

Hi sthar!

Mac · Post Post #63 (isolation #12) » Thu May 21, 2015 8:46 am

also, I'm good farside!

how are things with you?

Mac · Post Post #207 (isolation #13) » Fri May 22, 2015 6:11 am

im going to be vla til sunday night ish. will read up then!

Mac · Post Post #279 (isolation #14) » Sat May 23, 2015 8:03 am

im here! rejoice

Mac · Post Post #295 (isolation #15) » Sat May 23, 2015 9:05 am

vilewhirl wrote:sorenwagon was bigger. might still be even. why macvote over sorenvote if the job of your vote was to get wagongoing?

I felt like it was an rvs vote based on my already mentioned opinion on wagons. but we weren't in rvs.

/shrug probably not worth getting your knickers in a twist over

farside wrote:
Fair enough. I notice people that question the wagons like dragon and are town.
Why was it bothering you that he felt bbt was scummy?

well i didn't think his reasoning carried much weight. his answers to my questions didn't really carry much either

In post 72, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:23 - Scummy. Role-fishing. Could have waited for VC.

24 - Do you find creating wagons is a bad thing?

31 - Can you explain the opportunism behind my vote Dragon?

38 - Dragon, you seem to have a problem with Mac but maintain your RVS vote on me. Any reason for this?

52 - Dragon, why did you question Anti's vote but not Farside's?

this post seems to focus alot on dragon, save for the first question which is reaching ALOT and generally not a very good point. did you not have any non-dragon thoughts?

In post 82, farside22 wrote:Well I voted Mac because I felt he was making a mountain out of a molehill.
My experience with dragon thus far is he has foot in mouth disease and a few other things I want to say but on going game prevents me from continuing that thought process.

how is making a 'mountain out of a molehill' as you call it scum-motivated, and how is more likely to come from scum than town?

also, saint's posts either side of this post from farside aren't good at all. he backs out of his farside vote quickly, then backs out of his enjoyment of my posts even quicker. really strange.

In post 88, farside22 wrote:Saints funny.

Not sure about your alignment but I like your attitude.

what do you think of what I mentioned above?

In post 98, Soren wrote:And Vile was obviously lieing about the double and triple vote thing now.

well... duh? i thought it was pretty obviously rvs shenanigans. i don't know why you needed some sort of clarification from vilewhirl when the first votecount would either prove or disprove the 'claim' (i almost feel bad calling it that) also, I can't decide if your "holy shit, who was spider-man?" reads fake or not.

vilewhirl wrote:im still waiting for macs vote.
i want to see that guy make things happen.

why am I so interesting all of a sudden?

In post 136, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 126, Saint wrote:Doc claim??? Jk

okay, even if there was a doc claim, why the heck would a townie even hint at that? Even completely joking it would be in bad form. Granted I don't know anyone who would claim doc day 1 when we are barely out of RVs.

what the fuck is this? my eyes burned just reading it.

BooKitty wrote:Mac, can you give me a brief "state of the game" update from your perspective? Also, what information do you think people usually get from wagons on Day One?

you're about to get it with this post. well, you can form reads off wagons and it could potentially be helpful for vca later on in game.

i thought that was a pretty self explanatory answer to be honest, and i wonder why you felt the need to ask it

In post 213, Soren wrote:
In post 210, Vilewhirl wrote:hi soren.
are you almost ready to try and make reasons for voting me that arent really bad?

oh, you're town now

you're too scummy to be scum atm

on the contrary, i find vilewhirl to be too town to be scum. what's setting off your scumfeels?

soren wrote:This post makes you town. When you adopt the role of town leader it makes you look really town.

Saint's fluff and personal attacks =/= scum. I actually think he's pretty town from it.

dragonspawn is barking up the wrong tree. mainly because i dont finding creating wagons particularly scummy.

mac doesnt appear to be taking a strong stance

farside is town

and null for the rest

these are some really wishy-washy reads, especially the bookitty one. what makes bookitty's attempt to 'lead' the town a pure town action? why can't scumkitty pull this stunt?

In post 216, hiplop wrote:saint is definitely town.

not liking bookitty

VOTE: bookitty

In post 217, Soren wrote:what is your read on boo?

...really soren? could you not tell from the vote?

this is not the first time I feel like you're just posting to look like you're doing something.

antihero's entrance (i'm not quoting every post, no) was pretty town. he brings some different opinions to the table and i just didnt get a scumvibe from it.

Vote: Soren

A VOTE APPEARS

Mac · Post Post #377 (isolation #16) » Sat May 23, 2015 10:37 pm

i would like to hear more from sthar8. i don't actually know if he's scumreading you or just angry with what you said earlier.

Mac · Post Post #385 (isolation #17) » Sun May 24, 2015 1:16 am

soren is active lurking.

other than that, ill detail a bit more when im home from work

Mac · Post Post #392 (isolation #18) » Sun May 24, 2015 10:56 am

soren wrote:Viewhirl's lieing is too scummy to be scum.

He doesn't bookitty, That's not much of a read. At the very least I want to hear what specifically he doesn't like about boo.

what is vilewhirl lying about? also too scummy to be scum is absolutely fucking horrendous reasoning for a townread, but I'm sure you know that

soren wrote:Boo leads as town because that's what town boo does.

well... thanks for the lesson i guess? but that's not what i asked. i feel like a few of this game are familiar with each other, so what is making this townbookitty 'leading' the town rather than scumbookitty emulating her town game?

Mac · Post Post #414 (isolation #19) » Mon May 25, 2015 2:42 am

i'm not exactly opposed to the bbt wagon because i think vilewhirl and co are all making sense. but i would argue a soren wagon is much better. i'd probably also wagon saint too.

Mac · Post Post #521 (isolation #20) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:32 am

In post 493, Antihero wrote:
In post 414, Mac wrote:i'm not exactly opposed to the bbt wagon because i think vilewhirl and co are all making sense. but i would argue a soren wagon is much better. i'd probably also wagon saint too.

oh wow, i hate this post

why? what's wrong with it?

Mac · Post Post #522 (isolation #21) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:35 am

it's pretty funny how no one bats an eyelid until antihero says he hates it. i find it hard to believe the four people voting me so far all failed to miss it first time round.

(also, no one probably batted an eyelid because there's nothing really wrong with it IMO)

Mac · Post Post #523 (isolation #22) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:37 am

In post 517, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Vote: Mac

number of times my name comes up in ABR's iso before this vote: 0. :goodvoting:

well, two if you include both mentions of smack. but we're not going to do that

Mac · Post Post #527 (isolation #23) » Mon May 25, 2015 10:52 am

In post 524, farside22 wrote:
In post 522, Mac wrote:it's pretty funny how no one bats an eyelid until antihero says he hates it. i find it hard to believe the four people voting me so far all failed to miss it first time round.

(also, no one probably batted an eyelid because there's nothing really wrong with it IMO)

Well I tunnel and tend to miss things.

i remember you saying that.

doesn't explain the other two.

also if you feel like telling me whats wrong with it, that would be good

Mac · Post Post #529 (isolation #24) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:07 am

i'm really glad someone is as clueless as me

Mac · Post Post #535 (isolation #25) » Mon May 25, 2015 12:05 pm

In post 530, farside22 wrote:
In post 526, hiplop wrote:I want farside to be scum because he's being a dick but I fear he's probably town. Please stop being toxic. No one likes it.

What's the reasoning for mac? I thought he was coming off quite Towny, tbh. That one post doesn't seem all that bad to me.

Cant we all just murder soren.

Curious, farside, what about my post was out of place? I was behind so a lot of stuff was behind but how does that facilitate me being scum?

I explained my reasoning already.
How am I being a dick?
Or let me be blunt. How is the hydra not on your list for being a bigger dick?

In post 527, Mac wrote:
In post 524, farside22 wrote:
In post 522, Mac wrote:it's pretty funny how no one bats an eyelid until antihero says he hates it. i find it hard to believe the four people voting me so far all failed to miss it first time round.

(also, no one probably batted an eyelid because there's nothing really wrong with it IMO)

Well I tunnel and tend to miss things.

i remember you saying that.

doesn't explain the other two.

also if you feel like telling me whats wrong with it, that would be good

For me it was vague. The I like x view and could see bbt scum comment.
Sticking with Soren and saying it's better with really moving forward.
Basically it reads as willing to jump on a wagon at anytime and gives you that freedom without saying anything of value

Right. So instead of actually jumping on the wagon, i'm sc because i expressed not being happy with bbt's play but not enough to move my vote off soren.

how in the holy high earth is that scum? All I said was essentially yea, I don't like BBT but I much prefer Soren and I also don't like saint.

Makes no fucking sense

Mac · Post Post #549 (isolation #26) » Mon May 25, 2015 8:25 pm

In post 508, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 506, farside22 wrote:
In post 503, Albert B. Rampage wrote:are you scum bbt?

If you think bbt is town, vote Mac

dont think bbt is town but I'm not a huge fan of mac either.

what has convinced you that bbt is town?

In this post dragon says something pretty similar to what mac is being wagoned for and is ignored

/logic

Mac · Post Post #552 (isolation #27) » Mon May 25, 2015 11:19 pm

I will answer that question once I'm home. Roundabout 9/10 hours i think

Mac · Post Post #572 (isolation #28) » Tue May 26, 2015 10:54 pm

In post 557, Antihero wrote:
In post 521, Mac wrote:
In post 493, Antihero wrote:
In post 414, Mac wrote:i'm not exactly opposed to the bbt wagon because i think vilewhirl and co are all making sense. but i would argue a soren wagon is much better. i'd probably also wagon saint too.

oh wow, i hate this post

why? what's wrong with it?

because it takes a really passive attitude of approval towards the lead wagon, which inherently is more likely to come from scum (calculated inaction)

ehhhh no it's not in this case but whatever. yes I approved the wagon but i'd rather stick with trying to a build a soren one. < two wagons is not a bad thing. i genuinely can't believe we wouldn't be having this discussion if i had voted bbt. there's no logic in that. you're town, but you're being really stupid here and you've quite possibly gave bbt a way out of being lynched.

notice how he's dropped off the face of the earth again?

that final sentence can also apply to farside

Mac · Post Post #574 (isolation #29) » Tue May 26, 2015 10:57 pm

In post 568, Saint wrote:
In post 564, dragonspawn wrote:Saint why you voting mac?

because i dont want to be lynched
because he talked shit about me apparently
because i want to
because i can
because im town interested in self preservation and he has a higher chance of being mafia than me
because a lot of people are suspicious of him and i dont want him to coast into lategame as scum saying if he was maf he would have been lynched D1
because im not going to let someone we can lynch now live later to shoot me

tl;dr - saint doesn't have a valid reason other than "im town, so he might be mafia"

Mac · Post Post #575 (isolation #30) » Tue May 26, 2015 10:58 pm

In post 573, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 560, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Soooo, we should get another vote on Mac and then have intent stated.

That would move the game forward.

Hi Mac.

hi?

Mac · Post Post #578 (isolation #31) » Tue May 26, 2015 11:05 pm

In post 395, Saint wrote:
unvote;
vote: BBT

votecount; rubbing him the wrong way; etc
if im rubbing you the wrong way, goodbye to you, sir

we can go head to head

In post 396, Saint wrote:also i townread all 3 people on this wagon thusfar so thats a good indicator that hes scum

In post 397, Saint wrote:also his play is differing from the play ive read from him as town so meta

he doesnt like meta so

this series of posts made me lean towards saint being scum. it's like he realises he doesn't have a genuine reason for scumreading bbt and adds in afterthoughts. didn't appeal to me.

further confirmed by the fact his vote to put be to L-1 was absolutely shit. he's hiding behind the excuse of self preservation when he's got about two fucking votes.

??

Mac · Post Post #582 (isolation #32) » Tue May 26, 2015 11:07 pm

also soren is still scum because he knows i'm going to flip town.

i just want vilewhirl to come and cradle me and tell me everything is going to be ok

Mac · Post Post #583 (isolation #33) » Tue May 26, 2015 11:08 pm

In post 576, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Just letting you know I'm still here.

Waiting for someone to state intent so we can get a claim and move the game forward.

well yeah but you're not doing anything. are you?

who is your best bet for scum driving my wagon?

Mac · Post Post #586 (isolation #34) » Tue May 26, 2015 11:20 pm

boo's vote on me is rvs lol i completely forgot about that.

Mac · Post Post #596 (isolation #35) » Wed May 27, 2015 6:04 am

Why has it taken you 24 pages to explain that your vote actually has reasoning behind it and is not rvs?

Mac · Post Post #607 (isolation #36) » Wed May 27, 2015 10:34 am

In post 597, Bookitty wrote:I was gone over the three-day weekend. If you were paying any attention, you would have noted that.

i need a weekend that lasts til wednesday. that would be awesome

Mac · Post Post #608 (isolation #37) » Wed May 27, 2015 10:35 am

saint, what's with the self-preservation when you had ONE vote on you

or is that just an excuse to push through a lynch

Mac · Post Post #614 (isolation #38) » Wed May 27, 2015 10:51 am

In post 609, Saint wrote:having 1 vote on yourself doesnt mean it cant swing onto you

i just had that happen when i was town D1 on a diff account which i wont say what game it was because it is ongoing

that is such a shit line of reasoning. im sorry, but if you had that attitude with every single vote on you how are you ever going to push your scumreads? get them lynched?

i know you're probably going to retort with only knowing that you're town but that means sweet fuck all when you need at least two townies alive to win

Mac · Post Post #624 (isolation #39) » Wed May 27, 2015 11:06 am

not sure if trolling or

Mac · Post Post #648 (isolation #40) » Thu May 28, 2015 3:18 am

i have a bulge if that helps?

also i think saint might be town i'm not confident but sorenvote is sooooo much better

Mac · Post Post #651 (isolation #41) » Thu May 28, 2015 3:22 am

sorry. crude and disgusting is my style

Mac · Post Post #829 (isolation #42) » Fri May 29, 2015 11:34 am

good farside but things will have to wait!

v/la the weekend

i might be around, depends on RL stuffs

Mac · Post Post #908 (isolation #43) » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:15 am

i'll be back tomorrow i think, had an awful day today and not in the mood for anything

Mac · Post Post #1022 (isolation #44) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:18 am

im baaaack

and catching up!

Mac · Post Post #1027 (isolation #45) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:09 am

In post 657, farside22 wrote:
In post 656, dragonspawn wrote:
In post 655, farside22 wrote:Ds: your play is not always town like. Why is saints play sone thing you attack?

Cause his play is scummy as heck and he admits it is.

My play is the same all the time. It's consistent.

Admitting to scummy play doesn't mean he is scum.

^^^^^

In post 662, sthar8 wrote:@Shinobi- happy birthday!

In post 641, farside22 wrote:Star and hiplop who else are you scum reading and why?

Antihero, until he does something. And Shinobi, maybe. And we'll figure out who the rest of the team are after we lynch saint.

I find the antihero read particularly strange since he was doing something? i mean he practically drove a wagon on me, regardless of it being wrong, that was still something. there were much better candidates for a 'doing nothing' scumread (read:soren)

In post 666, sthar8 wrote:Crappy posting is more likely to piss off town than scum because scum can just skip most of it. They don't need to work out anyone's alignments.

bad logic since it's fairly easily to fake that kind of post.

In post 670, Soren wrote:
In post 582, Mac wrote:also soren is still scum because he knows i'm going to flip town.

i just want vilewhirl to come and cradle me and tell me everything is going to be ok

OBJECTION

DENIED

In post 688, Soren wrote:
In post 640, farside22 wrote:
In post 637, Saint wrote:Who are some inactive people who could be scum and need pressure?
Who has slipped?
etc

Vote: Soren

what happened to your scum read on mac?

i'm going to file this question in the under 'posting to look busy' category. farside can scumread more than one person, and vote more than one scumread. i feel like this is a veiled "why vote me??" post too.

i like saint alot better for #694. the frustration in that post feels genuine, and i feel his pain for coming from another forum on to here (as i'm sure most of us have)

soren wrote:
mac - could be scum for picking on the lowest hanging fruit

uh

when i picked on the 'low hanging fruit' as you call yourself, there was a wagon on bbt. that was the low hanging fruit i could've went for but i chose a different branch. i don't think you get out of a scumread by claiming you're low hanging fruit either

In post 713, Vilewhirl wrote:choooo
choooo
VOTE: saint
die die die.

no, he's town

bad vote. are you following up on your policy despite the fact saint didn't call anyone else a bad word?

In post 716, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: Saint

maybe scum. dragonspawn - this is what you call opportunistic.

In post 724, Saint wrote:Also Shinobi thanks for making me signup for a theme which is going to attract bad players who dont have a solid grasp on reality (newsflash marvel = no grasp on reality)

you guys actually think you're superheroes or something this game

i dont even know who my character is. he's just some stupid guy.

hey come on man. i am a superhero. we are all superheroes.

but i have to say i'm getting terribly bored of the back and forths that are not really game related. they're not helping me develop my reads.

In post 768, Vilewhirl wrote:Sorry I haven't been posting btw. Lots of stress irl. I've been reading and posting thought in the hydra PT but haven't posted before today.

Anyway, basically what I said in the PT is that a Saint lynch is the best option right now. Regardless of alignment, we get rid of a toxic, rude, egocentric player. If he's town, we get an easy wagon analysis tomorrow after scum pushes the easy mislynch. If he's scum, we lynched scum Day 1. Win/win.

PEDIT - Soren, gork posted them like a few minutes ago.

this makes literally no sense. you are offering to policy lynch saint and then claim we'll get easy wagon analysis tomorrow. how can we get wagon analysis off a policy lynch?

:badposting: i take back my townread on vilewhirl big time.

UNVOTE:

for now

Mac · Post Post #1028 (isolation #46) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:11 am

In post 993, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Not really...I should probably reread things before making comments like that. I remembered liking Mac's responses in real time as I was reading but rereading his ISO I'm not sure why I liked them :/

527 is funny though because;

In post 572, Mac wrote:i genuinely can't believe we wouldn't be having this discussion if i had voted bbt. there's no logic in that. you're town, but you're being really stupid here and you've quite possibly gave bbt a way out of being lynched.

notice how he's dropped off the face of the earth again?

that final sentence can also apply to farside

Who's dropped off the face of the earth now?

He does however provide good points against Saint in 578. Notably his (Saint's) reasoning for voting me after he voted and his reasoning for voting Mac.

it's called V/LA. unless you're trying to offend me by suggesting i use v/la to further my scumgame, then that sentence does not apply.

interestingly not the first time you've tried to throw mud at players who have declared v/la.

Mac · Post Post #1034 (isolation #47) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 9:19 am

In post 1030, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I know plenty of scum players who use/have used V/LA as a means of winning.

I wouldn't put it past anyone.

If you wanna come at me Mac, do it properly.

PEdit - I liked your points for Saint being town. Something you could easily write as scum.

come at you? i'm not 'coming at you' - i'm defending myself from the v/la and my scum game from what you insinuate from the v/la comment.

still got like 10 pages or so to read, but maybe tomorrow or thursday i'll finish.

Mac · Tue Jun 02, 2015 11:35 am

total coincidence.

Why did I post that as scum instead of just spitting out the wall i did about 45(?) minutes later?

Mac · Tue Jun 02, 2015 11:42 am

eh i havent got any really. I still have 10 pages to read (15 now actually) and the only memorable thing i can remember her doing is keeping an apparent rvs vote on me while the wagon built.

is that alignment indicative? Probably not until i read more.

Mac · Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:56 am

In post 888, Antihero wrote:'mkay, so nothing changed from the last time i read this thread other than you chucklefucks are letting saint get away with being a cheeky scumfuck and mac fell off the face of the earth now that the wagon's gone (shock!)

aaaaaaand there's now a wagon on soren for [reasons, that aren't good]

I WAS V/LA. HOW MANY TIMES DO I NEED TO POINT THIS OUT?

Mac · Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:58 am

can someone sum up the case on bookitty?

I don't know if I'll have time to catch up because I have an exam tomorrow, but with 12 hours remaining I'll make some kind of effort. I'll also be around so we don't end up no lynching

Mac · Thu Jun 04, 2015 12:59 am

ooookay bbt has a post like 3 above mine.

Mac · Post Post #1331 (isolation #53) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:22 am

In post 1327, Vilewhirl wrote:best thing i can think of alternatively that im actually kind of into is a sthar lynch.
guy feels like hes intentionally hiding behind a tunnel to avoid talking about literally anything else.
i dont know if 11 hours is enough time to be making a full CW from scratch though.

i might just have to settle for isodiving mac and seeing if theres actually a case worth pushing there.

if you don't scumread me now you won't after isoing me. i will accept being today's lynch if it comes to it, but 12 hours is plenty of time to swing a wagon. i'll be here until we have at least 2 to go before i will head to bed, and i'm sure others will come and go as the timezones reach morning

Mac · Post Post #1333 (isolation #54) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:24 am

i mean, with regards to bookitty, i always get the feeling that, when facing a lynch, dont give a fuck attitudes are town-motivated rather than scum. her attitude to you recently in her iso hasn't looked scum-motivated at all.

Mac · Post Post #1335 (isolation #55) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:27 am

i think shinobi might be a good lynch based on the fact his iso contains diddly squat reasoning for voting me, yet he keeps trying to push me as though he believes i'm scum including asking people to vote me. it looks like he's trying to use me as a compromise but hasn't articulated why it should be me.

other than i didn't post for a few days, which we've already established was because i declared v/la that seemingly no one cares about

Mac · Post Post #1336 (isolation #56) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:28 am

In post 1334, Vilewhirl wrote:careful mac.
youre chainsaw defending now.
because thats what that term means.
-.-

to be honest, i have no idea what chainsaw defending is and i've been here two years. elaborate

(also, idk if you are being serious given the -.- face)

Mac · Post Post #1339 (isolation #57) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:34 am

abr's iso is full of shit to be honest

Mac · Post Post #1342 (isolation #58) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:35 am

Vote: ABR

Mac · Post Post #1346 (isolation #59) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 1:38 am

abr's iso contains no references to a bookitty reads prior to his vote. he puts it down to gut, and he's already done that in this game with a vote on me (no mention of me before it) which is something you picked up on bbt.

if you're town bbt (which i think is pretty high given the last page or so) then it looks like he's hiding behind town (you) driving a bookitty wagon

Mac · Post Post #1355 (isolation #60) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:15 am

why are you guys not helping me with abr

Mac · Post Post #1358 (isolation #61) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:23 am

there's no one but me on the abr wagon!

i'll vote dragon if i have too; in the meantime, we need input from others as to whether or not they will compromise on dragon.

Mac · Post Post #1363 (isolation #62) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:28 am

Vote: Dragon

Mac · Post Post #1382 (isolation #63) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 4:49 am

In post 1379, Shinobi wrote:
In post 1335, Mac wrote:i think shinobi might be a good lynch based on the fact his iso contains diddly squat reasoning for voting me, yet he keeps trying to push me as though he believes i'm scum including asking people to vote me. it looks like he's trying to use me as a compromise but hasn't articulated why it should be me.

other than i didn't post for a few days, which we've already established was because i declared v/la that seemingly no one cares about

This is just not true.

care to provide some evidence?

Mac · Post Post #1421 (isolation #64) » Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:50 am

In post 1382, Mac wrote:
In post 1379, Shinobi wrote:
In post 1335, Mac wrote:i think shinobi might be a good lynch based on the fact his iso contains diddly squat reasoning for voting me, yet he keeps trying to push me as though he believes i'm scum including asking people to vote me. it looks like he's trying to use me as a compromise but hasn't articulated why it should be me.

other than i didn't post for a few days, which we've already established was because i declared v/la that seemingly no one cares about

This is just not true.

care to provide some evidence?

Shinobi? You cant just ignore it and hope it goes away

Mac · Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:16 am

can someone briefly summarise the last few pages and who we may be compomising on?

Mac · Thu Jun 04, 2015 11:34 am

In post 1574, Shinobi wrote:
In post 1564, Mac wrote:can someone briefly summarise the last few pages and who we may be compomising on?

Why is this joker still alive?

Probably because im not scum and you can't even bother yourself to make a case to support your bullshit accusations? Not even sure with what's wrong with what I asked.

I haven't read since this morning and i wont since im revising/away to bed. Im already voting dragon though.

Mac · Sun Jun 07, 2015 10:53 pm

VOTE: soren

i am town!

Mac · Post Post #1855 (isolation #68) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:29 am

i'm going to go with my instincts here and say the only confirmed town are the bodies we have.

all these claims could still be scum fake claiming, and i for one will stay on the side of caution for now

Mac · Post Post #1860 (isolation #69) » Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:50 am

ftr i don't think farside is gambitting because i really think it would be a stupid scum move to make

Mac · Post Post #1974 (isolation #70) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 4:18 am

i cant imagine any scenario on this planet where scum saint votes the claimed (proven?) doc

it's stupid, but it's more than likely town

Mac · Post Post #1984 (isolation #71) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:23 am

In post 1975, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Who is scum then Mac?

it's more than likely in the people who haven't been confirmed. with the exception of abr (who i don't trust) i have no reason to doubt any of the other claims.

what does your lynch order look like?

Mac · Post Post #1985 (isolation #72) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 5:24 am

In post 1983, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 534, Jingle wrote:

Mac (L-2): Bookitty, Antihero, BlueBloodedToffee, farside22, Albert B. Rampage

Psst, look at this wagon.

Look at all the conf town (via flips/claims). Then Anti, who is also prob town.

VOTE: Mac

This looks good for Today.

don't play this bullshit card, especially after pokemon upick where town members drove wagon after wagon on town.

Mac · Post Post #1994 (isolation #73) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:27 am

i am posting, it's not my fault people are flooding the game. i'm a low profile poster in the majority of games i'm in.

Mac · Post Post #1996 (isolation #74) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 6:36 am

me?

I gotta run for food of some sort but ill be kicking about later to provide some reasoning

Mac · Fri Jun 12, 2015 12:24 am

ive been a shit, currently at college but can we not lynch until ive caught up a bit?

Mac · Post Post #2084 (isolation #76) » Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:23 am

yeah, i think i should be able to do it by sunday night but that is subject to change because im pulling 11 hour shifts both days

Mac · Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:17 am

In post 1998, Saint wrote:she is ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PERCENT SCUM
WHO WOULD DO WHAT SHE HAS DONE THIS GAME AS TOWN?

whats the scum motivation behind doccing vilewhirl then evidently no killing? (since we have no other claims that the kill was blocked)
okay, didn't see the claim, fair enough. however

In post 2007, Saint wrote:still checking topic... noone to talk to... scum must be scummin it up in quicktopic

is quicktopic still used here?

i havent been scum since i got back to playing here... never get a good role

this quicktopic thing feels a bit fake?

sthar wrote:1)he's an uncountered believable investigative. his role is testable. That makes it both unlynchable and untenable for scum
2) claiming where he did served only to confirm farside and pseudoconfirm you. There's no reason for scum to want MORE confirmed players

well for 1), there may not *be* a town role to CC - it would be a risky move for scum though. on the other hand, he may be a scum tracker.
2) yeah... unless he wanted himself to be confirmed?
also not sure just what the hell 3 has to do with anything?

In post 2029, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:But at least Saint is active/posting so if he is scum he will become easier to catch.

Hiplop and Mac will have got to D3 doing next to nothing and I hate thinking of scum winning a game via this tactic.

next to nothing is a bit harsh. yes, i've been fairly inactive on d3 but it's been on the go only 6/7 days of which i've been maxed out between work and final days of college. not that i'm making excuses; i still have 77 posts and thats alot for me.

In post 2039, Vilewhirl wrote:
mac wrote:I gotta run for food of some sort but ill be kicking about later to provide some reasoning
you get one more of these posts before i vote you on principle.
make.
a.
good. catchup.
post.
or replace out.
or die.
idc which.

sorry, i did another one after this post

i can see why dragon claimed if he's just 1 shot, but conversely i could see this as a scum manoevre to avoid having to come up with reasons for continually avoiding the nk. meh

In post 2068, dragonspawn wrote:Sigh? That's it? You could at least try to give us a reason not to lynch you.

i agree with this statement. the sigh felt like scum who thought they had been hammered, i think town would be more ragey personally

farside you just said you hated the fact soren's wagon was being led by hiplop and me; what changed?

also hiplop why are you townreading me? i don't think i warrant it.

Mac · Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:12 am

i think i agree with saint vi reads, especially given the whole quicktopic thing. it struck me as a really really odd thing to try and fake if he is scum. i know i suggested otherwise but i was hoping for a telling reaction from saint, but i dug up his games and he doesn't have any recent completed ones.

Mac · Post Post #2220 (isolation #79) » Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:54 am

In post 2157, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 2156, Mac wrote:i think i agree with saint vi reads, especially given the whole quicktopic thing. it struck me as a really really odd thing to try and fake if he is scum. i know i suggested otherwise but i was hoping for a telling reaction from saint, but i dug up his games and he doesn't have any recent completed ones.

Translated;
Insert random, generic comment about the game state here and forget I ever said I was going to do ~things~.

um

i did things on the page before

thanks for reading it though. really makes this game interesting when people clearly dont read my posts

Mac · Post Post #2221 (isolation #80) » Tue Jun 16, 2015 3:58 am

i agree with vile about hiplop and i dont see why anyone else doesn't see this point of view. i think we have to give hiplop some credit around his scum game and assume he wont just go "I THINK SAINT IS TOWN BUT LOL VOTE SAINT"

soren should still die. so should shinobi. unsure on a third right now.

Mac · Post Post #2241 (isolation #81) » Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:51 am

In post 2232, Shinobi wrote:Btw gork, your point on me only trying to lynch hiplop isn't even correct. I offered you a Mac wagon and anti is getting replaced, and I already stated that I wanted to lynch both Mac and hiplop at the start of today.

so why don't you want to lynch me now?

Mac · Post Post #2246 (isolation #82) » Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:56 am

well, in your very words, anyone other than hiplop was absurd.

so no, you didn't want to lynch me at that point until vilewhirl called you up on it.

Mac · Post Post #2254 (isolation #83) » Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:01 am

anti slot can be squinted at tomorrow IMO. not sure anti's lurking necessarily is cause he's scum over RL things? is there proof otherwise?

Mac · Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:01 pm

@sthar - beetlejuicing? when?

also, that has never been a scumtell but whatever

Mac · Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:02 pm

Vote: Shinobi

Mac · Post Post #2306 (isolation #86) » Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:13 am

in fact, sthar, how the fuck is it a scum move to open up the lynch pool.

what a load of big, sweaty balls that scumread on me is

Mac · Post Post #2340 (isolation #87) » Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:32 am

vote: hiplop

this day is going nowhere and needs a flip, and i'm 50/50 on hiplop scum. game needs progression anyhow.

Mac · Post Post #2342 (isolation #88) » Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:47 am

he claimed some kind of vt iirc

Mac · Post Post #2397 (isolation #89) » Mon Jun 22, 2015 3:49 am

to the person who i think killed shinobi; i don't think you should claim that yet.

Mac · Mon Jun 22, 2015 11:53 am

In post 2398, dragonspawn wrote:How do you know the scum didn't kill shinobi?

Well, given farsidea protective role and the suspicion on shinobi at the end of the day, im assuming we have a vig and hes not an idiot that killed farside.

Mac · Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:40 am

In post 2488, Titus wrote:Might as well claim here. I am a one shot roleblocker. Anti blocked Vile N1.

flavour?

Mac · Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:41 am

not that i think it is at all relevant, you probably are scum. but i still have some reading to do so live for now

Mac · Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:45 am

titus; if you are town, why did you 'out' dragon?

even if it wasn't dragon who shot shinobi, why would your town mindset say his name in relation to the shinobi killing? why would it say any name who you thought shot shinobi?

Mac · Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:46 am

In post 2474, Vilewhirl wrote:oh and point9: towntitus wouldnt point that out something like that in the off chance scum hadnt noticed.
so yeah.
vote titus.
kthnx.
#eats-sammich

vile got there before me.

maybe i should've read first then posted.

Mac · Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:46 am

Vote: Titus