In post 659, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 656, Salamence20 wrote:*Pulling a sleepkrew*
You're replacing out because of Nacho too?
Didn't mean to displace you from a game you were already playing: if you want me to leave, I will.
In post 659, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 656, Salamence20 wrote:*Pulling a sleepkrew*
You're replacing out because of Nacho too?
In post 635, Vi wrote:ABR's play is easy like Sunday morning.
*vote the person who says easily punishable things
*vote Vi when convenient (for reasons that are best explained with the level of reasoning I'd expect from a seven-year-old)
*has spent the Day lurking instead of pushing his wagon
*only stops lurking to post about how he's being oppressed by the SJWs
In post 670, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:how about you talk to me, Nacho~
In post 671, Vi wrote:Would you please provide links.
In addition, you're also going to need to provide someone to take your place on the scum list. That would be much more interesting.
In post 681, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Nacho, talk to me you fucko.
In post 684, Master Zik wrote:In post 681, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Nacho, talk to me you fucko.
He isn't a fucko.
Currently, Nachomamma8 is imitating the traditional Treant style, while taking on the form of a Groot.
In post 489, Quaroath wrote:I really don't like the sheeping onto VI on the last page. I have a hard time picturing Viscum right now.
In post 595, Quaroath wrote:VOTE: plum
In Vi we sheep.
For now at least. I haven't had the time to really dig back like I should.
In post 696, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Nacho, I think we need to keep pressure where we are right now.
Work with me through this piece by piece. Answer the real question:
Why did RC die?
In post 703, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:The kind of post that could easily break the tipping point between two wagons, don't you think?
In post 721, Plum wrote:Also it's amazing to see the deviance from Vi's take on it; Vi thinks I'm scum playing mediocrely and has a major scumread on me; you apparently don't think so highly (in one significant respect, anyway) of my play in general and don't share the scumread per se but are happy to vote me. So, uh, thanks, I guess.
In post 721, Plum wrote:like why continue despite everything to really read both me and Vi strongly as scum without recognizing, let alone addressing, the elephant in the room there?
In post 721, Plum wrote:Ehhh. Kinda weird overall, but the most salient reading of Salamance wrt me is, in my view, that Salamance read the early wagon on me as scummy early and that read lodged in his head and has sort of overinformed his reads in stuff relating to me since then; he lacks any substantive explication of the read on me and not much attempt at reevaluation of the initial read on the earliest Plum wagon.
In post 722, Jazzmyn wrote:I do not agree with this, based upon the evidence you have provided. See below.
In post 722, Jazzmyn wrote:but I think there is a real (albeit subtle) difference that comes through when he is town as opposed to when he is scum. In #4, he was Town.
In post 735, Quaroath wrote:I gotta ask, what are you trying to say here, because I feel like you are really misrepping this.
In post 736, Quaroath wrote:Also, my plum vote can no longer be considered sheepish. It's my own.
In post 757, zakk wrote:not worth reading?
In post 851, Ranmaru wrote:Nacho, can you at least state any gutreads (any read you may have developed at the top of your head) now, so we can have something from you?
In post 765, zakk wrote:you're trying to dodge ABR and criticise him and distance yourself from him, because you know he was scum, because you're scum.
In post 772, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Because, by your own admission, you're not really caught up or motivated in this game. To have such solid opinions about everyone BUT me feels like a conscious choice to avoid me.
In post 774, Plum wrote:I'm all but caught up in this game, and I'm feeling reasonably motivated, actually. I'm going to try to keep it that way.
In post 790, Ranmaru wrote:Juls is scum because she vote hops onto RC, without any reasoning, when the wagon has a very weak premise. She interacts with him, but doesn't interact in a way that shows she's suspicious of him, but only wants to ask for reads from him. Later on, when Vi makes a crap case on Plum, Juls joins right on over, without much reasoning here either. Later on, Jazz catches her on a contradiction. She stated that she felt RC/VI, but was voting Plum. She never spoke up against RC/Vi at all.
In post 790, Ranmaru wrote:Vi's early game consists of joking around, and not doing much. Juls pulls her in (for a weird reason), and from then on, Vi starts doing a bit more. Right after Jules asks RC for reads, Vi makes a Plum case on the next page. Yet, it isn't really something that is scummy, but null. Later on, she asks to discuss reads with RC, who at this time, she doesn't appear to have a read on. They discuss, and she says she has 3 reads she'd like to 'cast a net on' (paraphrase). Rc asks to swap in Kinetic for one of the three, and she's alright with that. This is something to note when looking at her interaction with Jazz. Really, I find her play to be lazy, and being content with whatever lynch isn't herself.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:I actually don't understand how you liked LLD's vote on SK, when it was unknown if it was a joke vote or serious vote. Unless you meant you liked it either way (joke or serious?). I could understand the like if LLD stated it was serious before, yet that was not the case.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:I like this observation from Quaroth.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:91 - I disagree with this. His questions weren't accusations, they were questions. We all do not have 100% certainty of a person's alignment unless the mod confirms that to us. Therefore, if you find something concerning, you ask. Quaroth also never voted Sala, nor did it seem like he was aiming to. Yet I do agree that Salamence comes across as townie. I do not think you are worried people may flock to him, since you yourself let people flock to Jazz. Put simply, I hate the strategy some people have of "Never question your town reads" because it doesn't make any sense.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:I'm still peived that she mentions she's glad that Vi is doing something now, but she didn't mention anything about her lack of action before. She is downplaying her own actions, when she should be treating everyone equally. Instead of saying "You are right, I am being useless, so is everyone" she should be saying "You most of all Vi, were being useless and only did so due to Juls poking you, into making a crap case on me."
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:I don't think he's scum anymore, yet I still don't find this believable at all.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:Ignoring that fact that Jazz rightly called her out, Vi just went on to point out Jazz's post, knowing Vi herself had done the same. Manipulative.
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:NOTE TO SELF GET QUOTE LATER
In post 791, Ranmaru wrote:Hey there. I actually think your slot is town now, I just got distracted by Albert's jump on Jazz, which I realize was just him being wrong. I also think you are wrong on Vi. Do remember that Vi wasn't doing much early game, and had to be pulled in by Juls to participate, and then make a meh case on Plum, which Juls jumped on without thought. Of course, I can offer you an alternative to Plum, and that is Juls. I agree with your townread on Zakk, but not because of what you said. Finally, I think you shouldn't simply be reading Vi simply via her interaction with LLD, which I still don't find townie, with reasons as to why above. I implore you to look at her whole play, especially her early game play.
Generally, I disagree with your direction towards Quaroth and Salamence. Also, I need more from you before I have more to say about you, yet I'm fine with your slot now.
In post 801, Vi wrote:Nacho and Quaroath - What are your reads on me?
In post 601, Master Zik wrote:I'm not trying to get him to make better posts. I want you guys to understand that SleepyKrew acts in this manner as Town, and thus, you are correct, that my read on him is likely Town.
However, I have no intention to "motivate him to make better posts". As a Master, he seems to be suffering from a case of old and tired bones; he seems to be in a slump and incapable of performing at his prime capacity until he undergoes therapy.
I would be thrilled if he could let another capable Master enter the game and engage with our highly desired player list instead. As scum, we would have a more challenging game, and it would only be fair to his teammates. As town, the benefits are obvious.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:Vi's early game consists of lollygagging, joking for far too long and not scumhunting enough. Null by itself, but along with her whole play, it adds up.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:Her 'start' on scumhunting, in 130, was nothing but null on Plum.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:In 273, Vi critisizes Jazz for having a large scumlist, while having done the same herserlf.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:In her 416 Vi asks a leading question, asking LLD who out of the three voters on Jazz would be scum. She re-phrases her question in 419, askng If one scum jumped on Jazz, who would she think it was. She doesn't consider all the angles, such as non-voters, or the chance and timing of the wagon. I do not find this pro-town.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:In her 516, she mentions Abr is obv scum, a change from her earlier picks of Vezo > Al > Quaroth. While mentioning in her 479 that she reads Plum as Prob scum. Yet she plops her vote on Prob Scum Plum and never votes her 'obv scum' read of Al. This does not show a pro-town drive to scumhunt.
In post 825, Ranmaru wrote:and in her post 720, she casts a wide net of scum reads. She also changes the situation of the Jazz wagon to being mostly town, and switches gears to her own wagon and the Vezo wagon. The change doesn't make sense to me from a pro-town mindset.
In post 835, Master Zik wrote:I like the part where Vi was flustered and expressed signs of unease when I brought up that SleepyKrew should be replaced.
Knowing that retired SleepyKrew had a tendency to doze off at inopportune timings, and a younger and fresher Master would bring vigor into the town and revive the slot, would always be a situation that scum would object to.
In post 840, singersigner wrote:That looks more terrible than I thought, I'm sorry, I fucking hate walls, I'm just trying to catch up more quickly. I'll divide the pages into smaller increments for the next 14...to be done later. >_>
I PROMISE IT'LL BE OVER SOON.
In post 853, Jazzmyn wrote:Nacho, I don't understand why you say that you haven't posted in this thread due to a computer issue but that computer issue has apparently has not prevented you from posting in other threads. Please explain.
In post 888, Vi wrote:For future reference, zakk's post 884 is what you should be looking for in a situation like this, given that it's lazy sniping on a prospective lynchee.
In post 839, singersigner wrote:263...this kind of association sucks, especially with someone like Vezok who always seems to be mislynch bait regardless of how town he is.
In post 839, singersigner wrote:287...ok this is where I can see the manipulative side of Vi, which is disappointing. Shutting down conversation and not being transparent/offering whatever reads you can is actively anti-town. Why did you expect him to answer (truthfully) if you weren’t willing to do the same?
In post 839, singersigner wrote:319...I don’t like that Plum continues to avoid Jazz’s question despite being assured it’s a legitimate question. Even if townPlum thinks it’s coming from scumJazz, she’s not even voting him to make that clear, so it’s just being unnecessarily antagonistic which *I think* is out of character for her.
In post 839, singersigner wrote:Page 15 is also lame, but gives me pings on LLD’s reentrance to the game. I phrase it like that because she’s been contributing a lot of one-liners so far, but then gets in a shouting match with ABR, so now it kind of looks like when the spotlight is on her, she needs to contribute in a more significant way. It looks like now she’s taking control in a way scum might when they feel like they’ve lost it in 353, 355, 357, and 365.
In post 839, singersigner wrote:432...I like this observation from Master Zik. What’s even more interesting is that Vi says Jazz is an easy target but goes for Vezok? What was/is the difference between them that made Vezok scum while implying that Jazz is town?
In post 839, singersigner wrote:465...ok so here’s Vi’s hated townie claim (ish) that everyone’s been talking about.
In post 899, Jazzmyn wrote:I was not asking what kinds of expectations you look for to get town reads (but thanks for the links which I will take a look at some time if/when they become relevant). I was asking you whether you agreed with Nacho about his characterization of the links to Albert's games that he posted, because his characterization is essentially the opposite to mine. I would still like you to respond to that.
In post 903, Ranmaru wrote:I was re-reading and realized that Plum may have been going somewhere with her #787. Yet, she doesn't come to the conclusion that she's suspicious or weird from it, just that she's just townish over that. I just don't think Plum as scum would have reason to be challenging LLD here unless LLD if town.
In post 903, Ranmaru wrote:Alright, I'll drop my point on the RC/vi thing. Yet you can't deny that her interaction with RC was weird when he was voting him. I can't verify that ever because she's not here now to explain that. Ok, it's possible she may have been busy, but why vote at all when busy? She had enough time to unvote and re-vote even after RC gave an answer to her. So if she really was just being on there for... wait. The underlined doesn't make sense if she had enough time to unvote and re-vote even after RC explained. Anyway, going on with my thought anyway, if she was really being on there for pressure, she would have stayed off after his explanation. Or at least that's what I think a townie would be doing.
In post 903, Ranmaru wrote:You mean that my case is all null-tells, and just shows Vi being *useless*? I don't think that's the case here man. I think I know a crap case from a good one, and I'm sure I had alot more than that Plum case. In fact, I feel Plum is more of an example of a side-lining person, who just hasn't really gotten a good suspect out genuinely (just from her observation on LLD), but for some reason isn't pushing it as hard.
In post 903, Ranmaru wrote:Wish you could have waited on the Vi case so LLD could talk to me about it first, as I don't suspect you and would want to see what she does.
In post 905, Jazzmyn wrote:In post 892, Nachomamma8 wrote:many people had called for SK's replacement by that point and so Zik being yet another person pushing for the replace-out isn't that revolutionary to me.
They had? Who are these "many people" to whom you refer? I don't recall anyone calling for Sleepy to be force-replaced prior to Master Zik doing so (and I agree with the call for Sleepy to be force-replaced) but this post looks wonky.
Regards,
Jazz
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Yet does that mean I shouldn't ask/talk about it at all? From Plum's reasoning, it shows that she wasn't sure herself if the vote was serious or not, as she was stating possibilities as to why LLD might have voted that way. Unless you think I'm wrong and can give a different observation to Plum's reasoning here:
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:It's pretty hard for me to find anything alignment indicative of Quaroth. It's why I have a null on him. I want to see more of him too so I can get a better bead on him. Nothing obvious strikes me from his slot, and I would like to hear why you suspect him. Actually, I'd like a little more reasoning than your #693. This was just you giving a name to Vi for her to re-consider you, but now we are past that. Are you going to stick to that for now?
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Yet how does that help Vi read Quaroth? Because of that, I have less to work with in terms of reading Quaroth and so do you. Now we'll never know the results of his query, whether it would be good or not. Do you agree with Salamence being town enough to not even question?
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:I wasn't saying that Vi was being more useless then everyone else, I was saying she was being just as useless. LLD was too, and so was Albert, your predecessor. But I'm not using that against you, because it doesn't line up with the rest of your slots play, even though you say I'm only focusing on one part of her play. (Hello, what part of Vi's play did I miss then?)
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Yes, this explanation if laughable at best, but that's the only problem I have with his slot:
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Look, I town read you, and you are disagreeing with me. I don't find you suspicious for it. Yet, I find if I see someone thinking the same as I do, I would find it more likely to be of a town-mindset then a scum-mindset.
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Also, I find town is more likely to post something that shows that is honest, such as Albert (your predecessor), saying that he was going to wait because at the moment, he had nothing, instead of trying hard to not post things like that, unless they are incompetent as scum.
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:I do want to ask, since you have played with Vi before, how good at reading Vi are you? What would you expect of a ScumVi, TownVi? How are you reading SingerSigner?
In post 911, Ranmaru wrote:Salamence, I can see now as he's not even here, but the same is with other players and Quaroth, which annoys me a bit. Plus I don't remember your actual reasoning for Salamence, actually.
In post 534, Vi wrote:Oh hey there are fewer than two days until deadline. It's time for people to stop lurking.
I suppose there's something to these requests.
Mod: Please extend the deadline by 24 hours to accommodate Juls' V/LA.This should probably give her about a day and a half to get together. Of course, since I'm accusing her of being scum, this is a request made to my detriment, but I'm willing to do it, because only lurkers, idiots, and scum are voting me.
Mod: Please prod SleepyKrew with intent to replace overNight.
Mod: Please prod Master Zik, who is currently lurking his pants off.
As for my part, given vezokpiraka's recent posting I will at the very least not protest that wagon.
In post 914, Plum wrote:I'll take Vi's reversal on Ranmaru for what it's worth; I'd still love to understand why Ranmaru continues talking about scumreads the way he does
(e.g. "I do want to say this [unvoting Ranmaru] isn't enough for me to flip a read on you [Vi]", still talking less to a scum suspect than to a sort of abstract medium onto which he is projecting and defending reads). Also, while LLD is talking about weird things Ranmaru has said in discussing reading her, there was that time he effectively said, to the post where LLD voted me Day 1 "LLD is Town for this . . . conditional on Plum being scum" only in far more words.