I'm not titus
VOTE: chilledtea
L-1
In post 38, RadiantCowbells wrote:What is dis moonlogic tho.
In post 29, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 27, Dystopian Vision wrote:Your wagon?
two votes isn't a wagon, but I'm not surprised given that itl flipped as scum and my vote superficially looks like me trying to start a counterwagon (ended up being on scum though, so HA)
In post 59, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 56, Dystopian Vision wrote:In post 29, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 27, Dystopian Vision wrote:Your wagon?
two votes isn't a wagon, but I'm not surprised given that itl flipped as scum and my vote superficially looks like me trying to start a counterwagon (ended up being on scum though, so HA)
You were starting a wagon in response to a wagon. How is that "superficially" a counterwagon?
This post also looks like distancing
the key difference is that I wasn't voting to stop an RVS wagon but rather to express an actual scumread on one player who I was actually scumreading.
distancing from...what exactly?
In post 93, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like, she had no sense of irony about my immediate vote on her.
If she recognized it for the troll it was then I would expect her not to vote me or react much at all.
If she thought I was serious I'd expect her to see it as tantamount to a scumclaim and start trying to powerlynch me.
So yeah, I'm not a huge fan of that slot.
In post 99, Fate wrote:READ PLS
In post 115, RadiantCowbells wrote:I agree.
But I explained why I thought her reaction was off for \serious\ mode as well.
Bai.
In post 141, Killthestory wrote:Alright, sorry for the inactivity. I'm going to explain my naked vote on Kill now, and hopefully analyze others.
Kill has literally done nothing this game. Literally nothing. Now, I know it's slightly hypocritical coming from me, but I intend to change that. For the current moment, I think that Kill should have a wagon. He's literally getting it off easy because he's joke posting. Joke posting is NOT alignment indicative at all. The meta surrounding it is, but the content itself is not. Anyway, regarding meta, I've played with Kill on a different site before. Typically, Kill tried to promote getting serious early on. I'm getting no sense of that here at all. Not at all. He's literally just disrupting town's conversations and talks with stupid posts that have no meaning.
Then don't get even get me started on that OMGUS. He needs to do something or replace out. Honestly
In post 206, Untrod Tripod wrote:from purely a setup-spec perspective:
that would be a really bad idea as that could very easily end up with a no-win scenario for both scum factions because of massclaims. RCs suggestion is far more likely than "throw in a bunch of docs and roleblockers and bps"
In post 200, yessiree bob wrote:
there is no way someone of your caliber can make low level mistakes like confusing the interpretation of "not mafia" and "no result"
it also doesn't make sense for there to be an ascetic mafia and not godfather when there is a cop that specifically cops for mafia
here's out tinfoil theory, there was only 1 night kill last night, most likely because the werewolf was roleblocked
UT knew he was roleblocked, so he lied about being a cop and getting "no result" to dismantle his wagon
so can we go back and vote scum thanks
VOTE: UT
In post 219, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 214, Dystopian Vision wrote:In post 206, Untrod Tripod wrote:from purely a setup-spec perspective:
that would be a really bad idea as that could very easily end up with a no-win scenario for both scum factions because of massclaims. RCs suggestion is far more likely than "throw in a bunch of docs and roleblockers and bps"
If scum has a role-cop they would be able to tailor their claim to what the setup looks like
I don't think that's an unreasonable role to assume
...what? how does a role-cop negate a bunch of cross protecting and role blocking and bulletproofing?
In post 221, yessiree bob wrote:In post 216, Dystopian Vision wrote:No you don't get to call one confusion a town slip and another confusion a scum slip
you're grouping the two as if they are the same thing; they are not
there's a drastic difference between mistaking a player with another, and misinterpreting the implications of a negative result and a no result.
In post 252, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 250, SirCakez wrote:This game really needs a third flip.
ftfy
In post 280, Untrod Tripod wrote:===========[]
In post 296, Fate wrote:In post 66, Dystopian Vision wrote:In post 59, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 56, Dystopian Vision wrote:In post 29, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 27, Dystopian Vision wrote:Your wagon?
two votes isn't a wagon, but I'm not surprised given that itl flipped as scum and my vote superficially looks like me trying to start a counterwagon (ended up being on scum though, so HA)
You were starting a wagon in response to a wagon. How is that "superficially" a counterwagon?
This post also looks like distancing
the key difference is that I wasn't voting to stop an RVS wagon but rather to express an actual scumread on one player who I was actually scumreading.
distancing from...what exactly?
Distancing from itlepip
Mostly the read of UT as werewolf just seems fabricated and BS. I've said this before but it doesn't feel like a natural at all read to have. Itlepip puts someone at L-1 and UT immediately comes in and tries to pain the wagon on mafia guy as RVS and start a REAL one on his partner? Just seems like something they made up without thinking it through to have a read today.
Their exchange with RC was also off, and then they go on to vote ME because they didn't like how I was pushing UT? Like where did there read on UT go? They are just conveniently swapping votes with reasons on the spot, its scum behavior. The dissonance between the heads in thread is even more of a reason for them to be able to move their vote around conveniently.
In post 310, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 306, Dystopian Vision wrote:In post 280, Untrod Tripod wrote:===========[]
Uhh how do you go from challenging "we need a flip" to having no suspicion as to how fast that wagon just stacked on Cakez?
it's almost like you didn't even read what I was posting and were just looking for something to say
In post 333, RadiantCowbells wrote:ftr sircakez isn't a policy lynch I genuinely think he's a top scum pick.
In post 328, Fate wrote:oh RC has been V/LA that explains about half the apathy
DV lurking during this time is even worse
In post 314, Untrod Tripod wrote:I'm accusing you of not actually understanding the two things you're comparing
what does the wagon on Cakez have to do with him saying "we need a flip" and me seeing that as a scumtell? other than absolutely nothing of course.
In post 352, Untrod Tripod wrote:there's almost definitely only one more scum left on each team so that eliminates the possibility of a scum-driven speedwagon....
In post 353, Untrod Tripod wrote:and that's irrelevant to me because I have a scumread on SC so I want him to die
scum was speedwagoned on D1, I don't see how a fast wagon is necessarily going to be on town now?
In post 417, RadiantCowbells wrote:lol.
this is the point where I can legitimately say that you're not even trying to change my mind.
am I right?
In post 445, SirCakez wrote:I believe that then. Doubting Titus's claim now.
Three Investigative seems like a lot for a 10p game so pretty sure UT, RC and DV aren't all town.
Fate wrote:RC's claim is consistent with his play.
DV"s is NOT
also the conclusion that "SirCakez is town" based on going nowhere is some bullshit as well
In post 462, Fate wrote:Speed of the wagon is how you defend your townread on him? That's weak.
Even now you're still voting RC?
"Fakeclaiming to get the lynch he wants"
Even if that's so (Very unlikely here), is that SCUM BEHAVIOR?
There's no way you have a town mindset this game.
Yesiree bob how about you look at reads instead of claim verifiability. We already discussed Werewolf tracker possibility and oh yeah hey scum FAKECLAIM thats kinda the point. Go with the dayplay here
In post 461, yessiree bob wrote:In post 460, Bicephalous Bob wrote:flub, how did you feel about tracking a town read?