Clearly a double agent signing her real name instead of her cover one
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
In post 35, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 27, FA_Q2 wrote:VOTE: Code of Honor
Clearly a double agent signing her real name instead of her cover one
What do you think of the BlackStar wagon and her jump off of Dom?
[\quote]
I think that is normal for someone that is rather new. The join date is not all that long ago though I have not looked at how many games they have played.@blackstar - do you have any experience other than this avi?Jumping off a wagon that builds really fast in RVS is something that I would have done when I started here. It is interesting that he jumped off before any real reaction from the slot though so there might be something to that - what is an RVS without a reaction after all.
It really isn't, BlackStar wagon is a good wagon.
In post 35, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 27, FA_Q2 wrote:VOTE: Code of Honor
Clearly a double agent signing her real name instead of her cover one
What do you think of the BlackStar wagon and her jump off of Dom?
[/quote]
It really isn't, BlackStar wagon is a good wagon.
In post 118, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 90, FA_Q2 wrote:
It is extremely early to be calling for a policy lynch. Why have you done so? What is so bad that you want to PL on page 3 12 days from deadline?
It is? When is the correct time to call for a policy lynch?
Why are you asking pointless (and obvious) questions instead of scum hunting?
Why haven't you given a single opinion on a player in this game yet?
In post 211, MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: FA_Q2
Every post has avoided the Dragon Knight wagon and surrounding furor completely. Instead narrowly focuses on BBT.
Discuss ...
In post 211, MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: FA_Q2
Every post has avoided the Dragon Knight wagon and surrounding furor completely. Instead narrowly focuses on BBT.
Discuss ...
In post 221, Polar Vortex wrote:FA_Q, what do you think of Dragon Knight? Do you disagree that there were good non-policy reasons to lynch them?
-Snow
In post 204, Dragon Knight wrote:This is a role madness game. Nothing is ever as simple as "just a cop". We are not full-claiming, but you can bet your bottom dollar that we are town, and a "cop" sort of role. That is to say, alignment cop. Not role cop. There is of course more, but you guys don't get it.
Now, would you kindly...
In post 234, Dragon Knight wrote:@FA
I made that statement, not Firebringer. The thing is, we are a cop, yes, but we have more. This is not backpedaling. This is, "people are stupid and are trying to end a pretty good role for town. You may not like his play, and I don't blame you, but I am a solid player. Just trust me here. I will show much more usefulness later on in the game.
Oh, and if anyone is a neighborizer of sorts, I request you use it on me tonight. That's 100% a good choice of N1 action.
In post 278, Code of Honor wrote:I don't get the case on BBT, nor the case on Banta. Can those on their wagons explain their reasoning?
-Xk
In post 207, FA_Q2 wrote:The correct time is when you have exahusted your ability to scum hunt and/or ability to agree upon a good lynch.
Why am I asking the question? Because it was scummy of you to pull such BS so soon and allowed you to avoid actually giving a real opinion on the slot's alignment. I notice that you tried to avoid actually answering the query entirely and then try and flip it back on me. I am scum hunting and that question is not 'pointless and obvious.' It asks your motivations - the best place to catch scum. Your motivation for calling for a PL out the gate AND avoiding answering some simple questions about it AND immediately attempting to misrepresent my post show clear scum motivations.
You want an opinion on a player - you are clearly scum.
VOTE: BBT
In post 310, Jeanne11 wrote:Very well, since all you do is throw shade on me yourself, I'll stop you by claiming fully. I am a town watcher.
In post 314, Dragon Knight wrote:Also, watcher is not even close to cop. You definitely tried to throw shade at me there!
In post 374, The Banterlords wrote:In post 372, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 371, Polar Vortex wrote:Us as Jeanne partner is the most idiotic thing I've heard in this game. She looks like a liability for any scum team. If we were scum with her, why wouldn't we just buss her ass right now?
Also for people who want to investigate us, we're ascetic.
Bearbert
Always claim this stuff way earlier than you did.
they did in their first post.
I can go along with that plan, bbt.
UNVOTE:
~Dwlee
In post 373, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, I'm caught up.
Jeanne watches DK and that way we get at least one cop result. No point lynching either of them Today.
This should be today's lynch though;
VOTE: FA
In post 405, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 404, A Real Scourge wrote:oh, so there actually was a rule. i'm wrong then. DK, sign your posts before shos kicks you in the pants.
You guys worry about finding scum and we'll worry about semantics with the mod.
In post 444, The Banterlords wrote:In post 438, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 374, The Banterlords wrote:In post 372, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 371, Polar Vortex wrote:Us as Jeanne partner is the most idiotic thing I've heard in this game. She looks like a liability for any scum team. If we were scum with her, why wouldn't we just buss her ass right now?
Also for people who want to investigate us, we're ascetic.
Bearbert
Always claim this stuff way earlier than you did.
they did in their first post.
I can go along with that plan, bbt.
UNVOTE:
~Dwlee
Then why are you not voting for me?
Why can you 'go along with that play' but not willing to but your vote anywhere?
by plan I meant the thing with jeanne watching dk
~DWlee
In post 446, Ranger wrote:{TheDominator, The Banterlords, BlueBloodedToffee}
{Dragon Knight, Code of Honor, PhantomCobalt}
{BlackStar}
One.
VOTE: BlackStar.
In post 479, Masquerade wrote:I don't know anymore. I'm not used to Ranger giving that huge elaborations on reads unprompted.. I also have an issue with her comparing magna to another player, I want to see magna's response. Other than that, her readslists seem good enough to me, I don't agree with everything but I'm also not under the impression my reads are 100% correct at this point.
I want BBT to come in and read and share thoughts, most of all I want him to throw some questions my way. My reads on clumsy and Faq have changed to null in the last couple of pages and currently I don't know where I stand on anyone else. I'll do some rereads later.
In post 499, Code of Honor wrote:In post 373, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:OK, I'm caught up.
Jeanne watches DK and that way we get at least one cop result. No point lynching either of them Today.
This should be today's lynch though;
VOTE: FA
I like this plan, and I'm fine with the FAQ lynch. His ISO shows him voting BBT for the last week, while attempting to cast suspicion on almost everyone he interacts with, instead of actually pushing for BBT's lynch.
-Xk
In post 509, Polar Vortex wrote:And no, you don't fucking get a choice in who you investigate. I propose we also take a vote on that one.
Bearbert
In post 570, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 560, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 509, Polar Vortex wrote:And no, you don't fucking get a choice in who you investigate. I propose we also take a vote on that one.
Bearbert
No, no and fuck no.
This is asinine in the extreme. By telling scum who a cop is targeting you give them information that they need to decide in order to plan their actions.
We have 2 options, if you think DK is scum then you lynch it. If you think DK is town then they direct their power where they see fit. Chaining a PR is simply giving scum all the power over it.
Think about it like this. We tell DK to investigate Dom. They can't kill DK because Ranger is watching him. So if Dom is scum he can't do anything if he doesn't have a godfather role. If he's town, we either get an innocent investigation or we force scum to kill him. Either way we win. What's wrong with this plan?
Bear
In post 579, Code of Honor wrote:In post 560, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 509, Polar Vortex wrote:And no, you don't fucking get a choice in who you investigate. I propose we also take a vote on that one.
Bearbert
No, no and fuck no.
This is asinine in the extreme. By telling scum who a cop is targeting you give them information that they need to decide in order to plan their actions.
We have 2 options, if you think DK is scum then you lynch it. If you think DK is town then they direct their power where they see fit. Chaining a PR is simply giving scum all the power over it.
No. As long as both DK and Ranger are both town, the plan works and is a great idea. Ranger watches DK, and DK investigates Dominator. Worst case scenario is that we get just one result.
-Xk
In post 603, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 598, Polar Vortex wrote:
Why are you town? Have you done anything that would make people read you as scum? If not, why is FA_Q's push bad?
Bearbert
I'm town because my role PM was green and contained juicy goodness.
Are you saying you see nothing bad about FA's push on me?
In post 571, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 560, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 509, Polar Vortex wrote:And no, you don't fucking get a choice in who you investigate. I propose we also take a vote on that one.
Bearbert
No, no and fuck no.
This is asinine in the extreme. By telling scum who a cop is targeting you give them information that they need to decide in order to plan their actions.
We have 2 options, if you think DK is scum then you lynch it. If you think DK is town then they direct their power where they see fit. Chaining a PR is simply giving scum all the power over it.
I'm willing to lynch BBT as a compromise. Would prefer Dom/Scrouge. What do you think of those 2?
Bear
In post 895, Dragon Knight wrote:In post 893, Ircher wrote:No, let's lynch Magna. We're not lynching the unCC'd watcher D1.
CCs have no place in Role Madness games. Having someone be considered cleared because there's no CC in a role madness game is terrible.
In post 800, Ircher wrote:I think I have already. Mainly the last game I played with Titus, Titus had very strong opinions that he basically clung to the whole game, even if they were wrong.
In post 927, Polar Vortex wrote:So, it looks DK set us on fire before they died... we won't survive the next night.
And since we're already dying we might as well reveal that we're not ascetic. We're a reflexive poisoner. If our killer didn't die last night, he'll die with us (as well as anyone dumb enough to target a claimed ascetic with a non-killing ability - no one, I hope).
- Snow
In post 938, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 936, Masquerade wrote:717 anyone else feel this is resentment after bussing?
VOTE: ircher
Explain to me why you never voted code because I don't get it.
Don't see it man. The way code went after ircher really doesn't feel like bussing to me.
Bearbert
In post 956, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 955, Ircher wrote:Out of curiosity, did anyone visit me last night? (PS: If you answer, answer that question only)
I'd still support a Magna lynch right now, fyi. Gotta think on who else is scum and the SK though.
Code has only one partner. It says so in his role
Bearbert
In post 954, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 950, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 938, Polar Vortex wrote:In post 936, Masquerade wrote:717 anyone else feel this is resentment after bussing?
VOTE: ircher
Explain to me why you never voted code because I don't get it.
Don't see it man. The way code went after ircher really doesn't feel like bussing to me.
Bearbert
True but that only addresses half of his point. Ircher did agree code was scum, multiple times. He completely avoided voting for code save for a very short time when he was the only one on the wagon. Ircher has essentially avoided voting in general sticking with magna the entire day.
I see what you mean about him. The interaction from ircher with Code is weird. But I think the other part, the fact that Code got voted for the absolutely unnecesary attack on ircher does enough for me to clear them as partners. Obviously he could still be SK but I'm more interested in lynching the Code partner: Magna.
Incidentally, what do you think about the possibility of BBT being a serial killer? Would definetly fit with him staying low all game. I guess he could fit as a code partner too?
Masquerade, I'm pretty sure DK didn't kill Ranger. It would be stupid as hell to lose the game because you nightkill the person you are supposed to lynch. And I say the wagon on Magna was better because from the information we had at that point, Magna was the most suspicious. Code flipping scum doesn't change that(especially because Magna will also flip scum)
Bear
In post 961, The Banterlords wrote:In post 960, FA_Q2 wrote:
Yes but do you have anything with content to add rather than blank statements. We did, after all, get some good flips.
I mean I could iso people but there's a good case on magna out there and effort is hard
~Dwlee
In post 977, Polar Vortex wrote:I've just got a thought. Does anybody have an investigative role? By that I mean allignment cop only not tracker/watcher. I'll explain after I get an answer why I asked this
Bearbert
While I don't think we should rush, what makes you think we are in trouble? We have lost 1 3p, a scum and 1 town. We are in damn good shape right now. If the setup spec is correct and we have a 3p and a scum remaining that means 8 vs 2 that are not on the same team.In post 998, Polar Vortex wrote:The whole having one day left to live and our main suspect claiming survivor situation is kind of demotivating. It just wakes up the lazy in me.
We don't need to rush this day though. I mean, we definitely shouldn't. If we mislynch today we'll be in trouble. We really need to make sure we lynch the last mafia or the SK.
-Snow
In post 968, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
I’m and Informed Survivor (SMS Computer Algorithm). That’s right I’m 3rd party. I win if I survive til the end of the game regardless of who wins. I got three pieces of information in my role PM about the set-up itself.
1. There is a lyncher in the game.
2. There are two 3rd Parties in game.
3. There are at least three different possible kill sources in the game.
In post 1044, Masquerade wrote:In post 1041, FA_Q2 wrote:If we have a town killing role that failed to make a kill last night cycle that would confirm that magna is lying ergo scum. Otherwise, if the above is just me over analyzing, I would be inclined to believe his claim.
I don't really get this part. There can be multiple reasons why a kill could be missing if that even is the case.
Feels more like rolefishing if you ask me..
In post 1043, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 1042, Masquerade wrote:In post 910, shos wrote:Dragon Knight is dead. He was a BulletproofSemitown-Lyncher, 1-shot Strongman, 1-shot Dayvig, 1-shot Nightvig.
In post 1083, Masquerade wrote:I'll go last, if anyone else has info they can go after me or whenever. Everyone without info goes before me.
In post 1106, Ircher wrote:Someone said there was 2 TPRs. DK doesnt count for that purpose because he was semitown.
In post 1120, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1099, BlackStar wrote:
It's possibly that we can catch scum right here if they make a bogus claim. Why are you acting like there's a 0% chance of that happening?
I've been Scum/on Scum teams that made bogus claims and won.
It's too late to stop it now, though...
In post 1129, BlackStar wrote:I don't know if I should believe you. Your role is way too similar to mine and I don't think the town should have this much power.
I'm the train facilities. I can force commute people which means that I protect them and stop them from doing their night abilities. I targeted the banterlords on night one and dwlee last night
In post 1100, Dwlee99 wrote:I am the wang car bonus, I am a hider. Targeted polar vortex n1 and got roleblocked last night
In post 1125, Masquerade wrote:Ok well with just Blackstar and me left I'll claim now.
I'm the town bully and I can punch people and essentially it means I'm a roleblocker. I punched magna last night. According to my role-pm there are players that can withstand a punch.
In post 1092, Ircher wrote:Well, I, basically conftown.
In post 1139, Ircher wrote:In post 1137, FA_Q2 wrote:
As a reflexive neighbor you should KNOW if you were targeted.
Several of these claims are just bad.
That's an outrageous claim. Show me 3 games where this is the case.
In post 1138, Ircher wrote:Yes, I am. Since no one has targeted me yet, one of you guys target me tonight and I'm confirmed. I still got the bp, so scum can't kill me.
In post 1145, Masquerade wrote:PEdits:
In post 1135, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 1125, Masquerade wrote:Ok well with just Blackstar and me left I'll claim now.
I'm the town bully and I can punch people and essentially it means I'm a roleblocker. I punched magna last night. According to my role-pm there are players that can withstand a punch.
Bully?
Can you explain how that relates to the game theme?
No. I have no experience with GTA2. maybe shos can explain.
I can rb Ircher to confirm him tomorrow, provided I still live (and if we have another night)
Friebndly neighbour gets confirmed as town to anyone that visits him, it's not the same as neighbour.