Spoiler: Rest of your responses
1. It's less likely since Elyse has intentions to open an interaction with Kraska but Kraska does not reciprocate. If scum don't close it it seems less natural. Plus the question was *good*. Only thing is I think she did not follow up.
2. Yes. Please explain why it's ok for a question not to go anywhere besides being jokey.
3. Yet she was bringing attention to Elyse the whole time. Feels like she was having trouble warming up to the Elyse wagon. I don't think she'd try that hard to wiggle onto it if it was failing. I think she was struggling to produce content.
4. The point about Kraska not needing to distance since she could simply avoid Elyse and push a townie. I agree with that since it seemed she was struggling to produce content, as you can tell her reads were pretty weak. She also gave a scum reads of [Elyse, Camn] Yet she hasn't mentioned Camn as much as she did Elyse. It was nothing else.
4A. Kraska wanting to look like Elyse's wagon would go through is a stretch, since she was early on the wagon.
4B. An argument not making sense isn't alignment indicative. Elyse seems the type to vote out of emotion rather than logic. I think she's just wrong.
4C. I still feel it was simply Kraska struggling to make content so she's trying to follow up. Notice that she was not caught up with the thread so she was trying her hardest with what she had. Notice she was replying to Postie being wishy washy on Elyse's #329, it's easy to say "Yeah nacho kinda sucked but now I'm not sure about Elyse HMMM"
Next Post:
1. Yet it could also be a form of pressure.
2. I'm not saying it was unreasonable, she forgot to ask you about your reads too. That was my point.
3. I brought it up since it was something I saw you mention recently and I disagreed with you. I don't find that reasoning valid.
4. My point is I think scum would care more about their interactions with their own mates.
5. Alright.
2. Yes. Please explain why it's ok for a question not to go anywhere besides being jokey.
3. Yet she was bringing attention to Elyse the whole time. Feels like she was having trouble warming up to the Elyse wagon. I don't think she'd try that hard to wiggle onto it if it was failing. I think she was struggling to produce content.
4. The point about Kraska not needing to distance since she could simply avoid Elyse and push a townie. I agree with that since it seemed she was struggling to produce content, as you can tell her reads were pretty weak. She also gave a scum reads of [Elyse, Camn] Yet she hasn't mentioned Camn as much as she did Elyse. It was nothing else.
4A. Kraska wanting to look like Elyse's wagon would go through is a stretch, since she was early on the wagon.
4B. An argument not making sense isn't alignment indicative. Elyse seems the type to vote out of emotion rather than logic. I think she's just wrong.
4C. I still feel it was simply Kraska struggling to make content so she's trying to follow up. Notice that she was not caught up with the thread so she was trying her hardest with what she had. Notice she was replying to Postie being wishy washy on Elyse's #329, it's easy to say "Yeah nacho kinda sucked but now I'm not sure about Elyse HMMM"
Next Post:
1. Yet it could also be a form of pressure.
2. I'm not saying it was unreasonable, she forgot to ask you about your reads too. That was my point.
3. I brought it up since it was something I saw you mention recently and I disagreed with you. I don't find that reasoning valid.
4. My point is I think scum would care more about their interactions with their own mates.
5. Alright.