Mini 1840: Watch Dogs Blitz [Game Over]

SlySly · Post Post #17 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:54 am

Vote: Stargazers

for not greeting Korea.

SlySly · Post Post #145 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:06 am

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Gamma for being one of those that asks questions about the movie during the movie instead of just watching the movie and figuring it out without bothering others who are trying to watch the movie.

SlySly · Post Post #150 (isolation #2) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:14 am

It's more serious than my RVS, but not by a lot.

SlySly · Post Post #151 (isolation #3) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:14 am

That was @Gamma.

SlySly · Post Post #153 (isolation #4) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:18 am

In post 152, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 150, SlySly wrote:It's more serious than my RVS, but not by a lot.
You didn't answer the actual question.

Actually, that did answer the question, but I'll elaborate.

You've been talking non-stop. Spamming is a scum tactic. I'm not necessarily reading you as scum, but you have a LOT of posts already only 7 pages into a mini.

I'm perfectly fine with being on your wagon right now. Pressure is good and likely to bring info that will help form true reads.

SlySly · Post Post #157 (isolation #5) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:23 am

Infinity, I didn't notice you needlessly digging at the mod for information that would become obvious as the game progresses.

SlySly · Post Post #161 (isolation #6) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:25 am

@Infinity:

As far as disappearing wagon, I checked Firebringer's last post before making my vote and there were 2 wagons at L-4. Please excuse my internal tape delay.

SlySly · Post Post #167 (isolation #7) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:34 am

In post 160, House wrote:(spam posting is playstyle indicative, not necessarily alignment indicative)

You are 100% correct, the proper phrase should have been, "Spamming is a common scum tactic." Spam definitely does not exclusively come from scum.

SlySly · Post Post #169 (isolation #8) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 5:53 am

I just tested the texting system. Let's hope it's better than MetroPCS!

I did the following... /test Stargazers; Grapevine {identical message}
Let's see where the msg goes.

SlySly · Post Post #174 (isolation #9) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:07 am

In post 173, House wrote:
In post 172, lane0168 wrote:Why did you pick grapevine of all people?
They're both hydrae.

Bingo.

SlySly · Post Post #175 (isolation #10) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:12 am

In post 170, lane0168 wrote:What was the point of that?

Do you ever test features on your new phone?

SlySly · Post Post #182 (isolation #11) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 6:21 am

In post 176, lane0168 wrote:Why pick hydra?

The message was "Hydras are the devil."

In post 177, lane0168 wrote:
In post 175, SlySly wrote:
In post 170, lane0168 wrote:What was the point of that?
Do you ever test features on your new phone?
Yes. But what was the point of that?

To find out if it works. Assuming my message was sent unchanged, there are 4 players (2 in each hydra), via texting, that know I'm telling the truth about this.

SlySly · Post Post #209 (isolation #12) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:09 am

In post 205, lane0168 wrote:
In post 202, Infinity 324 wrote:How would saying "hydras are the devil" gain trust from anyone
How can you say I'm just trying to pretend like I'm doing something. What do you think SlySly was doing by sending the message? Just to see if it worked? Do you think there was a chance firebringer put in a game mechanic that wasn't there? That he lied to us about the setup?

Does the phrase "intended designation" sound fail-proof to you?

SlySly · Post Post #214 (isolation #13) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:14 am

In post 202, Infinity 324 wrote:How would saying "hydras are the devil" gain trust from anyone

I was going to have one hydra verify the first and third word and the other verify the second and fourth so it would be a public service, but lane was pushing me. At least we got to see that the msgs I sent went where I expected them to.

SlySly · Post Post #316 (isolation #14) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:22 pm

UNVOTE:

VOTE: lane

Just read the thread again. After reading the exchange between infinity and lane again. I think lane's scum. He's double talking.

SlySly · Post Post #318 (isolation #15) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:40 pm

In post 317, Creature wrote:What do you think about this?
In post 194, House wrote:
In post 191, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: lane
lane looks sincerely concerned about scum trying to disguise communications.

He doesn't seem to know scum have day chat.

Dude's town.

That did give me pause. However, I'd suggest House read the exchange between infinity/lane again and then compare it to what lane did to me.

SlySly · Post Post #334 (isolation #16) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:58 pm

In post 319, Creature wrote: Do you oppose StarGazers wagon?

Other than a slight bit of AtE from the nahdia head, nothing's jumped out at me that would make me support that lynch.

---------

In post 322, lane0168 wrote: What do you mean? Do you mean infinity questioning me about it, and then me explaining it, and then infinity claiming I'M THE one making a big deal about it? What are you talking about it?

You made a big deal about me sending texts. Mountain out of a mole hill. When I read through again, it became obvious you were doing the same to infinity before I even entered. I just didn't notice is so much the first pass through because I hadn't yet seen your reaction to me.

SlySly · Post Post #340 (isolation #17) » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:37 pm

In post 337, lane0168 wrote: Define big deal! And show me where I made it a big deal. Again it is you and infinity who are making it a big deal and somehow trying to make it seem like I'm making it a bit deal. Do you think a "big deal" generally comes with a vote. I mean if I made such a big deal about it that it gets your vote, but not a big enough deal that you get mine? You make no sense. You better read through it a third time. Carefully.

I'm not gonna spam the thread with more about this, everyone has already witnessed it once and everyone knows who initiated the blowup about me sending texts. Technically, it didn't get my vote. Reading through again and spotting the pattern after seeing you do it to infinity as well got my vote.

SlySly · Post Post #623 (isolation #18) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:51 am

more lane votes please

SlySly · Post Post #732 (isolation #19) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:59 am

In post 718, Grapevine wrote:If I'm a vig I shoot slysly

I hope you're a vig.

SlySly · Post Post #1037 (isolation #20) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:30 pm

I'm starting at page 27 to catching up.

SlySly · Post Post #1042 (isolation #21) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:43 pm

Hi Creature! Miss me?

The only reason I think Gamma is town is because if he was scum, someone would tell him to zip it in scumchat.

I'm still good with my vote on lane, he's been consistently anti-town throughout.

I think I could get down on a Panther lynch.

SlySly · Post Post #1053 (isolation #22) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:54 pm

In post 1049, House wrote: What, over that course of 140 posts, caused your read to swing so hard?

Your last post didn't feel deceitful.

SlySly · Post Post #1068 (isolation #23) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:13 pm

In post 1054, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1053, SlySly wrote:
In post 1049, House wrote: What, over that course of 140 posts, caused your read to swing so hard?
Your last post didn't feel deceitful.
That was directed at me.

Complete accident. Apologies. I need to pay closer attention to which tab I'm on.

SlySly · Post Post #1070 (isolation #24) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:14 pm

Just say ok and move on.

SlySly · Post Post #1072 (isolation #25) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:17 pm

No. Post game. Move on. Nothing to see here.

SlySly · Post Post #1081 (isolation #26) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:25 pm

In post 1073, Gamma Emerald wrote:SLYSLY ANSWER NOW OR THAT IS A SCUMCLAIM

Ok, brainiac. If you really think I scum claimed, where's your vote?

SlySly · Post Post #1095 (isolation #27) » Fri Oct 14, 2016 6:00 pm

In post 1087, lane0168 wrote:
In post 1076, House wrote:
In post 1073, Gamma Emerald wrote:SLYSLY ANSWER NOW OR THAT IS A SCUMCLAIM
Site rules prohibit him answering so stfu and get back to me.

I made a mistake. I've informed the

@mod

through PM. This will be my last post until the mod clears me to continue.

SlySly · Post Post #1219 (isolation #28) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:31 am

I've been cleared to continue in mod PM.

Maria, why am I scum?

lane, you have been anti-town the entire game.

SlySly · Post Post #1224 (isolation #29) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:44 am

This one?

In post 234, Stargazers wrote:
In post 153, SlySly wrote:
In post 152, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 150, SlySly wrote:It's more serious than my RVS, but not by a lot.
You didn't answer the actual question.
Actually, that did answer the question, but I'll elaborate.

You've been talking non-stop. Spamming is a scum tactic. I'm not necessarily reading you as scum, but you have a LOT of posts already only 7 pages into a mini.

I'm perfectly fine with being on your wagon right now. Pressure is good and likely to bring info that will help form true reads.
I really really hate this post yes you're right spamming is a scum tactic just like making long paragraphs is a scum tactic just like ate is a scum tactic see the point?

Everything can be used as a scum tactic I would just think you're over thinking into this but it seems like you're lightly pushing and trying to get the vibe of "Gamma isn't town" but not scumreading him yet
Pressure is a thing in games yes but doing it for reads is something I hate because people may not have strong reads right away and just forcing someone to out them via pressure can go south very fast
~Maria

Hey, shoot me for trying to actually do something. I guess you prefer 50 pages of fluff. Wagons cause pressure, counter wagons, and cause reads to form. Anti-town tactic could have replaced scum tactic in what I said.

SlySly · Post Post #1242 (isolation #30) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:24 am

hey lane, get that wagon on me started with a vote

SlySly · Post Post #1243 (isolation #31) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:25 am

i hear a lot of sly's scummy, but i don't see any votes. bring em unless you're just scum throwing shade

SlySly · Post Post #1256 (isolation #32) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:50 am

In post 1252, Infinity 324 wrote: Plus slysly couldn't explain so yeah.

When I made that post to Gamma, I was basically saying the same thing House said here while also changing the direction back to the game.

In post 1097, House wrote:Too late. Gamma broke site rules and it's because of you Lane.

Hope you're happy.

Learn when to shut your fucking mouth dude.

Explained.
------
Now, if I'm scummy, bring it. If you're not sure, here I am, rip off my sheep's skin and reveal that evil scum beneath. Let's get this blitz moving.

SlySly · Post Post #1257 (isolation #33) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:56 am

In post 73, lane0168 wrote: You think I'm scum partner with gamma cause im trying to sort other people?

Can you post an example prior to this post where you were "trying to sort other people??"

SlySly · Post Post #1283 (isolation #34) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:40 am

In post 1258, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1243, SlySly wrote:i hear a lot of sly's scummy, but i don't see any votes. bring em unless you're just scum throwing shade

In post 1245, Infinity 324 wrote:Do you want to make any specific accusations or are you just throwing shade yourself?

In post 1246, Infinity 324 wrote:^ @slysly

You came and stuck yourself in the middle of a conversation directed at lane and StarG(maria-head). I don't currently have anything to direct at you. Did you miss my 1257?

SlySly · Post Post #1285 (isolation #35) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 9:45 am

In post 1284, Infinity 324 wrote:No

I would like you to point out specific people who FoS'ed you but not voted you and why they are scummy

You answered your own question. Lot's of shade, no votes.

SlySly · Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:24 am

In post 1286, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1284, Infinity 324 wrote:specific people

------------

In post 989, Creature wrote:Up to page 20

Townreading: Gamma Emerald, lane0168, Infinity 324, House, MathBlade
Not townreading: Expedience, Tatsuya Kagame, Stargazers, GuiltyLion, Dunnstral, Grapevine, SlySly

Not putting middle ground

In post 1205, lane0168 wrote:
In post 1188, Creature wrote:Anyone has suggestions?
SlySly. The no good no help no contribution no read lurk sack.

In post 743, PantherPunt wrote:
In post 732, SlySly wrote:
In post 718, Grapevine wrote:If I'm a vig I shoot slysly
I hope you're a vig.

In post 734, Grapevine wrote:Okay slysly might be town. lol
had the opposite reaction

In post 234, Stargazers wrote:
In post 153, SlySly wrote:
In post 152, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 150, SlySly wrote:It's more serious than my RVS, but not by a lot.
You didn't answer the actual question.
Actually, that did answer the question, but I'll elaborate.

You've been talking non-stop. Spamming is a scum tactic. I'm not necessarily reading you as scum, but you have a LOT of posts already only 7 pages into a mini.

I'm perfectly fine with being on your wagon right now. Pressure is good and likely to bring info that will help form true reads.
I really really hate this post yes you're right spamming is a scum tactic just like making long paragraphs is a scum tactic just like ate is a scum tactic see the point?

Everything can be used as a scum tactic I would just think you're over thinking into this but it seems like you're lightly pushing and trying to get the vibe of "Gamma isn't town" but not scumreading him yet
Pressure is a thing in games yes but doing it for reads is something I hate because people may not have strong reads right away and just forcing someone to out them via pressure can go south very fast
~Maria

In post 808, Stargazers wrote:
In post 709, Gamma Emerald wrote:Town
{lane0168, SlySly}
{PantherPunt, House, Grapevine}
{GuiltyLion, StarGazers}
{Infinity324, Mathblade}
{Creature, Expedience, Dunnstral}
Scum
Mfw SlySly has the worst post in the game and is in your top townreads slot *deep breath*
~Maria

In post 853, Stargazers wrote:
In post 848, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 844, Creature wrote:I don't think I can sort Dunnstral now.
Welcome to the club.

UNVOTE:

The stream-of-consciousness makes it look like creature is gamesolving and reminds me of mini 1805 where he was town.

I have no idea where to vote.

Maria, who is your top scumread outside of creature and gv?
For now I say Slysly but this could change depending on something I can't say for now.
~Maria

In post 858, Stargazers wrote:
In post 153, SlySly wrote:
In post 152, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 150, SlySly wrote:It's more serious than my RVS, but not by a lot.
You didn't answer the actual question.
Actually, that did answer the question, but I'll elaborate.

You've been talking non-stop. Spamming is a scum tactic. I'm not necessarily reading you as scum, but you have a LOT of posts already only 7 pages into a mini.

I'm perfectly fine with being on your wagon right now. Pressure is good and likely to bring info that will help form true reads.
Does this post not seem scummy to anyone else this is the post I find the worst of them all~Maria

SlySly · Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:33 am

Like I said, I was mainly talking about lane and Starg(m). I'm just fulfilling infinity's request.

SlySly · Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:44 am

I am more than happy to lynch lane still and will gladly move my vote back, but the deadline approaches and it's time to get this game moving.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Panther

SlySly · Post Post #1297 (isolation #39) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:29 pm

...{playing along}

How so?

SlySly · Post Post #1299 (isolation #40) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 1:36 pm

That post series was to get you to stop talking before the discussion went too far. I'm not touching that post series again, nor should anyone else. Your vote's placed. Good job, your money and mouth are in sync.

SlySly · Post Post #1312 (isolation #41) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:12 pm

In post 1301, lane0168 wrote:
In post 41, lane0168 wrote:
In post 39, Infinity 324 wrote:Who said naked votes were scummy in this game
If you had to guess, what percent of the people who vote guilty in rvs because of his name are scum?

Ridiculous.

In post 1301, lane0168 wrote:
In post 42, lane0168 wrote:
In post 40, Gamma Emerald wrote:Whatever, lynch me 2 pages into the game.
There's at least one scum on my wagon.
Who do you think it is?

No, who do you think it is?

In post 1301, lane0168 wrote:
In post 44, lane0168 wrote:
In post 38, MathBlade wrote:Whelp. Looks like Nahdia's right this time.

Gamma or Infinity are obv scum. Gamma Emerald IMHO slipped with regardless of alignment and how that question was asked.

Gotta go to work.
Gamma or infinity are obvscum? Which one is it? Don't you think if they were obvscum, you'd know which one it is? You just saying you want gamma lynched today, and if town than infinity tomorrow?

I've read this line 100 times now and I'm still not sure it makes any sense. It's like a LOG song from their latest, started off great and went downhill from there.

In post 1301, lane0168 wrote:
In post 46, lane0168 wrote:
In post 27, Creature wrote:Yeah, scum feel less comfortable leaving naked votes apparently.
What do you mean "apparently"? That seems weird. Apparent by what?

Garbage

In post 1301, lane0168 wrote: To answer your question. Personally I think it's absurd you wanted me to find where I was trying to sort people pre THIRD PAGE, as if that'd be indicative of anything. Can you show me posts where you're trying to sort people before post 73?

I didn't claim I had been pre THIRD PAGE, you did. Your offerings didn't thrill me. What it's indicative of is you're full of shit.

In post 73, lane0168 wrote: You think I'm scum partner with gamma cause im trying to sort other people?

Before post 73, here's what I had done...

In post 17, SlySly wrote:
Vote: Stargazers
for not greeting Korea.

If you had to guess, what is the percent of people that use the word Korea follow by a period in their rvs vote end up flipping scum?

SlySly · Post Post #1317 (isolation #42) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:41 pm

In post 1314, lane0168 wrote:So you're saying if someone doesn't try to sort people exactly the way you sort people, they're scum?

I wanted to know if infinity was full of shit his claim. You think it's ridiculous not to take people's word for it on page 2?! Yeah ok.

Who do I think it is? Wtf? I'm not the one who claimed there was scum on the wagon. God you're bad.

I'm sorry you can't read good. Other people thought that was a bad post too... So not sure what your point is there.

"apparently" shows apprehension that you don't actually believe what you're saying. Scum don't believe what they're actually saying ever.

What a stupid fucking mudslinging post. You deserve to be lynched

In post 1315, lane0168 wrote:And if I had to guess, is say 100%

No, I'm saying someone that's claiming they've been busy sorting people when they haven't are full of shit. How's that alignment indicative? Scum are more likely to be fluffing than town. Make no mistake, I've seen plenty of town fluffers.
On page 2, usually anyone making much of a serious case is reaching unless someone has just done something really stupid.
You thought I was actually asking!

Your read on me is frickin awesome! In post game perhaps you can share some pointers and sign my transcript of this game for me.
It's apparent that you are looking for molehills for mountain building.
Thank you for your support.
Your guesses are just as awesome as your reads!

SlySly · Post Post #1320 (isolation #43) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:46 pm

Panther comes in a extols his greatness on us all and then goes tourette's on House. His knee jerk voting didn't fit with his scholarly context.

SlySly · Post Post #1322 (isolation #44) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:52 pm

In post 1319, lane0168 wrote:You haven't done shit to sort anyone. You wouldn't know what sorting people was if it kicked you in the head

Please bring a paint pen to post game. I want your autograph to be pristine. I'm planning to frame this one. It's not often I get to play with a legend.

SlySly · Post Post #1323 (isolation #45) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 4:53 pm

In post 1321, lane0168 wrote: On page 2 "such a serious case" HAHA! tell me what was so serious about it.

Your reading comprehension skills are epic.

SlySly · Post Post #1327 (isolation #46) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:09 pm

In post 188, lane0168 wrote:
In post 186, Infinity 324 wrote:@lane What was the purpose of questioning slysly wrt the messages he sent?
Because I'm trying to figure out why he did it. It's a game mechanic from the mod. Of course it's going to work. It's not some foreign mechanic. And now there's 4 people that know he's telling the truth about this. Why would he be lying about it? Like he's trying to gain people's trust for some reason. Or he sent different messages, one to his partner. Disguised as a test. And he now said what was sent. So if he did send a message, they can verify it. I just am trying to figure out the intentions.

How many messages after mine did you scrutinize?

SlySly · Post Post #1328 (isolation #47) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:16 pm

In post 1325, lane0168 wrote: "much of a serious case" doesn't matter. You still called it serious, and at the same time not sorting people. Which is counterintuitive.

I didn't call anything serious. You did.

In post 1317, SlySly wrote: I wanted to know if infinity was full of shit his claim. You think it's ridiculous not to take people's word for it on page 2?! Yeah ok.

See, infinity was playing the light rvs association game. You found a molehill and mountainized it.

In post 1317, SlySly wrote: On page 2, usually anyone making much of a serious case is reaching unless someone has just done something really stupid.

Translation for the "special" one. When it's page 2, anyone that is making much of a serious case about anything is usually full of shit unless some dumbass has done something exceptionally stupid.

SlySly · Post Post #1330 (isolation #48) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 5:22 pm

In post 1329, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 4, Expedience wrote:VOTE: Creature

Serious vote.

In post 5, lane0168 wrote:VOTE: experience [/vote

Serious vote.

In post 6, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: lane

Serious vote
@Sly: does this look full of shit? No, it's just people joking around.

Seriously? My gawd. It's like you read the mirror image of my words.

SlySly · Post Post #1336 (isolation #49) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:25 pm

In post 1331, Expedience wrote:SlySly, you should stop tunneling town and give reads on other players.

i've just been giving lane what he's been asking for.
i've gave my reasoning for my vote on Panther and made it perfectly clear i'm still in favor of lynching lane.

I thought you were scummy at first, but I did a read through and your iso, and I feel a lot better about you now.

SlySly · Post Post #1349 (isolation #50) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:48 pm

In post 1341, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1291, SlySly wrote:I am more than happy to lynch lane still and will gladly move my vote back, but the deadline approaches and it's time to get this game moving.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Panther
This post is also terribad.

Fine. I've been on lane all day. There's no movement there. The deadline is monday. I moved my vote because I saw Panther do something scummy and felt there is more chance of a wagon there than lane.

SlySly · Post Post #1364 (isolation #51) » Sat Oct 15, 2016 7:16 pm

In post 1363, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have half a mind

That explains a lot.

SlySly · Post Post #1429 (isolation #52) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:25 am

In post 1405, Infinity 324 wrote: SlySly's case on lane is terrible but probably not trying to look good either.

Join scum and vote me then.

SlySly · Post Post #1430 (isolation #53) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:26 am

My wagon is scum and idiots.

SlySly · Post Post #1431 (isolation #54) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:27 am

More votes on me please. My flip will bring some clarity.

SlySly · Post Post #1440 (isolation #55) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:48 am

In post 1437, lane0168 wrote:I'll talk to you about gamma.

Obviously, you didn't comprehend what infinity said.

SlySly · Post Post #1443 (isolation #56) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:52 am

In post 1441, lane0168 wrote:
In post 1440, SlySly wrote:
In post 1437, lane0168 wrote:I'll talk to you about gamma.
Obviously, you didn't comprehend what infinity said.
What?

I reread. I was wrong. I thought infinity said something that wasn't said. Carry on.

SlySly · Post Post #1444 (isolation #57) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:55 am

In post 1435, Infinity 324 wrote: I want to talk to someone about gamma.

In post 1430, SlySly wrote:My wagon is scum and idiots.

Gamma is town.

SlySly · Post Post #1445 (isolation #58) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:03 am

OMGUS

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Gamma

SlySly · Post Post #1447 (isolation #59) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:13 am

In post 1446, House wrote:Wtf just happened there?

Infinity got scummier. Gamma and lane remained the same. I proved that Creature and I are nothing alike.

SlySly · Post Post #1449 (isolation #60) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:20 am

In post 1448, House wrote:
In post 1447, SlySly wrote:
In post 1446, House wrote:Wtf just happened there?
Infinity got scummier. Gamma and lane remained the same. I proved that Creature and I are nothing alike.
If Infinity got scummier and Gamma remained the same, why did you switch your vote to Gamma the post after you called him town?

Panther is who needs rope. Infinity pulled off killing that possibility. Lane doesn't have enough votes. Time to prove how good Gamma is at spotting Slyscum. Get me to L-1 and I'll hammer myself.

SlySly · Post Post #1470 (isolation #61) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:47 am

In post 1455, lane0168 wrote:Or what now? Why did he vote gamma? Why did you vote gammas sly? To prove that just cause you're incredibly scummy, doesn't mean your scum?

Can you not read? I stated why I voted him. I voted him for "OMGUS." What's your read on that?

In post 1445, SlySly wrote:OMGUS

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Gamma

SlySly · Post Post #1476 (isolation #62) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:57 am

In post 1471, Infinity 324 wrote:What did you expect to accomplish with that?

Well, you pulled off the good wagon to bring the game to stagnation here close to the deadline. So, once again, I've gone and done something to get the game rolling again.
You gonna read me for scum like lane and Gamma, or are you going to go the route that requires neural activity?
--------

In post 1472, lane0168 wrote:I think you're trying to be over the top absurd hoping people think scum would never act like that because you have nothing else to do and its your last ditch effort to not get lynched today.

Do you seriously read what is going on as trying "to not get lynched today?" The idiotic votes were well in place before my rant began. I'm encouraging my lynch. Once it's clear that 2 people are either scum or clueless, those with a clue will know to ignore the spam.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:11 am

In post 1535, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1531, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1528, Stargazers wrote:*Marks house as VI*
I know our lynch tomorrow!
~Maria
Who
If gamma gets lynched Sly if Sly gets lynched Creature or house

Scum claim. LOL. Because Stargazers knows Sly and Gamma are both gonna flip town.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:17 am

In post 1478, Infinity 324 wrote:Don't see how voting a townread gets the game going

Lookie at what's happened since this post.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:20 am

Stay in denial. Flips are gonna happen and there's gonna be something to review.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:32 am

In post 1548, Infinity 324 wrote:A bunch of people scumread you more, and not much else

Scum know I'm not scum. They want me alive now. They won't NK me. They know idiots who sheep will waste powers on me instead of on them. I doubt they'll even let a lynch on me go through at this point. They probably want me around for at least a few more days.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:44 am

In post 1552, Infinity 324 wrote:And you'll accomplish what with that, if you somehow avoid being lynched? You're arrogant enough to think you're a better scumhunter than whoever will get NKed instead?

This isn't arrogance. There are many in this game that are far superior to me at playing mafia, especially when viewing things in a traditional sense. I'm not getting lynched. Scum are nodding in agreement with me right now. They think I'm a bonus prize for them, and as long as town ignores me, they're right.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:51 am

I don't care if I get lynched. I care that the town wins. Scum is not going to NK me. They want sheep with powers aiming at me instead of them. They know the sheep aren't listening to me right now. I will only get NK'd if what I'm saying is hitting close to home and the sheep are hearing me. There are townies with a brain that can see what I'm doing, whether they agree with it or not, and they aren't gonna lynch me. The only way I get lynched today is if nearing the deadline, a counter wagon to me is targeting scum, then assuming there's still a wagon on me, they'll jump ship to me just in the nick of time to save their buddy.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:04 pm

I'm not trying to prevent my demise in this game in the day or the night. I'm trying to win the game. I win when the town wins. Right now, assuming you're town, you may think I'm full of shit, but if I get lynched, I know how I'm gonna flip. You may mistake my confidence on this as arrogance, but tomorrow you'll see that I was telling the truth, and then you can go and review what bravado was around faking confidence with bs against me before things opened up. You'll hear me better then.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:04 pm

That was @infinity

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:13 pm

In post 1568, Infinity 324 wrote: What's my read on you again?

I don't know exactly what your point is. But getting yourself scumread for no visible gain, which seemed to be what your reaction test accomplished, doesn't seem like a good idea

But I don't really care at this point

You're not voting me, so I assume you don't have a scumread on me.
Or, maybe I'm your scum buddy and you just don't want to bus me.

You don't care? Tuned me out because you can't deal with my methods.

You don't know my point because you are ignoring and down-playing what my actions did because you attribute my actions as being of arrogant nature.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:23 pm

In post 1581, Infinity 324 wrote: Except I think grapevine and gazers are town

Stargazers scum claimed.

SlySly · Sun Oct 16, 2016 12:25 pm

In post 1583, SlySly wrote:
In post 1581, Infinity 324 wrote: Except I think grapevine and gazers are town
Stargazers scum
claimed
slipped.

Fixed.

SlySly · Post Post #1609 (isolation #74) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:30 pm

In post 1607, Infinity 324 wrote: Semantics

One of scum's favorite things.

SlySly · Post Post #1615 (isolation #75) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:51 pm

In post 1610, Infinity 324 wrote:Can you explain the supposed "scum claim"

First, I fixed it to a slip.

In post 1586, SlySly wrote:
In post 1583, SlySly wrote:
In post 1581, Infinity 324 wrote: Except I think grapevine and gazers are town
Stargazers scum
claimed
slipped.
Fixed.

In the bolded we see stream of consciousness posting from scum from the perspective that both with flip town and setting up other townies to be mislynched later in both cases.
I'll translate because scum like to keep it hard to read:
1. When gamma flips town, Sly's head rolls
2. When Sly flips town, Creature's head rolls (like how i didn't include house in the example?)

In post 1546, SlySly wrote:
In post 1535, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1531, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1528, Stargazers wrote:*Marks house as VI*
I know our lynch tomorrow!
~Maria
Who

If gamma gets lynched Sly if Sly gets lynched Creature or house
Scum claim. LOL. Because Stargazers knows Sly and Gamma are both gonna flip town.

SlySly · Post Post #1617 (isolation #76) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 1:52 pm

It's easier when you're the town under fire.

SlySly · Post Post #1622 (isolation #77) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:12 pm

In post 1620, Stargazers wrote: You clearly "forgot" to take in how I feel about these reads

I didn't forget, I left House out because I knew that's who you were bussing.

SlySly · Post Post #1643 (isolation #78) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:17 pm

In post 1626, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Stargazers I made the same mistake as Sly, it looks like a chain lynch without the context you gave.
Yeah but you didn't know the context of my reads and he did (at least that's what I'm getting from what he's saying)
From what I can tell he scumreads me House and 1 of you or panter and I want to know more on that.
~Maria

This is so ridiculous. Here's the context I knew, I read you as scum, so when I'm considering your thoughts on a topic, I consider it as coming from the scum perspective.

I've already said I'd be glad to lynch Panther and I've already said I think Gamma is town and why I think that.

Twist some more, scum!

SlySly · Post Post #1645 (isolation #79) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:22 pm

In post 1624, Stargazers wrote: what do you mean bussing?
~Maria

Bussing

SlySly · Post Post #1649 (isolation #80) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 4:35 pm

In post 1648, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1645, SlySly wrote:
In post 1624, Stargazers wrote: what do you mean bussing?
~Maria
Bussing
I know what bussing is and I misunderstood you then at the post above
Looking at things from a scum few point seems hard to do and un needed may I ask why you do this?

You ever been hunting? When you hunt an animal, you try to think like that animal so you can predict its actions. It's called scum "hunting" for a reason.

SlySly · Post Post #1651 (isolation #81) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:24 pm

In post 1650, Stargazers wrote: Can I ask what made you sr our slot in the first place and what other sr's you have
(a 1 line sentence or more saying why would be nice)

The first thing that pinged my interest was Maria-head's ocd about me making the worst post of the game, as I've already pointed out. Those y'all have "aligned" with in the game are those that I find the scummiest.

I've bolded those I find most likely to be scum.

In post 1644, Firebringer wrote:
Day 1 Vote Count 1.19

Lane0168 (L-6): GuiltyLion,
House (L-6):
Pantherpunt
,
PantherPunt (L-4): Expedience, Creature, Gamma Emerald,
SlySly (L-5):
lane0168
,
Stargazers
,
Gamma Emerald (L-2): Grapevine, Mathblade, SlySly, Dunnstral,
House
,

Not Voting (1): Infinity324,

Notice how House did the old 'give up' putting me at L-2 and then switched over to conveniently L-2 Gamma while there was plenty of noise to help it go unnoticed?

The funniest thing about all of this is, I had a good townread on Dunn and I logged in and saw the mod mistake on the votecount and saw Dunn was voting me. That's what sent me into a rant. I felt the place I had seen the most town brain working had betrayed me and all hope was lost. After the aftermath, he calls the mod out on it and it was a mistake. If not for that mistake, this game would've been a lot quieter!!! I think good information came from it all, so, no regrets!

UNVOTE: Gamma

SlySly · Post Post #1652 (isolation #82) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:30 pm

With that said, of the bolded, House is the one on the bubble. There are more than a few things that House has said that really gave me townvibes, but there have been some things from him that left me scratching my head.

SlySly · Post Post #1656 (isolation #83) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:57 pm

The deadline approaches as does bedtime.
VOTE: Panther

SlySly · Post Post #1659 (isolation #84) » Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:24 pm

Oh no, Math's caught me!

The deadline is in not very long. Would you have preferred I waited until the deadline had passed to vote? Panther must be your buddy.

SlySly · Post Post #1751 (isolation #85) » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:44 am

I'm voting Gamma in my next post if you don't vote Panther.

SlySly · Post Post #1757 (isolation #86) » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:46 am

I have a meeting in 14 min. That's how long I have.

SlySly · Post Post #1763 (isolation #87) » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:49 am

i will hammer before i go to meeting if no one else has.

SlySly · Post Post #1772 (isolation #88) » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:53 am

You're not confirmed until you flip.

SlySly · Post Post #1783 (isolation #89) » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:54 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Gamma

SlySly · Post Post #1811 (isolation #90) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:29 am

VOTE: Stargazers

SlySly · Post Post #1837 (isolation #91) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:25 am

In post 1834, Stargazers wrote:How convenient you lynch my top townread while I'm afk and Creature comes into the day claiming guilty on our slot lol I don't care what Nat says I'm willing to bet Creature is a role cop on us and saw that we're pr

Hilarious!

In post 1834, Stargazers wrote: We're a roleblocker and we can rb either phone actions or actual pr actions we can do both but we won't be able to rb the next night we roleblocked slysly last night

And it gets even funnier!!!

SlySly · Post Post #1840 (isolation #92) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:28 am

In post 1839, Stargazers wrote:Why the fk did yall let Gamma get lynched again? Was it close to the deadline or did you guys just bliz his ***
~Maria

Read up and find out, scum.

SlySly · Post Post #1844 (isolation #93) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:29 am

In post 1835, Stargazers wrote:VOTE: Creature

I'm pretty sure we most likely blocked the kill last night because that flip on Gamma was scummy as fuck

Why aren't you voting me? You blocked scumSly but you vote Creature for getting a guilty on you. Priceless!!!

SlySly · Post Post #1847 (isolation #94) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:32 am

In post 1846, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1844, SlySly wrote:
In post 1835, Stargazers wrote:VOTE: Creature

I'm pretty sure we most likely blocked the kill last night because that flip on Gamma was scummy as fuck
Why aren't you voting me? You blocked scumSly but you vote Creature for getting a guilty on you. Priceless!!!
Oh my god you're so stupid!
Sadly you're not confirmed scum but Creature is most likely or scum have a farmer or redirector but I've never seen that role before sooo
~Maria

Not sadly, you are confirmed scum.

SlySly · Post Post #1850 (isolation #95) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:37 am

In post 1535, Stargazers wrote: If gamma gets lynched Sly if Sly gets lynched Creature or house

I hammered Gamma. Why aren't you voting me again?

SlySly · Post Post #1871 (isolation #96) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:49 am

Anyone that blocked me, blocked nothing.

SlySly · Post Post #1882 (isolation #97) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:58 am

Action claim. LOL. More like actionless claim.

SlySly · Post Post #1885 (isolation #98) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:00 am

Come on, lynch me. I hammered town. Stargazers rb'd me and that why and that's why there was no NK.

SlySly · Post Post #1888 (isolation #99) » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:01 am

Here, I'll start the wagon for you.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: SlySly

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:01 am

In post 1887, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1885, SlySly wrote:Come on, lynch me. I hammered town. Stargazers rb'd me and that why and that's why there was no NK.
Chill, where's my vote dude

It was on Scumgazers.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:04 am

In post 1890, Not Chara wrote: Sly: that's still a claim of what you did. it wasn't needed, is the point.

I didn't do an action last night. That's not a claim.

What's needed are Stargazer votes.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:05 am

In post 1893, Stargazers wrote: SlySly with that overreaction though trying to play it all off

LMAO at the one blaming a role she's never seen for her guilty result. You really should take this comedy on the road!!!

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:10 am

In post 1902, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1888, SlySly wrote:Here, I'll start the wagon for you.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: SlySly
What the fuck are you hoping to accomplish with this

I assume "you" is me, and I don't think you're scum at the moment. So just wtf

i've said all along, my flip proves others wrong.

"you" is to whoever thinks i'm scum.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:15 am

In post 1913, Stargazers wrote:
In post 1903, Stargazers wrote:Nat what are you doing WRONG PERSON TO VOTE UGH
Fine you take over I'm grabbing a god dam soda
~Maria
Keep this stuff to Skype.

@Creature I realize it's a bit of a stretch for you to believe your result was messed with. But on the other hand, we're providing an explanation for the no-kill. If our slot were scum we obviously wouldn't be roleblocking our own partners.
-Nahdia

But came out swingin on Creature instead of backing it up with a vote on your explanation.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:18 am

In post 1546, SlySly wrote: Scum claim. LOL. Because Stargazers knows Sly and Gamma are both gonna flip town.

In post 1551, SlySly wrote:
In post 1548, Infinity 324 wrote:A bunch of people scumread you more, and not much else
Scum know I'm not scum. They want me alive now. They won't NK me. They know idiots who sheep will waste powers on me instead of on them. I doubt they'll even let a lynch on me go through at this point. They probably want me around for at least a few more days.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:19 am

In post 1920, Infinity 324 wrote:Lynch gazers, if they are town, lynch creature + slysly

I'm good with that

i'm good with that too

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:19 am

In post 1924, lane0168 wrote:So there's no other explanation for no kill?

No scum action to frame me.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:54 am

In post 1938, MathBlade wrote:I believe Stargazers is town or scum have fake claims.

Then you should hop on the night blocked scummy SlySly wagon.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:57 am

The claim is...
My night action was blocked and that's why there was no NK.

That means 1 of the 2 of the following are true:
1. SlySly is scum that issued the NK for scum and Stargazers blocked it
2. Stargazers, who has a guilty against them, is scum

Vote accordingly.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:02 am

In post 1880, Not Chara wrote:oh. happy scumday, SlySly.

TYVM!

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:44 am

In post 1951, MathBlade wrote: Stargazers town and roleblocked the killer who does not necessarily have to be sly.

One of your ridiculous theories destroyed.

In post 1834, Stargazers wrote:we roleblocked slysly last night

Occam's razor. It's me or SG.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:55 am

In post 1960, MathBlade wrote:The biggest thing is even if Stargazers blocked Sly it is not condemning of Sly. It means that if Stargazers is town then Creature's result is messed with or Creature is scum. There is not conclusive evidence of who did the kill.

There is conclusive evidence that there was no kill. That razor keeps getting shinier.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:23 am

Math is scum.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:32 pm

I'm getting the feeling Infinity just might be scum. At the deadline, I didn't trust Infinity to hammer so I did it. I had a feeling Infinity was falsely saying he'd hammer and we'd be left with no information and more confusion. He "hammered" for show and even admits to that in his pedit.

In post 1786, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 1781, Gamma Emerald wrote:But you all think I'm town!
And I'm SURE we have something that can prevent evens.
If we have 2 things that can prevent evens then we want to lynch again

Plus a lot of people still scumread you I think

Sorry it's gotta be done

VOTE: gamma

PEdit: beat me to it

---------

In post 1967, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm 99% sure one of stargazers and slysly is scum.

yet...

In post 1987, Infinity 324 wrote:VOTE: mathblade

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:12 pm

In post 2015, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1990, Infinity 324 wrote:The vote is symbolic

@SlySly

the 1990 quote is meaningless

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:18 pm

In post 2037, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 2034, SlySly wrote:
In post 2015, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1990, Infinity 324 wrote:The vote is symbolic

@SlySly
the 1990 quote is meaningless
No it's not, they're right. I wasn't trying to lynch mathblade, I voted them because they seemed like a very likely scumbuddy to stargazers at the time

Oh, forgive me. I thought we were discussing your "hammer" vote. I understand now that Math and you are talking about your vote on Math.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 2:11 pm

In post 2047, MathBlade wrote: Why did you think my quote of Infinity's post about Infinity's vote of me was about anything else? You said Infinity's vote on me was bad. I proved that was out of context.

Because I was tunneled on the first part of my post, about Infinity's "hammer' vote.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 2:14 pm

In post 2047, MathBlade wrote:You said Infinity's vote on me was bad. I proved that was out of context.

I was posting in a catch up, I didn't read the symbolic 1990 before i wrote what i wrote and it didn't jump out at me enough during my catch up to warrant editing what I had on the clipboard.
-----

In post 2048, MathBlade wrote:Oh and happy scumday

TYVM!

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:41 pm

Game sure grinds to a halt when scum are exposed.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:42 pm

In post 2055, MathBlade wrote:
In post 235, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 234, Stargazers wrote:Everything can be used as a scum tactic

Mainly this post here it seems really cheeky almost sarcastic.

That's almost convincing enough for me to move my vote off myself.

SlySly · Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:08 pm

In post 2055, MathBlade wrote:
In post 235, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 234, Stargazers wrote:Everything can be used as a scum tactic

Mainly this post here it seems really cheeky almost sarcastic.

This is a little more convincing. Here he brings attention to his bussing of stargazers, like a good little scum buddy, and follows it up with his vote on confirmed town.

In post 891, Dunnstral wrote:I don't understand how gamma can say I'm scum every other post but just quotes a post of me voting stargazers as the reason

In post 903, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Then follows up with more shots on confirmed town.

In post 909, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 906, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 905, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 899, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 890, Dunnstral wrote:@Gamma I really need you to explain your scumread on me. You were asked to before and dodged it
Your vote seemed like you were trying to be like "oh hey I see you scumread this person vote them not me".
This is super weak. You stopped voting me because you had nothing to base it on and you knew it
Lol. I wold have unvoted that post if that were the case.
You're scum though and changed votes to omgus mathblade

In post 1002, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 999, Infinity 324 wrote:Gamma is a fine member of the town
stop

In post 1789, Firebringer wrote:
Day 1 Vote Count 1.21

Lane0168 (L-6): GuiltyLion,
PantherPunt (L-3): Expedience, Creature, Infinity324, Gamma Emerald,
SlySly (L-6): Stargazers,

Gamma Emerald [LYNCHED]: Grapevine, Mathblade,
Dunnstral
, House, Pantherpunt, lane0168, SlySly,

Not Voting (0):

With 13 Alive it Takes 7 To Lynch

Searching for Replacement for GuiltyLion

Day Ends (expired on 2016-10-17 08:00:00)

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:43 am

In post 2070, Not Chara wrote:Sly: i looked at your Dunn case. i don't think pushing town on day 1 is particularly scummy by itself. did you find their reasons to be contrived?
also, i'm terrible, sorry. i've been busy and still have not caught up. but entirely based on day 2, i would still lynch Stargazers. and Panther is town.

Sly needs to stop voting himself.

As soon as the votes are where they need to be, on Stargazers, my vote will move to the right place.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:56 am

Flips make some things obvious.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:59 am

No, I don't. I posted those reads as a response.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:09 am

In post 2077, Not Chara wrote:that wasn't really a response. town push town a lot. you have to tell me why Dunn wasn't misguided town, or else say why all (or most) of the other Gamma votes were towny ones.

In post 2078, SlySly wrote:No, I don't. I posted those reads as a response.

Sorry, once again, my old age and confusion are setting in. I was thinking of another post...

So, now to answer in a way that might make you feel a little better.

In post 2056, SlySly wrote:
In post 2055, MathBlade wrote:
In post 235, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 234, Stargazers wrote:Everything can be used as a scum tactic

Mainly this post here it seems really cheeky almost sarcastic.
That's almost convincing enough for me to move my vote off myself.

I had Dunn as a townread for D1. Mathblade called Dunn and Stargazers scumbuddies for something seemingingly minuscule to me so I iso'd and offered up something with a bit more substance. If you want to ignore D1 bussing and called it misguided town, feel free.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:11 am

In post 2086, Infinity 324 wrote:Slysly + gazers isn't out of the question.

Yes it is. If you think I'm scum, vote me. I'm already supporting a wagon for that ridiculous theory. If you want to push it, vote me or stfu.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:14 am

If you don't scumread me, then Slysly + gazers IS out of the question.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:15 am

In post 2089, Not Chara wrote:Sly: who did Dunn bus? Stargazers? or are you using bus to mean voting town?
yet, i do sort of like your answer. it doesn't make dunn look more like scum, but it makes you a bit more likely to be town.

pedit: wait, what? you just said they could be a team. does that not imply a scumread?

In post 2058, SlySly wrote: This is a little more convincing. Here he brings attention to his bussing of stargazers, like a good little scum buddy, and follows it up with his vote on confirmed town.
In post 891, Dunnstral wrote:I don't understand how gamma can say I'm scum every other post but just quotes a post of me voting stargazers as the reason

In post 903, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:38 am

In post 1937, PantherPunt wrote:
In post 1896, Stargazers wrote:So at risk of saying too much, Maria has an explanation for why she thinks Creature is scum but some of the assumptions in her logic aren't flying with me so I'm going rogue. I still don't see even with the presence of a role cop mafia would want to 1 for 1 us right now. Creature may be scum as well but this is practically confirmed in our eyes.

VOTE: SlySly
-Nahdia
so you figured out what your POV should actually be, at least

It took me doing this for them to commit. Why? Because they are scum.

In post 1936, PantherPunt wrote:
In post 1888, SlySly wrote:Here, I'll start the wagon for you.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: SlySly
when will people stop doing this though

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:43 am

In post 2080, Infinity 324 wrote:Why is panther town chara?

I know I'm not Not Chara, but since I'm scum, I should do a little white knighting.

Here's why Panther is town...

In post 1808, PantherPunt wrote:for any enterprising townies out there...I believe gamma was a wagon that gained momentum at various times throughout d1 (not worried about eod consolidation)

would be interesting to see who were the subjects of conversation/competing wagons when gamma votes built at various times
how the voters who moved to him did so (progression of read vs their other scumreads/votes)
who voted him but didn't vote him as deadline approached and if that makes sense for that person

I plan to do this but won't have the hours until tomorrow

In post 1852, PantherPunt wrote:
In post 1834, Stargazers wrote:How convenient you lynch my top townread while I'm afk and Creature comes into the day claiming guilty on our slot lol I don't care what Nat says I'm willing to bet Creature is a role cop on us and saw that we're pr

We're a roleblocker and we can rb either phone actions or actual pr actions we can do both but we won't be able to rb the next night we roleblocked slysly last night
so he saw you were a roleblocker and decided that he would claim a guilty on you to get you lynched. knowing it's a 1 for 1 and that he'd be lynched the next day...as a rolecop

there is no world that ever happens and no world where I'd believe you actually believe that

gg your game is over

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:57 am

In post 2097, Infinity 324 wrote:You seem paranoid about people scumreading you sly

Look, I'm terrible at this game compared to some, but I have played a lot and some of their good has rubbed off on me. What you don't realize, this is the new and improved, much calmer Sly than what existed in my previous mafiascum life. I do things my own way because I don't know all of the ways of the grandmasters.

With that said, I've played enough to realize that some of the people throwing shade on me are either, 1. scum, 2. a grandmaster that is not going to stoop to my level and even consider what such a peon is offering, 3. a VI eager beaver that's sheeping scum because scum made a post that "sounded good"

We have a guilty. The guilty is trying to frame me as the blocked NK.

Ain't nobody got time for that.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:19 am

In post 2102, Infinity 324 wrote:I don't see why the guilty wouldn't bus as it was going down, that seems like a reasonable play to me

Mathblade brought up something weak about Dunn being scum with Stargazers, so I went and iso'd Dunn and found something with a little meat left on the bone. That's the only reason "bussing" even came up. There may be bussing that happened that I haven't noticed yet.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:35 am

If I was scum with Stargazers, would I really be voting myself and Stargazers be the only one on the wagon? It's called Watch Dogs, not Surreal Alternate Reality.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:32 am

I'll hammer Stargazers.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:51 am

In post 2133, MathBlade wrote:
In post 2131, SlySly wrote:I'll hammer Stargazers.
No. I don't trust you in the off case StarGazers is town. I will hammer once everyone is posted and we can use this time to wait on a House replacement.

Come on, I want the hammer my scum buddy. It's the pro-scum thing to do.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Stargazers

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:56 am

What if it takes longer than 3 days to find a replacement?

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:38 am

In post 2152, Grapevine wrote:
In post 1807, Not Chara wrote:i still have no context for any of this, but that question looked to me like what Panther was reading it was. 'are you confident about your result, and should we listen to you?'
i don't see a problem with that, Varsoon.
also, hello! :>
It reads more like lining up lynches to me.
No shit Panther's willing to deal with the consequences of what he said--trying to insist "Oh but it you're wrong we get to lynch you, too" is awkward. Like I said, it seems like setting up for a town v town where both get lynched.

Also, my whole message thing was just to make sure no one had message spying, everyone got messages as intended, and could respond to them without role shenanigans getting in the way. It also served as a bit of a reaction test, but, /shrugs, didn't really get great info from it other than that SlySly, Tatsuya-slot, Lane, Stargazer, and Expedience did not respond, for whatever reason.

Everyone the replied did so as instructed.

Apologies for my absence. I've been a little sick.
-V

I responded.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:53 am

In post 2153, SlySly wrote:
In post 2152, Grapevine wrote:It also served as a bit of a reaction test, but, /shrugs, didn't really get great info from it other than that SlySly, Tatsuya-slot, Lane, Stargazer, and Expedience did not respond, for whatever reason.
I responded.

In post 1628, Firebringer wrote:
Infinity 324 has sent a message to SlySly.
SlySly has sent a message to House.

-->SlySly has sent a message to Grapevine.<--

Gamma Emerald has sent a message to SlySly.
House has sent a message to Infinity 324

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 2:38 pm

In post 2170, Expedience wrote:
In post 1804, Infinity 324 wrote:Creature, are you fine with being lynched if stargazers flips town?
Let's bring back the post.

Really?

Seems like a no brainer.

Creature has guilty on Stargazers.
Go with the guilty. Lynch Stargazers.
If town, lynch Creature.

Or,

Stargazers says I'm blocked scum.
Go with the theory. Lynch SlySly.
If town, vig Stargazers and lynch Dunn.

Sorry, got excited on the last line. I like efficiency.

SlySly · Wed Oct 19, 2016 3:07 pm

In post 2176, Grapevine wrote: I'd bet my bottom dollar that people using this as a means to scumread me are likely scum hoping to push a lynch because they don't know how the fuck I operate.

It was because of me that bets were officially disallowed on this site.

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:42 am

Prod avoidance while nothing goes on.

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:43 am

Stargazers is scum

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:59 am

In post 2273, Grapevine wrote:
In post 2270, SlySly wrote:Stargazers is scum
Well yea. Is that your only read?

I'm sure this list is scum-filled.

In post 1789, Firebringer wrote:
Day 1 Vote Count 1.21

Gamma Emerald [LYNCHED]: Grapevine, Mathblade, Dunnstral, House, Pantherpunt, lane0168, SlySly

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 6:00 am

@Grape: Add infinity to that list as well since he found it so important to include his pseudo-hammer post.

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 6:17 am

In post 2282, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 2279, SlySly wrote:@Grape: Add infinity to that list as well since he found it so important to include his pseudo-hammer post.
I don't get what your big issue with this is

You think scum!me would expect to get towncred for hammering to L+1

I just have this feeling you were going to let the day go to no lynch and that you posted that for nothing but show.

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 6:27 am

In post 2285, Grapevine wrote:
In post 2279, SlySly wrote:@Grape: Add infinity to that list as well since he found it so important to include his pseudo-hammer post.
I get you oldschool lot with your things like this that you truly hold dear. But he's unfortunately town here.

I also don't think there's more than one scum on the gamma wagon. They didn't have a reason to get their hands dirty with that at all.

I pushed it mad loud. And infinity defended it loud. Scum stayed away.

I said Gamma was town the entire time. There's scum on that lynch.

SlySly · Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:37 pm

In post 2333, Aquanim wrote:sup everyone

I've got a lot of thread to read, so if anybody wants to give me some pointers to what's important to read first I'd like to hear it.

Gamma was lynched yesterday and flipped town. I hammered Gamma, but I said yesterday that he was town but a mislynch is better for town due to information gained than a no lynch.

D2 starts:
1. Creature has a guilty on Stargazers
2. There was no NK
3. Stargazers claims they blocked me and suggested that why there was no NK and that Creature's investigation was redirected by some unknown force
4. There's been no additional blocking reports

SlySly · Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:12 pm

In post 2393, Not Chara wrote: it's possible Stargazers wrote a post in the scum PT about it

Why don't you check it right quick and let us know for sure?!

In post 2393, Not Chara wrote: Stargazers is the only scum player i claimed to.

Go ahead and claim the rest of your buddies, too.

SlySly · Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:18 pm

In post 2406, Not Chara wrote: i'll hammer Stargazers before i go to bed.

Not without a few more votes, you won't.

SlySly · Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:08 pm

In post 2421, Not Chara wrote:i'm done.

SlySly · Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:59 pm

In post 2433, Dunnstral wrote: I was also considering letting mathblade hack the item

That would have been a waste.

SlySly · Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:04 pm

In post 2435, Dunnstral wrote:Why did two people die?

Vig or sk would be my guess.

SlySly · Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:08 pm

More likely a vig though. If there was an SK working, I'd think there'd have been at least one kill on N1.

SlySly · Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:36 pm

In post 2454, Not Chara wrote: he wouldn't
know
that i claimed to three people because he would have had no time to check the bloody PT if one of his hypothetical buddies had posted about it.
how on earth would he have known what the other two texts said?

1. He could have seen that you sent 3 messages at the same time, as the mod posted the notifications 4 in game posts prior to his reaction to your text.
2. He couldn't know what the other 2 texts said, but it's not too much of reach to think he might have instinctively assumed all the messages were the identical, a CC kind of thing.

You've expressed this is the reason you had infinity as a tr. There's no need to spend all of today fighting about it.

---------------

In post 2444, Not Chara wrote: i'm not sure if there's a vigilante. Mathblade is a weird vig kill, in my opinion.

Dunn, does your ability show all items that are/have been in the game, or just the ones that players are currently in possession of?

either Infinity protected Creature or scum killed Infinity.

Ah, the infinity protection theory is valid. The kill count is still 2. Scum going after creature makes sense. Math's dead too. Weird, or not, something killed Math and vig seems more likely to me than SK or scum group #2 in a mini.

The lynches:

"

Gamma Emerald

[LYNCHED]: Grapevine, Mathblade, Dunnstral, Aquanim(House), Pantherpunt, lane0168, SlySly"

"

Stargazers

[LYNCHED]: Creature, lane0168, SlySly, Dunnstral, Not Chara(GuiltyLion), Grapevine, Aquanim(House)"

Creature was not on the town lynch, but was on the scum lynch.
Panther wasn't on the scum lynch, but was on the town lynch.
Mathblade wasn't on the scum lynch, but was on the town lynch.
Not Chara was on the on the scum lynch, but not on the town lynch.
Infinity had expressed willingness to hammer the town lynch, but technically wasn't on either lynch.

I can see the thinking behind a Math, Panther, or Infinity targeting by a vig based on this.

SlySly · Sat Oct 22, 2016 8:43 pm

In post 2456, SlySly wrote: Weird, or not, something killed Math and vig seems more likely to me than SK or scum group #2 in a mini.

As soon as I posted this, I remembered something. Where there's a South, there's bound to be a North. If not a vig, and there's 2 groups, why no kill on N1?

In post 2427, Firebringer wrote:
Spoiler: Stargazers Flip
Welcome,
South Club 1 Shot Roleblocker,
you are aligned with the

Chicago South Club!

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:44 am

Creature, did you get the text I sent you yesterday?

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:48 am

In post 2475, Creature wrote:The red color suggests it's the only mafia group.

In post 2476, Creature wrote:Yeah, there's no north club.

The color means nothing.

A multiball game - look at the player's alive and dead on the opening page.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:52 am

In post 2477, Aquanim wrote:
@SlySly
: Can you summarise why you scumread Lane on D1 in a few sentences?

He was fluffing, defensive and hindsight shows him putting all his blame on now confirmed townies.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:54 am

My first post of the game.

In post 17, SlySly wrote:
Vote: Stargazers

Just listen to me.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 10:43 am

In post 2519, lane0168 wrote:Blame of what?

Perhaps "shade" would have been a better word choice than "blame."

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 11:56 am

VOTE: PantherPunt

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 12:04 pm

Creature, is this supposed to be a comprehensive list of all messages?

In post 2487, Creature wrote:
In post 171, Firebringer wrote:
SlySly has messaged Stargazers
SlySly has messaged Grapevine

In post 223, Firebringer wrote:
Dunnstral has sent a message to Stargrazers
Dunnstral has sent a message to Grapevine

In post 310, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Dunnstral.

In post 429, Firebringer wrote:
House has sent a message to SlySly
House has sent a message to Infinity 324
House has sent a message to Gamma Emerald
House has sent a message to Tatsuya Kagame
House has sent a message to Dunnstral
House has sent a message to lane0168
House has sent a message to Creature
House has sent a message to GuiltyLion
House has sent a message to Stargazers
House has sent a message to Expedience
House has sent a message to Grapevine
House has sent a message to Mathblade

In post 441, Firebringer wrote:
Grapevine has sent a message to SlySly
Grapevine has sent a message to Infinity 324
Grapevine has sent a message to Gamma Emerald
Grapevine has sent a message to Tatsuya Kagame
Grapevine has sent a message to Dunnstral
Grapevine has sent a message to lane0168
Grapevine has sent a message to Creature
Grapevine has sent a message to GuiltyLion
Grapevine has sent a message to Stargazers
Grapevine has sent a message to Expedience
Grapevine has sent a message to House
Grapevine has sent a message to Mathblade

In post 486, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Dunnstral

In post 804, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Dunnstral.

In post 813, Firebringer wrote:
Mathblade has sent a message to Stargazers

In post 822, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Mathblade.

In post 833, Firebringer wrote:
Mathblade has sent a message to Stargazers

In post 840, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Mathblade.

In post 896, Firebringer wrote:
Mathblade has sent a message to Stargazers.
Dunnstral has sent a message to Stargazers.

In post 907, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Dunnstral.

In post 1534, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to Mathblade.

In post 1693, Firebringer wrote:
Mathblade has sent a message to Stargazers.
Expedience has sent a message to House.

In post 1877, Firebringer wrote:
MathBlade has sent a message to Stargazers

In post 1933, Firebringer wrote:
Stargazers has sent a message to MathBlade
Not Chara has sent a message to Grapevine.

In post 2355, Firebringer wrote:
Not Chara has sent a message to Infinity 324
Not Chara has sent a message to Aquanim
Not Chara has sent a message to Stargazers

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:24 pm

I'm good voting lane or not chara.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:30 pm

Ok, i just did an iso of exp. If the game's not over when he flips scum, it's time to lynch lane.

In post 1653, Expedience wrote:I'm super lost atm.

Infinity, lane and SlySly are town I think.

Weakly townreading Gamma and stargazers.

We should lynch panther or creature, or maybe someone else like the Guiltylion slot. I won't fight it if you guys want to lynch Gamma though and it goes near deadline.

idk that's all i got

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:58 pm

The lynches:

"

Gamma Emerald

[LYNCHED]: Grapevine, Mathblade, Dunnstral, Aquanim(House), Pantherpunt, lane0168, SlySly"

"

Stargazers

[LYNCHED]: Creature, lane0168, SlySly, Dunnstral, Not Chara(GuiltyLion), Grapevine, Aquanim(House)"

"

Pantherpunt

[LYNCHED]: Creature, Grapevine, Aquanim(House), SlySly, Dunnstral, Creature"

The shorter the lynch list gets, the more scum lynches look done by townies.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:02 pm

Would Aquanim hammer Stargazer and jump on the quick lynch of Panther if he was buddies with them?

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:12 pm

I don't think Aquanim would hammer a partner and then help with a quick lynch of her remaining partner. Not buying it. Nor am I assuming there is just one remaining scum.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:36 pm

In post 2608, Not Chara wrote: there isn't any reason
not
to hammer Stargazers there. Aquanim would have fallen under fire immediately for not lynching Stargazers, who was already doomed, at that point.
helping with a quick lynch on another guiltied partner is also nothing different from that.

combine them and it's the method of team suicide. i'm not buying it.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:56 pm

In post 2614, Not Chara wrote:if you believe there are more than 3 scum, it isn't suicide.
and even then: i don't think you understand how bad a choice it is to fight a lynch on a guiltied partner. they're
going
to get lynched whether you bus them or not.

you don't have to fight it. you don't have to participate either. there's a million ways to act like you're in support of something but more focused on something "more pressing."

see, panther didn't have to jump on the wagon. no one called him out for that specifically, unless i'm forgetting something.

In post 2426, Firebringer wrote:
Day 2 Vote Count 2.05

Stargazers [LYNCHED]: Creature, lane0168, SlySly, Dunnstral, Not Chara, Grapevine, Aquanim

SlySly (L-6): Stargazers

Not Voting (4): Mathblade, Pantherpunt, Expedience, Infinity324,

With 12 Alive it Takes 7 To Lynch

Day Ends (expired on 2016-10-23 08:40:00)

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 2:58 pm

I'm sure infinity or mathblade would have hammered if aquanim hadn't.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:01 pm

i'm not forgetting they were guiltied. guiltied or not, if i'm scum, i'm makin the town do as much as the work as possible. squirming through the heat is better when your friends are still alive with you.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:08 pm

In post 2625, Not Chara wrote:i said i wouldn't argue about this anymore. someone else explain this to SlySly, because i don't feel like talking in circles with someone who doesn't think. Aquanim is scum, and nothing about being on those lynches makes him more likely to be town.

i'm thinking plenty. i'm not even arguing. i'm calling it like i see it. sorry i don't see it your way.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:12 pm

In post 2626, Not Chara wrote:ugh. Sly, not every scum player is you. you should know your own playstyle isn't standard.

when you're scum, it's a team effort. i was just telling you my perspective. it happened to come from my perspective. you've pointed out a flaw to me, thank you. you are correct, i'm not standard. i need to think of that more, not only in mafia, but in my daily life, as well.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:31 pm

You can have the honors Not Chara.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:20 pm

This was my first game back after a 3 or 4 year hiatus. Thanks for putting up with me. Go town! LOL. Thanks for modding Firebringer, I would love to play in more of your games in the future.

SlySly · Sun Oct 23, 2016 4:22 pm

not chara, had you been here from the beginning, you could have claimed miller.