130.Mirror Mafia - Game Over

[Kcdaspot]

/confirm

[Kcdaspot]

oh...

sorry i didn't see this start.
VOTE: cecily
dumbest name of the playerlist.
with magister ludi, and who ever this KC guy is taking 2nd and 3rd respectively..


...wait a minute..

[Kcdaspot]

i'm going to sleep

off of first impression:

thor and pacman are prob town.

dunno the rest.

bedtime kiddies.

[Kcdaspot]

how come a game that has 21 people is being played by only 4-5 people?

UNVOTE:

re readan.

[Kcdaspot]

1. Your boss comes out with an important project and gives it to you. It is extremely hard, but if you complete it by yourself, you get all the praise and a raise. Do you work alone, or gather a small group to work with you?

2. You begin playing a new strategy game you have never played before. You are going to play this game with your friend in 3 days for an unknown prize. Do you study yourself, or use a computer to assist you in mastering it?

3. You are tired and walking home one day when someone hops off their bike and leaves it unlocked to quickly buy some groceries. Do you steal the bike and ride home?

4. 2+2= ?

almost missed these.

1.get a small group and figure the crap out.

2.how do I study myself? 3rd option: read a walk through.

3.I keep walking because my fat ass needs the exercise.

4.42

MORE READAN

[Kcdaspot]

I like the Acro case.

why did he automatically assume there is a 3rd party just from the hider role?

i'm not voting thoo

too many people left to comment on the exchange.

also thor IS in fact town.

and that was one HELL of a reach by flinter.

in fact scratch that about not voting.

VOTE: flinter

put that theory of yours back into the cracker jack box it came from.

[Kcdaspot]

Kcda, what do you find so troubling in flinter's 'reach'? Am I reading you right in that you believe having an incorrect or potentially false conjecture makes someone mafia instead of just misguided?

The thing is, i don't have such a problem with the theory in of itself. It's a odd theory but justified townie when thought about. It's the fact that this comes at page 5. with little posting from any of the others s/he seems to want to try and push a complex theory. why? is s/he looking for scum? or a target?

It's a case i'd expect on D3 or D4.

But this early in D1?

shady as hell.

[Kcdaspot]

This post is what you can wait for from eager scum. Acronach obviously is the weakest player of the first part of the game. He quite new (shown from the hider comment from epicmafia, and also other posts), he's enthousiast, meaning that acronach posts enough for some material early game. He's the easiest target. And scum jumps on eagerly.

But what's more off is that he is telling Pacman to give scum a 1/3 chance of making 2 kills. It's pointless and scummy. By not telling who he will target, Pacman will usually survive, unless he targets scum. Meaning that everytime he survives (common knowledge tells that's 3/4 times, I think), we have an inno. If we would follow this great plan by Calcifer, we would see that Pacman died, and if none of his three targets were killed, we would know that at least 1 of them is scum. That doesn't improve our odds that much at all. While it is riskier for our powerrole.

Calcifer was caught off guard by the early claim and tried to make a gutsy post to limit the threat pacman poses. And then he made a large post to make it seem like he scumhunted. While acronach is just an easy target.

vote Calcifer

I don't think your claim was well thought through, pacman, but this might make it worth it!

This is either a double bluff or RVS. Way to complex for RVS.

[Kcdaspot]

-_-

well maybe i don't get it.

UNVOTE:

AND BAH.

flinter's case still makes sense.

could you explain better flint? for a simple guy (aka dumbass)?

brb work

[Kcdaspot]

makes NO sense.

SADFSADFSADFASDFWADFAS