OK...McStab, a.k.a. Mr. Fitz is conf-NOT MAFIA...."let's kill him because I think he is the SK" to paraphrase. A closer look over your ISO shows that your initial read on me was that my slot was
virtually confirmed town. Good to know. Why has this opinion changed?
And in post 122 you tab my slot as
nearly 100% certain town. More goodness...thank you.
Votes on Sal and PMyst were fairly weak IMO. Vote on Sal in Post 296 was warranted. Sal is hard to not vote.
Votes PMyst again (on D2) in part because he was not on Prescending's wagon. This indicates to me that McStab is concious of implications of one's prescence on and off wagons.
In
Post 414 McStab encourages everyone to keep voting the player [PMyst]
"still pushing the lynch of the jailkeeper guy."
This despite the fact PMyst had not made any posts between
Empking's claim and McStab's accusation that PMyst was pushing for the claimed JK's lynch.
In
Post 571 he has ~scum reads on two (now confirmed town) players: Toog and ~mcqueen.
In
Post 619 he unvotes the claimed cop (Toog), and instead of laying another vote down on his remaining suspect mcqueen he decides he'll provide his thoughts tomorrow. Isn't that nice. He avoids committing himself to a player wagon and he somehow knows he will be around the next day to give his thoughts (granted the claimed cop would be the assumed NK).
In
Post 670 he basically lays out a case for Empking as scum...says he wouldn't be opposed to lynching Empking...and then says anyone who hammers Empking (who is at L-1 ATM) would move to the top of his suspect list. WTF?! You misleadingly implicate PMyst for pushing a lynch on the claimed JK and then the next day...you give subtle encouragement to the case against Empking while at the same time sitancing yourself from his lynch. You never even mention the possibility of a potential hammerer getting it right. You're just prepared to crucify whoever does lynch him. Why? Because despite the fact you support Empking's lynch...you aren't about to actually hammer him when whoever does do that would be such a nice target for you. The fact the empking hammerer happened to be mcqueen and mcqueen was the NK is beside the point. And 6 posts later you claim intent to hammer Empking. That's as good as a mislynch vote IMO. And he (McStab) spends his next 4 posts bashing Empking. But not voting him. Keeping your VCA clean IMO.
And in
Post 731 he has decided my slot is now an SK and he would be ok with its lynch. Why no concern about this D2 or D3? And he ends the post with a stated willingness to vote Sal, my slot, Arugula, Moi or Rofl. What ever happened to your suspicions towards mcqueen from the previous day? The only people you aren't willing to lynch would appear to be mcqueen (who you suspects the previous day) and inte.
Note... was going to dispel suspicion that my role could be an SK by showing that both NK's on N1 were shot. However, our esteemed mod doesn't go into that level of detail. I would argue however that since SK's typically do not "shot" their victims, that if there were an SK in the game (ie me as Mcstab is grasping at) the mod would have been more inclined to show different NK flavor.
tl:dr;
I'm not an SK....I'm a 1-shot vig.
Mod...can you elaborate on how IAI was killed N1? Was he shot or killed by some other means? You do mention shots being fired in your N2 NK flavor.
In
Post 896 he annoints MoI "near conf town" (WHY?) and with regard to me....states our 1st priority should be finding mafia. Despite the day prior being willing to consider lynching me.
In
Post 926 he pulls out the "I've only been on one town lynch" card. As shown earlier...McStab is sensitive to appearances on wagins...especially mislynches. WIFOM. And despite not having a singe vote on him at the time...McStab asks for people to provide a case on him and accuses people of sheeping my case on MoI. I.e. he's discrediting my MoI case and trying to save his buddy.
In
Post 928 he tries AtE.
In
Post 935 he MISREPS Sal when he says Sal led lynches on a PR and "FOUR other townies." That adds up to 5 lynches. I only see a scum lynch and 3 mislynches, of which I would argue Sal led none of. McMisrep.
In
Post 950 there is more appeal (to fear or emotion?). I note that mcStab has incorporated the use os CAPS a lot more frequently on D5.
In
Post 976 he pushes the same story he did with PMyst...that even is Sal is town the town is better off without him. If Sal is town and we had lynched him yesterday...we'd be in MYLO right now. Good thing we didn't go for the consolation lynch.
In
Post 1022 everyone who disagrees with McStab appears to be a sheep. AtE. AtE.
I can't bother with the last few posts. I'm voting McStab.
See --->
VOTE: McStab