NY 166: Knight-Errant 18p - Game Over!

[Baldrick]

Early buddying is always bad, especially when the only thing the townread is based on is...

Day 1 meta. Draw your own conclusions.
VOTE: Concombre

-Antagon

[Baldrick]

Not going to happen.
More blatant OMGUS please.
-Antagon

[Baldrick]

Abdel.

Nothing wrong with iso 0 or 1.
"So I'm apparently getting lynched for a bandwagon vote. What?" however.
That be scum thinking.

B

[Baldrick]

And why can't Fegelein, Baldrick and Concombre be Scumbuddies? Those are the three that are suspected the most by the playerbase.

Misrepresentation that bad is comical as well as scummy.

[Baldrick]

And why can't Fegelein, Baldrick and Concombre be Scumbuddies? Those are the three that are suspected the most by the playerbase.

Misrepresentation that bad is comical as well as scummy.

Oh, and this post was created by Baby Spice.
I don't use emoticons.
-Antagon

[Baldrick]

Out of curiosity, what made dopog look scummy to you, especially with only one post?
-Antagon

[Baldrick]

Do you think you reacted to it well?

Need an unbiased viewpoint on this. But I thought I generally reacted to it quite well.

True dat, and you did.

But then it was not much of a band wagon.

Abdel's reaction to being called on it, wrongly, was not so good though.

~B

[Baldrick]

Firstly, what is breadcrumbing?

Dropping subtle hints in one, or more, of your posts as to a role or information you either have or plan to claim. Something you can point back to to help support your claim.

A truly brilliant example a few years ago was someone who wrote a long post where the first letter of each paragraph spelled out doctor, which she later climed. (Though that way is possibly illegal now under the anti-cypher rules)

[Baldrick]

Baldrick buddying with Fegelein. You say they responded well to a bandwagon that wasn't much, doesn't make much sense.

This from someone who buddied HD earlier?

It makes perfect sense. He reacted well, though it's not a strong read oppertunity due to the weakness of the wagon.

Abdel however, is reacting badly.



~B

[Baldrick]

Firstly, what is breadcrumbing?

Dropping subtle hints in one, or more, of your posts as to a role or information you either have or plan to claim. Something you can point back to to help support your claim.

A truly brilliant example a few years ago was someone who wrote a long post where the first letter of each paragraph spelled out doctor, which she later climed. (Though that way is possibly illegal now under the anti-cypher rules)

Another Baby Spice post.

Baldrick's asking why someone had a scumread on me is something I'm noting.

I didn't have a scumread on you from your post.
Someone else did.
Is there a bad reason for someone not to clarify a scumread?

Hmmm...

Hydra slip.

[Baldrick]

How did I buddy HD? I have mentioned them in like 2 posts both times saying I wanted to see what they had to say since they haven't done anything this game. How can I possibly buddy with someone who has done nothing?

#182.
If my comments were buddying, surely yours in #182 were as well.

~B

[Baldrick]

"backseat scumhunting = Not hauling your ass to scumhunt, just sitting back, asking questions, throwing suspicion away from you. It's an overly cautious kind of play."

The measure of all of those things are subjective (bar asking questions) [and definitely (which you're aware of sometimes I guess) some players do have a generally more cautious style of play].

Furthermore my point was really that I've never seen you say "this phrase is an example of backseat scumhunting" or something to that effect or "this is just throwing suspicion away from you and not actually trying to scumhunt" so yah. You never seem to link the two things -- backseat scumhunting and what people actually say that is scummy (in regards to backseat scumhunting). Definition makes no sense (at least within the confines of this game) without concrete (or even tiny) examples.

Hi.
Does Dopog always post like this or is it just when he is scum, because it is a scummy post.

[Baldrick]

@Baldrick;

I didn't have a scumread on you from your post.
Someone else did.
Is there a bad reason for someone not to clarify a scumread?

I know you didn't
I'm figuring this question is more asking why would I call you out for asking someone why they have a read.
Enquirying about why someone else has a certain read on someone else can be indicative of alignment, IN CONTEXT, hence why I said I'm noting it.
And it's weird that you asked about a specific person, so I felt that your question was implying something (e.g. you disagree with their read) but idek.

Farewell!

The reason I asked for the explanation of the read is because I agreed with it; I wanted to see if they had the same reason for agreeing with it as I did.

Spoiler: Chess Puzzle

1. Nf7+
Rxf7
2. Qxe8+
Rf8
3. Qxf8#
Wait, 3 moves? What?

-Antagon

Quote tags fixed. - The Knight-Errant

[Baldrick]

Also, the reason I haven't laid a vote, is so we can drag day 1 out and get as many scum as we can in 1 swoop.

???

Don't worry, I'm confused too.

dopog's post is weird, but I can't exactly put my finger on it.
VOTE: dopog

-Antagon

[Baldrick]

It basically consists of:

"Your first two posts weren't scummy, but you're third one was scummy. Why? WHO CARES LOL IT'S SCUMMY LET'S WAGON WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"

Strangely unaccompanied by a band wagon vote you might notice. So why accuse me of wagoning?

^That actually makes quite a lot sense, now that I look at it. Can I get a list of your reads?

"I agree, so let me get your list of reads so I can agree with that as well."

Scummiest person in the game.

No, just the biggest VI in the game. Of course VI can be scum sometimes too.


Katarina and PV are missing from your list Eddie.

Feglin, how do I go from town to a favoured lynch within a few posts? For that matter, why the TUNNELSNAKES?




~B

[Baldrick]

I remember TS, I was in that game.

Just wondered why you did the TS thing here is all.

~B

[Baldrick]

Strangely unaccompanied by a band wagon vote you might notice. So why accuse me of wagoning?

Much worse than that.
I'm accusing you of cheerleading a wagon you don't even want to be on.

It's not like your Concombre vote ever actually went places at this point, nor did you even try to push it. So let's just call Random Post A scum thinking to fit in with the crowd! No one will ever notice us cause we never actually joined the wagon, we just cheered it on!

...right, and my middle name is Biggles.

Actually, more to do with an agreement to pretty much let Antagon handle the actual voting, but keep trying Biggles.

Of course since then I've come to the conclusion that Abdel is most probably town.

~B