NY 170: Georgetown II (Game Over)
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Why?In post 85, WBOCampfire1104 wrote:I'd take Slandaar's post as sorta scummy
Sample scum PM says there are only 3 scum on a team.
This means compared to a mountainous 10/3 there is a gain of 3 mislynches to find one scum. Compared to a mini normal of 10/3 where you have 3 mislynches here we have 6 but no PR's. I just don't see that as likely the number of mislynches available seems too high for only 3 scum, this, combined with the fact the game will also take forever if it were only 1 scumteam means 13/3/3 seems very likely.
Tell me; how many scum did you assume there would be?
Probs.In post 85, WBOCampfire1104 wrote: but probs a mistake.
Vanilla doesn't mean it can't be multiball. 13VT, 3 Goons, 3 Goons.In post 82, emeraldemon wrote:"As this is a vanilla game these are the only roles:", which makes me think it can't be multiball or have a SK.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
nomnomnomIn post 81, Garmr wrote: Fresh meat how sweetIn post 81, Garmr wrote: I see your link to as a message saying this me this town read up and go easy on me. Also even through slaandar brought up wifom of multiball with out going to the night phase (Bad slandy)
Yep.In post 81, Garmr wrote: The question you should of asked was what makes you think it's multiball?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
The sample PM didn't remove type but did remove an XXX to hide how many scum there are? I see!In post 98, Tebow wrote: The sample scum role PM also says 'You are a Mafia Goon' not 'You are a [TYPE] Mafia Goon.' It seems unlikely to me Huntress would deliberately reveal the exact size of the scumteam(s).
Maybe the sample PM wording is exactly the same as the real PM's after-all that is the point of them. Mafia Goon could be coloured to indicate the team.
What do you mean at this point in the game?In post 98, Tebow wrote: In any case - why do you believe speculating on this at this specific point in the game is useful?
It is something to talk about, to generate discussion, that is what the point of RVS is.-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
This is my 'I am not impressed' face;In post 244, Albert B. Rampage wrote: What's up?In post 271, Sotty7 wrote: I'm seeing a lot of town kicking up a dust cloud for scum to ooze into and hide behind. Lets stop that.
(That is my 'I have such nice shades you should sheep me face')-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
HiIn post 245, OhGodMyLife wrote:Whoever brought up multiball
Well, you're wrong.In post 245, OhGodMyLife wrote: none of these things even remotely resemble scumhunting
Let us take this hypothesis as true, it would mean starting a conversation about multiball would draw out and ultimately help catch scum.In post 245, OhGodMyLife wrote: It's all white noise that looks on the surface like helpful activity but is actually just a fine place for scum to hide.
Was I doing that? meh I know to watch peoples activity regarding multiball and activity regarding scumhunting need to be about equal (or increase in scumhunting), if activity drops from someone when multiball talk ends they are scum. There is nothing inherently wrong with talking about multiball in RVS after-all as long as the person transitions; it is better than making a random vote because someone posted above you.
We could also go another level, if we know that most people think that it's scummy and there are a lot of people who incorrectly do (town like to talk), then we can assume scum will see this as a reason to use to accuse town of acting scummy and this leads to scum who know people will be accused of scum for talking about multiball are less likely to do it than town.
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Her name is Sooty get it right Garmr! Don't think star trek think Childrens TV!In post 290, Garmr wrote:scotty.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 582, OhGodMyLife wrote:Slandaar is on my scum shortlist too
Why is he a non-starter?In post 583, OhGodMyLife wrote: and absolutely avoiding the major issues with his vote parked uselessly on a nonstarter
3 walls; conclusion; 'lets lynch a lurker'.In post 589, Chevre wrote: it just feels outside of that he's done relatively nothing
also; Poor Fonzy.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I assume this is meaning;In post 604, OhGodMyLife wrote: straight up to snipping away the point he didn't want to deal with.
Alright then I won't 'ignore' it; What exactly do you mean by sitting out all major discussions? Could you tell me GF's contribution to these major discussions?In post 604, OhGodMyLife wrote: does not absolve your sin of hiding on the sidelines sitting out all major discussion.
That doesn't mean its a non-starter just means I didn't push the wagon. What is the difference between that and lets just take a completely random example; GF's vote?In post 604, OhGodMyLife wrote: But to answer the question you thought would let you avoid the rest of it, its a non starter because you put your vote there and prompty did nothing at all to get it started.
Who are we talking about here?In post 604, OhGodMyLife wrote: Somebody who *knows* he's town is feeding that fire.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
People are just randomly voting me it seems.
Stalled while Kabs is awol.In post 662, Sotty7 wrote: How's this coming?
Why were you claiming scum on page 1?In post 666, Aegor wrote: emeraldemon is a really bad D1 lynch. Slandaar's posts consist of naked votes, fluff, setup speculation, and general badness. He is absolutely useless and this is mountainous so we are in no danger of lynching a PR. He is a great lynch for today.
I tell you what, you make a case on someone, anyone, then I will.
Useless indeed.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I thought that would be the answer.In post 682, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Because you usually have a trajectory, are more forceful, do less setup speculation and post more.
Meta, if I were scum here, I would have posted a lot more or at least thrown some nice town looking content out, I find it interesting you think I would not consider my meta in relation to others.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I have initiative so its not that, I have confidence so its not that. Sometimes I just don't feel like putting in the effort to lead the town.
Check for example how kabs has sat on EG for her 'im scum' but not Aegor who has done the exact same thing. Check how Maestro can conclude Kabs is VI instantly but not EG. Maestro whos sole content has been to argue with a VI to look good and a self vote apparently means you should unvote your scumread who then accuses Chevre of doing exactly the same thing as he has.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Havn't decided who to lynch yet.In post 726, emeraldemon wrote:Slandaar, if Kaboom is obviously scum why are you still voting the goodfather (now inHimshallibe)?
The real question is how I voted someone who has by their own admission played terribly and replaced out due to it.
Brian is obviously scum; making these walls which are completely disconnected from the game.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Albert call the win condition police.
(hes scum)In post 764, Brian Skies wrote: Hey, man. It's not my fault you're incapable of completing your phrases. Whether you meant you wanted a Brian wagon or not, that was NOT how you wrote it.
Town: OK I misunderstood; scum; what? hey thats your fault!!!
The resort-to-blaming shows a guilty conscience-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Dunno really, it is quite fun on the sidelines.In post 764, Brian Skies wrote:I'm the guy who likes to hang out on the sidelines
You jealous?In post 767, Brian Skies wrote: How long do you plan on sitting there on the sidelines
Why are you voting me?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Then post reasons.In post 772, Brian Skies wrote:About as much as you and then some.
Have you asked me questions? nope, where have you been scumhunting?
Yep.In post 772, Brian Skies wrote: What makes you think I don't have reasoning? Can you conclude town from your iso considering you've been relatively active this game?
So, you have reasons? get to it then.
My posting in this game is actually very different. My ISO being useless is greatly exaggerated.In post 772, Brian Skies wrote: You look about as useful as you've looked in any of the games you've been with me (you were scum in both of them by the way).-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Dunno what you mean; but its funny because if they are towntells why are they not towntells and instead fake?
They have the same chance as everyone else of rolling scum.In post 774, Brian Skies wrote: -Going after low-hanging fruit (lurkers; relatively new players in Goodfather/Kaboom)
Being new doesn't mean they are not scum; perhaps you should look at the why and if the why isn't there; ask; not just look at targets and make baseless accusations. I assume you think they're town to even suggest this, why is that?
Have I?In post 774, Brian Skies wrote: -General fence-sitting
Well actually GF was replaced so I don't think your argument holds, nice try.In post 774, Brian Skies wrote: and leaving votes on low-hanging fruit (like literally, I'm here right now and you've called me scum not once but thrice, put your vote where your mouth is)
And what has this to do with anything?In post 774, Brian Skies wrote: Also, I'm tired of your bullshit in my games and watching your slot flip scum after you replace out (you were actually kind of townish in that werewolves games, dunno why you replaced out). Actually, why did you replace out?
I assume you are replacing out soon?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Feign ignorance about what?In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: You use the sample PM to feign ignorance over the matter
Nope, I did not do that. Quotes.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: and later go "oh hey, so that's how that works." Yeah, no.
Exactly, vanilla game so its not a breadcrumb just how I decided to word it.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: The second one looks like a faked breadcrumb. It's a vanilla game so I don't understand your intent.
What is the difference between that and your vote on me?In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: I agree with the bold part, except you just vote them and call them scum, but you don't really offer reasoning for them to defend themselves. Lurkers and newer players are low hanging fruit and I don't think you really had any intention of trying to sort them.
I as a lurker am low hanging fruit.
You are scum committing the exact same crime that you accuse me of it appears.
I don't particularly care for them, what is the issue with that?In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: You have clearly avoided the major wagons, even up to this point
Don't understand, I clearly havn't been townreading you, yes???In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: where you have stated me as a scum-read. If you were townreading Chevre/EG, fine. But you've clearly not been townreading me.
His replacement is in the same slot so, yes, still scummy.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: No, it still holds. So unless you think his replacement is still scummy, or scummier than me, what the fuck is your vote still doing there with only two days left on the deadline and that wagon clearly not going anywhere (I mean if you were pushing it, it would be a different story, but you aren't)?
I read through you so easily.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: General prejudice.
VOTE: Brian
Yes. You apparently think those who make posts like;In post 776, Brian Skies wrote:
Should I be?In post 775, Slandaar wrote:I assume you are replacing out soon?
Should replace, so you will be replacing out?In post 765, Brian Skies wrote: Then push my wagon harder and put me out of my misery.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Nice wall, I have had enough of that.In post 764, Brian Skies wrote: Yes, Sland is the only scum read of mine.
One scum read who he has general prejudice against; how coincidental; hes scum, lynch.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: General prejudice.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Brian thinks I have been trying to fake towntell so I present you;
Brian faketowntell #1;
Scum wouldn't do that would they?! (why would town?) Wifom nonsense isn't needed unless you are scum.In post 207, Brian Skies wrote:Will actually read posts sometime this weekend.
Meanwhile, don't mind me slipping my vote onto the largest wagon.
VOTE: Emogirl
Brian faketowntell #2
Making up reads? Scum wouldn't do that! (why would town?) Wifom nonsense isn't needed unless you are scum.In post 419, Brian Skies wrote:Page 17? Really? I'll catch up on Sunday.
Haven't read anything, but Albert and Garmr both get townreads for being awesome. Maenara gets one too because I still feel bad.
Emogirl can be scum for as long as I sit on her wagon. Will try to figure out why she's getting wagoned later.
I could go on but want to keep this post a reasonable length.
The best reasons he is scum is;
This is very very good. It really shows he is scum.In post 766, Slandaar wrote:
(hes scum)In post 764, Brian Skies wrote: Hey, man. It's not my fault you're incapable of completing your phrases. Whether you meant you wanted a Brian wagon or not, that was NOT how you wrote it.
Town: OK I misunderstood; scum; what? hey thats your fault!!!
The resort-to-blaming shows a guilty conscience
Lynch Brian it doesn't get much more obvious.In post 779, Slandaar wrote:Nice wall, I have had enough of that.In post 764, Brian Skies wrote: Yes, Sland is the only scum read of mine.
One scum read who he has general prejudice against; how coincidental; hes scum, lynch.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote: General prejudice.
Interestingly the rest of the town burnt themselves out in the first few days of the game; I am by far the most active player now.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
OK cool story.In post 805, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Because you made yourself a non-entity. If you had posted more content, you would have been easily caught. You replaced out before.In post 803, Slandaar wrote:I accumulated approximately 0 votes in those games,
It appears you are the one who misremembers.
So, where is the pressure that you claim exists?-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I assume you responded to this somewhere then?In post 807, Slandaar wrote:
OK cool story.In post 805, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Because you made yourself a non-entity. If you had posted more content, you would have been easily caught. You replaced out before.In post 803, Slandaar wrote:I accumulated approximately 0 votes in those games,
It appears you are the one who misremembers.
So, where is the pressure that you claim exists?
Quotes.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
When you find out your post didn't go through that is your cue to re post it.In post 830, Albert B. Rampage wrote:...
I responded to your question but my post got caught in the simulposting. If you didn't spam the thread with one-liners, you might have seen it. Too bad for you.
The act is amusing though.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Why are you asking me? Obviously I will say no whatever my alignment.In post 854, Matias wrote: The bolded is funny because I ISO'd you. Did the emerald read just come out of nowhere? Because it's conveniently placed as the wagon was building.
I have your slot as scum too.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Experience doesn't mean anything but it is interesting you diverted to that. We were both is low hanging fruit positions as it were.In post 861, The Fonz wrote: That depends entirely on who you class as 'low hanging fruit,' doesn't it? Both you and Chevre are MafiaScum veterans, so I'd say I'm not going for low-hanging fruit at all.
Who do you think is a poor player but town?
So, is there anyone?
I don't answer these type of things because I try not to call people poor etc so I won't be here.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Of course hes not; he took sarcasm literally and made a case about it.In post 864, The Fonz wrote: What matters here isn't if he'sright.The question is, is he sincere? 'Feigning ignorance of the setup' is an accusation I've heard town make a lot.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
Poor but really its lynchability which are similar but different. Experience doesn't equal ability level which apparently you think.In post 869, The Fonz wrote: Then I'm really confused by what you mean by low hanging fruit. If it's not inexperienced or poor (or both) players, what is it? Because that's what 'low hanging fruit' has meant every time I've seen anyone use the term on site.
I have 2 people grudge voting me and I was lurking, how am I not? case in point: I have th most votes so you can't actually win the argument.In post 869, The Fonz wrote: How are you 'low hanging fruit?' Like seriously, you're confusing the fuck out of me.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
I didn't say that.In post 874, Albert B. Rampage wrote:How is Fonz a weak or lynchable player? This doesn't add up.
MOST people think it is based on experience or ability but that is because they don't really understand (and should not be making the argument in the first place), lynchability can vary throughout games; if a bad player somehow is considered confirmed town they are not low hanging fruit.
This isn't very complicated.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
This is Brians definition.In post 776, Brian Skies wrote:Lurkers and newer players are low hanging fruit
Therefore his ONLY scumread from his POV;
#1 is low hanging fruit
#2 he holds a grudge against
Obviously he is scum. You can't make the argument he did with his reads.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
In post 887, Aegor wrote:And way to grasp onto straws, Slandaar.
One of the most ridiculous things I have ever read.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
No, that isn't what I said.In post 911, Chevre wrote: I think there is a difference of definition here because you've said you're low-hanging fruit due to your amount of votes; I think just the contrary, "low-hanging fruit" is someone who probably doesn't have a lot of suspicion but it would be incredibly easy to make a case on.
What happens when you make the case and they get votes/suspicion? they are not low hanging fruit anymore?
You are scum aren't you.
Yes actually check a few pages ago.In post 913, Bulbazak wrote:Is that all you've got, or do you have some more misreps to spout?
I didn't misrep him he said low hanging fruit are lurkers; I was lurking ergo I am low hanging fruit and he is being mosntrously hypocritical.
Perhaps you can point the misrep out?
Too many scum. Luckily I killed myself so don't need to figure it out, I knew voting Emerald would do that, but did it anyways because... you guessed it.-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
Slandaar Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10735
- Joined: August 3, 2011
-
-
-