But not quite.
For making me lose that 2-room game after playing 40 days and 40 kill-less nights.
In post 246, RadiantCowbells wrote:SOMEONE PAY ATTENTION TO ME GODDAMNlT
In post 82, Gooner wrote:Didn't realise that this had started. Will catch up and post now. For now FOS: any Spurs fans.
In post 344, Gooner wrote:Peregrine, are you a Spurs fan?
Now GC. He's been active lurking up to this point. I mean read his ISO. It's all lovely blending into the background, not doing anything to push the town along type scum. The type of player you don't really tend to notice until the end of the game when he's revealed as scum. Fortunately, I have a lot of experience with this type of scum and have grown accustomed to spotting them from a mile away.
This intrigues me. Since I have about 1 post where I've said anything that is remotely scumhunting, I'd like to hear about the show vs the results.In post 345, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: PeregrineV
Making a show of his scumhunting, instead of being focused on the actual results.
I was actually lynched, and my team won, so not sure how I flaked.In post 398, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're making a monologue with town. You did that in the game I modded, too, before you flaked.Gonna start with the past-past Nikanor reads,
@Mollie- Why do I think you are scum this game? Is that feeling strong enough to lynch you today?
While a fun back and forth (ie, dialogue), I'm now behind 15 pages so we'll pick this up later (but probably not).In post 421, RadiantCowbells wrote:Monologue. You're not talking with anyone, you're talking to 'em
Rumor has it he claimed doc. Why lynch doc claim day1?In post 876, Ythan wrote:Formerfish.
First, you must post the secret town password.In post 902, Yates wrote:Hey guys. I just received confirmation I'm taking over in this slot. Let me read the game and get back with thoughts.
We're pretending I did. Now that it "happened", say I'm confused by the Formerfish hate, and want some strong examples of his full-on sliminess which i will then concur or dispute, at my leisure.In post 905, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 904, PeregrineV wrote:Re: Formerfish is scummy
Which posts are being used to support this opinion?
OK, fine you can be town.In post 906, Yates wrote:Zuzu's Petals. There. Now an angel got its wings.In post 903, PeregrineV wrote:First, you must post the secret town password.
I'm only on page 8 and I'm already tired of reading this game. Some of these posts make me sad.
And watch all of the videos for important clues.In post 909, PeregrineV wrote:OK, fine you can be town.In post 906, Yates wrote:Zuzu's Petals. There. Now an angel got its wings.In post 903, PeregrineV wrote:First, you must post the secret town password.
I'm only on page 8 and I'm already tired of reading this game. Some of these posts make me sad.
Read the first 10 pages and the latest 10 pages. If there is anything important in between then Samuel L. Jackson will instruct you to read those posts.
In post 909, PeregrineV wrote:OK, fine you can be town.In post 906, Yates wrote:Zuzu's Petals. There. Now an angel got its wings.In post 903, PeregrineV wrote:First, you must post the secret town password.
I'm only on page 8 and I'm already tired of reading this game. Some of these posts make me sad.
Read the first 10 pages and the latest 10 pages. If there is anything important in between then Samuel L. Jackson will instruct you to read those posts.
If scum she'll never be lynched.In post 1251, Untrod Tripod wrote:why mollie?
What about 1023?In post 1255, RadiantCowbells wrote:Don't shoot Gooner. I'm good with the other two shots, though I'd prefer Green.
Does it?In post 1258, Malakittens wrote:I never gave out vig targets, does that make me scum?In post 1253, PeregrineV wrote:If scum she'll never be lynched.In post 1251, Untrod Tripod wrote:why mollie?
Relational tells with Fish, Zek, Sthar.
She never gave her own vig targets out (that I can see).
Sthar has 8 votes and you have 6 when you vote you.In post 1262, Marquis wrote:eh
because i don't want to have to waste my time and town's time fighting a mislynch on day 2
VOTE: marquis
i'm a vt
let's pretend for a sec though that i'm vengeful and my will to kill zekrom extends into tomorrow or something. or w/e
Yes, it's true.In post 1308, Untrod Tripod wrote:well lookie lookie
two terrible votes by two of my day 1 scumreads
I am SO DOWN for a Marquis lynch
vote Marquis
Given your experience level and game knowledge, and the flip of a town roleblocker, Why would you think that the shot (if true), would not have been blocked?In post 1310, Ythan wrote:So how many nights does Zekrom get to not confirm his claim?
VOTE: Zekrom25
I feel good about this vote also. ++ to MalaIn post 1326, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: Mollie
Serious vote.
You remind me of Shos when he discredited every single one of my crumbs in OGM. Shos was scum;therefore you are scum by default.
Also;
I think I'm down for a Zek lynch, but not voting because not many people have posted and I don't want a quick lynch to end this day off, tbh.
You could ask the mod how many shots you have remaining.In post 1332, Zekrom25 wrote:idk if as a vig my 1 shot was wasted
I'll rearrange this:In post 1385, Cabd wrote:Aaaaanyways.
Here's my starting point from my initial skim:
Confirmed Scum:
Zekrom
Probably Scum:
Malakittens
PeregrineV
Lean Scum:
Elyse
Tman
To be sorted:
Deathnote
serrapaladin
pisskop
Yates (formerly Matias)
Untrod Tripod
Nikanor
Porochaz
Pacman
Green CrayonsLean Town:
Mollie
Ythan
Radiant Cowbells
Marquis
Confirmed Town:
Cabd
In post 1479, Marquis wrote:i hate this.. maybe i'm just paranoid but as much as i would have liked to just hammer zekrom day 1 i can't bring myself to do it now or even vote for him because cabd's play fits in with scum gambiting to get the mislynch off quickly then excusing it tomorrow as a town gambit. again idek if it's just paranoia but someone else look at gooner pre- and post-zekrom claim and tell me how it makes sense
pedit iso gooner... why did he want to lynch fish over zekrom, when it would have made more sense to directly cc zekrom and get the protective role on him night 1?????
No lie. This doesn't look like an expression of disbelief:In post 1481, Untrod Tripod wrote:always make the play that has better odds of success. you're arguing for a cute play here instead of a good one.In post 1479, Marquis wrote:i hate this.. maybe i'm just paranoid but as much as i would have liked to just hammer zekrom day 1 i can't bring myself to do it now or even vote for him because cabd's play fits in with scum gambiting to get the mislynch off quickly then excusing it tomorrow as a town gambit. again idek if it's just paranoia but someone else look at gooner pre- and post-zekrom claim and tell me how it makes sense
pedit iso gooner... why did he want to lynch fish over zekrom, when it would have made more sense to directly cc zekrom and get the protective role on him night 1?????
In post 703, Gooner wrote:1. Zekrom's claim makes me not want to lynch him today. I say we give him a night to prove whether he's a one-shot vig or not. Zekrom, use your vig shot tonight. Good targets for vig shots are lurkers.
Yeah, OK.In post 1483, Untrod Tripod wrote:point taken
can we let Cabd do his analysis first before delving into the WIFOM pl0x
This is how I read that.In post 1601, Nikanor wrote:I was going to go through every post of evilpacman18's and make up some bullshit tell on everything he said, hoping it'd get him lynched. Instead, I decided to point out the one post that I actually found scummy. Hence the "honestly".In post 1598, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: NIKIn post 1592, Nikanor wrote:Honestly, the one thing that got me looking at evilpacman18 was this:This post is written at a time when sthar is already taking a lot of heat, but only has three votes on him. And the entire post is bullshit! "Intentional dissonance," REALLY? evilpacman18 doesn't even vote sthar until two other people hop on the wagon, making this post even worse, since sthar didn't post a single thing in that time.I don't like sthar. He posted a read list "in the interest of transparency" meaning he's more concerned with peoples' perceptions of him than posting reads because they convict him into lynching/defending certain people, etc.
Also he's got like a third of the playerlist chalked up to VI (including myself, which I can't remember playing with him but whatever) which normally indicates a town read (it is a VILLAGE idiot, after all), but in the case of someone like fish, who he says he doesn't really believe the claim, meaning he's reading him as scum, it's either a mislabeled null-read or intentional dissonance. Either way, his dismissal of so many players as VI is some indication that, again, he's more interested in looking actively engaged than being so. zekrom's 959 is more typically dull posting from him but I think he accidentally tripped over the discovery that sthar doesn't actually have much at all and for a full playerlist reads post, it leaves me at least still quite unsure of what sthar thinks.
last time someone said 'honestly' during a post they were scum. Sayin 'honestly' is a classic scum tell because if you were already honest about it you didn't need to emphasize honestly
You were a strong townread of mine day1.In post 1641, Elyse wrote:Still here. I agree with mollie that serra's post was hedgy and he looks scummy.
Don't have much else to add. I didn't like evilpacman complaining about only being voted for for one post but Nikanor did the same thing kinda. The main thing that bothered me about his explanation of using the word honestly was that an explanation was unnecessary. I use honestly in my daily life all the time and it's completely unnecessary. Honestly, apparently, and literally are three words I need to stop overusing, but the use of the word "honestly" has changed and it doesn't necessarily mean someone was lying before.
In post 1643, Elyse wrote:I was more active and confrontational Day 1.
It would get me modkilled, so no.In post 1647, DeathNote wrote:Can you trying showing us why you are town too?In post 1644, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1643, Elyse wrote:I was more active and confrontational Day 1.
You were active and made posts that resonated with me.
But since I have been wrong before, and know this, I require constant Elyse-town reassurance in the form of you town-posting some more.
Can you do that please?
Sure I do.In post 1647, DeathNote wrote:Do you have any scum reads?
But my quality is much higher.In post 1649, tman2nd wrote:It is true that he hasn't been very active at all, so it is odd for him to request that someone else post more.
A brief line of "why" for each could bolster support for lynching that person.In post 1652, DeathNote wrote:Tman the parrot.
Honestly, I am down to lynch one of the following:
Tman
Peregrine
Mala
Nikanor
Marquis
your defense of scum Zekrom and attack of the confirmed town-doc Formerfish puts you in the scum or bad town category. Until I learn to flipflop my reads like you, or figure out why you do so and get away with it, your probably scum.In post 1659, Green Crayons wrote:Pot. Kettle. VOTE: Peregrine. Also because the reasons the confirmed town stated.
Mine are hidden through the thread.In post 1660, DeathNote wrote:You show me yours, I'll show you mine.
This doesn't make sense, Yates.In post 1671, Yates wrote:In post 1666, Nikanor wrote:It wasn't serious.In post 1622, Yates wrote:So Nik...In post 1161, Yates wrote:Is this serious? I'm not going to read the whole game. Spare me the drama and tell me.
VOTE: Nikanor
Probably not the best idea- feeling like my reads are really subpar this game.
1665.....In post 1682, DeathNote wrote:Yates- [noun]Plural- YatesA creature that stands precariously upon a thin object, usually a fence or bench.
UT- I saw Marq vote as a possible buss but I am totally down to kill Marq. My read on him hasn't changed in the slightest.
Unvote
Vote: Marq
Malascum is viable.
I have been giving them. It just appears you haven't been reading them.In post 1687, DeathNote wrote:Dude, I am not going to pick through YOUR iso to make YOU give opinions about the game. If you want to just throw out reads without supporting them, thats your prerogative. By asking for you to explain reads, I have already done my part.
Um, why?In post 1692, Elyse wrote:I just have a townread on PerV.
In post 1713, RadiantCowbells wrote:The thing is I had a heavy scumread outside of UT before the info got erased and now I'm just trying to figure out who it was.
VOTE: UT for now.
I meant your UT scumread. I remember nothing that does not exist.In post 1716, RadiantCowbells wrote:Someone was calling someone else scum in an insanely scummy half-assed way.
Remember anything like that?
Mollie starts with 3 scum suspects. Does malakitten defend all three if all three are town?In post 174, Malakittens wrote:How, I'm not really getting scum vibes off their posts.In post 168, pirate mollie wrote:I like green crayons but it might possibly mean they are scum
Nor am I seeing what you see in Death or Elyse.
Are you trying to sheep me?In post 2018, DeathNote wrote:I also want Elyse to answer GC's questions. I just did a quick ISO and Elyse's activity has fallen off drastically.
@Elyse- Why are you entering active lurker stage? Your posts were much more thought out early game.
Does it?In post 2021, DeathNote wrote:No?In post 2020, PeregrineV wrote:Are you trying to sheep me?In post 2018, DeathNote wrote:I also want Elyse to answer GC's questions. I just did a quick ISO and Elyse's activity has fallen off drastically.
@Elyse- Why are you entering active lurker stage? Your posts were much more thought out early game.
But if you want credit for saying that first, then all yours buddy. Hope it helps you seem a little more townie.
Trying to connect the Deathnote thought processes here.In post 1652, DeathNote wrote:Tman the parrot.
Honestly, I am down to lynch one of the following:
Tman
Peregrine
Mala
Nikanor
Marquis
And then I said:In post 2023, DeathNote wrote:I'll wait for you to post something that makes sense.
If you are still trying to say I am mimicking your reads or buddying you then the answer is hell no. I wouldn't mind seeing you dead but there are lots of people in this game that fill that category.
If you remember, that is also the time when I started questioning your reads as you weren't giving any and then when you did, you wouldn't explain because "herp-derp you first".
In post 1665, PeregrineV wrote:Mine are hidden through the thread.In post 1660, DeathNote wrote:You show me yours, I'll show you mine.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... er_sort=Go
Pick a post or player, get all specific on me, address anything I posted before, and we'll talk.
Hell, I even started.In post 2023, DeathNote wrote:I'll wait for you to post something that makes sense.
If you are still trying to say I am mimicking your reads or buddying you then the answer is hell no. I wouldn't mind seeing you dead but there are lots of people in this game that fill that category.
If you remember, that is also the time when I started questioning your reads as you weren't giving any and then when you did, you wouldn't explain because "herp-derp you first".
In post 1664, PeregrineV wrote:your defense of scum Zekrom and attack of the confirmed town-doc Formerfish puts you in the scum or bad town category. Until I learn to flipflop my reads like you, or figure out why you do so and get away with it, your probably scum.In post 1659, Green Crayons wrote:Pot. Kettle. VOTE: Peregrine. Also because the reasons the confirmed town stated.