![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
. . . Ok . . . now my secondary goal that spans the entire remainder of the game (besides finding scum and puppies) is to get 2 people to tie by the deadline... >:DIf two players have same number of votes lynch is decided by duel
Karen wrote:theopor_COD wrote:vote WhoMe
Not bolding votes - heinous crime.WhoMe? wrote:I wish i had a pund for eveytime someone used that in random voting. Hell I wish I had a pound for everytime YOU used that in random votingChocolateAttack wrote:Vote: whome?Yes, you!vote WhoMe
1);scummy to give the first random vote
2) thinks he was "random" voted (not paying attention to posts);
3) "not bolding votes - heinous crime."
Making a note of it cause I have a feeling it won't be there long.ronie101 wrote:howz it going fellow nerds???
THIS IS NOT HELPFUL.Karen wrote: i will say again, i am a townie, and regardless if you are going to bandwagon me to death, i hope i have elicited enough conversation to make it much easier for my fellows in the long run.
QFT. The only difference in the post I see is that a few others are agreeing with dybeck. I concur with everything else though.Cephrir wrote:You're defending Karen so adamantly it's ridiculous. I think that either a) you're scum with Karen, and that's why you're defending her, or b) you're scum and are trying to pick up Karen as a "pet townie". Add this to the fact that you are the only one who sees your logic, andMajor FoS: dybeck. If I could vote for two people, I'd be voting for you.
Because as much as I would like for more people to vote for Karen... this just looks like a set up for an accidental hammer or something. Also the fact that he is "small FOS"ing based on someone elses logic.green day wrote:Unvote I think I'm passed voting for WhoMe? at the moment. I have a small FOS on Karen, for reasons stated above by Zoneface. Sorry I haven't been talking much, I don't have enough time to do a detailed inquiry at the moment.
CKD, he did not really say that it was fun for the scum, more that it was fun for the game as a whole (amirite?). Also, I take that as a she is not going to get replaced gesture...Me wrote:Confirm Vote: Karen
^^^MafiaScumWiki wrote:A Jester is a role which wins when they are lynched. They generally cause difficulty for the Town in two ways. First, because (while the Jester is alive) they aim to prevent the Town from lynching Scum. Second, because their attempts to get themselves lynched inevitably involve trying to convince the Town that they are Scum, and thereby cause confusion and distraction for as long as they are alive.
If a Jester is lynched before any other faction has won, the game will usually continue to determine second place.
Often a Jester role also involves a Post Restriction, so that it is not too easy for the Jester to get themelves lynched.
A variation of this role is the Kamikaze or Suicide Bomber, where the player that casts the deciding vote dies along with the lynchee.
I am going to get a new one later today, then I get to pay my parents back later (and spend 10-12 hours over the next week DLing softwareChocolateAttack wrote:Lol! my comp broke about 10 days ago, the only internet access i have now is my school and my friend house so i wasn't been on much lately too. I actually got prodded on one other i game i play "sigh" but I think my comp should be back soon since i hear it was fixed from my big brother's friend.Twomz wrote:Hai guys, posting this in all my games.
This morning my lappy would not turn on, I went to get it checked out and either the video card ($300 to fix) or the motherboard ($600) are broken. I do not have that kind of money, therefore I will be using college compies to access games in my extra time. My playing may be sporatic and I may not have time to make long meaningful posts for a while. I am working on the situation and will inform y'all whenever I have fixed the problem.
-Twomz
This is a very good point.sonic wrote: It finally occured to me that I may have been thinking wrong. Theo would have been an obvious target for the lynch today (Day 2) if he'd have been left alive. This is bad for the wolves AND for the mafia. Both sides want the other side lynched during the day. It's in their best interests to kill off the scummy players unless they legitimately think their NK choice is the other side. Just something to think about.
This post has merit... possibly merit badges...Blight wrote:Here's how it looked to me. DAS thinks Green Day is getting too many votes, but he chooses not to take his own vote off. Instead, he asks someone else to unvote. That was odd. Not incredibly scummy, but odd.ChocolateAttack wrote:I don't think there is any thing odd about my post and DAS since i think DAS was right about Green Day being too close to lynch. The longer the day time is the better for the town to be more precise in chosing their vote so i didn't want the day to end too quick and make another mistake like Karen. And what make you so sure that Green Day is scum.Blight wrote: Also, I have to say that these posts by ChocolateAttack and DavidAngelSummers seem very odd:
ChocolateAttack wrote:No problem! i take my vote off Green Day for the time being since i want to hear more from him and a quick lynch is now bad for the town.davidangelsummers wrote:Can someone else unvote greenday ..hes a bit to close..I cant as I said I would not unless he came up with something concrete..and tag team Dybeck and Ckd will have my neck...
Unvote
about DAS didn't unvote Green Day, ifomsthis because it indeed odd but he has his reason so i guess it up to you to believe him or not.
Then you come along and immediately comply to his request. It kind of seemed like you were buddying up to him...or possibly even taking orders. Either way, it just seemed odd.
Vote 1) Case made yesterday?dybeck wrote:Oh yeah, I totally forgot Cephrir was scum.
unvote, vote: Cephrir
Vote 2) Scum trying to act like town... (can you elaborate on how this is different from town acting like town?)flyinghawk wrote: For some reason this really hits me as a scum trying to act like a town. Dummy, CKD was right, karen was a town.
vote: Cephrir
Vote 3) Reason for voting dybeck scummy.CKD wrote: wow, I dont know what is more astounding, that you actually posted that case, or that you think the town might actually believe it. I think you are scum, and you are trying to get another fast town lynch Day 2...hopefully the town will learn from Day 1..
unvote, vote cephrir
I still find davdangelsummers scummy..lets see how long he lurks.
Vote 4) The "point" in question is that some of the people voting GD were on the Karen wagon, and people on Cephrir were not. Vote is for lurking and not explaining his case against his target (CKD unless I am mistaken at this point, all the finger pointing is confusing me).killerbob wrote: I do agree with you on that point. I was making those observations as well. But I agree with Karma that Cephrir has been kinda lurky and not explaining his case. Until he comes out of the shadows I'm going to vote: Cephrir.
Dybeck, could you please post the reasons for the people that were on the Karen wagon?dybeck wrote:Who'll join me on a Cephrir bandwagon?
I think that all those not on the Karen bandwagon will understand why.
unvote, vote: Cephrir
Thirdeddybeck wrote:I too would like to hear this.Kanaga wrote:To keep the game going- Cephrir, could you explain your case against Dybeck?
thinktank wrote:I think that Greenday made a valid case that those who wagoned karen should be watched. Since she was Town, that makes sense and considering he defended karen throughout it highly unlikely his actions seemed scummy. His logic makes sense and it must be analyzed to who and at what time joined the karen wagon.
I hope that is sarcasm... although I do not know why would need to say it...ChocolateAttack wrote:Guys, i just learn something cool today by a fellow mafia player. If u scroll all the way down to under the preview and submit boxes, there is a drop down menu that allow you to read all the post that made by a particular player in this game. It extremely helpful if you look into someone.
...? C'est la vie?Thorn wrote:Ceist la vee.
How exactly is this suspicious? I would say the opposite would be true (stalling). If you meant trying for a quick lynch that is one thing... but just getting the game moving is not suspicious behavior imo.Kanga just kept trying to get the game moving.
I disagree... this would be a classic case of "all the eggs in one basket." It is more likely that they just see things in the same light and have similar thought processes/experiences.Cephrir wrote:Scumbuddies are linked together by agreement.
While I agree that more discussion was needed... I also want to point out that there was no discussion, nor was there any indication that there would be discussion.dybeck wrote:Honey, please read my posts.
I'm voting you for your clear opportunism in ending the day as quickly as you did, when it was clear that more discussion was required. I believe you did it to save your scumbuddy from lynch.