Let's Bob the Builder that motherfucker.In post 1135, Wake1 wrote:I would be willing to hammer Nosferatu.
Or we can implode implosion.
Let's Bob the Builder that motherfucker.In post 1135, Wake1 wrote:I would be willing to hammer Nosferatu.
In post 1141, Performer wrote:@Zach OBJECTION !
---
@Wake I think those are good observations in your reads list on a few folks, and I can concur that Nos has been void of substance in his ISO, and for no good reason.
As for Sick, I found this post stood out in his ISO , and I 'd like to hear him tell us how his thought processes are working. So far I can't tell how he's arriving at his conclusions.Just dismisses a big piece of d1 and votes an entirely different person. Hmm.In post 547, Sickofit1138 wrote:I'm not getting into the Zach v Titus. Not worth my time right now.
Right now: VOTE: Dunnstral.
Every time he posts I like him less and less.
Dunnstral wrote:In post 1133, Zachstralkita wrote:Dunn: " They're both town "
Nos might not be
Can we outline why Implosian is mafia like I'm 14 years old please
i didTitus wrote:Yeah, Nos was compromising. Then Wake wanted it and I don't trust Wake at all.In post 1139, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1138, Titus wrote:OK, I don 't wanna vote Nos now.
and I'm the one being difficult..
You go first on Implosion, I'l supplement.
That was way too deep for me right now mane. I want them to play Illmatic at my funeral and the entry fee is a blunt.In post 1152, Performer wrote:@Wake yes, but iirc, there's no wagon on Nos so it wouldnt' be as productive as the one I'm with now. If there's a wagon on him , I could move to that though.
@Zach LOL . I've considered this, because it would be fun. I grew up in a bleak setting. I don't want to die and the people are sobbing and sad. Once I am dead, I want them to celebrate and performers are a way of doing that. I want them to not only think of the bad times being overcome, but to rejoice about the good times.
Dunnstral wrote:Zach can you do sickofit?
Wake88 wrote:Zach, here's a column of players.
Dunnstral
Titus
Performer
Nosferatu
Podoboq
From top to bottom, could you rearrange the column from least willing to lynch to most?
Boem_u_dusi wrote:Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
Myself and Dunnstral played a game on MafiaUniverse.In post 1177, Titus wrote:TrueGent?In post 1170, Zachstralkita wrote:Wake we can save the Titus/Dunn fiasco for another day.
Oh goodie, a sub-out. Dunn this game is reminding me of that TrueGent shit.
This is the worst fucking shit I've ever seen.In post 1184, Nosferatu wrote:that's a loaded question. If you guys were still looking for scum, ^^^^^.In post 1171, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
They need to get their shit together. I feel like a Capri-Sun straw hole pre-poke.Wake88 wrote:Thoughts on the people refusing to vote him?In post 1194, Zachstralkita wrote:This is the worst fucking shit I've ever seen.In post 1184, Nosferatu wrote:that's a loaded question. If you guys were still looking for scum, ^^^^^.In post 1171, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
I forgot to mention my modkill sparked a huge ass thread on that rule. I think you can discuss subs there now.Titus wrote:We can.In post 1189, Zachstralkita wrote:Myself and Dunnstral played a game on MafiaUniverse.In post 1177, Titus wrote:TrueGent?In post 1170, Zachstralkita wrote:Wake we can save the Titus/Dunn fiasco for another day.
Oh goodie, a sub-out. Dunn this game is reminding me of that TrueGent shit.
Day 1 I wagoned the shit out of this dude called TrueGent because he put me off. He subs out and his replacement comes in. I continue to wagon him.
They don't allow you to discuss sub outs on that site, which I think is bullshit, but nevertheless I ask the mod " hey, is it allowed to talk about how the replacement MAKES the person scum?" just as a hypothetical and I get modkilled. I flip VT and what do you fucking know? Dude's replacement flips scum. Ironically my modkill worked as an angleshot for HIS lynch.
In post 1184, Nosferatu wrote:that's a loaded question. If you guys were still looking for scum, ^^^^^.In post 1171, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Is this an invitation? This doesn't sound towny.In post 1167, Nosferatu wrote:sorry, I'm just in too many games.
replacing out
rip my replacement for having to read through all this.
pedit: or you guys could lynch me, that could happen too.
That's because Dunn closed his eyes and just threw darts at names for his scum/town list.In post 1207, Titus wrote:Right but yet for some reason it is impossible to get the three of us to agree on a wagon.In post 1205, Dunnstral wrote:"I feel like he's coasting by posting infrequently" there's like 8 other people you can slap that on to
Dunnstral wrote:In post 1218, Zachstralkita wrote:Actually gonna phone post til I doze
As usual Dunn is wasting more time than a clock belt
No I'm not, people keep getting in the way of my scumhunting
It's a shame you don't control the course of the game all by your lonesome LMAOTitus wrote:Nos isn't on my list, so no.In post 1221, Zachstralkita wrote:Dunnstral wrote:In post 1218, Zachstralkita wrote:Actually gonna phone post til I doze
As usual Dunn is wasting more time than a clock belt
No I'm not, people keep getting in the way of my scumhunting
All you vote is town I don't want to hear that
Nos is the lynch let's go
The fact that you even bothered to say this makes me want to hijack a school bus full of Martian puppies and crash it into a fucking volcano
In post 1253, Titus wrote:The fact we don't waste time on the obvious angers you?In post 1250, Zachstralkita wrote:The fact that you even bothered to say this makes me want to hijack a school bus full of Martian puppies and crash it into a fucking volcano
& u and titus wonder why people SR YOu LMFAOOOO
oh ya....Titus wrote:@Zach, you think I am town. You're town. The players on our wagons mostly changed. His stayed put. He has done little to no scumhunting to me and Wake is distancing from Sick of it. sick of it has taken soft easy positions.
What the fuck are you talking about G that's not even where my vote's at right now, unless you're talking about my Fallout NV Terrifying Presence perkDunnstral wrote:Hey shannon, what are your other reads right now actually? (I understand you're feeling overwhelmed by the likes of Zach)
In post 1260, Dunnstral wrote:Are you serious, you were just being antagonistic because it was me?In post 1258, Zachstralkita wrote: oh ya....
She said " The fact we don't waste time on the obvious angers you?" the question was directed at me.Dunnstral wrote:See here's your problem: You think everything is about youIn post 1258, Zachstralkita wrote:obviously I wasn't going to ask him
In post 1299, Titus wrote:Umm Nos did gather heat and has a wagon. He subbed out so someone more engaged could play. That's townie.
another prospective lynchPerformer wrote:??In post 1322, Titus wrote:@Performer, How would you explain the near townslip deal?
Zach what's your read on imp? I'm kidding about him being a tr btw .
I'm very sure we'll have plenty of opportunities to lynch them later, as much as they go on about how obvtown they are.In post 1327, Varsoon wrote:The annoying thing is that I'm pretty much compelled to agree with you.In post 1316, Zachstralkita wrote:Because they claimed mason. It's a clusterfuck to get into when you start doubting the legitimacy of said claim, we can get into that another day.
As little as I like Dunn AND Titus' play, the Mason claim ensures that the weaklings on this site would never lynch them without an equally strong role-claim contesting theirs. It's lame, but people like to play it painfully safe.
In post 876, implosion wrote:Looking back I'm really not a fan of AGar's content post. He attacks Titus largely for pushing with empty reasoning, when he himself in his post gives very little reasoning for much of what he says (he cites posts 89, 367-368, 370-376, 387 and possibly more as bad or terrible or etc but gives no justification, as though those 10+ posts are self-evidently scummy [which they aren't]). In assessing Titus's 447, he immediately jumps to the worst possible interpretation:when it's fairly evident, I think, that Titus is simply saying that itAGar wrote:Are you really saying because you did something one time in a game when you were scum, that this means he's scum?canbe scum and attacking it for reasons other than her having done it as scum once (calling it LAMIST) together with the fact thatTitus had already been pushing Zachwhich pretty clearly indicates that Titus wasn't pushing Zach with the logic of "I did this once as scum therefore you're doing it as scum." This jumping to the worst possible interpretation of things, IMO, indicates a lack of intellectual honesty in evaluating information, which in turn indicates scum.
Besides you and me who is ACTUALLY going to help that wagon get to L-0In post 1335, Varsoon wrote:Yeah, so let's lynch Dunnstral so we can be done with this day.In post 1333, Zachstralkita wrote:For all the hype leading up to it, Dunnstral's "case" on Varsoon was utterly shit.
In post 1337, Varsoon wrote:Well, no one, but that's because we haven't counter-claimed masons yet.
I think the legitimacy of our out is overshadowed by the doubt of almost everyone in the game along with Titus and Dunnstral's competing c laim.In post 1342, Varsoon wrote:I was REALLY hoping we wouldn't have to out like this.In post 1340, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1337, Varsoon wrote:Well, no one, but that's because we haven't counter-claimed masons yet.
I think we can't sidestep this any further, mason buddy.
I crumbed it in my first post, too. :/
Scum Dunnstral and Titus (Ditus if you will, the other one sounds kinda wrong)'s reward has far exceeded the risk if they gain your trust Day 1. Which they have.In post 1349, implosion wrote:Varsoon wrote:@Performer: PRs are important, but the site-meta trends to favoring mechanics far heavier than rhetoric, so much so that the rhetoric of the game often becomes superseded by the mechanics. Claiming masons only renders any sort of leverage to the slots because people think the mechanical advantage of (possible) masons is stronger than any rhetoric that could be thrown down. Even if they are lying about being masons, the fear that we'd lose such a mechanical advantage keeps players from voting there, even when the claimed masons are bringing garbage to the table, rhetorically.
-The odds of it being a scum gambit are so horrifically low. The risk/reward of claiming masons on d1 as scum is absolutely terrible.
.
First of all, get that 100% out of here you can't fabricate statistics like that.implosion wrote:100% falseIn post 1352, Zachstralkita wrote:Scum Dunnstral and Titus (Ditus if you will, the other one sounds kinda wrong)'s reward has far exceeded the risk if they gain your trust Day 1. Which they have.In post 1349, implosion wrote:Varsoon wrote:@Performer: PRs are important, but the site-meta trends to favoring mechanics far heavier than rhetoric, so much so that the rhetoric of the game often becomes superseded by the mechanics. Claiming masons only renders any sort of leverage to the slots because people think the mechanical advantage of (possible) masons is stronger than any rhetoric that could be thrown down. Even if they are lying about being masons, the fear that we'd lose such a mechanical advantage keeps players from voting there, even when the claimed masons are bringing garbage to the table, rhetorically.
-The odds of it being a scum gambit are so horrifically low. The risk/reward of claiming masons on d1 as scum is absolutely terrible.
.
Except, the chances of you being scum with them is moderate.
they will lose my trust iteratively as days go on
and thenscum are down two players with almost nothing to gain
implosion wrote:key wordIn post 1357, Zachstralkita wrote:Oh man, oh man... you actually did it. You actually said those words in that sequential order. RIPimplosion wrote: I don't even care if they are scum. there's no reason at all to try to lynch them today.
today
Each inhale is 1. Breathe in and out until you get to 10 and restart.In post 1365, implosion wrote:it has been a really fucking long time since i ahve raged in a mafia game but you are seriously bringing me closezach wrote:this is still a blatant anti-town post, if you have scum on day 1 page 1 post 2 you nail those fuckers to the wall. you do not let them thrive.
Inhale. Count to four.implosion wrote:it's literally like before you've read the words in my post, you assume that what i've written is scum motivated and then apply that to what i've written
zach if you are town for fuck's sake have some intellectual honesty and try to fucking understand the points i'm making
Dunnstral wrote:What happened to townreading me?In post 1345, Zachstralkita wrote:I think the legitimacy of our out is overshadowed by the doubt of almost everyone in the game along with Titus and Dunnstral's competing c laim.In post 1342, Varsoon wrote:I was REALLY hoping we wouldn't have to out like this.In post 1340, Zachstralkita wrote:In post 1337, Varsoon wrote:Well, no one, but that's because we haven't counter-claimed masons yet.
I think we can't sidestep this any further, mason buddy.
I crumbed it in my first post, too. :/
In any case, I'll take " Lynch Dunnstral " for 500.
VOTE: Dunnstral
Quit flailing.Dunnstral wrote:They're not actually claiming masons guys, don't be dumb
Okay fortune teller, and I'm assuming you know what day page and post it will happen as well? Oh, and you'll also be alive?implosion wrote: I have honestly found setup spec post-massclaim to be the most accurate means of scumhunting empirically. And a massclaim will eventually happen.
What part of " ruse " do you not understand?Dunnstral wrote:Guys
You realize they're not actually counter claiming masons?
Have some context and read the whole thread
Dunnstral wrote:No they can't because this is a normal gameIn post 1385, Zachstralkita wrote:" Masons " can also be mafia-aligned
If the cop should check anyone, it's one of Dunnstral/Titus.Boem_u_dusi wrote:Hmm, what's the probability of them claiming mason as towns?
I think cop should check one of them to make sure.
Performer wrote: