RichardGHP wrote:
Reading through Yos' and dj's ISO, I noticed sometihng reasonably interesting. It might come to nothing, but I would actually rather lynch Yos today. My reason being, Yos pushed hard on me all game until the start of Day 3, when I came back with a result.
Wrong.
I pushed hard against you until you claimed on day 2.
After you claimed on day 2, I said we should let you live and get your investigation, and I argued strongly against lynching you on day 2 at that point.
Then, I decided to investigate you; not because I thought you were the most likely to be scum, although I was still somewhat suspicious of you, but because of your claim. Because of your claim, finding out your alignment before you came back with a result seemed the most useful piece of information I could get, especially if you came back on day 3 with a "I saw person X kill person Y" type result on day 3, putting the town in a position where we would have to decide if we should trust you or not. Conversly, if I could confirm you as town, then your information becomes far more useful to the town. At the time, I was expecting to get off one cop investigation night 2, claim day 3, and then probably get nightkilled; I wasn't going to try to wait for a second investigation before claiming, seemed too risky.
If you had come back on day 3 and claimed something scummy, like saying you tracked the person who got nightkilled who thus can't confirm you, I would have pushed for your lynch. Instead, you claimed a type of result that made it likely you really were a tracker, which made you a bad lynch. That obviously has nothing to do with the failed investigation; I explained all this on day 3, after your claim, and you seemed to understand it then.
I'm really confused what you don't understand about this. I made it pretty clear why I stopped pushing for your lynch on day 3.
(By the way, my role is also why I was so opposed to a mass claim yesterday, for reasons that should be obvious.)
Don and I are both claimed Power Roles, only with don, Yos and don have conflicting claims.
Seriously? I claim cop, with a guilty on him, and Don counterclaims even night cop. It's pretty much the classic despreation move for a scum who got nailed by the cop, is to counterclaim the cop; I don't understand why you'd take his claim at all seriously.
While it makes sense for them to be crossvoting now, Yos was on don WAY before either even night cop claim came along.
...um, I was suspicious of him yesterday, so I investigated him, and it turns out that I was right, he's scum. What on Earth are you talking about? Do you not think it made sense yesterday for me to try to lynch someone I thought was scum, do you think it dosn't make sense for me to investigate someone I'm susupicious of, or what? You're not making sense here, Richard.
[qupte]
Meanwhile, don has hardly mentioned Yos at all. Now, what possible reason could there be for that? I think Yos knows that don is even night cop and tried to pre-emptively counter-claim with a guilty report on who he knew would be his CC, in order to make himself look town.[/quote]
That dosn't make sense either. How would a scum know there even was an even night cop in the game? And you think I'm scum who somehow knew he was an even night cop, and so, instead of just killing him, I decided to wait until after an even night, let him investigate, and then claim cop with a guilty on him, dooming myself for absolutely no reason?
Richard, you're making no sense at all here, and it's worrying me.
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
