In post 6256, RCEnigma wrote:What is the flavor significance?
Lorenzo Lamas is a real person. He's an actor (known for being Lance in Falcon Crest and a movie called Body Rock in the early 80's)
In post 6256, RCEnigma wrote:What is the flavor significance?
So you don't know Lorenzo Lamasr too??? Wait (I've linked his page on IMDB)In post 6258, Bambi Jay wrote:There's her flavor, Almost.In post 6209, Amrun wrote:I’m oh shit I am so sorry, I am prospero. I just remembered the P.
Why should I? And even if I did why do you think I should comprehend it? basically, why should I be any different from the rest?In post 6260, davesaz wrote:Have you read all the other conversation about that?
I just caught you a scumster with my meme'ing! How'bout'that???In post 6261, Bambi Jay wrote:Almost-senpai please speak in a language the non-meme inclined cab speak as well, we are trying to make peace with them.
AP hates to keep his on.In post 6264, davesaz wrote:Mathblade would make a comment about pants here
Well, they can shoot chkflp (if you can convince them to, because I am not even trying)In post 6268, Bambi Jay wrote:Well Nancy shouldnt make it so obvious then while telling me I was stupud for even talking to her about it for a second.
Lets discuss this So Nancy atleast shoots the right person. Heck, maybe Shiro will come in too. We gotta be through.
Your job is to tell us you're bored, tired and can't sleep??? Or is it to NOT READ and come ask who claimed what and whom to lynch??? WOW! BoonIn post 6286, Creature wrote:Yah whatever at least I'm doing my jobIn post 6272, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Note: Just because Creature was proven right doesn't mean he's less boring.
In post 6284, chkflip wrote:That's so incredibly off base it's cute.
I was indeed making a Renegade reference, hoping to get a read off of it if my suspicion was correct and they tried being cheeky or something.
In post 6293, Venus and Mars wrote:What does Lorenzo Lamas have to do with anything?
ONE question: Did you get a desperate modifier? because assuming Amrun gives out that along with her dead fish necessitates that both go together (or fail together). If it's two actions (maybe she is split) then she could not have given Titus BOTH on the same night.In post 6296, Adorable wrote:VOTE: Amrun
Amrun says she gives out dead fishes and when she saw Titus claim desperate she said she got scared her fish caused that. Next Amrun says she gave a dead fish to me and wouldn't mind I become desperate and now I think Amrun is scum who gives out desperate modifiers to players and she even asked me if I got a modifier which makes me think she planned on giving me a desperate modifier. I also got my Amrun case I will make and it will take a while for me to find the posts and I will vote Amrun in case I forget to vote.
In post 5710, Boonskiies wrote:You are a Willbooster. This will make whoever you target unable to be blocked
It sure does!In post 6316, Venus and Mars wrote:Creature’s fail on A50 fits with either A50 getting williboosted
It would please me more than you think. At least I won't have to be in the same thread as you two.
Tiger?? More like a SKUNK to me.In post 6338, Bambi Jay wrote:Oh shit, Monkey Man you pulled the tiger's tail.
Your mother is an ass. Go ahead and report me if you dare.In post 6341, Venus and Mars wrote:There’s really no justification for you being as ass
Alright, I've cooled down a bit. Check this out:In post 6350, Bambi Jay wrote:Almost, serious talk, what's going on here?
In post 337, Titus wrote:Great. Well I am a mechanical and data driven player, so fuck you.In post 336, 50 Judge Powers wrote:That's not a bloody insult. It's a fact. Like, Chara -for instance- is far better at tone reading while I am far better at mechanical play, and it's no insult to either me or them to state that fact.In post 331, Titus wrote:Insults are bad.
See? these are 2 incidents by 2 different people that I did NOT react to the same way I reacted to nancy. Why do you think that is? It's because I perceive NEITHER of them to be a hypocrite. Like, of I told them the same they'd be alright with it and won't make a fuss.In post 5792, The Fonz wrote:In the nicest possible way, go fuck yourself.In post 5789, 50 Judge Powers wrote: or I'm sabotaging the game.
Nothing wrong at your end, mate. None of it is. I mean, I haven't been "mean" to anyone else in the game, have I?In post 6384, chkflip wrote:You're not wrong about the reference, only my alignment, friend. I'd say I've made off-hand references like this previously in the game with other players but that's not really indicative of anything.In post 6290, 50 Judge Powers wrote:How can it be off base when you admit to have been making a Renegade reference??
Anyway, if I'm wrong I'm wrong, but this still looks legit to me. I am NOT going to lynch "Drew" once more. He's already dead.
Side note, Idk what's going on but I'm sorry if something that has happened in this game somehow stirred anything up inside you to make you react the way you're reacting. I don't think you're a bad person but I also don't think you're making the best decisions right now. And I think you know that. Maybe take a breather from this game or ignore a slot for a little bit man.
The 2nd part isn't at all about me if that somehow isn't clear.
Happy BirthdayIn post 6392, The Fonz wrote:More when I'm not out celebrating my birthday.
Man, you need to go see a doctor ASAP. You read and understand almost everything?? That's soooooo alarming. I suspect you may have a brain inside your skull!!!!In post 6389, Bambi Jay wrote:I think he was mostly aiming the hypocrite comment at Nancy? Not sure tho.
In post 6510, Titus wrote:My PoE is sound unless someone finds a hole.
In post 6516, Titus wrote:Aaron is the the middle?
Hole... middle.. nips... this game is AWESOMEIn post 6518, Titus wrote:AF was lurky and Nips built fast.
In post 6520, Titus wrote:This was Sunday at about 2:30 pm.
In post 6520, Titus wrote:At Monday at around 1 AM, Nips was L minus 1.
Or it could be A50 and he was fake claiming all along. I'd never trust that monkey even if the mod somehow confirmed him in the thread. (Just saying)In post 6521, Titus wrote:The stronger case is that pretty much only Fonz and Nips can be renegade.
Or A50. Don't forget to throw mud on the monkey anytime you can.In post 6533, Titus wrote:So who is lying and thus the renegade? It's either Fonz or Nips
In post 6535, chkflip wrote:AF can't be TMI on Nips AND 50/Nips hold the same alignment.
Choose a storyline. You cannot have both.
You're quite literally stating whatever you can to make 50 look bad and your stories aren't aligning.
This whole business is gross.
That is untrue. I am currently voting YOU.In post 6536, Titus wrote:A50 can be scum. His only push is the doctor ffs.
Aberdeen takes the lead! It's Aberdeen: One, Hearts if Midlothian: Nil.In post 6539, The Fonz wrote:No, you're incorrect. What do you mean, possible Creature track? Unless Creature actually claims to have tracked her, that's not confirmed. Bambi is confirmed by Adorable, Check. Davesaz' action is not externally confirmed.
But let's take this further. Either you're ascetic scum, or someone interfered with you last night, or chkflip is lying when he said he interfered with Bambi and someone else also interfered with her. Are you going to claim that was also me? It's absolutely asinine, Titus, and I thought better of you.
I'm going to not engage Titus the rest of the day. My rising anger is making me feel like blurting out my role just to shut her up, but again, that is not in the town's interest.
Um... let me guess.. erm.. this is a tough one... hmmm.. you die, perhaps??In post 6549, Titus wrote:What do you think happens if scum shoot me?
I swear I ain't shagging anyone atm.In post 6550, Titus wrote:Then who is the fucking renegade?
So, hole.. finger.. nips & stretching... let me get ready for it...In post 6563, chkflip wrote:Let me know if I need to stretch that part out for you
Like, you are playing the game! Right? Could've fooled me.In post 6572, Joan of Arc wrote:"Yeah, sure, let this player be rewarded for spreading toxicity and making the game unplayable."
Whoops! You forgot to re-re-re-re-re-re-re-re-quote this.In post 6577, Joan of Arc wrote:Anyway, do continue playing your game of 'letting people ruin the game as much as possible', because that would end up so well for you......
FTFYIn post 6576, Joan of Arc wrote:"And the players who don't contribute are far worse devils than someone who is intentionally toxic to the game as a whole."In post 6574, Joan of Arc wrote:"Because leaving a toxic player in the game is so damn good for the game, amirite?"In post 6572, Joan of Arc wrote:"Yeah, sure, let this player be rewarded for spreading toxicity and making the game unplayable."In post 6563, chkflip wrote:"Hey chkflip, why are you still defending 50 after they called to be shot by the vigilante?"In post 6552, Joan of Arc wrote:FTR, I don't like how they are fine with keeping toxicity in the game while ignoring what their supposed townread had to say about that.
I'm so glad you asked a legitimate question instead of continuing to be a worthless fucking lurksack. Thanks for the question! It's quite a simple and explainable situation, really, but Alphabet Town doesn't have good reading comprehension.
That's okay. If D2 said anything at all about me it said that I'll reiterate until my fingers are numb without qualms. I'll be pissy, yes, as should be expected. But I'll elucidate oncemore.
If one believes that it's absolutely certain that 50 and Nips MUST be the same alignment (as they should, since by claim alone 50 used his ability unabated because of me and cleared Nips. By cleared, let's just assume for sake of ease that this means they share an alignment), then certainly their deaths are interchangeable. Right? Right! Because they share an alignment! Huzzah!
Let me know if I need to stretch that part out for you and I'll happily break it down even further.
Now, given that information, which player contributes to the game with opinion, information, and votes? A50.
Which one doesn't contribute to the game with opinion, information, or votes, AND prodges? Nips.
THERE
FUCKING
FORE
If 50 and Nips hold the same alignment, the better kill is Nips.
Are we all caught up now?
Good.
I'm glad.
See you in three days.
Doesn't matter what time of the game it was, but when the ball hits the back of the net.. it's a GOAL.In post 6588, Titus wrote:Why are you rewarding that when the renegade PoE is all about n1 not n3?
I am voting Titus, am I not? And I said I'd only vote Titus/Joan. That's how I'm reading the game, tbh. Titus/Joan are one pair of the scum team (same PT). That's where I'm at. 80% certainty.
But it is.. at least to a 5 y.o. it is. Haven't you ever seen a little kid holding a knife as a sword and wearing a pan on his head for a helmet and pretending to be Russel Crowe as Gladiator?In post 6713, chkflip wrote:Knife ain't no damn small sword wtf rofl.
Why would you be upset if someone called you a czar??In post 6799, The Fonz wrote:basically I react the same as if someone called me a c*** to my face in real life.
Ya think??In post 7065, Bambi Jay wrote:Titus that one is literally too obvious.
Bigger than my EGO???In post 7069, Bambi Jay wrote:Monkey plz don't talk RN. We got bigger problems.
You're a fun-wrecker, aren't you?In post 7195, Bambi Jay wrote:Mister 3 personalities, do you agree with the Adorable shot, yes or no?
1 word response only quoting this, and only variations of yes or no.
I told you you needed to have some protection.In post 7310, Bambi Jay wrote:I got No Result instead.
In post 7751, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Can someone please reiterate how Bambi was cleared mechanically?
Thank you.In post 7762, Weiss Schnee wrote:no one is asserting bambi was cleared mechanically are they?
In fact, rereading that exchange I get the idea that Bambi+Creature are one pair of the scum quartet and chemist is a member of the other duo.In post 7680, Chemist1422 wrote:So hiderreceives actions if they hide behind scumwhich might’ve been nice to clarify before I got overexcited
Nope. Joan can't target the same person twice in a row, and she was on Titus on N1, so she "could" have been on her once more on N3. Then again, if she didn't then she could be on N4. Scum wanted to avoid the risk of their kill on Titus being blocked by the Doctor so they made sure she could not be doctored on N4 even if Joan didn't target her on N3.In post 7776, Weiss Schnee wrote:If giving Titus ascetic was so they could kill her wouldn't she be dead today over fonz?
That too, Thank you, scum girl.In post 7777, Bambi Jay wrote:2 different pairs, Weiss. 2 different objectives.In post 7776, Weiss Schnee wrote:If giving Titus ascetic was so they could kill her wouldn't she be dead today over fonz?