What does this mean? is a challenge different to a vote?
regardless, I'm first too
VOTE: votato
What does this mean? is a challenge different to a vote?
iTs sImPLeIn post 65, Paragon wrote:Because if firebringer had picked a gun, he would be one of the four.In post 64, farside22 wrote:What makes you think fire isn't one of the three?In post 62, Vecna wrote:Only 3 townguns. Clearly firebringer is scum else it would be 4 townguns
VOTE: firebringer
I’ve just read “advanced scumplay 1010101”. Was a very exhilarating rea-In post 104, Paragon wrote:eyestott! Are you reading up articles on townplay or are you ready to solve the game?
Don't worry Paragon, you can have my townread tooIn post 282, Paragon wrote:How dare youIn post 279, eyestott wrote:Okay, DonSirloin is my strongest townread
Sure!In post 292, Paragon wrote:Your vote is looking lonely and unused there, eyestort. Do you fancy joining me on cakez? He essentially sheeped someone else who gut read Something_Smart as scum without giving any reasons for it.
At this point, guns are so much more likely to hit town than scum, I reckon scum would be fine with leaving guns alive until they've 'thrown away their...In post 289, Paragon wrote:I'm not actually sure whether scum want to shoot for roses or guns. Shooting for a rose poses a decent chance of the shot being wasted, while shooting for guns are guaranteed kill-shots. I think it depends whether the rose elimination strat is viable, and I don't think it really is based on the number we have. Gun claims are probably just free shots for scum.
If we mass claim, scenario 1 or 4 never happens for obvious reasons. Scum are gonna claim so they don't confirm one of the pools. 2 would probably claim rose, and the other gun. Technically you can try and lynch the gun to clear the other guns, but I really don't think the payoff is worth it.
That’s an overly simplistic and incorrect way of looking at thingsIn post 302, Knightmare491 wrote:So the plan is simple, we know we have 8 townies with roses, that means there's three with guns.In post 45, Knightmare491 wrote:I have something in mind to give us a slight edge. Will talk about it later.
So one by one we just claim whether we have a gun or not. No need to claim what night it will be used on. That way we basically get 3 ICs and reduce the lynchpool by 3.
The fact that you don't see how this negatively impacts town is worth -2 townreadpoints.In post 338, Knightmare491 wrote:It's 14 not 13. Like I said it gives the vig a pool to shoot in. If only 1 of them claims to have a gun, we lynch 1/4, 25% chance to hit scum, vig kill reduces the pool even further. We lynch scum day 2 or 3 max. Guaranteed. What cards are we giving the scum please tell me? How does it hurt town.In post 319, Paragon wrote:Why are you assuming scum ever put more than 1 of them as gun claims? One of them will fakeclaim gun, and so lynching in the gun pool is going for 1/4 chance of scum if we do this. Lynching in this game regularly is going for 3/13 chance of lynching scum, which is actually only marginally lower odds than your strategy which requires a mass claim and giving scum all the cards.In post 311, Knightmare491 wrote:Scum either choose to give us 3 ICs or put themselves in the lynchpool. If all 3 scum choose to claim having a gun then we can make the 3 shoot the other 3.In post 306, Paragon wrote:I see a flaw in your plan! What stops 1 of the scum from claiming gun? Do you still lynch in the guns aiming to hit them?In post 302, Knightmare491 wrote:So the plan is simple, we know we have 8 townies with roses, that means there's three with guns.
So one by one we just claim whether we have a gun or not. No need to claim what night it will be used on. That way we basically get 3 ICs and reduce the lynchpool by 3.
If you were joking, I apologise and give you permission to berate me.
I haven't played in a large game in a large amount of time, and there's too large an amount of people for me to have developedIn post 339, chkflip wrote:Engage with me eyestort I will stort this out for you.
I'm crying nowIn post 345, chkflip wrote:eyestort, they are both similar but also vastly different. Both net a modicum of information that is arguably useful but also not very useful; however, both are bad because mass claiming is bad and you should feel bad for letting it snowball to this. I hope this helps.
Still, does it help you sort Kneye?In post 345, chkflip wrote:eyestort, they are both similar but also vastly different. Both net a modicum of information that is arguably useful but also not very useful; however, both are bad because mass claiming is bad and you should feel bad for letting it snowball to this. I hope this helps.
I just threw up a bit thereIn post 368, Something_Smart wrote:Sorry etytteost.
I think there's a very real possibility Knight is scum trying to force a massclaim so he and his buddies can kill all the guns N1In post 360, Knightmare491 wrote:VOTE: eyetott
That's not a town mindset, it's scum trying to scare town.
1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!In post 387, Knightmare491 wrote:Okay, let's suppose you are town and you chose a gun. Tell me realistically what night would you choose.In post 385, votato wrote:you're right, scum could make a play for a scenario we all agree is worse for them. its possible. but realistically, they split 1/2 gun/rose. then if nothing goes wrong its 1/4 chance of hitting scum. if things get messed up because a townie fakeclaims or night actions mess things up, the odds go downhill. Plus we are hoping that the guns get their shots off night 1, which we cant count on.
wutIn post 495, Iconeum wrote:have you considered that a scum lynch day 1 usually results in town losing the game?In post 401, Knightmare491 wrote:if there is a scum lynch day 1
at least in my experience - but i think others will disagree
massclaim huh?
My d1 reads tend to be as accurate as closing my eyes and hoping for a miracle. My only even semi-confident scum read atm is Knight, for the way he went about his setup spec.In post 553, farside22 wrote:Who are your scum reads and why?In post 552, eyestott wrote:I’m here for a bit. Someone engage with me and ask me about something
OofIn post 565, lilith2013 wrote:Uh....... thanks for telling me this but I didn’t ask you anything???In post 558, eyestott wrote:Lilith, I didn’t feel any scum vibes from Iconeum when I spoke to him.
Although, out of the two players who’ve recently started their activity (vecna and iconeum), vecna seems more towny to me than iconeum.
Just tryna start discussion...In post 569, eyestott wrote:OofIn post 565, lilith2013 wrote:Uh....... thanks for telling me this but I didn’t ask you anything???In post 558, eyestott wrote:Lilith, I didn’t feel any scum vibes from Iconeum when I spoke to him.
Although, out of the two players who’ve recently started their activity (vecna and iconeum), vecna seems more towny to me than iconeum.
Nope, he just lent me his avatar cause my one was literally a bag of dirtIn post 571, Vecna wrote:Wait, eyestott, are you an elbirn alt?
Gimme a few minutes to re-ISO him and I’ll get back to youIn post 567, farside22 wrote:Why is that scummy?In post 564, eyestott wrote:My d1 reads tend to be as accurate as closing my eyes and hoping for a miracle. My only even semi-confident scum read atm is Knight, for the way he went about his setup spec.In post 553, farside22 wrote:Who are your scum reads and why?In post 552, eyestott wrote:I’m here for a bit. Someone engage with me and ask me about something
In post 367, Knightmare491 wrote:I asked the mod yesterday, they can.In post 362, Firebringer wrote:i don't think they can multitask and shoot 4 players in a night.In post 361, eyestott wrote:They do also get a factional kill, but good point.
Ahhh my bad Lilith, first time I read this and responded to it I’m not sure what happened, but I confused votato and iconeum.In post 546, lilith2013 wrote:Wow this was horrible. A whole post of wishywashy nonsenseIn post 544, votato wrote:i don't like that iconeum finally shows up and doesn't contribute anything. I was gonna swap my vote but then chk gives that super weak abr vote, so it gets to stay
VOTE: votato
Okay you make some good points.In post 735, farside22 wrote:That's fair. I don't agree with you, I think Chkflip hit the nail more closer to my thoughts.In post 733, Vecna wrote:Its just the impression I get when reading his posts. He calls shit as he sees it, isnt afraid to piss people off, and is generally just flailing about in a way id expect a towny to do that is somewhat newer to this.
Its not a strong super-confident read, and im not gonna use much energy to oppose this wagon if thats what a majority wants, but I wont be voting there,
Here is an oxymoron: viewtopic.php?p=11766721#p11766721
Knight is town for discussing massclaim, but no one else can because they are scum? He didn't point to anyone and many were discussing it because, guess what it was a discussion that Knight brought up.
Vote low hanging fruit: viewtopic.php?p=11768783#p11768783
And finally his town reads: viewtopic.php?p=11768820#p11768820
Like really, eyeslott and Paragon!
Paragon isn't even the top of my town list. He barely post and made a few points and has gone MIA since. And yes as the game goes on my read on him goes down. I see scum make a few good post and disappear after so that is why I'm on the edge with him.
But lets say he thought players discussing the massclaim were scum, why not say who and why? Why not vote for them?
He's obviously played mafia before, because he said as much. So I will not coddle a player that played and knows how to fake town tells.
Isn't this a paradox then? Like, why would scum!eyestott, as the last person to claim, claim a rose, thereby confirming the three claimed guns, unless he was NOT somewhat rational?In post 2615, Vecna wrote:I know youre probably not gonna believe this, but ill stick to it I was still very much suspecting at least a somewhat rational approach to this from scum. Not claiming gun whatsoever was a huge fuckup that might still cost them the game.