I dunno if it's true but it fits with the themeIn post 29, Endless Terror wrote: for the record gypyx, i think your claim is true
VOTE: Happy Unbirthday Boon
I dunno if it's true but it fits with the themeIn post 29, Endless Terror wrote: for the record gypyx, i think your claim is true
*crickets*In post 155, Aristophanes wrote: Oh, I was asked about my thoughts on claims. One sec I'll take a look at them.
In post 256, BrightEyedFish wrote:When did I say it was difficult?
In post 168, BrightEyedFish wrote: I'm still tying to figure out whats going on.
Does anyone have a list of the "claims" made so far? If not, I'll try not to forget to make one later.
nope, only you and tsunami had a substantial vote countIn post 269, Endless Terror wrote:really? why are votes on us in particular suspicious? the other claims are fine to vote?
-tay
that was a joke lolIn post 274, The Pelican Brief wrote:Sam, I'm not feeling theBEFvotes. If you thinkBEF'sreply is likely, then what point does your vote have there? 259
~Taly
does that work on this forumIn post 294, Happy Birthday Boonskiies wrote:@Ircher
re:votes: 1 mafia 1 inquisitive/fisher 1 sheep 1 randomIn post 306, Happy Birthday Boonskiies wrote:@samantha: whatdya think, thoughts on counterwagon/votes on you? and why ascetic claims all town
they could all be mafia claims, I just don't think any areIn post 312, Happy Birthday Boonskiies wrote: I don't doubt that they're true either, but why can't 1 be a true mafia ascetic claim?
"I didn't read the thread"In post 475, NicoRobin wrote:I have no scumreads or townreads right now.
watIn post 541, BrightEyedFish wrote:Currently, I am voting Sam to show ET that I am willing to work with them so they can stop wasting time on me.
first, thanks for the laughIn post 547, Happy Birthday Boonskiies wrote:Hi, Samantha. Nicorobin to you too.
uh the goal was to encourage the people voting for pelican to not vote for them; you answered your own question thereIn post 585, Ydrasse wrote:my samantha vote is doing fuck all right now but it's definitely my strongest read like. what is the point of shading pelican and saying that voting them doesn't make sense and going onto a wagon that is objectively worse (pelican had votes, nico had none and nico's presence is negative) for like... what? what is the goal here?
yes it's totally logical to seek information from people who have already given it & that you can already read insteadIn post 623, The Pelican Brief wrote:3)I'm seeing a trend into your posts about voting and going after players that aren't contributing much. Why not have input or pressure players that are far more readable?
~Taly
I wanted your opinion since you seem to think gamma is mafia, which would have implications outside of gamma, and you didn't give it. Like I said, I don't care about actually lynching nico (just as I didn't care about BEF) and just wanted them to post. If I wanted to push something I'd be pushing a person who could actually get vote majority.In post 707, Endless Terror wrote:that slot's focus on nico seems to be scum finding something to push
another "10 pages are too hard to read" postIn post 684, Vaxkiller wrote:Im on page 19 will pick up tomorrow.
probably "and you will allow all other actions performed on your target to succeed, even if it would normally fail from modifiers such as "Disloyal"."In post 1033, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:wait I don't get it, how is their role at all negative utility
anyone who pushes back on you saying 2 posts with basically nothing in them was town meta looks good to meIn post 1283, Shoshin wrote:Hey Gamma, can you explain why HUB is town? This player seems very upset that I replaced a potential mislynch. In my experience, that's a massive scum-tell.
right now:In post 1293, Shoshin wrote: What're your reads?
I totally forgot about that, I'm glad you pointed it outIn post 1355, Shoshin wrote:I could be wrong about Sam. I expect my reads overall to suck after taking long break from the game.
both + a tiny bit moreIn post 1300, Ydrasse wrote:am i leanmaf for pushing you or leanmaf for not wanting to vote the nicoslot...?
In post 1364, BrightEyedFish wrote:Now, re-reading the Vax votes, HUB and Sam left but came back (was the hammer vote) are the most pinging votes.
so uh... I orchestrated vote(s) after they reached 3 votes, but also it's mafia-indicative that I unvoted/hammeredIn post 1435, BrightEyedFish wrote:Would scum!TGP who has less posts than the mod bus? Yes, but only if instructed to in the mafia pt. Which implicates Sam and to a certain extent Bell.
I support this but alsoIn post 1374, Shoshin wrote:Looking back, I agree with HBB that this raises concerns. Scum tend to over justify reads they know are wrong, and while the reasoning is weak, it's also over justification relative to the other reads.
what I'd rather do depends on what he says (or doesn't say) today
can your reaches pls stop being predicated on my lack of intelligence thxIn post 1440, BrightEyedFish wrote:Also, I'm pretty sure you just scum-slipped.
no I was on him before nico got replacedIn post 1476, Gamma Emerald wrote:You forgot Samantha lul
what does warlocked mean?In post 1662, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:what's the phrase, you think there's a scenario where gamma is getting warlocked by ari?
aren't you saying they gained credibility in your eyes instead of lost it then?In post 1704, shellyc wrote:BEF!scum also loses out on cred and draws attention to themselves doing it. i cant really see this from a scum!pov
In post 1859, Shoshin wrote:What's an enchantress?
that's from the main page btw not me quoting what I got (which has universe flavor)Every night, you may target a player. You will force that player to commute, meaning any actions performed by or targeting your target will fail. If your target is not aligned with town, you will also commute during the night. You will not be informed of this. If you were to be roleblocked, your action will not go through.
a) important to protect them if they are townIn post 1861, Shoshin wrote:Why would you use your role on Pelican instead of checking alignment of an inactive player. This seems completely inconsistent with your behavior so far.
? noIn post 1862, Shoshin wrote:You're a parallel universe, Sam?
who did you target though?In post 1869, shellyc wrote: we are a plain old town comm not an enchantress/whatever
not at all because it was win/win regardlessIn post 1889, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:On this, how did them being a claimed pr factor i to your reasoning?
you said that 7~ pages ago and I meant to ask but forgot: did that mean you hadn't read all the pages, or something else? if so, have you now?In post 1732, Shoshin wrote:this game was a replacement on D2 & I'm not entirely sure what's happening in this game yet.
??? there is no reason to be voting a commuter as the game stands