The following is a compilation of everything you've brought to bear against C-Worl, Ladyλδ. Not counting those posts where you pointed back to these four, or where you repeatedly reference the "page you spent talking about C-Worl," or the several times you've pushed the C-Worl wagon without adding to the body of evidence.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:C-Worl: Why are you voting Charlie? Further, your only votes this game have been on Charlie and Jin. You advocated a policy lynch on Jin (and I love you for it, but it ain't town), which is an easy lynch to get.
Then, you switch to the Charlie wagon when it starts to garner support, and the Jin wagon is failing.
Opportunism is a scum intent best seen on the first day. No scum wants to be lynched D1. It's their worst nightmare.
This is scum. Vote: C-Worl
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:C-Worl is actually scum, because not only did he do the same thing you accused Charlie of being scum for (Policy on Jin), but he also followed it with a HORRIBLE Charlie vote, which was opportunistic as hell.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:C-Worl wrote:So... we're not policy lynching Jindori? This makes me a sad turtle.
Unvote; Vote: Charlie
Case makes sense.
See this vote?
Read As:
"OH SOMEONE POSTED A CASE ON CHARLIE, AND IT GOT APPROVAL.
LET ME JUMP ON THAT."
He doesn't even state the case. He just says "nice case", let me follow it.
And then later, when pushed for a reason, he regurgitates the same shit that other people have been saying.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:C-Worl. There are probably about 10-14 scums in this game, of different factions.
The size of the read I have on you makes me about 95% sure you are one of them.
The other 5% is that you are an impossible VI.
The first three posts revolve almost solely around this one post:
C-Worl wrote:So... we're not policy lynching Jindori? This makes me a sad turtle.
Unvote; Vote: Charlie
Case makes sense.
Which I agree is scummy. From most people. But hear me out on this. This is the third game I've started with C-Worl, and I am convinced that this kind of early vote-hopping is just in his playstyle, regardless of his alignment. He appears to ascribe to the school of thought that early wagons are a good way to get people to pay attention, start sweating, and get into the game. It isn't a terrible idea, except it gets mistaken for opportunism. A lot.
And here's the thing: Take this away, and your case evaporates. If I weren't so rock-solid sure of your Towniness (for now,) I'd suspect you like hell for railroading a null tell. But I am, so I don't.
I included your fourth quote, Ladyλδ, to illustrate something. C-Worl
does
have quite a bit of VI going on in him. He's still adjusting to this style of play and this board's meta, and he's a hell of a lot better than he was a month ago.
Finally, to preempt the inevitable "Scum defending scum!" bullshit, let me say (again) that C-Worl is NOT a Town read right now. He is thoroughly NULL. I've simply played enough with him, and have developed enough of a rapport (and hell, even fondness) for him, that I don't like seeing him railroaded on such thin evidence.
---------------------
I've reviewed the Raivann case too. Was this the post you referred to?
Raivann wrote:tclawren wrote:
Occult please. I want to think you are
own. I really do. But that was un
alled for. IGMEOU
In other news Raivann
and should die. That last post was awful.
P.S. HAPPY BIRTHDAY VEZOK!!!
Look! It says "tc is scum" I cracked the code!
Please point out the scum tell.
Note that while I'm not on board with a D1 Raivann lynch, I
also
got subtle scum vibes when reviewing ISO. I'd just like someone to put their finger on it.