Mafiastuck (GAME OVER TOWN WINS!)
-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Well see it went something like this:
>gets home late
>6 new pages of game
>"uhh, when I have more time"
>gets home late
>6 new pages of game
>"holy fuck"
>gets home late
>4 new pages of game
>"holy fuck"
>weekend <-- you are here!
So I'll be jumping into this sometime today now that I have time to read *everything*.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Hmm~
First thing to catch my eye is Robocopter87 inquiring about Titan's role speculation. Good example (#93). Titan's spec was out there and was a likely derailer so there's mostly scum motivation for digging in (instead of, uh, leaving it be).
Don't like combEnigma's #198. Jump on the Nacho/Phil mini-consensus doesn't seem geniune. Same can be said for the comment on Nik. Easy post to make as scum. Next post at #217 doesn't make me feel any better about the guy.
Speaking of Nikanor, he's town. Maybe Epic too, less sure on that one though but it's strong enough to mention.
Actually Nachomamma's followup (#218) is awkward. Sounds like he'd be talking to a townread but there's no indication of that.
Next up is Phillammon's #230. No comment on why the u-turn was odd (or a u-turn at all), instead there's a comment on wagon placement (and wagon placement means nothing unless the behavior justifies something being off).
Already have too much stuff I don't like. <_< Surely sorting this shit out will be easy.
Gonna split this so people bother to read my posts. Just finished reading page 10. I'll vote when I'm done.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Part 2, Get on the Floor
Robocopter gets some more scum points for #274 and the posts after that (up to #295).
xtoph's posts in the #270 range rub me the wrong way. In particular #275. The aggression in that last part doesn't read town.
I like Alsark for #279 and agree with Epic's #300 on xtoph.
Would hang Robocopter for the things I pointed out and stuff showcased in #361.
Why are people treating Noir as a hydra? Or am I imagining things?
Gonna have to ask Pandorica how sure he is on the "Robo wouldn't have the balls" claim @ #396.
Read up to end of page 17.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Didn't mention it earlier but add Sunshine to the town list.
These last 7 pages were so uninteresting I have nothing to talk about.
People I might be interested in voting: Cubix, Pasch, DeasVail, Cheery Dog, Robocopter, Q, xtoph. Going to have to read again to see what to do with this list.
A wagon on Riggs is fine too. Something tells me I'm going to agree with Epic for most of the game. (both heads)-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Read Cubix's ISO first because herp first on the list
... <_<
VOTE: combinatorialEnigma
Why did I type that entire thing
Slight chance I'll prefer a different lynch after I'm actually done reading those folks but damn. Main thing that made this read jump in priority is the whole backing off from Nacho.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 592, Titan wrote:In post 591, BT wrote:Slight chance I'll prefer a different lynch after I'm actually done reading those folks but damn. Main thing that made this read jump in priority is the whole backing off from Nacho.
Oh dear, seriously? I am not understanding the suspicion of the retraction on Nacho. It reads as completely honest and genuine. Maybe some people are not just looking for wallwars and are looking to get opinion on people? If anything, Rubik's retraction makes him more town. This just looks like mindless sheeping that isn't going to help the town at all.
Let me ask you, in your own words, why do you suspect the back off of Nacho?
At first it looked like Nacho gave him an opportunity to get rid of a risky FoS and he gladly took it.
...But on second glance it's not as decisive as I thought it was. Fair enough. I'm actually pretty sure I want my vote elsewhere right now so back to reading I go.
Admittedly it's because none of my reads are rock solid (except for the cubix read I *thought* I had) and most of the lynches on bad nonexistent folks are appealing anyway. (most of the people that magically appeared on that list are those kind of people)In post 594, Sunshine and Rainbows wrote:
This is a p good list other then the cubix and robo but I think this is more literally doing what Titan is accusing Phil of.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 647, Pandorica wrote:In post 586, BT wrote:Gonna have to ask Pandorica how sure he is on the "Robo wouldn't have the balls" claim @ #396.
Fairly sure? I don't really know what you want me to say. I'd not have said it, if I wasn't reasonably confident.
Well I wanted to make sure if it was
"there's NO WAY this guy is scum with his meta"
or
"i don'tthinkhe's scum with his meta"
In other news I guess the Q wagon isn't getting any support.
Pacsh's #657 is "don't lynch meeeee" bad.
The wagon is speeding up real fast but that's kind of understandable really.
Sure.
UNVOTE: numberQ
VOTE: Pacshendale-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 687, Sunshine and Rainbows wrote:gRRR
Has your other head posted in the last few days? Curious. #594 looks like you wrote it together, actually.
In post 618, BT wrote:Robocopter do you happen to have reads? Plural.
Fully expecting Robocopter to respond with reads in his next post.
In post 688, Phillammon wrote:As I agreed earler, with you guys on pasch, willing to vote but I'll wait for a count.
Unofficial "Just for You" Count:
In post 614, quadz08 wrote:Votecount 1.4
Paschendale (4): Zeta, Sunshine and Rainbows, AurorusVox, Titan
Paschendale (11): Xeta, Sunshine and Rainbows, AurorusVox, Titan, malpascp, Pandorica, Cheery Dog, Nachomamma8, Noir, Porfervor, BT
Your move.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 701, malpascp wrote:In post 699, Pandorica wrote:Really nice catch Pandorica. Gonna ISO Cheery right away.
You act as if his ISO has anything meaningful in it.
Replacing out like that is annoying as any alignment unfortunately. At least we get to read the replace in.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 704, BT wrote:In post 701, malpascp wrote:Really nice catch Pandorica. Gonna ISO Cheery right away.
You act as if his ISO has anything meaningful in it.
Quote tags.-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Actually malpascp.
In post 530, malpascp wrote:
My vote was kinda random, but either way Pandorica's reaction was really bad. And backfireing at everything is just anti-town.
In post 701, malpascp wrote:Really nice catch Pandorica. Gonna ISO Cheery right away.
P-Edit: haha I'm even cooler.
What's up with this?-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 727, Noir wrote:you know i'm not really confident in paschendale flipping scum. his reactions to getting bw'd just don't seem scummy to me. also faraday's declaration that his replacement request was a scum tell is a load of bullshit
can we please get combinatorial instead
Uhh
In post 692, Paschendale wrote:I legit have no idea how you guys are finding me scummy here. I'm really completely at a loss for how you discern alignment out of a game so stuffed with garbage that nobody even looks like they're trying.
I'll just replace out and you guys can play with someone who understands how these big games work. And I'll probably avoid them in the future. They're not nearly as fun for me as I thought they would be.
Mod: I'd like to be replaced.
It's not bullshit, faraday is right. The first line reads like he's madhe'sthe one who had to be bw'd. That's frustrated scum.
(If Pasch flips scum this is something to look at.)-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
I wasn't being a critic if that's what it sounded like. I justIn post 737, Sunshine and Rainbows wrote:i also support paschendale lynch from what i've read and......... eh i'm really just here to say that no bt, i didn't ask shadoweh "HEY WANT TO HYDRA IN A 30P GAME" just to make her do all the work. more incredibly useful content like this coming whenever i have more time :>kind of likeyour posts is all.
I'd say vig robocopter but at least he has a vote now, uhh Q is a nice target.
Cubix, "actual stuff"? Feel free to show me posts by robocop that talk about something game-relevant that isn't Vifam.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Super concise catching up, leaving out a bunch of stupid remarks (mainly on the scumclaim because all things considered the entire affair (and trying to analyze it) is useless).
Cheery Dog #968 looks lazy (especially the reason for suspecting Nacho) and is bad to begin with because he's doing some weird PoE thing that is usually done by scum. Handwaving no less than half the damn playerlist as town doesn't help his case since it's another scum thing.
Don't know why Cubix clearly saw people wanting to lynch him and decided it'd be a good idea to drop a small update post and go poof.
God there is nothing to talk about. Seriously, I got absolutely nothing out of pages 33-40. I don't know if this is surprising but eh.
AV popping in and out with a crappy post like #1055 puts him in the "would invite to death" pile.
DeasVail going best of two bad lynches in #1058 without naming a, uh, preferred lynch?? is pretty bad. Still unsure about this one though.
And mmm yeah I see Nachotown now.
Sunshine #1070 is actually exactly how I feel about Titan minus the drinks. At least he's posting although townreading every second wagon is kind of boot-to-head worthy really. (the second head is okay) DeasVail is slightly guilty of this too.
I'm fine with the wagons as is I guess?-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Named the same thing twice here.In post 1086, BT wrote:he's doing some weird PoE thing that is usually done by scum. Handwaving no less than half the damn playerlist as town doesn't help his case since it's another scum thing.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
It's not. In this case though it was your reason for voting Nacho. Ultimately your vote was really weak and that's something I attribute to scum.
In post 1088, Cheery Dog wrote:What makes someone be able to go from completely different levels of fuckdom because of one post?
Uh?
In post 1088, Cheery Dog wrote:What is actually wrong with discoounting half the playerlist as possible day one lynches when it's obvious they're not going to be the day 1 lynch? I am not going to whittle my way through 29 other players when most of them have done nothing at all suspicious. If they do happen to do something suspicious (like Titan did) then they can be brought out into the open and investigated further, otherwise they are best left to do their own thing with the people who happen to be the possible day 1 lynches. When we get down to less players (and if I'm somehow still alive) then I will have a complete opinion on everyone, at this stage I find putting aside the better half of the playerlist is a good idea.
I thought they were your townreads? Are they 'not possible d1 lynches' now?-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
I'm pegging it as pretty damn weak. There are plenty of people who've changed opinions in a matter of posts in this very thread, and it's not necessarily a scum move anyway.
Honestly that list looked like you removed most of the notable players and started from there. That is a scum move. (I'm not the first to mention this, in fact.)-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1107, Tazaro wrote:How would you like to try to get 8 people off of you?
Uhh umm
*) buckle up
*) be productive
*) be townie if possible
*) show us a better lynch
There really isn't any reason for people to be swayed by your vote
Also yes
In post 1106, Titan wrote:
This seems forced to me I am now beginning to support where our vote is.In post 1094, Tazaro wrote:What the hell, people. Paschendale was an idiot. Get off my back, and preferably to someone who is voting for Paschendale.
That's what I was talking about by faked rage
I mean obviously you'd be varying degrees of mad as any alignment but that was pushing it
PEdit: Fair enough, he could do better obviously, but it wouldn't be the first time some dumb gimmick poster was town (in fact in my history the vast majority of gimmick posters were town but whatever) and his content isn't actually scummy as far as I can tell-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1181, ActionDan wrote:BT I think your reaction and vote were both bad.
Hell I felt they were bad too, probably because I don't do that sort of thing a lot, and by that sort of thing I mean fish for reactions.
Those posts (both of them) did give me some legit scum vibes though but I wasn't sure and I remembered someone saying something about towntells (apparently that was you) so I... went with it anyway. For the above reason.
That said I FEEL like I should be getting something from his response but nothing is happening. I'll try reading a bit more.
UNVOTE: xtopherusD
VOTE: Tazaro-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1204, malpascp wrote:Guys, lets get this straight. Do you think Tazaro, not Pasch, just Tazaro, is scummy enough to get lynched? I know this is not the only thing to take into account, but it would be nice to know after all why people are going back to that wagon after it lost some steam when Pasch replaced out.
Anything you find weird about that last part?
This made me check your vote. It's still on buldermar.-
-
BT
-
-
BT
-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1415, Titan wrote:Actually the fact you didn't claim before you were hammered makes you prob scum but w/e.
Not to mention the whole nonchalant stage he went through recently.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
VOTE: Cheery Dog
Note that Cheery Dog is conf. not on Tazaro's team (further proof is Pandorica pushing for Cheery Dog while admitting Pasch was bad when the wagon on the latter was starting), as far as conf. goes. Biggest reason for this vote is the reactionary play when and only when his wagon was a possible thing.
I would actually reread the thread but I don't exactly have time to pour into this game for the next while. Minimal contribution will have to do.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Actually yes.
UNVOTE: Cheery Dog
VOTE: Maenara
The only thing I've really done between last post and this one is skim through his ISO. Quantity of comments on how he himself is scummy, which is usually done by scum (scum are more aware of that kind of stuff, like, interested in how town/scum they look). Not to mention #1487 here looks like the common helpful scumbag.
Add to this slight sheeping to Sunshine (and Zdenek, who is town. his "Based on the exchange between Noir and Pandorica around 455, I'd be hesitant to string up Cheery Dog. At this point he's done little to warrant that much attention." is good enough to change vote)-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1491, Porfervor wrote:Zdnek's only post in this game looks like a scum trying too hard to be town look mom im scumhunting
And now I may be able to see this too. Thanks a bunch.
Still, that little thing about Cheery Dog holds water regardless of his alignment.
Will get back to this tomorrow against my better judgement (way too busy for this).-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1516, Maenara wrote:BT, what happened to your vote on xtop ages ago, and why is it not a valid thing today?
Only time I voted xtoph was from when I was undecided and did it for reactions. I'm still undecided.
In post 1520, Maenara wrote:It couldn't be that I said it because of the distancing thing.
Nope.
Not at all.
?-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1524, Maenara wrote:
I see him trying to get a reaction and a read. I see him saying he didn't get one. I don't see why that's not valid now.
Do you see xtoph anywhere? I don't. He was posting at the time (a rare enough occurrence) so I gave him a nudge.
I still don't get what you two are talking about.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1608, Zdenek wrote:
Anyway, I am way more inclined to vote for Cheery Dog than Malpa, so this is a good place to start.
Vote: Cheery Dog
.
In post 1533, Zdenek wrote:Maenara could easily be scum.
[...]
Town because of scum interactions (which might be a really shitty reason to think someone is town, depending on your point of view):
Cheery Dog
[...]
Scum:
maenara, but probably not Batterwitch aligned.
In post 1555, Zdenek wrote:That said, the Noir - Cheery Dog connection seems plausible when laid out like that.
Why are you not voting Maenara.
In post 1612, Robocopter87 wrote:Why is buldermar suddenly acting like a doofus
1) This is not new. 2) You're barely any better.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 1797, Phillammon wrote:In retrospect, this explains a lot about how may pages I had to catch up. I am willing to vote either of CE or malpa right now, convince me that malpa is a bad choice.
Am I expected to assume you don't have an opinion on Maenara/Cheery/Zdenek or what?
I approve of what Fate is doing. Though I would go Maenara ~ Zdenek > Cheery. More on Zdenek when I have the time but he's pretty bad.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Yeeaaah he's scum.
UNVOTE: Maenara
VOTE: Malpascp
Scum posting realizing the wagon isn't going to blow away on its own. Had doubts at first (in no small part due to the people voting it and the case being mostly connections) but not so much now.
Maenara is scum_of_other_color for disappearing like that. Zdenek is also scum and the reason for that is what I pointed out earlier;
*couple of goodposts going places*
"nevermind cheery dog wagon will have to do"
He'd made comments like "Maenara is obviously scum" and said vote (here) was really damn weak in comparison. Almost like he didn't really pay attention to his catchup (oh!).-
-
BT
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
One OTHER reason why we're NOT doing this whole night plan is that it will inevitably derail the game when we start pondering "whyyy didn't this work as planned". And no we can't just assume it WILL work as planned becausewe're not the mod.
Phill's recent thing is a very easy (and not very subtle.....) way to get on a maybe-potentially-viable Cheery wagon. Noted, I guess.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 2256, Phillammon wrote:In post 2254, BT wrote:One OTHER reason why we're NOT doing this whole night plan is that it will inevitably derail the game when we start pondering "whyyy didn't this work as planned". And no we can't just assume it WILL work as planned becausewe're not the mod.
Phill's recent thing is a very easy (and not very subtle.....) way to get on a maybe-potentially-viable Cheery wagon. Noted, I guess.
Could people stop being so passive aggressive about me not having been here and go reread my reads list? This is pointed partially at BT, but there are quite a few people guilty of this.
This isn't "Wagon is possibly viable", this is "Reviewing null read that people are talking about"
Actually, #2244 gave me that specific vibe, but your response + reading it again it's not as bad as I thought it. Carry on.-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
Check the state of the wagons at the time and see if your theory makes any sense. If anything, I was suspicious of Cheery Dog too and I had no reason not to pile on that if my motive was ~counterwagon ho~. xtoph was not a likely lynch and I made that switch for exactly the reason I've stated more than twice now. (which you have linked) Never really left the Kill Tazaro movement.
That said, I was legit curious about your "hah voting pattern" point so much that I took a look at my ISO and found some stuff I forgot about. Like #707.
How is dude not lynched yet?
(It's hard NOT to see the "BFFs with The Felt" case in that post, or, say, his response.)-
-
BT Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 743
- Joined: June 30, 2012
In post 2327, Sanjay wrote:How do you feel about xtoph now?
You know that one guy you always promise to read but never get to? He's that guy. Though, from what I recall of his posts today, I'm feeling better about him.
In post 2399, Sanjay wrote:Sorry, everyone else on the BT wagon! I know this feels like kind of a betrayal. I hope we can still be friends.
You're the first person to touch me this game. It's cool though!
... And you guys start an AVox wagon. Why. It's like every other wagon choice has more backing it up. Lynch someone else. Like Maenara, or, you know, MALP.
Zdenek is terrible by the way and Fate's case wasn't terrible so I don't know what the fuck. Look at his jump on AVox too. Are you guys blind.
Let's make one thing clear, though.
We are lynching Malp today.
Also.
Give me ONE good PROPERLY REASONED and LOGICAL reason to let this guy live another ONE day.
Also.
Give me ONE good PROPERLY REASONED and LOGICAL reason to lynch ANYONE ELSE, in partuclar AVOX first.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-