In post 2011, Thestatusquo wrote:In post 2008, Slandaar wrote:I don't count lyncher as scum sorry TSQ.
Ignoring that I'm referencing 2 games, huh?
Same applies to SK.
Good job.
In post 2011, Thestatusquo wrote:In post 2008, Slandaar wrote:I don't count lyncher as scum sorry TSQ.
Ignoring that I'm referencing 2 games, huh?
In post 1468, Slandaar wrote:
You will need to show this.
---
And this.
I mean everyone knows it is just made up nonsense.
In post 1472, Slandaar wrote:Oh and don't be intimidated just provide the quotes requested. They exist, right?
In post 1484, Slandaar wrote:Why are you writing a wall saying nothing instead of producing what is requested?
In post 1486, Slandaar wrote:Actually I want 4 quotes.
But you seem to be trying your hardest to avoid producing.
In post 1488, Slandaar wrote:You have said numerous things which are blatantly untrue.
This is an issue.
Produce the quotes.
In post 1490, Slandaar wrote:No-one is going to fall for this I mean the longer you delay the worse it looks for you but then... you can't produce the required quotes.
What a bad position you find yourself in.
In post 1711, Varsoon wrote:Also, Slandaar, I only skimmed the thread.
My points on you were pretty much all misinformed, as I clumped up a lot of the ideas I had about multiple players onto ones about you.
I probably lied a bunch in there.
But it was really funny, and you took it really seriously, which made it funnier.
In post 1738, Slandaar wrote:You have trashed this thread lying and misrepping me knowing full well you are doing it.
Why would town do this again Varsoon?
Why would town try to mislynch someone with lies and misreps?
Do explain.
In post 2000, Varsoon wrote:It doesn't matter if you're 'purposefully doing it'.
You PURPOSEFULLY posted that you NEVER have the highest post-count as Scum.
If it's just a point in your meta, then let it just be a point in your meta.
We discussed this.
In post 1703, Varsoon wrote:In post 1500, Varsoon wrote:In post 1246, Slandaar wrote:I understand perfectly.
YOU do not have a clue what you are saying.
In post 1243, Thestatusquo wrote:"town people care about the alignment of the people they're lynching and scum players do not."
How does this generic statement apply to me?
The why.
The why is this:
In post 1061, Thestatusquo wrote:UGH. NO. Saki is just being saki. Which is terrible, but not alignment indicative. I don't believe you don't know this.
In post 1095, Thestatusquo wrote:I know saki plays like that and I have played roughly 4 games in the last 4 years. If you don't know and you've been on this site for any meaningful period of time, then you're blind.
I don't know Saki.
I told TSQ this, he doesn't care because he is scum.
In post 1095, Thestatusquo wrote:And, you know, this might just be me, but when I'm attacking someone for meta stuff I... I don't know, ask people about their meta?
Meta stuff.
What is meta stuff about lying and nitpicking? these are not meta arguments. I am not going to meta someone when they have lied to me in the way Saki did.
That's TSQ's entire case debunked in seconds.
Now, why TSQ is scum: he didn't meta me while accusing me of not metaing Saki for NON META RELATED THINGS.
His entire argument about me relies on meta that I will continue to dismiss as nitpicking. It's stupid.
Have a nice day.
The bolded part was never a part of your post 1246!
You keep insisting that you're reading what I write but whenIyou never noticed.misrepresent what you said,literally
It's hilarious!
In post 2076, Varsoon wrote:He dismissed any push he didn't agree with on D1 as 'nitpicking'.
In post 1459, Slandaar wrote:In post 1453, Varsoon wrote:then rely on meta-game knowledge to make your Saki push
This gem
VOTE: Varsoon
Where did I use meta knowledge to lynch Saki?
In post 2137, Seohyun wrote:what's the difference between claiming mason and claiming vt? plus, it seems like you lied so...
In post 2146, Thestatusquo wrote:Ooh you already got hammered.
Good.
Welcome to my blacklist, regardless of which alignment you are.
In post 2151, Varsoon wrote:Furthermore, the accusation was more along the lines of you being manipulative of meta in order to leverage a lynch on Saki.
In post 2348, vezokpiraka wrote:Start listening to other people.
In post 2352, Team 9 wrote:He was just applying the one of the most common town fallacy of "wrong = scum"
In post 2348, vezokpiraka wrote:
but you had to go after Saki. I thoufht you bussed nf then deflected. What was that all about?
In post 2348, vezokpiraka wrote:
Also team9 was so obviously scum. The only reason they hadn't gotten lynched was because of flames and slandaar.
In post 2347, Varsoon wrote:Well, yeah, I'll try to lie less in the future (even when joking).
I didn't mind so much that you forgot your case, but that you were saying that that I was scum because you forgot your case.
In post 2376, Not_Mafia wrote:So, I can 'explain' everything else, but why out the mason. Not that it wasn't clear but why?
In post 2401, Saki wrote:I'm sorry I had to quit this game being a complete asshole and tool