In post 1541, Psyche wrote:</3
what are you moping about? she talked quite a bit about you
In post 1541, Psyche wrote:</3
In post 1550, estival wrote:Why is honeybee a loser? I looked at her ISO and she had a couple of "will catch up" or "hard to get into this" posts which always ping me as off as well as the general lurkering.
In post 1550, estival wrote:Also why don't you tell me what your reads of theamateur and aristophanes are?
In post 1554, estival wrote:Although let me ask you how certain you are about heartless as town. I read the seraphim in ISO which was extremely long and seraphim talks and talks and talks but it seemed like there was some reason he wasn't 100% sure about heartless's claim. He did change to heartless being scum being slim I think but I'm not seeing the confirm town for anyone at this point since its a bastard setup. Except the dead of course.
In post 1564, pirate mollie wrote:that is a very large town list coming from paranoid freak you
In post 1563, Heartless wrote:town: 4nxi3ty, Aristophanes,Bookitty,Boonskiies, Cheetory6,Honey bee,Jackel98,Marquis,mastin2, pirate mollie, Psyche,Reina, Seraphim, theamatuer,Varsoon
In post 1576, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1574, Heartless wrote:Here's your hydra dissonance, estival.
In post 1563, Heartless wrote:town: 4nxi3ty, Aristophanes,Bookitty,Boonskiies, Cheetory6,Honey bee,Jackel98,Marquis,mastin2, pirate mollie, Psyche,Reina, Seraphim, theamatuer,Varsoon
Bolded are reads I either disagree with or don't think the evidence is there for.
can you plz walk me through why you think honeybee might be scum but anti has them as town?
In post 1616, estival wrote:Heartless seems to be the Big Dog or Cerebrus so why would Seraphim as scum go against him when he's got so much support?
In post 960, Seraphim wrote:For the record, I was demotivated last night which means roleblock maybe? I didn't use any actions.
VOTE: theamatuer
The party continues.
In post 1628, Honey bee wrote:You have to realize tho those are two different types of things. One of those is an item, the other is a modifier. How can you modify something that didn't happen?
In post 1771, Cheetory6 wrote:@Heartless,
Can you explain to me why you were okay with pressure on Sera dropping?
I'm looking at your ISO and I don't get it.
Why is he town now?
Also, what's your stance on gilgamesh at this point?
In post 1841, pirate mollie wrote:I already kind of want to start crying myself as well gauge my eyeballs with a very dull butter knife and then rip out my own intestines and hang myself with them.
In post 1862, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1858, Heartless wrote:mollie, are you townreading Bookitty? Why?
she is in the town pile for the time being. is it just her entrance on d1 or is there more to it than that.
In post 1872, Bookitty wrote:@Heartless:
I have been trying to figure this game out. I'm not sure why that would ping you but I honestly don't care. What you said made sense and I've explained several times why I believed you about Farside based both on the events we know for sure and my own impression of Farside's play.
Mollie was right about Ika and that firmed up a previous gut townread I had on her. Your claim and my belief that you were targeted by bulletproof scum last night -- that along with your play Day One was my reason for townreading you. I haven't been secretive or provided trumped up reasons for my reads.
I hate it when I make an effort in a game and then people point to that as a reason to scumread me. In this game, I am pretty sure I'm not going to be lynched regardless of vague gutreads from you or anyone else. I don't understand what you want to push me on; I'm providing all the information I can at every point that I can. What do you want me to respond to? I had no idea why Shaft was being pushed until Mollie clued us in about her neighbourhood; I thought it was another lurker lynch. Why would I immediately sheep a wagon I didn't understand? Yes, Mollie is a town read; that doesn't make her infallible. I agreed with her about Ika for reasons I can't yet talk about, but I never agreed to proxy my vote to her for the whole game.
In post 1872, Bookitty wrote:As far as I recall I have one completed game with Anti in which I was scum. You can verify this with him. Scum won that game. I don't recall getting any special treatment and I surely didn't see the behaviour you're accusing him of exhibiting. I'm not doubting you that he's done that; I'm saying you're making all kinds of assumptions without any real basis for them imo.
In post 1872, Bookitty wrote:Did you ever read my ISO? I said I'd be happy for you to do that. So far your argument is that I'm not sheeping Mollie enough somehow and that I was fluttering my eyelashes at Anti. Guilty of the first, for sure, but I plead innocent to the second.
In post 1873, pirate mollie wrote:well I am falling for shaft's aTe in the hood which is very mild but he sounds so defeatist it is making me feel bad. so i think it is more that anti genuinely doesn't want to be a dick to some1 as likeable as boo. can you point me to the posts where she did that tho?
In post 1907, Bookitty wrote:Heartless has to believe that a bulletproof or a doctor was responsible for the survival of whomever shot them. Yet they seem to have abandoned this idea and are pushing suspicions elsewhere.
In post 1925, pirate mollie wrote:@ tth
it sounds like you and anti just differ on reads. I didn't flirt with him in our game I mean I signed all my posts "I love nacho" or "iln". it sounds like he just goes soft on the players he likes.
In post 1873, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1865, Heartless wrote:In post 1862, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1858, Heartless wrote:mollie, are you townreading Bookitty? Why?
she is in the town pile for the time being. is it just her entrance on d1 or is there more to it than that.
There are things that arejustoff.
She's going to great lengths to talk about how much she believes us about farside's invention and that's making me paranoid. There's also the recent behavior around the swirling Shaft and estival wagons. She's been working with you this whole time with her votes, which would make sense if you were town reading each other and trying to work more efficiently at game solving. Given that, it's weird she didn't acknowledge the Shaft wagon you're championing and went straight for a policy lynch vote on estival (Post 1833). That's an anomaly.
Another thing that really pinged me was the way she responded to Antihero a while back in Post 1319. When Anti outlined vague gut suspicion of her, she wentstraightfor Anti's weak spot: guilt. One way I've seen scum try to shake Anti off their trail is to play on his shame and make him feel like a dick for pushing them. Irritatingly he usually backs off, especially if the person is question happens to have two X chromosomes . The most recent example where I had this problem was with Anti and Titus in Open 581. That game made me go on an hour long tirade about which parts of his brain he was thinking with and why he was falling for Titus' stupid AtE. I thought he learned his lesson, but I guess old habits die hard.
If Bookitty has experience with Anti or his hydras, which she indicated she did in Post 1553, she knows which of his buttons to push. The paranoid part of me says it's a manipulative ploy.
well I am falling for shaft's aTe in the hood which is very mild but he sounds so defeatist it is making me feel bad. so i think it is more that anti genuinely doesn't want to be a dick to some1 as likeable as boo. can you point me to the posts where she did that tho?
I am looking at the 2 wagons on d1 and they are pretty interesting. ika was lynched with 13 votes while what comes closest to a competing wagon is shaft at 4. so i am guessing there was a bit of bussing going on? of the 4 on shaft far flipped town while on ika bulge flipped town. I find the lack of a proper cs to be very interesting.
In post 1959, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1953, Heartless wrote:ok
bottom line
do you think we should lynch one of bro or sera b/c of it?
y/n
i say n
not today.
I just checked back over estuvia's posts and i am kind of seeing what is talking about with the rapid shift in tone. tempted to sheep gamma cos it will firm up a read. thing is they are claiming vengeful in which no1 is really gonna wanna hammer that unless we are pretty convinced that he is scum and if he is town scum aren't going near it. so its ugh but I feel like his role that I don't mind pl-ing and I am back to waffling on the read just cos of that shift in mood in when it clearly wasn't serving him.
In post 1979, Reina wrote:Heartless I don't mean any of this personally.
In post 2064, pirate mollie wrote:the biggest red flag was from anti where he said that there wld be a protective role for each faction when at the time I was looking at only 3 kills and 1 attempted. sk, pgo, vig and then scum. but there seems to be this weird anticipation of multiple deaths when the d2 op does not point to that. but the weird assumption of multiple protective roles kind of does!
In post 2002, Pirate Ika wrote:I am most likely going to vote with reina cos it is rare that reina reaches out like this and I see what he is saying. I am not exactly dazzled by estuvia's post or reasoning there is a weird cog-dis to them but again, I find it common from people from that play group.
I find it funny how estuvia keeps discrediting reina in the most bizarre ways. I think estuvia is suffering from played-5-gamitis which fits from his viewpoints.
it is the rapid mood changes that is baking my noodle. estuvia was called for getting all meltydowney, got defensive about it and then changed their approach and instantly tried to appear more reasonable. to me this points to a more self-conscious survivalistic mindset which in my opinion is scummy. I see this come a lot from newbs tho but I am just leanig scumy at this point.
I am not as confident as I was about shaft. he basically just gave up as he was catching up in the thread and I am not used to seeing such defeatism in shaft and I have seen more of his scum games than his town games. he basically was just like, "you do what you feel like you need to do". cos i was talking about being transparent about our convos. I am just going to give him a bit of time.
anyhoo that is where I am at.
In post 2070, mastin2 wrote:(1979)
Heartless.
Reina.
You're both beautiful.
Shaft's scum.
estival's probscum.
They're both likely scum, neither is a scumdriven counterwagon to the other, we have a rare scumVscum situation.
Now make up and kiss.
In post 2064, pirate mollie wrote:it just seems like some pple have inside knowledge of set up design that i don't have.
the biggest red flag was from anti where he said that there wld be a protective role for each faction when at the time I was looking at only 3 kills and 1 attempted. sk, pgo, vig and then scum. but there seems to be this weird anticipation of multiple deaths when the d2 op does not point to that. but the weird assumption of multiple protective roles kind of does!
okay I need a break.
In post 2066, Heartless wrote:In post 2064, pirate mollie wrote:the biggest red flag was from anti where he said that there wld be a protective role for each faction when at the time I was looking at only 3 kills and 1 attempted. sk, pgo, vig and then scum. but there seems to be this weird anticipation of multiple deaths when the d2 op does not point to that. but the weird assumption of multiple protective roles kind of does!
there are so many things wrong with this.....
>i never said there would be a protective for each faction. in fact, sk didn't get a protective. i said spread across all factions
>d2 op has 3 deaths, i have no idea what you're talking about in the rest of the post
i have no idea what you're getting weird with me over b/c what i said was pretty straightforward
In post 2082, pirate mollie wrote:because it is the shittiest argument in the world that the reason there are so many protective roles are cos we have 27 players and critic cld not come up with anything else. it is the exact same argument anti used and all you managed to do it is prettify it up with different words but the shitty premise is the same. when i pressed anti he never really addressed my point all he did was avoid and deflect.
I have played critic's games before and 1 thing I know for sure is that they do not lack creativity. so why is there this assumption of a bunch of protective roles running around other than the claimed 1s? I mean the "sheer volume" argument does not get anymore specious.
In post 2078, Heartless wrote:I respectfully disagree and I'll walk through it a little more when I have time to write a longer post.
In post 2137, pirate mollie wrote:for some strange reason that I cannot fathom I am so good with this lynch right now.
In post 2144, Cheetory6 wrote:I thought you wanted Shaft lynch?
If you do you should actually make a case like you promised three days ago.
In post 2157, Cheetory6 wrote:I honestly am getting a little wary of you Heartless. For reasons that are probably obvious.
If estival is town then I wouldn't mind a check on Heartless for sanity's sake.
In post 2163, pirate mollie wrote:In post 2160, Heartless wrote:In post 2157, Cheetory6 wrote:I honestly am getting a little wary of you Heartless. For reasons that are probably obvious.
If estival is town then I wouldn't mind a check on Heartless for sanity's sake.
Why, because of the supersaint thing or because you don't think I can get a town read right?
worried?
In post 2170, Cheetory6 wrote:Are you townreading estival, Heartless?
In post 2183, vonflare wrote:
Me?
What does jfc mean?
In post 2187, vonflare wrote:In post 2182, estival wrote:Oh fuck vonflare,
I was an Unlynchable.
I would be unvoted. You fucktard.
I was gambiting because I know scum won't hammer with the supersaint fear.
FFS everyone in this game who voted me shit town or scum.
Hah the dayvig was fake, and I believe you are town after that reaction.
In post 2193, Cheetory6 wrote:Could call people on it dumb? Could call me dumb? IDK.Heartless wrote:Yes, and I don't know what more you want me to do regarding this wagon
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Is there any reason to not test if she's full of shit on this unlynchable thing right now?