WiFom City: Don't Trust Titus - GAME OVER
-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Yeah, sorry, I didn't mean to say I wasn't going to try. I just wanted it to be known that I'm not even going to try to setup spec and acknowledge that this might make me prone to being manipulated but I think I'm a good enough player to recognize when that's happening.
I guess SK multiball wouldn't be as bad as We are the Purple was. >_>-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
PAGES 1-5
17 by Mastin...seems an awful lot like setting up a narrative for how long she will stick around like she knows her play will be scummy and won’t be nightkill worthy, etc, etc. Initial gut scum read. This is also the first time I’ve ever seen her say her reads might not be good which I’m not sure how to take as either alignment. >_> Later she says my team instead of town...
25 by Bulb doesn’t really acknowledge why he thinks Mastin is town which is normally fine but since I feel the opposite it feels unnatural for towncred.
26 by Quoth...actually explains the read on Mastin and while I still disagree it feels like a town explanation due to the inherent meta layers involved to come to that read.
62 by TBB but@mod...is it possible to get a separate quote when answering setup design/role related questions to make it easier to find?
66 by TBB...knowing why someone’s being voted but it being ”too obvious to sheep” seems like wanting to withhold credit for bussing a buddy while delaying the actual bussing as long as possible...alternatively encouraging someone’s incorrect read on someone while avoiding a mislynch. Gut scum read here that does not have any baring on TriforceP’s alignment.
Followed by 69 for seemingly no reason after mild encouragement from Oversoul...
Followed by BURDEN OF PROOF geezus fuck this guy is scum.
104 and 105 by ZZZX...you really need to stop trying to prove how awesome of a player you are. Until you stop having at least an equal amount of games that put you in endgame as still a wild card, and people start agreeing, it’s never going to be true.
106 by TBB...that hydra dissonance I sure do love!
107 by PV...seriously? The question thing is the most suspicious thing you’ve found so far?? Seems like an easy vote park...
121 by TriforceP...no follow-up now that you’ve determined RVS is “about” over (hint: it was over like on p2). Why unvote?
Scum reads so far are Mastin and TBB. Town reads are Quoth...well that's it so far but that's acknowledge there needs to be followup by some people.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
PAGES 6-10
135 by BF...picks up on the same thing I did with TriforceP’s unvote/out of RVS statement. Shows town line of thinking.
140 by Mastin...WTF WHY DO PEOPLE FEEL LIKE THEY NEED TO PROJECT A DIFFERENCE IN PLAY. I thought it was a scumtell from Titus in S&V but I just saw it from townNacho in Saki mafia, so I’m gunna try not to let this conbias me...
153 by TBB...big reads list that doesn’t make much of an impression on me...until the bottom! He does that “encouraging” thing that scum like to do when they’re trying to look productive. What bothers me is that he said “we’re 7 pages in with little to no hunting yet” which is pretty untrue! There have been plenty of reads discussed so it’s like...how can you even think that? Seems like trying to hard to look pro-town to me...
154 by Drixx...this is 100% protown. The only worry I have is that it could be baiting a JK to ensure the rest of their scumteam doesn’t get caught, but I highly doubt that with the way it was worded. I really like this for town. @Drixx, did you discuss claiming this with ZZZX? Why didn’t he mention it before?
157 by PV...nailed the hypothetical issue I thought he could’ve had with Atum. I actually missed Atum’s response to PV, but the wording of it seems awkwardly pretentious and fake. Slight scum read on Atum.
171 by Drixx...I didn’t really have an issue with you bringing up the trust tell thing until now, probably mostly because I just assumed you were town regardless, but this seems out of place. You’re commenting on him saying a fact, as in, mastin has literally only ever seen him play as one alignment, not “oh I only play like this as one alignment” so your bottom line of “I didn’t expect to be scumread for being helpful” pings my scum-trying-to-be-helpful radar. Stahp.
172 by TBB...ugh, Idon’tlike that I just agreed with everything TBB said...
If I didn’t know any better, I’d take elusive’s abrasiveness as a scumtell. Unfortunately it’s null.
224 by Maxwell...what’s the thing elusive’s doing that you don’t like and how does it affect your read on him?
228 by TriforceP...noting this later for if either of them flip scum.
244 by Grib...could you...give any more insight on elusive being town? I agree that he’s being attacked more for playstyle but his content is neutral to me so what’s your experience with him and why do you think he’s town?
249 by elusive...the Klingon scumread kind of came out of thin air after her vote on you. What made Klingon’s vote on you more scummy than anyone else’s thus far?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
So I just noticed this in my catchup, but...
What's the difference between this:In post 791, elusive wrote:Oh and to clarify I mean a real reads list,not an OMGUS I put everyone in my wagon as scumfor the SCUM LOLZ
And this:
In post 249, elusive wrote:Klingon scummy asf and I need to look at those interactions becausescum love to wagon mefor not playing like a robot.
Also, have you ever noticed that OMGUS more often comes from town than scum? Scum realize they've been caught, so it's easier for town to accuse the people of being wrong about them than scum trying to throw shade on people they know are right.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
vote: elusive
This is 100% policy.
I'm still reading up and don't have a strong read on elusive one way or another so I really don't care enough to prevent a lynch on him at this point.
PB don't replace out, just lynch him so you don't have to deal with his shit anymore and maybe he'll learn something about how we play on this site in a civilized world.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 876, Grib wrote:Stop. We are not wasting a lynch on obvious town.
What about on an obvious white-knight?
Like, seriously? I've only read ten pages, but have been trying to keep up with the added pages since I replaced in, and this is like the second or third time there's been serious issues made of elusive's play.
Are you opposed to policy lynches? Is this really creating a conducive scumhunting environment? It's selfish play and self-serving, regardless of alignment, it's anti-town.
I just got out of We are the Purple Mafia with Wisdom where he was literally just spamming shit and making the game miserable for everyone to the point of apathy, and his scum team ended up winning. I don't want that to be the case here, because obviously if he's town scum will never kill him, and it's an easy distraction cover for an SK. If he's scum even better.
I see literally no downside to policy lynching elusive at this point, especially if it means players like PB would stay in the game instead.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
I've always advocated policy lynches, for exactly this reason.
I see no reason to report behavior I can advocate not being a part of this site's meta through . You can't really bait me into taking action myself, though, since I can't do that in a game I'm currently play.
You can keep trying to exaggerate why you're being wagoned right now. It won't do you any good.
This is also all I'll say on the matter. I don't want to encourage more negative utility in the game more than has already been done. You can just deal with the hand you asked for.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 881, elusive wrote:Oh and singersinger is just on something because this is page 10:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=225
You haven't read but you feel the need to comment? Oh cool. You haven't read and you and Prolapsed feel the need to defend KC slot. Oh cool. I asked you simple questions and instead of answering you advocate a policy lynch. Oh cool. So damn town. It's a wonder.
Calling the scum team-> KlingonCelt, SingerSinger (replaced scum Persivul who's replace out had nothing to do with me since this isn't the only game where he's done that out of some issues), and with an outside chance of : Prolapsed, Gumball.
I'm not actively defending the slot. I'm pointing out the inconsistency in your words and actions which wasn't about KC's alignment, it was about yours. I also explained that I was trying to keep up with recent posts, so when I posted that particular catchup, you had recently posted the inconsistency I saw.
I only asked you a question you seem to have avoided; I wasn't even accusing you of anything until now, so...I'm not even sure how you got that out of my post...?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 884, elusive wrote:singer, [snip] I mean as a Mod maybe you should investigate unfair or lopsided Mod decisions in games but you're not going to do that, are you?
We can talk more about this after the game, but we allow mods to use their discretion within reason to make the decision they feel is best for their games. If that's something you disagree with, please address your concerns/complaints to the relevant LM or site mod.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 800, singersigner wrote:So I just noticed this in my catchup, but...
What's the difference between this:In post 791, elusive wrote:Oh and to clarify I mean a real reads list,not an OMGUS I put everyone in my wagon as scumfor the SCUM LOLZ
And this:
In post 249, elusive wrote:Klingon scummy asf and I need to look at those interactions becausescum love to wagon mefor not playing like a robot.
Also, have you ever noticed that OMGUS more often comes from town than scum? Scum realize they've been caught, so it's easier for town to accuse the people of being wrong about them than scum trying to throw shade on people they know are right.
I asked you what the difference was between those two posts. How you feel it's difference between your circumstance and KC's.
I assumed you weren't answering it because you referenced back to the fact that "I haven't read but need to comment" because I was asking clarification on something, and pointed out an observation I've noticed more in town than scum. Again, this wasn't more so about KC's alignment, it was about discerning yours. Instead you said I was high on something which didn't address the issue at all.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 886, elusive wrote:You haven't answered my questions.
So...where are the questions you expect me to address? The backhanded one about not refuting the case you brought up on KC that I haven't read yet? Or the one about my definition of "civilized" which was clearly just trying to bait me down a tunnel I refuse to go down with you.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 892, elusive wrote:singer, you can't answer any questions until you read instead of baiting me. Considering you played with me in Ori and stuff, I can't imagine why you would think that was okay.
Think what was ok?
How am I baiting you? (don't think I didn't notice you throwing that word back in my face )-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 896, elusive wrote:Even this conversation, singer is you avoiding reading the game. So why don't you catch up. Then you can do this (in case you miss it):
1. What are your reads or general thoughts about players?
2. What are your specific reads or thoughts about mastin vs. KC and gumball's soft defense of KC.
3. What are your thoughts on Bulbazoar the main wagon and the people scum or town reading him?
Is that reasonable?
Noted to come back to.
Do you believe that these current interactions and reads I'm trying to develop as the game goes should just be discounted until I've caught up? Because I don't.
I'm also not planning on reading much of this game tonight because I kind of just don't want to. I put a lot of effort into catching up and try to do so without also falling behind, so disagreeing with the way I'm doing it and attacking me for it serves no purpose other than to try to make me look scummy when I'm not.
I'm sure you can guess how I feel about people who try to make me look scummy when I'm not.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 778, singersigner wrote:Scum reads so far are Mastin and TBB. Town reads are Quoth...well that's it so far but that's acknowledge there needs to be followup by some people.
Also, my catchup posts should answer your first question, and this should've already answered your second (except the part about gumball). The third isn't game relevant where I am right now because there's no wagon on him, and since I've replaced in I've only seen mild comments about Bulb so...guess I'll get to that when I get to it.-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 902, elusive wrote:In post 900, singersigner wrote:When did KC refuse to do anything until Mastin responded to her?
I'm sorry but am I going to shortcut the game for you? Or are you going to catch up? Because wow.
Maybe ISO KC.
I find that town are more willing to point you in the direction they need you to look because they just want people to make informed decisions and are willing to do whatever it takes to get someone to see their point of view. Scum like to be stubborn and antagonistic in order to create chaos that can be used as triggers for future "scumreads."
That being said, I've been very transparent about where I am and what I'm doing to catch up, so either I missed this conversation with Mastin/KC (doubt it), or it came after where I was, and you're purposefully trying to make it seem like I'm not paying attention.
Do you not see the issue I have with you claiming that I'm singling you out when I finished Page 10 that ended with a post by you, and as I posted that particular quote, you had literally within a few posts of that catchup post, posted something I felt was different. Why do you insist on being abrasive and unwilling to reason? How does that help anyone read you?
(hint: this is what I saw from Wisdom in the Purple game. He attacked me for not being caught up while still trying to keep up, claiming I was asking questions that I "had no intention of following up on" or "could've been answered if I'd just read the thread" when I was just trying to engage myself in a game I'd fallen behind on)-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 904, elusive wrote:Ok so Bulbazoar wagon has died down (cool singersinger hadn't read the game but somehow knew that, cool cool cool).
Ok, Abed.
But in all seriousness, Bulb wasn't a wagon by page 10. You asked me to comment on the Bulb wagon and as of page 10 there wasn't one.What part of that was unclear?
Like, you either want me to comment on the current Bulb wagon not caught up which how am I supposed to do that, or catch up and comment on the nonexistent Bulb wagon which woah wait if you've been reading the game how did you not know it died down??? So...if the current Bulb wagon isn't the Bulb wagon you think it is it's not as bad except if I mysteriously knew it wasn't a Bulb wagon because it just so happened to not have been a wagon at the point that was relevant to me and the game state say whaaat.
Geezus fuck, this is Wisdom all fucking over again.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 908, elusive wrote:Singer, you defended the KC slot and are now turning a policy lynch into a scum read. You are scum and so is KC. Thanks for making that easy.
As for being helpful, I asked you several questions and instead of answering them you said you didn't have time and would catch with the rest of the game when you had time. Yet you 1. Knew that the wagon on Bulbazoar had gone down and 2. Again, will do anything to defend the KC slot.
I don't help people who don't answer my questions but instead fake reads.
Muffin, where is your vote right now. Also I am playing the game.
You didn't even read my catchup posts and now you're accusing me of faking my reads and not properly answering your questions even though I only failed to answer one due to my being behind?
And...how am I defending the KC slot again? Because I don't think you've made your own personal narrative clear enough for me.-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
For posterity so I can rub it in later:In post 912, elusive wrote:In post 900, singersigner wrote:When did KC refuse to do anything until Mastin responded to her?
That is called a soft defense. Since its nominally easy to ISO a player and find the exact post (she hasn't posted much overall anyway). This is either a delaying tactic or a annoy a player tactic.
I asked you three questions which you said you wouldn't answer until later because of etc. How dare you accuse me of not reading when that's what your past few posts have been about? Am I asking you about your catchup posts or did I specify three questions that I would like the answer to once you've caught up? Which you claim you won't do until another day but you have no issue continuing to respond to me right now instead of catching up and doing me the courtesy of responding to my questions. Or do you refuse that common town courtesy?
Don't avoid the obvious. If you need to refer to a game, please refer to Ori where we both played. Or my Wiki is pretty up to date with complete games, town and scum.
1. I literally just wanted you to direct me to it because ISOing on phones is hard and frustrating without ctrl f.
2. Apparently you missed the post where I actually did answer the questions, and even quoted myself for you instead of making you look back. You didn't specify that you wanted my opinion once I caught up so I gave you what I had at the time. You're also either ignoring or don't believe me when I say I take catching up seriously, so I actually want to be able to sit at a computer and take the time to do it properly.
3. I honestly don't remember much about Ori except the Metal Sonic drama. I tend to block scum games out of my memory as I'm not as invested in them.
Anyway, I'm sorry for your replacement because I'm pretty solid on my scumread of you now. Womp womp.
Anyway, s-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Objectively speaking, it was a good policy lynch because of the wifom he was creating. Though I don't condone them as much in minis, especially not outside of D1.
Why do you have such a townread on elusive/incoming? What do you think of the most recent conversation?-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Bulbazoor wrote:That is a bad comparison. Players s tyle of play are different. Not one player is the same in this game.
That's not what I'm comparing. I'm asking them to look at the similarities behind the actions that were clearly scum motivated. Like, Wisdom created a narrative that I wasn't paying attention and didn't have intent of finding scum, and elusive did the same thing. Yes, those are mutually exclusive from the players themselves, but consistent within alignments as far as the anti-town motivation goes.
Also, I know it was originally directed at Grib but can you also answer my question about why you're town-reading elusive?
Quoth The Pidgeon wrote:Wisdom himself said that he was being that way in wtp2 to "fake his town meta".
And people let him get away with that?? Wtf.
I hate this site meta so fucking much right now.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 936, Bulbazoor wrote:I do not get why scum would react the way she did. That would bring attention to her slot. It is a weak read mostly gut.
How did it turn from an "obvious town" read to a "weak read mostly gut"?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 941, Bulbazoor wrote:But you are still scum.
Wait, seriously?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 944, Bulbazoor wrote:Yes. Perse was scummy. What was the need of a site flake?
Are you even listening to yourself right now?
First of all "site flake" is the very definition of null and not alignment indicative so how you're trying to read anything from that is beyond me.
Second of all...well I don't care was perse did but did you even read anything that just transpired over the last few pages? Because I feel like you didn't.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 948, Bulbazoor wrote:I read you trying to compare two totally different players.
...and?
So you can do one of three things:
1. say you disagree with me but you understand where my motivations are coming from.
2. say you disagree with me and you don't understand why I feel this way and it's scum motivated becaaause....'x'.
3. make a semi-factual statement, disregarding my own commentary on the matter about how it's not the players themselves, but the actions the players took which are parallel and scum motivated, without commenting on how it makes you feel except that somehow you're deducing I'm scum because of it question mark. (I see you've chosen this route but I'd love for you to open doors number one or two)-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 950, Bulbazoor wrote:Well. What was the overall point?
What do you mean what was the overall point?
Point of what, my interaction with him?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
I'm honestly not sure if you're fucking with me at this point.
I was in the middle of catching up, had taken a break, kept up with the current thread, called elusive out on a potential inconsistency that he didn't like (or explain before he got defensive), started getting into a conversation with him where he started accusing me of being scum because I wasn't caught up yet and singled him out when it was obvious it was because he just so happened to be the last posts I read both on page ten and when I posted my catchup, etc. He started reminding me of arguing with Wisdom in the Purple game, who I caught as scum based on the scum motivated of Wisdom's posting, accusing me of doing the same things which just looks like a default scum push, so I related it to elusive who then got up in arms about how I clearly wasn't reading and how could I relate him to someone else's meta when it's the action not the person and akldsjhnbalskdgjbagd how is no one seeing this??-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Because Titus originally invited me be a part of the game in the original playerlist but I didn't want to have too many commitments so I told her to put me on the replacement list. Then she solicited me as a replacement right when Saki mafia was winding down so I figured I'd end one and begin another.
Why?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Muffin wrote:In post 954, singersigner wrote:I'm honestly not sure if you're fucking with me at this point.
I was in the middle of catching up, had taken a break, kept up with the current thread, called elusive out on a potential inconsistency that he didn't like (or explain before he got defensive), started getting into a conversation with him where he started accusing me of being scum because I wasn't caught up yet and singled him out when it was obvious it was because he just so happened to be the last posts I read both on page ten and when I posted my catchup, etc. He started reminding me of arguing with Wisdom in the Purple game, who I caught as scum based on the scum motivated of Wisdom's posting, accusing me of doing the same things which just looks like a default scum push, so I related it to elusive who then got up in arms about how I clearly wasn't reading and how could I relate him to someone else's meta when it's the action not the person and akldsjhnbalskdgjbagd how is no one seeing this??
So, I find the argument you're making a little confusing. Let me try to explain it to you, and then you tell me if I've got what you're saying correct, k?
You're saying in some other game, Wisdom (who was scum), attacked you for making comments/observations about recent events despite not having read the entire thread.
You're saying elusive did the same thing here.
You're saying this is indicative of elusive scum?
Honestly I find that pretty weak.
Well when you put it that way yeah it doesn't sound all that great but in my head it was like so ridiculously parallel that it just seemed like a lightbulb aha moment that it's really easy for scum to push buttons when they know they can get to someone. I can count on one hand the number of people who as town get under my skin as much as Wisdom did that game, elusive was doing here, my first and only ever replace out due to scum, and countless other interactions I've only now started to understand as coming mostly from scum because it means they're manipulating the game.
Basically I saw elusive twisting the facts only she felt were relevant (conveniently overlooking anything else or repeating it was scummy in order to reinforce that idea in the rest of everyone's head), in order to fit her narrative without acknowledging the bigger picture. Only scum feel the need to do that because they can't win otherwise.-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 996, Oversoul wrote:Singer, have you supported policy lynches in other games? If so, links plz
I have! But because I do it almost every time I have a chance, I'm gunna use the fancy search option and find one for you since I can't think of one off the top of my head that are't ongoing.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
PAGES 11-15
255 by Mastin...what’s the point in giving a reads list if you think it sucks?
260 (and 270) by elusive...yeah, yeah, I know she’s not in the game anymore, but I noticed another discrepancy in the way she interacts with people: “answer them if you’re town and like to be cooperative.” Then she turns around and insists on not cooperating for the sake of...what? I don’t think hypocrisy is a scumtell, but in this particular instance, it feels like she’s picking and choosing when she thinks it’s town/scum based on the same trait. If she thinks it’s town to be cooperative, why wouldn’t she just point me to her case, or quote the KC/mastin thing when I asked? It seems like if she really cared about pushing a scumread that she genuinely believed in, she would do everything in her power to convince people and help them come to that conclusion. Instead she just created more conflict knowing it would continue drowning the thread and create apathy.
283 by Quoth...SOMEONE SEES IT.
286 by KC...what’s the point of commenting on the fact that elusive’s wagon isn’t a “wagon” if you weren’t going to comment on the votes themselves...or at least comment on why Muffin was commenting on it?
314 by TBB...what’s the point of asking him for generic reads? Do you want to know his read on anyone in particular? You seem not to care about why you’re making him upset.
317 by Muffin...I like the thought process here. I don’t know enough about TriforceP’s experience to say it applies, but the thought process is town.
I feel like it’s a fruitless exercise to continue pointing out posts/issues I’m having with elusive’s play, so I’ll just say that my read hasn’t changed. -_-
357 by TBB...as much as I’d love for this to be a scum slip, it’s not, but still terrible. Definitely points to being hyper aware of what he’s be doing as either alignment, making the previous statement completely void.
360 by Muffin...what do you think about my assertions that she was inconsistent with her pushes, and that it’s not about how abrasive she was?
372 by Banana...um, what made Bulb fake it and not elusive?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1066, Firebringer wrote:So I looked at bulba posts.
He definitely seemed townishthough I am not sure I would be able to tell if he was scum or not....
VOTE: Bulba
Until I get a better scum read or one at all.
Feels town.
Must vote!
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1072, Klingoncelt wrote:*And I did comment on it. I pointed out that it's not really a wagon.
Yeah I got that, but that's not the point. There was clearly an opportunity to say why it didn't matter, why Muffin cared, what you thought about it.
You stated a fact. You didn't include any of your own commentary. I was asking you why. The closest you've come to giving your own insight/input on the matter is saying that it wasn't worth looking at. That wasn't communicated to Muffin at the time, which would've allowed for a conversation or insight as to why Muffin felt it necessary to say something about it.
My point is, comment like that serve no purpose in advancing the gamestate because it didn't seem like you really cared to learn about Muffin's alignment based on something you clearly had an opinion about.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
@Oversoul:
In post 3421, singersigner wrote:Wisdom also never responded to my points last night and instead decided to take the opportunity to rehash how I must be scum for making the mistake of trying when I was clearly over my head, failing to explain why that makes me scummy and only reaffirming why he's been terrible this game.Would not hesitate at a policy lynch,hence my "would lynch either of them" comment that apparently made me opportunistic once the deciding vote was placed. Good times!
In post 4955, singersigner wrote:In post 4948, TellTaleHeart wrote:In post 4947, singersigner wrote:I'm not gunna lie, I'm not going to be willing to avoid your lynch for long.
I'm kind of wondering why you're doing it now.
Why are you doing it now?
UT's the kind of person I can't read. So. I don't.But he's also not the kind of person I policy lynch.So. I don't.
In post 481, singersigner wrote:Oof, the replacement request has been out for a few days.
I'm not really sure what to do here. Normally in a regular game (especially in larges)I'd advocate just lynching the slot instead of waiting for a replacement,simply because it's pretty much in the plan anyway. But...it's a newbie game so I feel like it'd be unfair to disregard the opportunity for a claim.
What I'm talking about is basically a policy lynch=lynching based off of a pre-set standard as opposed to in game related posting.Other examples include lynching all liars (proven fake claims for example), or lynching someone you've played with in the past who's proven to be a substantially weak player as either alignment (this one doesn't get used as often anymore).[
We know that Ravyn is here, and we can keep him accountable, but I feel like everyone's in agreement that we're working with a scum team anyway. Waiting for a replacement is only wasting our time, AND the replacement's...
In post 151, singersigner wrote:On policy lynches...so they are and they aren't scummy I guess.I'm in the minority of agreeing with them because I think there's a lot to learn from them with regards to why, when, and now they happen.I would never do it in a newbie game in part because of sheer size of them, as well as because of the setup. I don't think here is the time nor the place to do it, and if you are curious as to my thoughts on the matter, I'm more than willing to delve into specifics after the game. Seeing as y'all are arguing about 'compromising' on a lynch to avoid a no-lynch, it's kind of a moot point? There's a difference between compromising, and policy. I've done it several times to my dismay. It doesn't give town much information on wagons, but allows for information on flips, etc.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
I'm sure there's more if I went further back in my history, but the last quote from a newbie game over a year ago should explain my thoughts on PLs pretty sufficiently.
Were you hoping to catch me lying or doing something out of character? Because I can't make these things up, lol.-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
I can't tell if Bulb is scum or massively shortsighted/newb. Does anyone have any experience with him?
Also, I know I'm only on page 16+recent posts, but right now I'd be ok with an Atum, Firebringer, TBB, or mastin lynch.
Any lurkers would also be acceptable: Grib, Gratuitous, ZZZX, PV, PB...all have under 25 posts. q_q-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1163, Bulbazoor wrote:Oh and singer, did you forget that there is a such thing as newbie 1616? Are you scum purposefully ignoring that fact. Or did you forget? I was scum and you were town. Another one of ky scum games. Compare me to that also. You also get the chance to compare singer in that game.
Yes I did forget about that game. I play so many newbies that I often forget who I've played with. Especially since you replaced in that game and apparently got lynched pretty quickly, so...sorry I was focused more on your scumbuddy that game? And yeah, if you remember it, and you're telling people to compare me to that game, so why haven't you?
Bulb wrote:Singer, mastin was pretty obvious as town in thise first posts. I find scum hard to fake an emotional wall post like that. I doubt that scum would even come up with that. So why are you know trying to get a new mislynch? So you moved on from elusive?
I understand why you might disagree since you don't have the same level of experience with Mastin, but believe me when I say she can.
Also, lol, elusive is Firebringer. No way am I lynching you now, since that slot's flipping scum.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1226, Oversoul wrote:Singer, talk to me about Banana Frog
I want the Frog head to post more because I've seen him as both town and scum now and am not as familiar with Plotinus. I feel like Plotinus is town and that Frog thinks his scum game is good so if anything, his lower activity is leaving trust with the fact that they don't have anything to hide.
In post 976, Quoth The Pidgeon wrote:I just noticed there is a p in Triforces avatar.
Singer might be the SK but we can X that bridge later.
In post 1012, The Blue Blur wrote:What?! Bulba has been doing plenty of scumhunting...
He's still a strong town read of mine
Singer slot could be "scum" as in "SK scum". I do see it.
I have a scum read on one of these. Hint: it's the one that took the "out" to call me scum in another way other than the way they already know I'm not.
Oversoul wrote:1078 - Singer, I suppose the better question is.. have you ever supported a policy lynch as scum?
I don't know. I only have like four scum games in my site history (most recent was a newbie in December...before that was the 2012 scummies invitational >_>). I imagine I would, though, since it would be consistent with what I do as town.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1232, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1231, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1230, Muffin wrote:Wow Goat's ISO is horrible
Oh look, we agree on something.
Let's do this, then.
VOTE: The Goat
Wholey shit, I would've included The Goat in my PLs but I assumed it was someone posting out of hydra...-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
Looks like he has a history of being flaky, though. He was almost replaced out of his last game in January. He also had about 100 posts in that game despite it's speed and length, which is a far cry from this one...
Hewasa third party, though, so I don't really know that it says anything but he doesn't care about this one. -_-
Anyway, PL or bust, as I always say.
That's a lie, I never say that.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1190, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm surprised gratuitous wagon has taken off so fast considering he's stayed under the radar for most of the game
In post 1196, Flubbernugget wrote:Then just tell me what you think of the wagon.
It took three ish pages for it to grow
These sound like conflicting things because 3 pages to get like 6-7 votes isn't really that uncommon?
In any case, how do you feel about it, then, if you think it came out of no where and grew so quickly? Do you think it's on town, on scum, on...? If on town (which is what I"m assuming because of your surprise) then who is scum on the wagon? If on scum...why does it matter how quickly it grew?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
PAGES 16-22
386 by TBB...why do you say you didn’t want to push Bulb is you think he’s scum? What’s stopping you? Also, I thought it was pretty obvious that Bulb was bolding the question Elusive asked, not actually asking himself, so what made you think he was going for townpoints?
390 by Quoth...yes! He’s scum! That’s why! Come see the light!
429 by Maxwell...for some reason I really don’t like the preemptive “not going to have any solid reads until D2” after agreeing that reads’ lists aren’t a bad idea. He’s also preemptively excusing any potential contradictions with his reads, which rubs me the wrong way.
445 by Quoth...I know this was about Gratuitous’ reads, but the comment about Bulb stuck out because I feel the exact opposite. I feel like Bulb’s been OMGUSing practically everyone who’s expressed suspicion of him in the way of snark.
448 by Quoth...how do you feel about any of my comments in my catchup with regard to TBB? I’m surprised you’re null on them but confident on people with considerably less posts from which to gain insight.
452 by Atum...still don’t like this guy!This is a really awkward request, and almost like he wants Oversoul to prioritize who he would find suspicious like he’s already caught his team.Ok I think I misread the question but I still don’t get what he’s hoping to learn/gain from that information.
460 by Muffin...why did you acknowledge that you put yourself in there twice but not specify which one you were supposed to be voting?
(on page 20 and I haven’t seen nearly the issues with Gratuitous as others have seen...I have more problems with Bulb than I do Grat at this point)
487 by Triforce...I don’t mind that you draw on your experience with Mastin so much as you are playing to others’ experiences and almost fearmongering Pers into listening to the majority. I’ve rarely deferred to someone’s judgement above my own, and it’s only when I know their ability to read a certain individual is onpoint. What you’re also doing is speaking to him as though you don’t need to decipher an alignment.
Pages 21-22 weren’t that exciting. Lots of fluff.
I will be skimming past the rest since I think there's only a few pages I missed. Otherwise I'm mostly caught up? I see the Kling/mastin thing was literally on the past I replaced in on...thanks for nothing elusive.
Pretty solid scumreads are still TBB, Mastin, and Firebringer, with Triforce, Atum, Maxwell rounding it out.
Non-negotiable townreads are Quoth, Drixxz (ZZZX is lucky he has a hydra buddy to carry him), and PV.-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1266, The Blue Blur wrote:Singer shut up and vote Grat/Kling.
You can read me as scum tomorrow.
~Sally
vote: The Blue Blur-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1323, LittleGumball wrote:why are people following my vote
Is this meant to be facetious or have you just not been following the thread?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1326, Bulbazoor wrote:VOTE: Gratuitious
Scumread and lots of info can be possible gain. Some people stayed out of it, which can indicate possible scumteams if he flips scum.
You haven't commented on anything but your own agenda. I'd rather see you flip than Gratuitous, to be honest.
Why do you think Gratuitous is scum again?-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1334, pisskop wrote:And KC. she thinks I'm scum
Do you think it's unreasonable KC thinks you're scum when your predecessor had 6 posts? Does it make her scummy?-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1354, Banana Frog wrote:oh, so your problem isn't that she was townreading x, y, and z but should have been scumreading them, or visa versa. Just the presentation/ reasoning given?
That makes a lot more sense. Carry on!
--Plotinus
How does it make more sense? How can PK know the reasoning behind the reads' list doesn't make sense if he hasn't read anything yet? I'm not even really sure how the presentation has anything to do with it, but whatever.-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
-
-
singersigner I Got This
- I Got This
- I Got This
- Posts: 7891
- Joined: June 8, 2010
In post 1382, Prolapsed Brain wrote:In post 1358, singersigner wrote:AKA, the only wagon that's gained any traction.
....are you looking at the same VC that I am?
Or do we have different definitions of "traction" ?
I mean, neither you nor Firebringer has had any major wagon, elusive...ish, but that died early and was mostly from irritation, not people actually seeing the scumminess that I do. So yeah, KC is the only wagon he'd "agree with" so far that's been of popular opinion.