yeah This is a good place to start
VOTE: Shinobi
My role is weirdly negative too. whats bad about claiming that without claiming fully?
oh and @almost please go back to your obv town/scum style . I want to read you
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
~Rylai
oOIn post 87, Shinobi wrote:What?In post 83, Rylai and Lina wrote:"My role is weirdly negative too. whats bad about claiming that without claiming fully?"
this won't be answered with a "why?"
~Rylai
Interpret it as a complete post again?In post 90, Shinobi wrote:I didn't interpret it as claiming a negative utility role - I interpreted it as generic advice that wasn't useful.In post 88, Rylai and Lina wrote:oOIn post 87, Shinobi wrote:What?In post 83, Rylai and Lina wrote:"My role is weirdly negative too. whats bad about claiming that without claiming fully?"
this won't be answered with a "why?"
~Rylai
Is this really that hard to understand?
what about she claiming she had a negative utility role seemed fake for you?
~Rylai
Honestly the backlash from my reads seems so strong that I might just be wrong and am missing something that seems obvious to everyone else.
Its written down in my sigIn post 103, Almost50 wrote:I thought the point of signing your post is to tell us which head is posting. Using the HYDRA name doesn't exactly serve that purpose.
That's the Ranger style , yeahIn post 113, Mixed6 wrote:I do like Ranger's ranking as it makes her easier to pin down for reasoning later regardless of alignment; is that par for the course for her play?
This is contradictingIn post 103, Almost50 wrote:Still not sure whom I would want to lynch, but I think this is a fair bet (considering it can't be changed, so it has to be someone I'm fairly reading TOWN, and I hope I'm not being irrational here.)
HUNTMASTER VOTE: Reasonably Irrational
Juliet speaking~In post 123, Fire Assassin wrote:Hello Frozen.In post 121, Rylai and Lina wrote:This is contradictingIn post 103, Almost50 wrote:Still not sure whom I would want to lynch, but I think this is a fair bet (considering it can't be changed, so it has to be someone I'm fairly reading TOWN, and I hope I'm not being irrational here.)
HUNTMASTER VOTE: Reasonably IrrationalThere was plenty of time for making a decision he thought he can't change it.
dah Baka?!!
~Rylai
Your trusted Romeo is here.
I was scumIn post 130, Fire Assassin wrote:But you didn't trust me in that game.....
You thought I was scum even in dead thread.....
I TRUSTED YOU!
>.>
huhIn post 135, Fire Assassin wrote:That I should be the one to ask you if I can trust you!!!!!
I don't understand this. D&D's are in Not voting pile when there is a Spider vote there.In post 161, Hastur and Muriel wrote:Oh, so it does... although that post was edited, but that was two hours later. Thank you for pointing that out, though, because while that initial votecount does include Patches, it doesn't list D&D as "Not Voting." So however their lack of vote works, it's enough that they aren't even counted there.In post 156, Reasonably Irrational wrote:
HD: I did not notice when Patches was added. They were definitely there at the start of D1, given that the very first VC posted by Varsoon to start the day off, with the list of players and the status of everythiing, includes Patches the Spider.
-HD
I dunno of I trust you mate. A bird told me you have a tendency to throw people into pits.In post 39, Patches the Spider wrote:...Oh, a hunter of beasts, are you? Glory be. You know not the value you possess.In post 29, Reasonably Irrational wrote:I think RVS is stupid so I won't be participating, but A50's reason for not participating is a bit paranoid, at this stage. We're looking at a threshold of 12 to lynch(Also, so, Patches the Spider. Did nobody else notice that there's an extra player in the game? Any thoughts beyond the obvious but potentially misleading one?), and all the things that we are *aware of* that involve large numbers of votes require time and echoes to purchase.
But but won't you townread usIn post 170, Gee Willikers wrote:R&L is honestly null as far as I can tell right now, can't yet see what some are seeing there.
In post 175, Gee Willikers wrote:Your petty anime gifs have no influence on the heart of a sociopath, try again shiro.
~wgeurts
You never town read me as eaither alignments.In post 230, Ranger wrote:{D&D, RyLina}
{Mixed 6, Reasonably Irrational, Nahdia, Sensei}
{Klingoncelt, Almost50, Hastur, Xkfyu}
{Gee Willikers, Fire Assassin, randomidget}
{Toogeloo, Zulfy, Bogre}
{Shadow_step}
{Patches, Shinobi}
8.
omgIn post 232, Gee Willikers wrote:She was a 13 year old girl which was emotional issues and was mentally unstable, but not a troll.In post 231, Ranger wrote:Counterpoint: Kain Tepes.Reasonably Irrational wrote:Shadow_step: Zulfy is the trolliest of trolls imo.
Her sudden disappearance after stating she wanted to commit suicide does worry me though.
completly opposite. I really feel bad about how natural his posts seems. seems a bit careful behavior and a safe play which I don't expect from town normally.In post 238, Gee Willikers wrote: I also quite like how natural Elibern's posting seems.
thats a slot in the game , with a vote. A master , as he called it and some potential abilities,In post 238, Gee Willikers wrote:What use does discussing this have at all? It let's scum seem useful while honestly any banter about it now isn't going to accomplish anything. Maybe when we know more about it, then it could potentially be used as evidence for people's alignments. Right now it's a distraction to be blunt.
Worst post so far award?In post 422, Bogre wrote:First off - is it too much to ask for grammar, spelling, and sentence structure?In post 220, Nahdia wrote:ok friendo let's work together and do some sicknasty scumhunting and hold hands and frolic through daisy fields and live happily ever after. i totally and completely forever and ever disavow my previously stated scumvibes on u. totes. for sure. 100%. no take-backsies.
I feel a lot of Nahdia's posts are just obstructionist dribble. Someone before mentioned this is a Nahdia meta. Regardless, there's like no wheat in any of the chaff that I can see.
to be clear are you scum reading nahdia becuase of her style of posting and her wordings?In post 453, Bogre wrote:@Shadow - step
You think Nahdia has more patience for Mix6? - with a post like 'UGGHHHH FINE' ? Because it seems like at least ABR portion of hydra and Nahdia -definitely- did not have much patience for one another.
Is that where your presumption of it being staged is coming from, or somewhere else?
you posted something about his voting style which wasn't true. how you got that wrong while rereading?In post 432, Bogre wrote:Yes, I was talking about Almost. Currently posting-as-I-reread.
I have a slight townread on almost and I'm not sure about {fire assassin , kling} row read but U guess I can see the rest.In post 466, Randomnamechange wrote:{Reasonably Irrational, Daenerys and Dragons, Gee Willikers, Toogeloo}
{Mixed6, Ranger, Rylai and Lina, Nahdia, Xkyfu}
{Fire Assassin, KlingonCelt}
{Hastur and Muriel, Zulfy}
{Yume, PeregrineV}
{Sensei, Shadow_Step} (these two probably aren't scum together)
{Bogre}
{Shinobi, Almost50}
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Shinobi
I'm willing to let Almost wait for a bit. Shinobi's tone is really off.
picking this up for LinaIn post 468, Shiro wrote:Gambler's fallacy is knocking at your door friend.In post 461, Almost50 wrote:I find it extremely unlikely that "all" 6 hydras are town, don't you?In post 360, Ranger wrote:Gee Willikers would also be a good huntmaster candidate. Forgot them earlier.
think about us please. I love hunting and I guess we can help in the line up.In post 479, Reasonably Irrational wrote:Yo. As I said, so far I'm pretty content with tomorrow nights hunt consisting of Mixed6, myself, D&D, and *possibly* Gee Willikers, although if Random responds correctly to my last question, they might be a better choice because I'll be almost positive they're town. As I said before, there is an actual mechanical reason why our slot should be huntmaster, but I think we mostly agree on party composition.In post 473, Mixed6 wrote:Where is Cerb? Cerb what do you want to do about the huntmaster?
Do we have a consensus on lynching shadow?
Rampage
I want to see more from shadow, but we have a definite consensus on scumreading the slot.
-Cerb
but there were only 5 people on your wagon so you basically are scumreading whoever is in your wagon baka.In post 487, Almost50 wrote:So, in sum: I'm NOT scum reading everyone on my wagon, but I suspected 4 of them and posted a list of the order I was "mis"trusting them from strongest suspect to weakest suspect, which translates from "most likely to be scum of the five" IF THERE SHOULD BE ANY AT ALL, to "most unlikely to be scum" even if the wagon did contain scum.
I'm very far behind but this can have a voteIn post 732, Shinobi wrote:I already hit that point where I hate every single player in the game.
Normally it takes significantly longer but I'm already there.
Yay.
thats the way he always play his town games. hence I got a slight town read on him. not strong enough but I want to have that noted for now.In post 490, Fire Assassin wrote:I do not like this line of thought at all.In post 487, Almost50 wrote:Basically, I will tend to "suspect" everyone who voted me that early, as I've been a potentially low hanging fruit to some extent, and nobody had a real reason to vote me (I'm just being lazy, but NOT being scummy).
"Not being scummy, but lazy isn't anti town at all"
where is this hatred coming from. your scumreading him or he is just pissing you off?In post 492, Fire Assassin wrote:ABR should not become the huntsmaster. End of story.In post 484, Gee Willikers wrote:Cerb, you disappoint me a little >_>
Anyway, ABR is in my eyes the best person to become huntsmaster right now and preferably we'd have a party including us, RI and Ranger/someone else. Though there seem to be games within games going on here so that may be subject to change.
~wgeurts
tbh I hate randomidget distanced play and I always end up scum reading him , hence I have no idea how to look at this FB. please explain your townread on him.In post 498, Fire Assassin wrote:These huntmaster votes are terrible.In post 475, Varsoon wrote:Spoiler: HUNTMASTER VOTE
Mixed6 (3): Mixed6, Gee Willikers, Ranger
Reasonably Irrational (2): Almost50, Reasonably Irrational
I am going with someone better:
Huntmaster vote: Randommidget
huh ??!In post 516, Nahdia wrote:sorry i guess i wasn't clear. my reasons for not wanting to lynch cerb today have nothing to do with the game itself.
This response was off.In post 558, Gee Willikers wrote:When was the last time you played with me?In post 555, Randomnamechange wrote:Wgeurts' strong arm is feeling really off. Fire I would kind of expect it from.
why are you town reading ABR so hard ?
where did this question came from suddenly?In post 595, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:You are townreading FA?In post 591, Randomnamechange wrote:As my liege commands.Fire Assassin wrote:Stop being toxic.
I have to go now, I will be back in about 5-6 hours to sort out the mess you guys are making.
Votes on Almost50 for lynch.
Votes on Random for huntmaster.
Do it.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Almost50
-Daenerys
cerb I'm really uncomfortable with your play here but I guess that makes no sense from scum? why are you outing yourself if you have a mechanic dependent power?In post 609, Reasonably Irrational wrote:Let's fucking move on to something else. We can table the huntsman discussion, especially until I've had the opportunity to talk about it with Elbirn.
Shinobi and Assassin were here and saying stuff, right, and I kinda just didn't let any of it sink it because I was trying to figure out what was going on with randomidget etc. Anything important happen there?
-Cerb
ABR: You can refuse to answer the question, best for WifoM, but I'm just telling you that in a universe where we are both conftown, I am voting and campaigning for myself 100% of the time, with the information I currently possess.
why are you still voting my slot if you only wanted to prove you exist in game and you can vote?
this is town posting . I loved it.In post 621, Toogeloo wrote:God, I hate the noise in this game, and with multiple hydras, it's like having almost 30 players. Come back to a ridiculous catch up and have to skim through stupid pointless posts.
I honestly feel as if self voting and self endorsing for Huntsman is stupid. I will not be voting for anyone who does it. I mean seriously... everyone will claim they are the best person for Huntsman. I know I'm town, I could vote for myself. Now where would that put us? It would have been much better if you couldn't self vote at the very least.
I'm too lazy to go back and find it, but someone said my vote on Patches was pointless and another said that the Mod wouldn't make it that "easy." First off, the Mod already confirmed that lynching anyone/thing will grant rewards, which is in direct conflict to what Patches said in regards to not granting rewards for being lynched. Secondly, what's "easy" about voting for Patches? You realize how much faith players have to have to go out on a limb and lynch a slot like that?
Is there some kind of town bloc with the current Hunt Party going on too? Like they all seem to love each other, and they seem to want to keep the Hunt going in their little clique or something. The only person who doesn't seem included is the Huntmaster himself, Kling.