Night and Day Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I guess this is one way to sign your posts. ThinkBig, aren't you supposed to be a hydra?In post 55, ThinkBig wrote:Ego post!-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 105, Branson wrote:EgopostIn post 96, texcat wrote:
I guess this is one way to sign your posts.In post 55, ThinkBig wrote:Ego post!ThinkBigBranson, aren't you supposed to be a hydra?In post 99, Aronis wrote:I'm policy lynching the next person who doesn't post in their hydra-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Exactly. Perhaps I should have said... for attempting to town slip.In post 166, Vedith wrote:That wasn't a town slip.
Questioning 5 Scum out of 18 players was just for show.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Titus, he did the same sort of thing here, too.
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
So why don't you vote Vedith instead of Rauth? What is your case on Rauth?In post 192, Aronis wrote:
you decided I'm scum solely because I posted a quote using red text, anybody in their right minds would discard your reads in a heartbeatIn post 179, Vedith wrote:Rauth could still be scum bussing and expecting the wagon to die.
Not only did Aronis post in red (obviously on the mind due to seeing red on their role pm) but also called the other Scum read town and tried to say that my reads won't be worth reading just because I voiced my opinion on the opening post.
Easy game, easy money.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I stand corrected.In post 205, Vedith wrote:He's voting what's their face, not Rauth.
@Aronis, so why aren't you voting Vedith? And is your only case on what's their face a hydra slip? And you think Vedith's case is weak?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Hi Bran, No. Are you?
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I absolutely agree with this post, but hey, it's mafia; that's what people do.In post 319, Frosted Kelvin Bran wrote:The more people post "you should justknowthat I'm town" the more I dislike the playerslot.
This kind of rhetoric is silly. If you really expect people to have a confident town read of you less than thirteen pages into a game (if we remove mastina's posts, this thread is probably only at 10, moderator influencing game thread length, tyranny), you are you silly.
While I do believe that confident posting is good, the high level of "I'm right and you should justget it" is irritating and needs to stop. If you want to convince me of something, you're going to have to actually provide reasons rather than try to berate me into thinking you're right because the sky is blue, you had a banana for breakfast, and your dog didn't shit on the floor today. Your good mood or overwhelming magical self-confidence and competence is not a reason that I will accept.
I still think CE 79 is a good lynch, but Titus, I appreciate your 374 and can see your point, but I see town jump on what they see as an rvs wagon all the time for no reason at all and just because it's there.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Remind me who is in your town block, please.In post 389, Aronis wrote:
I will not tolerate people trying to break apart my townblockIn post 387, MathBlade wrote:Will be online in about an hour. Just got out of work.
@Aronis -- What makes you say Titus is hating on me? (I haven't caught up yet). Titus scumreads me almost literally every game except when I am scum so meh. The fact Titus scumreads me pretty much says I is Town. I didn't see the hate before but the scumread. If she said I was an idiot or dumb or incapable that would be a different matter.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
You can deduce all of that from a vote count???In post 667, MathBlade wrote: Based on this VCA Rauthedir reads like Town newb, Aronis reads like lynchbait, Vedith always annoys me as Town, EddieFenix reads like a limp in vote after not providing more details like I asked. Titus and dramonic seem like scum partners.
Thinking Titus dramonic EddieFenix.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
That doesn't mean that they're not scum. In fact, some might say that it makes itIn post 919, BTD6_maker wrote:The 79 CE wagon has stalledmorelikely.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Because I still think CE is the best vote for today. Just because the wagon stalled is no reason to unvote. My vote is not going to follow the action, it's going to stay on the person I find the scummiest.In post 931, Alisae wrote:
Bruh I haven't even gotten into the game yet I need to get into the game to answer this zzzIn post 919, BTD6_maker wrote:Gamma Emerald gave no reasoning, except that Ginngie and Aronis may be scum together. Alisae, do you agree with the vote on Aronis?
--
Huh? I'm getting bad gutpings. Like why are you even saying this or attempting to draw a conclusion out of BTD's observation?In post 926, texcat wrote:
That doesn't mean that they're not scum. In fact, some might say that it makes itIn post 919, BTD6_maker wrote:The 79 CE wagon has stalledmorelikely.
People to ISO
Texcat
Aronis-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And this is you just casting shade. What on earth makes you think that I was trying to be concerned about hydra slipping? I was annoyed, not concerned. And not even very annoyed.In post 964, Alisae wrote:96 - This reads fake here. It looks like she is trying to be concerned here, but it really reads like she doesn't care at all.Spoiler: Texcat case before I go to bed.
You say potahto and I say potato. You say shit vote and I say scum vote.165 - Shit vote. In the hood they asked why Aristophanes said he was town and made that "slip" and it's a question that doesn't really go anywhere and looks like a faked attempt to gamesolve. Not to mention scum aren't going to fake a townslip to the degree that Aristophanes did in the dark PT. They're gonna try to be a bit more sly about how they do it. If anything, I'd say 70 CE is town because of that.
Why this fascination with my level of concern? No, I wasn't concerned about the question. I thought I saw a contradiction and wanted an explanation of said contradiction. What is so concerning about that?204 - I don't buy that texcat is concerned about the question being asked here, not to mention the question here seems really manipulative.
LOL. Just LOL.383 - Okay. This is what buddying really is. I usually say that buddying isn't a scumtell, but that's because people think buddying is "warming up to someone to get them to townread you" and that's litterally what site BFFs do all of the time and that is not scummy at all. What buddying really is is hiding behind someone else's content. And that is exactly what is happening here. This makes Frosted Town and Texcat scum.
Wow. Do you really think MathBlade should have been able to deduce all of that from one vote count, as he claimed to have?669 - Gaslighting MathBlade. This probably also makes MathBlade town.Spoiler: What do you think of Rauth saying the same thing?
And this is just outrageously false. You really stretching to throw shade here. I didn't try to assume anything. I didn't assume anything.926 - Trying to assume why BTD unvoted 70 CE here is scummy. They don't even attempt to hunt or sort the slot or even attempt to figure out why the slot did what it did.Spoiler: BTD explicitly said he was unvoting because the CE wagon was stalled.
I don't even begin to know what to say to this. Yuck.tl;dr Texcat isn't really interested in scumhunting and developing reads, and their tunnel on 70 CE looks super fabricated. If I had a 1 bullet and I was in a room with Hitler, Stalin, and Texcat, I'd shoot Texcat. Too bad I don't have that 1 bullet and the gunstore is closed, so I guess I have to wait for that shit to open I guess. Going to sleep now.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
If you had made any points, perhaps I could have addressed them.
It's the kind of defense your point deserves. I call someone out for hydra slipping and you think that's scummy. What can I say? It doesn't even deserve a LOL defense.Alisae wrote:
Um...I'm powerlynching you...In post 994, texcat wrote:And this is you just casting shade.
what kind of defense even is this.
wtf
I say I agree with a post and you say that I'm buddying and scum. I disagree with BTD about his unvote and I'm scum. I can't win when I agree with someone, and I can't win when I disagree with someone. I don't know if this is just a severe case of confirmation bias, or if you have some sort of grudge here, but your "case" does not hold water.
Address the point imo. If you're town interact with me and give me something to work with. Because this is just unhelpful and is going to get you lynchedIn post 994, texcat wrote:LOL. Just LOL.
--
Okay, first off that really doesn't matter. MathBlade likes to use VCs and collect data from them. That's how they play. And you aren't even pushing Rauth, so why are you deflecting towards him? And even then, your tone sounds like moreso you're trying to gaslight Math, Rauth's tone just sounds like he's interested in the question that's being asked here.In post 994, texcat wrote:Wow. Do you really think MathBlade should have been able to deduce all of that from one vote count, as he claimed to have?
Rauth says he agrees with me here, and yet you don't say that he's buddying. He asks the same question that I did, and yet I'm the one that's "gaslighting". I'm not deflecting onto Rauth. I'm pointing out the inconsistencies in your "case". Why is something scummy one time and not another time?In post 670, Rautherdir wrote:
I have to agree with texcat, where are you getting this from MathBlade? Could you explain that a bit better?In post 669, texcat wrote:
You can deduce all of that from a vote count???In post 667, MathBlade wrote: Based on this VCA Rauthedir reads like Town newb, Aronis reads like lynchbait, Vedith always annoys me as Town, EddieFenix reads like a limp in vote after not providing more details like I asked. Titus and dramonic seem like scum partners.
Thinking Titus dramonic EddieFenix.
First off, you think the way to powerlynching someone is to say things that are outrageously false? That's just wrong. Second off, I did poke it. What do you think my post was?
First off, it's not really shade if I'm powerlynching you. Second off, why didn't you poke it instead?In post 994, texcat wrote:And this is just outrageously false. You really stretching to throw shade here. I didn't try to assume anything. I didn't assume anything.
I have answered. And I prefer to post here where everyone can see rather than in the hood.
Can you address my concerns? You think my case is bad, explain why it's bad if you're town? Or don't if you're scum, because I like lynching scumIn post 994, texcat wrote:I don't even begin to know what to say to this. Yuck.
You still have to answer these imo.In post 962, Alisae wrote:
Tex along with these, can you tell me why your existance in the dark hood is like, non-existant?In post 934, Alisae wrote:t would be really cool if you could tell me why.
Also instead of assuming thats why he unvoted, why don't you ask him?
And even then, what do you think about BTD unvoting like that?-
-
texcat
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I just went back to the signup thread to see which half of the hydra originally was interested in the game. And it was ThinkBig. I also noted that ThinkBig said he would be active, but hates being scum. Just using that for meta, you might think he was scum here. I hope he picks up his prod and explains.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
What is this? Are you playing some other game?
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Evidently.In post 1387, Titus wrote:Is that what this site has become, spam nonsense?
VOTE: Aelita
Spoiler: The entire ISO-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And why are you trying so blatantly to buddy up to Titus?In post 1399, Titus wrote:
Who are you?In post 1397, A2 wrote:Titus,
please don't let this turn into Spring Fever
Like, I can't see Texcat as town, if you think they're town help me out here.
Like Titus, you know I am willing to work with you, it's just things like what happened in Spring Fever and Railgun where you hardpush town just give me sads
Also, What do you think of the Bulb v Gin fight?
I'm still trying to make something out of that.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1415, MathBlade wrote:
I was being sarcastic.In post 1414, Bulbazak wrote:@Math: I think you're getting some of your games mixed up. Please watch that. Also, I think I see what you see in regards to Aelita. I don't think Texcat does, though.
@Titus: Are you actually reading the game?
I think Texcat was fishing pure and simple. Her mistake on this page does little to convince me otherwise.
This is totally flying over my head. What mistake? And what could you see in Aelita's handful of nonsense posts?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
You said I made a mistake. I'd like to know what the he'll you're talking about.In post 1419, MathBlade wrote:
You did it again.In post 1418, texcat wrote:In post 1415, MathBlade wrote:
I was being sarcastic.In post 1414, Bulbazak wrote:@Math: I think you're getting some of your games mixed up. Please watch that. Also, I think I see what you see in regards to Aelita. I don't think Texcat does, though.
@Titus: Are you actually reading the game?
I think Texcat was fishing pure and simple. Her mistake on this page does little to convince me otherwise.
This is totally flying over my head. What mistake? And what could you see in Aelita's handful of nonsense posts?
You're fishing for info about other people versus making your own conclusion.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
It's certainly hard to see from where I sit.In post 1458, Aronis wrote:Math had been town since like post 1, am i missing something here?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I am completely frustrated this game. It would help me a lot if people would just say what they mean and mean what they say. At least some of the time.
Mathblade accuses me of rolefishing every time I post, but I don't see what I'm doing that's rolefishing. And no one bothers to explain it to me.
I ask about Aelita's handful of nonsense posts and all I get is A2 saying they look normal for Aelita and a accusation that I'm not moving the game forward. But at least Aelita is getting replaced.
I wade through a ton of posts from overnight and end up with a fake claim from Aronis.
I feel like everyone is speaking in some foreign language.
VOTE: Aronis-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
He's not a mason. I don't know why he would claim that.
In post 1763, texcat wrote:It would help me a lot if people would just say what they mean and mean what they say. At least some of the time.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
About as fake as that mason claim.In post 1879, Ginngie wrote:Ya know, it gets to the point where it sounds fake-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 1953, DrCirno wrote: I really feel like texcat wagon is just a lazy wagon.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Rauth claimed Town Linked. He doesn't know exactly what "Linked" means. It could be masons; it could be neighbors; it could be some sort of lovers. And he doesn't know who he is linked to.
Aronis claimed mason. Something that he couldn't know on the dark side. His claim is obviously a scum claim. Enough of it appears true (Rauth did claim linked) that it looks like Aronis didn't make it up out of thin air. But it is way too specific for a dark side claim. It has to be a claim from scum. Titus asks, Why did he claim? I think he just forgot that he was on the dark side and couldn't know all these things. He just got ahead of himself. Who knows?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
+1In post 2164, Frosted Kelvin Bran wrote:
If you aren't scum, then please explain how you knew Rauth was also linked.In post 2162, Aronis wrote: srry guys I guess I kinda fucked up, but I'm town so can we plz not lynch me. I'll even stop spamming and try to be a productive member of society next day phase
-Kelvin-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Why not? He hasn't explained how he has knowledge that only scum could have.In post 2197, Titus wrote:I don't want Aronis.
I agree that it was almost too stupid to be scum, but how could it possibly be town???? No one can explain how he has this knowledge that he shouldn't have.QuantumRadius wrote:i'm not exactly sure what to do
aronis did a stupid but it was almost too stupid to be scum, especially because maf has daychat
and I can't get Titus today, no wagon support
aaaaagh
UNVOTE: aronis-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
This is the only explanation that I can see. I don't understand why everyone is not voting for Aronis.In post 2217, Vedith wrote:Because he's Mafia and it says who he is linked with.
He probably assumed that Rauth knew he was linked too but not what power, so he claimed mason as a fake slip to tomorrow go, "Oh I assumed it was this".
It's simple logic.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I don't see the possibility. It does not look possible to me within the rules on the dark side that you quoted.
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I'm certainly willing to listen if Aronis has an explanation, but since he's had ample opportunity to provide one and hasn't.....In post 2270, Frosted Kelvin Bran wrote:
Just because you don't see the possibility, doesn't mean that there is not a possibility. That's why we should find out how Aronis knew. If his reasoning is plausible, then there's certainly no reason to lynch him yet.In post 2268, texcat wrote:I don't see the possibility. It does not look possible to me within the rules on the dark side that you quoted.
-Kelvin-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I never assumed it was real. It was obviously fake. It wasn't so obvious to me that it was intended to be fake and sarcastic. It was certainly anti-town to involve Rauth and force him to claim. It was certainly anti-town to let it go on so long before claiming town investigative. It's late, late on Day 1. I'm happy with my vote on anti-town.In post 2417, Creature wrote:
I was never told it was sarcasm.In post 2416, Aronis wrote:I just sarcastically claimed Mason
Why everybody assumed it was real?-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
This is a non-vanilla game right? Everyone is going to claim a power role. We are going to lynch a power role. I still like my vote on Aronis.In post 2578, Creature wrote:Oh nice, we had to make Snarky claim before pushing a wagon that isn't Aronis nor Snarky.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Mathblade
Titus
Ginngie
Creature
QuantumRadius
BTD6_maker
Frosted Kelvin Bran
Rautherdir
Those are the players in the Light. And you want me to guess who was role copped? And since when is a role cop a town role? Are yall sure you know what you're doing over there? My guess would probably be Titus, and second guess would be Rauth. That's based on who I think most likely to be investigated. I'm leaving my vote right where it is.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Yeah, I don't understand the gambit. Why not just tell us the truth about why they thought there was a strongman? Did the gambit actually add anything?
Aren't you voting for BTD?In post 3364, Vedith wrote:I have town reads and possible scum reads.
Aronis is my only "yeah, that's scum fo sho" read.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Could someone tell me if the reaction test was Titus's idea?In post 3523, A2 wrote:I'm saying scum!Titus could easily do the reaction test.
It sort of sounds like you might have been blocked? Were you blocked? I think that if you were blocked that would confirm BTD as scum.In post 3583, MathBlade wrote:
Merged thoughts. Could have been blocked or tracked me*In post 3582, MathBlade wrote:
Because I don't know what happened. BTD6 could have blocked me or maybe he didn't. There is no way for me to know. I scumread BTD6 but if I explain it requires claiming and I would rather hunt. Scum want to know something I am pretty damn sure that is why I am being wagoned.In post 3580, 79 CE wrote:That's kind of my issue. I feel like if you were town you would've made this a 1v1 and been screaming to high heavens for BTD's head. Why haven't you?
Groceries beckon.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
I would add BTD back on. He claimed, but so did Titus and Ginngie. Why eliminate him for the claim?In post 3954, Rautherdir wrote:Okay, here is the lynch pool as it stands now:
Mathblade
Titus
Ginngie
Creature
QuantumRadius
Nosferatu
Everyone tell me one person who they think should be removed from that list, and why. If possible continue this format so that all the thoughts are in the same place when we finish.
Rautherdir: I think Ginngie should be removed from that list because I don't see mafia bringing up the protection thing.
I'm not going to vote Math today.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Where is that like button?In post 4064, Ginngie wrote:sassing is the gateway drug into bullying-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 4226, Rautherdir wrote:
... You were in the dark when night 1 actions were resolved.In post 4220, TheWayItEnds wrote:which still implies light scum.
cool.
the formatting of the way my role resolved n1 makes me think busdrivers are unlikely unless this game is bastard, which, granted i dont know.In post 4228, TheWayItEnds wrote:My role pm mastin sent me has a submitted n1 action
Ugh. So which is it? A day 1 action or a night 1 action? I'm not buying it. I would have thought that a day action would resolve at twilight, and a night action would resolve at dawn. And you clearly think that your action resolved at dawn and had something relevant regarding busdrivers at night.In post 4229, TheWayItEnds wrote:Oh actually it's a day or night action.
VOTE: TheWayItEnds-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
In post 4264, Bulbazak wrote:@tex: He never said anything about busdrivers.In post 4220, TheWayItEnds wrote:which still implies light scum.
cool.
the formatting of the waymy role resolved n1 makes me think busdriversare unlikely unless this game is bastard, which, granted i dont know.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Care to share? Cause I still find the whole story inconsistent and not credible.In post 4321, Bulbazak wrote:Vote Mathblade
Back to voting scum.
P-edit: Don't worry about it. I just found something that confirmed your story.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
And why are you only bringing this up now? He said he misread. Presumably while you were discussing night actions, he still thought he got the result of Math went no where. You've been putting out false information for no real gain. I still think that the whole rolecop fiasco was a ruse so that we wouldn't look too hard at your protection claim.In post 4496, Titus wrote:
BTD6 was not roleblocked. He never claimed it in the light while we were discussing night actions and only claimed it after he was wagoned as a method of diversion. 1938 is a bunch of questions ending in something he's not confident in. He doesn't followthrough with it. It's another shading of Math post.In post 4492, 79 CE wrote:
He was roleblocked. 1938 is scumhunting among other instances in his ISO.In post 4484, Titus wrote:No. My townblock has shown zero scumhunting from BTD or explained his fake result
@ginngie, whatever.
VOTE: Titus
L-2-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
Your reluctance to lynch in the protect claims baffles me. It's role madness. We're going to lynch a PR. Are you saying that protective roles are more valuable than investigative roles? What roles are you willing to lynch? I think that the strongman was trying to get the jump on any trackers or watchers that saw them kill Snarky. And my bet is that the strongman who invented a protective claim is Titus. Surely the scum would have discussed what to do in case they were seen, and have a claim ready.In post 5015, Bulbazak wrote:I've never shown any interest in Titus today. In fact, I've been pretty adamant about not lynching in the protect claims and PoEing scum from the remaining 4. Heck, most of my Math push has been me arguing with Titus about her Math read, so I definitely haven't had a scumread there in a long time. And when a strong townread of mine like that is suddenly, without warning, wagoned, I go ballistic and will do whatever it takes to dismantle the wagon, even if I have to compromise to create a counterwagon. This isn't anything new. I did the same thing in HU2 and in some other games I can't remember right now.-
-
texcat Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: August 18, 2014
-