[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 2088912 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Polyamory - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #30 (isolation #3) » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:36 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Porochaz wrote:What is the aim of a polyamourous relationship as in is it just because you dont settle down with the one person, or is it a chance to do things you might not necessarily do or want to do with your wife?
Seems just experiencing relationships with people that don't have unneeded limits. I know with my wife, she wouldn't be keen on me growing a relationship with another women regardless of the intentions.
Post
Post #31 (isolation #4) » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:39 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
UncertainKitten wrote:
Ythill wrote:
If it's okay with them I don't see why not. I think the key here is whether the girl in your example is free to do what makes her happy. If she feels like she's allowed to see other people but chooses not to, then I don't see what's wrong with it, except that she'll have to deal with his un-faced fears if and when she changes her mind. If she feels like she's been manipulated into a one-sided situation, then it's not healthy IMO.
Well, she knew from the outset how the situation would be, and it was her choice to accept or not. Considering it ties into a master/servant situation, it kinda makes sense that it's "one sided", but she did understand that before she submitted. What I guess I mean is if the situation is explicitly known that she's not to 'stray' (and doesn't desire to), and is also made aware that her master would play with other girls, and accepts all that, is it liable to stay stable?
Course, there are other components but they don't tie directly into polyamory.
Not to be ignorant of the situation, but I thought that was normally how master slave relationships worked?
Post
Post #40 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:20 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Yosarian2 wrote:Historical: Man, if Nixon had been into BDSM, he probably wouldn't have felt so emasculated and powerless that he felt like he had to bug a hotel room just to feel like he was in control of something.
Post
Post #51 (isolation #9) » Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:27 am
Postby shaft.ed »
VP Baltar wrote:
Thestatusquo wrote:Cliquey, it would seem to me from your statement that, like me, your number one thing isn't really cheating, but rather "honestly," in this situation, and as has been pointed out by drunkychaz, there is no deception whatsoever, so I don't know that it can be labeled as cheating. I think YThill has been overall very honest: The top issues I see with his arrangement are the unspoken jealously that all humans feel when they see something that is in their mind as "theirs" being "used" or "possessed" (quotation marks because those terms are probably a little off) by someone else, and also the social stigmas that go along with such practices. I don't know that I would be able to make such an arrangement work, seeing as I can sometimes be a fairly jealous person, but if YT can get past that, then jolly good for him.
Post
Post #100 (isolation #16) » Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:39 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Thestatusquo wrote:Shaft.ed, were you born 40 years old?
probably. When I was a kid and my grandparents would take me to the grocery store and offer to buy me treats, I would decline saying "You can't buy that. It's not on sale."
Post
Post #105 (isolation #18) » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:15 am
Postby shaft.ed »
VP Baltar wrote:
Ythill wrote:I don't think it is. There's plenty of non-sexual (or pseudo-sexual) behavior that most people refrain from if they're mono.
Sorry, I should have been more specific. I am encompassing the "pseudo-sexual" behaviors under the umbrella term "sex" in that quote. I'm not sure where you are putting the line at.
Post
Post #223 (isolation #21) » Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:32 am
Postby shaft.ed »
I got married for health insurance and I'm in a monogamous relationship. Also weddings don't have to be expensive, don't understand why they have become such a huge cash dump.
Post
Post #265 (isolation #22) » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:59 am
Postby shaft.ed »
TheButtonmen wrote:
SFG wrote:I dunno, maybe my sample size of ~15 romances and ~25 friendships is too small to rule out RNG, but when 86% of my romances are a net negative and 44% of my friendships are a net negative
15 ended romances and 25 ended friendships?
Either your like 87 or I'm mightly confused.
or you get more attached than the people you are attached to
Post
Post #289 (isolation #25) » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:34 am
Postby shaft.ed »
Max wrote: I like to go to the big country estates and sit under the weeping willows while it rains. The gardens are beautiful and just sit amongst them in the rain. Take a plastic bag with a change of clothes. Be willing to get genuinely wet. Just sit there and watch the world go by.
This sounds like a great idea! I think its going to rain today. I only have one pair of shoes....might still go for it. Really love rain, but haven't been soaked by it for years now.
Post
Post #318 (isolation #28) » Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:28 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Max wrote:On a side note how was the rain shaft.ed?
Way too much lightning to sit outside in it. I got a little wet on my way home but it wasnt as fun as getting soaked through. Hopefully next time we'll just get rain.
Post
Post #376 (isolation #30) » Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:54 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
@Shea, stop being retarded
@Oman, I sense that rape is a touchy subject for you. Was there some incident involving large amounts of alcohol, a general's daughter and a herd of sheep?
Post
Post #379 (isolation #31) » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:13 am
Postby shaft.ed »
Ythill wrote:
shaft wrote:It will be if Ythill is on target
Did I tell you about that?
Don't think so. I was just referring the Little Mermaid getting it on the face imagery. But it sounds like you've got a story to tell. Don't hold back.
Post
Post #450 (isolation #37) » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:44 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
SFG wrote: I guess I don't even have to have my friends hurt me anymore, when I can count on the enemies of my friends to do so. One more reason not to talk to people...
Post
Post #451 (isolation #38) » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:57 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:@AniX: On reflection, it must be that you do not produce semen. If you did, it would come out (no pun intended) nocturnally, if no other release were available.
No semen doesn't have to come out. Your testes can absorb it. I've never had a wet dream. And at times have gone more than a month without ejaculating. I'm also pretty sure there was a decent amount of time between the onset of sperm production and my first ejaculation. ejaculated.
Post
Post #469 (isolation #40) » Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:22 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
Shattered Viewpoint wrote:You're talking sperm; I'm talking semen. Different things.
headdesk
There's nothing magical about semen. It's mostly with sugars and proteins. It's production is also regulated by sexual arousal, so you don't get into Lucy and the converybelt situations if you dont ejaculate.
Xine wrote:
Nuwen wrote:
TheButtonmen wrote:Man how is your son going to pull off his teenage rebellion; be a straight laced, god faring, monogamous, drug free, stodgy, conservative member of the armed forces?
Your not leaving him many options!
Becoming a Trekkie is the obvious one.
Win
I hope the people going to Stumptown can plant the seeds.
Post
Post #516 (isolation #46) » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:37 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
quadz08 wrote:Basically, it comes down to (in straight relationships, anyway) men who aren't crazy are more willing to have one night stands than women who are aren't crazy.
Post
Post #521 (isolation #47) » Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:52 pm
Postby shaft.ed »
quadz08 wrote:Yeah, I think I have pretty high standards as well. Of course, I'm also
terrible
at meeting girls. I can do the whole chat them up, become friends thing, but not I'm really bad at sparking sexual energy with anyone I don't really know. And even with people I know, I'm not that good at it hahaha.
Post
Post #552 (isolation #50) » Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:22 am
Postby shaft.ed »
Actually there are instances of exclusive monogamy in the animal kingdom. In fact, I think there was a study of prairie voles? that mapped it to a genetic locus. Could be way off on the species but it was a small ground dwelling mammal. Different communities were found to practice polygamy or monogamy.
Post
Post #700 (isolation #59) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:02 am
Postby shaft.ed »
SocioPath wrote:
Fate wrote:anyone here judging for being a liar is on some level or another a hypocrite.
Wrong.
I don't know Socio. Dating a woman with two kids, while you got two other chicks on the side and telling them you aren't seeing anyone else is
exactly
like lying to people while playing a party game. That's why I had to quit playing mafia, because I couldn't take the emotional strain of lying to people all the time. I even tried going to confession and I'm and atheist! I'd be all like "forgive me father for I have sinned." And he'd say "mafia...again? I told you, you don't have to worry about that. But if you masturbated last week, that's really naughty. You'd better tell me all about that. Where you a naughty boy?"