NFL Football Thread 2013

shaft.ed · Post Post #633 (isolation #0) » Sat Jan 11, 2014 8:07 am

Saints barely bested the Iggles where the home field advantage was minimal and the opponent was lesser

shaft.ed · Post Post #638 (isolation #1) » Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:29 pm

i was rooting for the Chargers cause I wanted to see the Philly home opener streak keep going

shaft.ed · Post Post #640 (isolation #2) » Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:13 am

last three? superbowl winners won the Philadelphia home opener

shaft.ed · Post Post #643 (isolation #3) » Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:18 am

In post 641, Jake from State Farm wrote:Ravens lost to Philly last year so that streak ended last year

sorry philly oponent

shaft.ed · Post Post #669 (isolation #4) » Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:25 am

Kinda glad Seattle won. I think with the key injuries to SF, if they advanced it would have been a pretty lopsided affair with Denver.

shaft.ed · Post Post #680 (isolation #5) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:55 am

Den will be over 20. Seattle's offense has to show up for this game. Seattle offense vs. Denver defense will be decisive.

shaft.ed · Post Post #718 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:35 pm

What kind of bizzaro world are we living in when the Probowl was a way more exciting game than the Superbowl?

shaft.ed · Post Post #720 (isolation #7) » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:43 pm

I can't decide which is worse
cutting DJax or signing Sanchez

shaft.ed · Post Post #722 (isolation #8) » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:53 pm

more likely going to Oakland

kinda curious what Philly has planned for all that free cash now

shaft.ed · Post Post #724 (isolation #9) » Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:08 pm

yeah there definitely seems to be more to the DJax story. When Sproles was traded a number of Saints spoke out. He was arguably a smaller component to their offense and at least the team got something for him.

I couldn't find the cost for Sanchez. 2.25 isn't bad, I had read 4. That must be with all the bells and whistles

shaft.ed · Post Post #738 (isolation #10) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:02 am

will be interesting to see how they deal with the cap

shaft.ed · Post Post #741 (isolation #11) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:51 am

he's playing the long game obv

shaft.ed · Post Post #746 (isolation #12) » Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:55 am

Jets should be interesting until Vick gets hurt

shaft.ed · Post Post #769 (isolation #13) » Wed May 07, 2014 5:36 am

In post 765, Jake from State Farm wrote:I still can't believe people are drooling over this kid, imo he will be a bust in the NFL

Hope he sends Russel Wilson a thank you card

shaft.ed · Post Post #789 (isolation #14) » Thu May 08, 2014 8:01 am

so any live streams

yeah i'm that bored

shaft.ed · Post Post #792 (isolation #15) » Thu May 08, 2014 8:21 am

In post 791, Yates wrote:I'm railing on Reggie Bush

wrong thread

shaft.ed · Post Post #799 (isolation #16) » Thu May 08, 2014 1:01 pm

whats with all the bowties

shaft.ed · Post Post #808 (isolation #17) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:08 pm

are they ever going to shut the fuck up about Manziel?

shaft.ed · Post Post #810 (isolation #18) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:13 pm

I was really hoping the Browns were moving up for him just so they would shut up

Got my fingers crossed Clinton Dix drops to 22

shaft.ed · Post Post #813 (isolation #19) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:17 pm

Arizona would go Bridgewater
he's already used to the uniform

shaft.ed · Post Post #815 (isolation #20) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:35 pm

shaft.ed · Post Post #818 (isolation #21) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:46 pm

good trade
for the Iggles

nother page for the Brown's coloring book

shaft.ed · Post Post #823 (isolation #22) » Thu May 08, 2014 3:49 pm

In post 816, Yates wrote:lol - Chucky and Mel almost went at it. I will laugh my BALLS off if you guys sign Manziel. MY BALLS!

I can't believe someone didn't shut that crap up. Nick Foles had a ridiculous season. How the hell are you drafting a QB in the first round after that?

shaft.ed · Post Post #831 (isolation #23) » Fri May 09, 2014 12:40 am

shaft.ed · Post Post #843 (isolation #24) » Fri May 09, 2014 5:32 am

In post 838, Yates wrote:way more gifted than Vai Sikahema [that sumbitch] returning kicks again.

but he punched the goalposts every time her returned one

so like twice

shaft.ed · Post Post #844 (isolation #25) » Fri May 09, 2014 5:34 am

In post 842, AGar wrote:Their logic was Bortles -> UCF -> Jacksonville -> $$$

I don't think so
UCF is of no importance in collegiate sporting in the state of FL
I think they honestly were worried one of the QB hungry teams in the top 8 would take him

shaft.ed · Post Post #877 (isolation #26) » Tue May 13, 2014 12:27 am

he probably just borrowed the wrong piss

shaft.ed · Post Post #886 (isolation #27) » Thu May 15, 2014 6:20 am

Rams obv had a good draft. They were loaded with picks.
Doesn't mean Bradford stopped sucking

shaft.ed · Post Post #889 (isolation #28) » Thu May 15, 2014 9:32 am

experts were saying the Iggles would replace Foles with Johnny Greenbacks

shaft.ed · Post Post #899 (isolation #29) » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:15 am

"PC cops" aside. Native Americans have themselves been fighting in the courts to get this name changed for decades.

shaft.ed · Post Post #901 (isolation #30) » Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:10 am

the whole premise of the "government stepping in" is complete nonsense

The decision is the current state of a long legal battle that started back in the 90's. It is illegal to trademark a name/product that is derogatory to a race of people. As such a suit was brought long long ago by a group of Native Americans. The same decision was made in 1999 as the current one. However, it was overturned by an appeals court after the Redskins challenged the ruling

Also her comparison are stupid and non-related to the case in question

shaft.ed · Post Post #905 (isolation #31) » Thu Jun 19, 2014 4:58 am

In post 904, Konowa wrote:
In post 902, AGar wrote:To be fair, everything I've seen illustrates that the Redskins are still free to keep the name. Just now anyone and their brother who wants to make knockoff Redskins shirts/gear/whatever can do so.
Isn't merchandising split amongst all the teams? I really wouldn't see the other owners losing whatever profit they could get.

theyd make more money rebranding cause now everyone wants/needs no merch

shaft.ed · Post Post #913 (isolation #32) » Thu Jun 19, 2014 5:13 pm

In post 911, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 910, AGar wrote:a lot of people buy into shit like "tradition", "identity" and "history" for their teams
This but Redskins just doesn't seem racist.

well that's a relief

shaft.ed · Post Post #921 (isolation #33) » Fri Jun 20, 2014 10:52 am

given how good a job he's doing, he will lose(lost) more fans on his own than the people threatening to leave if the change the name