there was no reasonable expectation of a person highlighting that post that they were about to receive a star wars spoiler. Really shitty thing to do imo.
In post 166, Thestatusquo wrote:Ok but Chevre is not vonflare, the tone of the thread had been joking about old spoilers that don't matter anymore and fake spoilers. To say that there was an expectation that you would have something like that spoilered in that situation is not reasonable.
It was leaked months ago.
What the fuck does that have to do with literally anything
I personally was pretty pleased with the star wars spoiler.
It confirmed that I didn't care about star wars. At least not ones that pander to the fans of the originals. Episode 2 was the best one. Actually had the most interesting plotline.
At least my least favourite character dies. That was another plus.
In post 168, Antihero wrote:there is no single murderer. everyone on the train was in on it.
I love this
oh lol
i thought another thing we were doing was making vague spoilers that wouldn't mean anything to ppl who didn't read the work in question/ doesn't know what i'm talking about.
sry.
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.
I assume that's a poirot reference? Am I wrong? I think you'll find that this site has a lot of crossover with the kind of people who like Agatha Christie.
That's a spoiler for Murder on the Orient express, is a twist that basically everyone with half decent knowledge of Christie's work probably knows, and it's vague enough that most people wouldn't realise it was referring to it.
