The Politics Thread

[Majiffy]

Dear Diary,
Today I met someone just as much of a dirtbag as me

[Cromulent Simpsons Quote]

Dear Diary,
Today I met someone just as much of a dirtbag as me

[Majiffy]

Someone's alt game is on point today.

[Cromulent Simpsons Quote]

Someone's alt game is on point today.

[Majiffy]

Listen if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk.

[Cromulent Simpsons Quote]

Listen if we keep meeting up like this, people are going to talk.

[Ircher]

So, erhm.... Who's gonna win the Democratic nomination?

[Majiffy]

[drmyshottyizsik]

As much as it shouldn't be so clear I think it is very clear Clinton will get it

[Ircher]

Our justice system is playing favorites; Clinton should be indicted imho.

[Psyche]

oh, really??

[drmyshottyizsik]

I agree

[Ircher]

Indictment is based on evidence. It sounds very improbable to me that there isn't enough evidence to draw up formal charges against Clinton.

[Ircher]

While the media always exaggerates things, there must be SOME evidence suggesting that Clinton MAY be guilty.

[KuroiXHF]

Our justice system is playing favorites; Clinton should be indicted imho.

[drmyshottyizsik]

There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

[Ircher]

Which, that shouldn't be the case.

Rule of Law: No one is (or should be) above the law (the Constitution).

Not indicting Clinton imo violates this principle that our government was founded on. That's why impeachment exists.

[Psyche]

There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

[Ircher]

There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

You're telling me its 100% the media then?

[drmyshottyizsik]

There is, but Loretta Lynch said she wouldn't indict her

that's not true

you're right she just made it a point to announce that she isn't required to indict her even if the fbi says she should

[Psyche]

she did not "make it a point to announce" anything

Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, asked whether her agency would be "required" to pursue criminal charges against Clinton, and she responded accurately to that question

[Psyche]

keep the distortions coming

[Ircher]

She should be imo. Again, going back to Rule of Law; justice should be served objectively, not subjectively. Unfortunately, justice has seemed to become intertwined with politics now, so.... broken system.....

Pedit: So you DO agree she should probably be indicted?

[drmyshottyizsik]

she did not "make it a point to announce" anything

Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, asked whether her agency would be "required" to pursue criminal charges against Clinton, and she responded accurately to that question

Of course that's hiw she answered it, but if she were willing to indict her she would have said so, and wouldn't continuously not answer the question when asked of whether or not she would be willing to regardless

[KuroiXHF]

Does anyone know why the Trump page is locked?