Secret Hitler (Game Over)

[dweller]

/in

I am happy with 7 people but if more people want to join then I think we should increase the number of players. Otherwise I am happy with whatever other people say.

[dweller]

Hi this is my first secret hitler game and I am very excited to play this game.

[dweller]

I would suggest that the chancellor claim before the president. If you discarded a fascist policy or whether you got 2Ls you should tell it immediately.

[dweller]

I'm just gonna trust the people who know how the game works. I got LL.

I was given RBB and I discarded red and passed two blues.

You got RBB which means now there are 5 fascist and 9 liberal policies left in the deck.

[dweller]

I'm just gonna trust the people who know how the game works. I got LL.

I was given RBB and I discarded red and passed two blues.

You got RBB which means now there are 5 fascist and 9 liberal policies left in the deck.

i think you got that mixed

Yes.. I did actually.. It's 5 liberal and 9 fascist

[dweller]

okay I agree with the plan if others have no objections.

[dweller]

Hey all good morning... I received F and L card.

[dweller]

Also if we are going with the meta that Oka pointed out then I think 37 is a good choice. because everyone deserves a chance at least for first deck

[dweller]

Shouldn't Oka be picking me since I already passed a lib policy?

I think for maximum info we should give everyone a chance to come in government. after that we should decide based on our judgements.

[dweller]

Well I do not know much about the game so I want to hear what other people have to say.

[dweller]

Yes I also agree what is stated above. I will nein the next two governments if everyone wants this. Just waiting for Oka to nominate someone as chancellor.

[dweller]

NMSA what's on your mind? I am hoping you will be picking Formerfish as we discussed earlier.

[dweller]

Okay so if anyone has no objections I would like to nominate Egix96.

[dweller]

Okay so if everyone agrees with that and as we already discussed earlier, I am nominating Egix.

NOMINATE: Egix96

[dweller]

I got FFF literally

[dweller]

Ok so you're checking egix then

Why Egix?

[dweller]

But it doesn't make sense to check egix. Because I had some other people in mind I was suspicious of.

[dweller]

Also he didn't have any conflict. so it makes much more sense to have a peek on the person who may be in conflict or the person you are most suspicious of.

[dweller]

Dweller who are you suspicious of?

I mean the only other people who played F. because it is the only option where I can get any info. but inv my own chanc also seems a valid choice. because it also help us getting info

[dweller]

Okay since this is what meta says and majority of the people have suggested me so I'm gonna do it.

I am going to investigate Egix96.

ACTION : Investigate Loyalty of Egix96

[dweller]

k guys bluechecked Egix means he is liberal.

[dweller]

Why are we skipping 7? we've got no clue about him

[dweller]

Would have last time but we got rrr and our hands were forced.

Let's rout out these evil facists.

Pedit- he tried to go off of our plan first by nomming someone we didn't agree upon.

First I didn't nominate someone out of order. And I didn't deviate from the plan. I just gave my opinions and whatever my thoughts. And that was a part of discussion only not actual nomination.

Second you have a power called vote. So someone gets nominated that you do not agree with then you can use it to show disagreement and to stop that government. And whatever I did I did after asking everyone if they have no objections.

So accusing me like this is just going no where. I cannot get it for what you are accusing me. Can you elaborate?

I clarified everything to you. so I hope it makes sense

[dweller]

Yes I also agree what is stated above. I will nein the next two governments if everyone wants this. Just waiting for Oka to nominate someone as chancellor.

Why are we skipping 7? we've got no clue about him

hmmmmmmmmmmm
why was it fine skipping 3x and 4x
but not 7x

Huh, I was really hoping dweller was gonna comment on this...

@dweller
When 3x was gonna nom someone and we agreed to nein it, you asked why couldn't they play. Then people explained that meta says 51 plays because that's best for the first run-through and you said ok.

Now that meta says we go back to 15 you try to get 7 through on the basis of "we have no info on him". Why?

Well if you read the past few pages carefully then you will come to know that it was decided that we will keep doing this UNTIL they fail or in other words if they pass fascist policies. And which did actually happen.

So according to the meta that was discussed earlier, we had to keep doing this if and only liberal policies are passed then why are we still doing it? Why are we still repeating this cycle instead of deviating from it.

So still sticking to the plan makes no sense to me. So the only feasible option is going for other alternatives that's why I said that I have no issue with 7

[dweller]

And whatever I said above it's not only directed towards you. I am referring it to everyone what I think.

[dweller]

Or maybe I'm misunderstanding something or I may be wrong.

[dweller]

As said, we are doing it because we need as few people touching the deck as possible on the first round so we can PoE the liars more easily. Fewer people touching it = fewer possibilities of who's lying.

what first round are you talking about? first round was over way back...
also would we stick to this same plan till the end of the game? because we trust them doesn't mean that it will always be L. the deck also comes into play

[dweller]

First round = first run-through of the deck, until it's reshuffled.

We would've stuck with the same plan had Blues kept getting passed. And nobody said anything about trusting anyone, it's about keeping as few hands touching the deck on the first run-through as possbile.

Why do you say you have "no issue with 7"?

Okay I think that's fair.

I said that because there's no valid reason or evidence against him so I'm neutral towards him.

[dweller]

Hey sorry for the late response. I got FF btw. I just checked what policies I got. Forgot to check it earlier. so sorry for that.

[dweller]

Well I think that it doesn't even matter. it would have been an F anyways

[dweller]

Hey why are people wanting to shoot me?

[dweller]

Well instead of shooting me you should be more concerned of drawing and passing a liberal policy. If you are saying that you will shoot me that means you are expecting a fascist policy to be passed. So good for you.

[dweller]

Nope it is also for you Dats if you get special elected

[dweller]

So we will know whether Dats is hitler or not after we get all the votes?

[dweller]

Mena what do you want to hear?

[dweller]

Mena what do you want to hear?

What you think of dats chancellor, why u weren’t in any of the discussion of dats chancellor, and what you voted on this election

Are you worried that she may be hitler?

[dweller]

honestly if ur that scared u could go vote no

You mean I should vote no?

[dweller]

I was absolutely in favor of this government. but after rereading dats I also have doubts on dats. because she is the only one who is trying to look liberal so it's quite possible she might be hitler. Also I forgot that it's hitler's job to look as much liberal as possible.

[dweller]

I legit received RR last government. And the only time I was president I got RRR and I passed RR to egix. And this is gonna happen when you bring same people over and over again. The deck doesn't consist of all liberal policies. I wasn't even in favor of this plan. i was the one who said to go for other alternatives.

[dweller]

And are you going to trust me if I say that I am in support of your/FF government. when you've already shown your mistrust on me.

And you bringing this fact again and again that if you get the gun if you get the gun this really tells me where you're coming from. For what should I defend myself I know that I'm liberal and people will take decisions that are best for the game.

[dweller]

And that's why I haven't voted until this point. otherwise I would have voted immediately. but I want to make my decision after careful consideration. but it seems like that it would be much better to vote no for this government.

[dweller]

Oh yes I forgot I'm not the laziest person here

[dweller]

only

[dweller]

Also I never said that I am in conflict with you. because it's also possible that we both are unlucky liberals. It's only after you are trying so hard to appear liberal and you are pushing me that I have doubts on you.

[dweller]

Dats what you're doing is literally powerwolfing

[dweller]

Only a hitler can order people to vote the way they want

[dweller]

Data you said that I passed F immediately after you so that's why I'm fascist so why can't you be fascist that you passed F immediately before me. and you are the one who is pushing so hard to become chanc not me. so what do all these things indicate?

[dweller]

Data you said that I passed F immediately after you so that's why I'm fascist so why can't you be fascist that you passed F immediately before me. and you are the one who is pushing so hard to become chanc not me. so what do all these things indicate?

She was open to me being chance but people wanted me to be pres knowing that I was going to choose dat.

I trust dat more. Especially after your absenteeism...

Yes earlier I was also convinced but after rereading and she pushing me so hard has really made me to reconsider

[dweller]

Yes but she is going to be chancellor so that's why I'm more concerned because I don't want town to lose the game instantly

[dweller]

Can't the last B in the last two remaining policies(that were leftover). I mean you said that 5B were already claimed so what else do you want? Do you expect that all the B's would be placed higher in the deck. that is not how it works

[dweller]

Not necessarily.. I think all the policies are reshuffled including the leftover.

[dweller]

Dats you are so close to victory. you shouldn't ruin your own game at this point.

[dweller]

But aren't you conspiring to enact an F during your government all along?

[dweller]

Yes I know I forgot to mention the condition if in case you are not hitler then you would be conspiring as a fascist. Also I didn't say anything about anyone getting the gun but I think you have something in mind.

[dweller]

The only possibility that the president gets the gun is if RRR is drawn if you both claim liberals. So you ARE expecting that in fact there is a possibility of RRR unless one of you or both of you are fascists. But to me it seems very unlikely after the reshuffle of the deck and egix claiming RRR. Because according to you there can't be RRR twice in a row. so I'm looking forward to it.

[dweller]

Seems very unlikely to me because why would a liberal do so.

[dweller]

Okay I agree with nein to FF

[dweller]

NOMINATE: OkaPoka

I know it will be neined. I also have cast my vote.

[dweller]

good game everyone

[dweller]

When I signed up for this game I was really hoping that I get a liberal role. It would have been much easier but I also enjoyed playing as fascist. Being liberal is straightforward you don't have to lie but you have to lie if you're fascist. But playing fascist also helps us in thinking from different perspectives and how to lie and cover each other.