Nomic

Feirei · Post Post #36 (isolation #0) » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:07 pm

/in

VOTE: 4

Feirei · Post Post #76 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:21 pm

Proposal 14: If a player intentionally spams to end the page, they are removed from the game forever

Feirei · Post Post #78 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:27 pm

VOTE: 14

Feirei · Post Post #82 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:56 pm

3 already passed, N.

B_E, that is proposal 7

Someone clarify Rule 2?

Feirei · Post Post #85 (isolation #4) » Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:21 pm

VOTE: 7

Feirei · Post Post #95 (isolation #5) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:21 pm

In post 89, Ythan wrote:Also intentionality can be difficult to determine.

Intentionally is like what B_E did.

Feirei · Post Post #97 (isolation #6) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:31 pm

In post 90, Burning_Earth wrote:
Next page is limiting the player base
, after that we amend rule 0 (any proposal with 5 or more votes?),
next is win conditions.

@ Bolded: Can we not?

We don't have enough players to move this game forward, and it's too early for win conditions.

Feirei · Post Post #99 (isolation #7) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:55 pm

In post 98, JDGA wrote:I can agree with this. Unless the game somehow gains too many players to get in some meaningful discussion during a voting period, I doubt we'll
ever
need to restrict the playerlist.
And as for win conditions, well~

Depends on how soon we all want them, I guess?

//eats the bottom of the page

oops.

Feirei · Post Post #101 (isolation #8) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:03 pm

VOTE: 6

Vote tags are so screwed up...

Feirei · Post Post #103 (isolation #9) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:27 pm

Who really cares about scores.

Feirei · Post Post #105 (isolation #10) » Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:46 pm

But it is /far/ too early.

Feirei · Post Post #108 (isolation #11) » Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:37 am

Yeah.

Feirei · Post Post #113 (isolation #12) » Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:12 am

In post 111, N wrote:VOTE: 3

Three already passed. In the same post as the proposal (Post 24)

Feirei · Post Post #122 (isolation #13) » Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:58 pm

Maybe posts to bump the thread when no one posts for 24 hours should be immune to the double post rule. Just my two cents.

Feirei · Post Post #128 (isolation #14) » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:20 pm

VOTE: 16

I prefer JDGA's wording.