Nomic

[Ythan]

0 At the end of each page, the proposed rule or amendment with the most VOTE: s on that page will be added to this list.
0.1 In the event of a tie, the proposal among those with the most votes on the page that also has the earliest vote on the page is the winner.
1 This rule does nothing.
2 Each person may only give a maximum of one vote to a proposal per page.
3 Double posts are not permitted.
3.1 Breaching this rule will result in your votes on the page(s) of your breach(es) failing to count.
4 Editing posts such that the "Last edited" tag appears is not permitted.
4.1 Breaching this rule will result in your votes on the page(s) of your breach(es) failing to count.
5 No rule may be applied retroactively.

[Ythan]

It has begun.

[Ythan]

Rule clarified I guess for the perplexed.

[Ythan]

Further clarified for the continuously perplexed.

[Ythan]

Clarification requested: If a proposal is made on page 3, do we only consider votes for it that also occur on page 3? And am I correct in interpreting Rule 0 in that a proposal made on page 3 will not be added to the charter until the end of page 4? (as the preceding page to the end of page 4 is page 3, or is it actually page 4, since page 4 has indeed ended?

First, yes, but a proposal can be repeated in the future. Second, clarified and thank you.

[Ythan]

Clarification requested: If a proposal is made on page 3, do we only consider votes for it that also occur on page 3? And am I correct in interpreting Rule 0 in that a proposal made on page 3 will not be added to the charter until the end of page 4? (as the preceding page to the end of page 4 is page 3, or is it actually page 4, since page 4 has indeed ended?

First, yes, but a proposal can be repeated in the future. Second, clarified and thank you.

In fact, a proposal need not be repeated. The original poster could simply vote in favor of their own previously unsuccessful proposal on another page.

[Ythan]

I have fixed rule (nevermind) for the use of vote tags as yes, they are perfect for this game and helpful to the mod.

[Ythan]

Ythan, will you be participating, or aiming at a more impartial role? I, for one, invite you to the partake as the former.

When I see an opportunity for improvement. For the most part I'd like to see what happens.

[Ythan]

Okay initial rules finalized aaaand

go

continue.

[Ythan]

Ythan, will you be participating, or aiming at a more impartial role? I, for one, invite you to the partake as the former.

When I see an opportunity for improvement. For the most part I'd like to see what happens.

To clarify, I will be voting.

[Ythan]

Ruling, proposal 1 actually proposes two rules.

[Ythan]

It is my misfortune to inform you that you would be required to repropose anew. However! I will do this so that the order is not upset.

VOTE: The first part of proposal 1.
VOTE: The first part of proposal 1.

[Ythan]

Proposing a rule is not actually necessary except to have something to which to refer. What I am referring to is:

No proposal shall be considered, nor vote tallied until its respective player has formally '/inned'.

[Ythan]

VOTE: four

Cyb it says rule not rules.

[Ythan]

Proposal 11: Any votes in a post which violates a rule are not counted.

VOTE: Proposal 11

This is important.

[Ythan]

I don't think double posts are as problematic as a mandate without a consequence.

[Ythan]

10 would slow the game down too much.
VOTE: Proposal 5
11 I think would create a precedent of "well if I'm breaking the rules but there's no vote then who cares?"

Well if I'm breaking the rules but nothing happens then who cares?

[Ythan]

VOTE: Proposal 10

Proposal 12 (for later): Players may change their votes during the day, using unvotes

The day?

[Ythan]

Proposal 13: Amend the text of Rule 0 to read, "At the end of each page, the proposed rule or amendment VOTE: d by the most users on that page will be added to this list."

[Ythan]

VOTE: Proposal 13

[Ythan]

Proposal 15: Editing posts is illegal

VOTE: proposal 15 and yes I edited this post DEAL WITH IT!

I don't think we want to lose the ability to edit the OP.

That is already illegal under proposal 5 (mod add it to the OP)

2:29 am

VOTE: Proposal 37
VOTE: Proposal 37
It means that this doesn't work.

No, it says you can't do it. But there's no consequence so apparently you can.

Proposal 14: If a player intentionally spams to end the page, they are removed from the game forever

Also intentionality can be difficult to determine.

[Ythan]

7 is better than 15.

[Ythan]

Also intentionality can be difficult to determine.

Intentionally is like what B_E did.

No 'doing like what B_E did' then?

We need to say something at some point like "player base is limited to 20" or we'll have to keep track of scores for everybody, even lurkers.

VOTE: Vote 6

What scores? Need a problem before you need a solution.