In post 95, esuriospiritus wrote:but a surer path to getting a title could be to be that person that helps organize LoL games
Anyone that does this should be demoted to Townsperson imo
In post 95, esuriospiritus wrote:but a surer path to getting a title could be to be that person that helps organize LoL games
In post 107, Espeonage wrote:I want Townsperson back, is this the place?
In post 113, esuriospiritus wrote:why did I think FakeGod already had a title? .-. I think the reasons for the title are mostly good but the stuff for "seven-colored" seems like kind of a stretch. I mean, good formatting = rainbow...? :s maybe if he was one of the obviously LGBT people on the site, but just for formatting/touhou reference is very meh...
In post 113, esuriospiritus wrote:why did I think FakeGod already had a title? .-. I think the reasons for the title are mostly good but the stuff for "seven-colored" seems like kind of a stretch. I mean, good formatting = rainbow...? :s maybe if he was one of the obviously LGBT people on the site, but just for formatting/touhou reference is very meh...
I got my title before the 6-month mark because Oman went all ABUSE OF POWER (...I didn't even have 100 in-game posts remaining after the crash wiped out the late 2011/early 2012 stuff). It was a pretty memorable circumstance and I've stuck around, in one way or another. I think the 3-month rule is fine. If a user has a memorable trait and there is a clever suggestion, then why not? Users can apply to be an IC after spending three months on site. If they have enough experience to be relatively competent at teaching Mafia, then they are probably capable of being memorable. People aren't going to waltz in and demand titles (because self-noms were, are and will be frowned upon), but what if a 3-month user gets a fitting one? It's not the end of the world, I suspect.In post 83, esuriospiritus wrote:Also seriously I'm sorry but the 3 months rule is just wtf no. 3 months is barely enough time for a newbie game to finish (ok, maybe two if they're both really short). How many newbies -- even the ones that manage to complete a game here -- go on to actually stay on the site long enough to make a mark on it? You're willing to give people who will probably ditch the site within the first year a title but there are still people who have been here for years who even most of the newbies know that still don't have titles? That's kinda fucked up. If anything, I think the time before someone is eligible for a title should be increased, not decreased.
In post 120, Tierce wrote:I think the 3-month rule is fine.